practical relative degree in smc systems frequency domain
play

Practical Relative Degree in SMC systems: Frequency Domain Approach - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Practical Relative Degree in SMC systems: Frequency Domain Approach **Antonio Rosales, **Leonid Fridman and *Yuri Shtessel **National Autonomous University of Mexico, UNAM *University of Alabama in Huntsville, UAH July 13th International


  1. Practical Relative Degree in SMC systems: Frequency Domain Approach **Antonio Rosales, **Leonid Fridman and *Yuri Shtessel **National Autonomous University of Mexico, UNAM *University of Alabama in Huntsville, UAH July 13th International Workshop on Variable Structure Systems Nantes, France A. Rosales, L. Fridman, Y. Shtessel (UNAM) Practical Relative Degree in SMC systems July 1 / 22

  2. Outline Introduction 1 Problem Statement Practical Relative Degree 2 Performance Margins 3 Definition of Performance Margins Performance margins for conventional SMC Performance margins for 2-SM (Twisting Algorithm) Practical Relative Degree with Performance Margins Requirement 4 Conclusions 5 A. Rosales, L. Fridman, Y. Shtessel (UNAM) Practical Relative Degree in SMC systems July 2 / 22

  3. Outline Introduction 1 Problem Statement Practical Relative Degree 2 Performance Margins 3 Definition of Performance Margins Performance margins for conventional SMC Performance margins for 2-SM (Twisting Algorithm) Practical Relative Degree with Performance Margins Requirement 4 Conclusions 5 A. Rosales, L. Fridman, Y. Shtessel (UNAM) Practical Relative Degree in SMC systems July 3 / 22

  4. Introduction Relative Degree Unknown Model Frequency SMC Tolerance Chattering Domain Limits Unknown n Analysis Unmodeled Dynamics (Fractal) 4 Supposition Practical SMC “Sliding Relative 2-SMC Tolerance Frequency variable Degree . Limits Domain converge to ( k ) . Analysis a . Limit Cycle” 1 2 5 Tolerance k- SMC 1 Boiko, et al. TAC 2004 PRD with ( k +1)-SMC Limits Performance 2 Boiko, et al. TAC 2005 . + Margins . 3 Hernandez, CEP 2013 Performance Requirement Margins . Boiko, JFI 2013 4 5 Shtessel, et al. CDC 96 A. Rosales, L. Fridman, Y. Shtessel (UNAM) Practical Relative Degree in SMC systems July 4 / 22

  5. Problem Statement Control System A1. Plant has unknown relative degree r . A2. W ( j ω ) of the linear plant may be obtained. A3. Linear plant has low pass filter properties A4. Amplitude and phase frequency characteristics of W ( j ω ) are monotonously decreasing functions, i.e. | W ( j ω 1 ) | > | W ( j ω 2 ) | and arg W ( j ω 1 ) > arg W ( j ω 2 ) for ω 1 < ω 2 A5. Describing Function of SMC may be obtained and it depends only on the amplitude A A. Rosales, L. Fridman, Y. Shtessel (UNAM) Practical Relative Degree in SMC systems July 5 / 22

  6. Problem Statement Effects of Unmodeled Dynamics Presence of unmodeled dynamics in the system increase the relative degree. The output y will not converge to zero but to a limit cycle [Shtessel, et al. 96],[Boiko, et al. 05] HB equation gives a solution and limit cycles in systems controlled by SMC may be predicted. Tolerance Limits The frequency ω c and amplitude A c are the tolerance limits of the acceptable limit cycle of the output y , so that self-sustained oscillations of the output y with the amplitudes A ≤ A c and the frequencies ω ≥ ω c yield the acceptable performance of the closed loop system in the real sliding mode [Utkin 09] A. Rosales, L. Fridman, Y. Shtessel (UNAM) Practical Relative Degree in SMC systems July 6 / 22

  7. Problem Statement Motivation Example Suppose system has r > 2 and it is controlled by SMC and 2-SMC Case 3. Which controller is to be selected for the implementation? Case \ Controller SMC 2-SMC Case 1 A > A c and/or ω < ω c A > A c and/or ω < ω c Case 2 A > A c and/or ω < ω c A ≤ A c , ω ≥ ω c Case 3 A ≤ A c , ω ≥ ω c A ≤ A c , ω ≥ ω c A. Rosales, L. Fridman, Y. Shtessel (UNAM) Practical Relative Degree in SMC systems July 7 / 22

  8. Outline Introduction 1 Problem Statement Practical Relative Degree 2 Performance Margins 3 Definition of Performance Margins Performance margins for conventional SMC Performance margins for 2-SM (Twisting Algorithm) Practical Relative Degree with Performance Margins Requirement 4 Conclusions 5 A. Rosales, L. Fridman, Y. Shtessel (UNAM) Practical Relative Degree in SMC systems July 8 / 22

  9. Practical Relative Degree Practical Relative Degree Practical Relative Degree (PRD) is understood as the smallest order r of SMC, that yields a predicted limit cycle in the closed-loop system with the amplitude A ≤ A c , A c > 0 and the frequency ω ≥ ω c , 0 < ω c < ∞ . A. Rosales, L. Fridman, Y. Shtessel (UNAM) Practical Relative Degree in SMC systems July 9 / 22

  10. Outline Introduction 1 Problem Statement Practical Relative Degree 2 Performance Margins 3 Definition of Performance Margins Performance margins for conventional SMC Performance margins for 2-SM (Twisting Algorithm) Practical Relative Degree with Performance Margins Requirement 4 Conclusions 5 A. Rosales, L. Fridman, Y. Shtessel (UNAM) Practical Relative Degree in SMC systems July 10 / 22

  11. Definition of Performance Margins Performance Phase Margin The Performance Phase Margin (PPM) in the system is the maximal additional phase shift in W ( j ω ) that the closed loop system can tolerate for its output y to exhibit the acceptable limit cycle with A ≤ A c , A c > 0 and ω ≥ ω c , 0 < ω c < ∞ in the real sliding mode. Performance Gain Margin The Performance Gain Margin (PGM) in the system is the maximum additional gain in W ( j ω ) that the closed loop system can tolerate for its output y to exhibit the acceptable limit cycle with A ≤ A c , A c > 0 and/or ω ≥ ω c 0 < ω c < ∞ in the real sliding mode. A. Rosales, L. Fridman, Y. Shtessel (UNAM) Practical Relative Degree in SMC systems July 11 / 22

  12. Performance margins for conventional SMC DF conventional SMC Let the controller be u = − α sign( y ) (1) DF is N ( A ) = 4 α/π A , where A es the amplitude of y . Harmonic Balance equation is Re { W ( j ω ) } + j Im { W ( j ω ) } = − π A (2) 4 α where ω is the frequency of the output of system r = 1 Im r = 2 r = 3 2 A 1 A 2 A 1 Re - 1 . N(A) W 1 (j ) W 2 (j ) W 3 (j ) A. Rosales, L. Fridman, Y. Shtessel (UNAM) Practical Relative Degree in SMC systems July 12 / 22

  13. Performance Phase Margin Conventional SMC Performance Phase Margin Method PPM SMC 1. Locate maximum amplitude A c and the minimum frequency ω c in − 1 / N ( A ) and W ( j ω ), respectively. 3. Plot a circle with radio A c . 3(a) If the frequency ω c is located outside of the circle, the PPM should be obtained as the angle formed between the intersection of the circle with W ( j ω ) and the negative real axis. 3(b) If the frequency ω c is located inside of the circle, the PPM should be obtained as the angle formed between the vector associated to ω c and the negative real axis. A. Rosales, L. Fridman, Y. Shtessel (UNAM) Practical Relative Degree in SMC systems July 13 / 22

  14. Performance Gain Margin Conventional SMC Performance Gain Margin SMC PGM SMC Consider the gain K > 1 in the harmonic balance equation K 1 W(j ) Im K 2 W(j ) 1 K · W ( j ω ) = − K 3 W(j ) N ( A ) K 3 >K 2 > K 1 A Solve the harmonic balance equation Re ! " for K with A c and ω c known, A ! - 1 . N(A) − π A K Re ( W ( j ω )) = 4 α K Im ( W ( j ω )) = 0 Value of K ≥ 1 which satisfy HB equation system with r ≤ 2 is K → ∞ PGM → ∞ . A. Rosales, L. Fridman, Y. Shtessel (UNAM) Practical Relative Degree in SMC systems July 14 / 22

  15. Performance Gain Margin Relay System PGM Relay System PGM Relay System 1. Consider the gain K > 0 in the Im harmonic balance equation 1 K · W ( j ω ) = − PGM A N ( A ) A c - 1 . A Re 2. Solve the harmonic balance N(A) equation for K with A c and ω c known, 1 1 K = − N ( A c ) W ( j ω c ) 3. The value of K is the PGM of the system for the acceptable amplitude A c . A. Rosales, L. Fridman, Y. Shtessel (UNAM) Practical Relative Degree in SMC systems July 15 / 22

  16. Performance margins for 2-SM DF for Twisting Algorithm Let the controller be u = − c 1 sign ( y ) − c 2 sign (˙ y ) (3) where c 1 > c 2 > 0 . DF is N ( A ) = (4 /π A )( c 1 + jc 2 ) , where A is the amplitude of the output y Harmonic Balance equation is W ( j ω ) = − A π c 1 − jc 2 (4) 4 c 2 1 + c 2 2 where ω is the frequency of the output y . A. Rosales, L. Fridman, Y. Shtessel (UNAM) Practical Relative Degree in SMC systems July 16 / 22

  17. Performance Margins for 2-SM K 1 W(j ) a) b) K 2 W(j ) A A Im Im K 3 W(j ) A c - 1 . - 1 . K 3 >K 2 > K 1 N(A) N(A) Re Re PPM PPM c c W (j ) Figure: For Twisting Algorithm. a)PPM, b)PGM A. Rosales, L. Fridman, Y. Shtessel (UNAM) Practical Relative Degree in SMC systems July 17 / 22

  18. Outline Introduction 1 Problem Statement Practical Relative Degree 2 Performance Margins 3 Definition of Performance Margins Performance margins for conventional SMC Performance margins for 2-SM (Twisting Algorithm) Practical Relative Degree with Performance Margins Requirement 4 Conclusions 5 A. Rosales, L. Fridman, Y. Shtessel (UNAM) Practical Relative Degree in SMC systems July 18 / 22

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend