practical
play

Practical Philosophy Political and Philosophy of Ethics Social - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Practical Philosophy Political and Philosophy of Ethics Social Aesthetics Law Philosophy Normative Philosophy of Applied Ethics Metaethics Ethics Literature Moral Moral Philosophy of Bioethics psychology Epistemology Film


  1. Practical Philosophy Political and Philosophy of Ethics Social Aesthetics Law Philosophy Normative Philosophy of Applied Ethics Metaethics Ethics Literature Moral Moral Philosophy of Bioethics psychology Epistemology Film Business Moral Value Theory ... Ethics Language ...

  2. (Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stcrX2VAfuk) •    

  3. • • • • • • • • • • •

  4. •   •    •  

  5. • • • •

  6. • • • •

  7. Exercise

  8. •  • 

  9. Trans- Trolley killing one to save five plant Driver • These two thought experiments have an important similarity: an agent can kill one person to save five • But: we differ in our moral assessment of these cases 1. How do we know this? 2. Is this important? 3. What do we do now?

  10. •  • •

  11. Trans- Trolley killing one to save five plant Driver killing vs killing vs killing letting die • Foot finds what she thinks is a relevant dis similarity: in Trolley Driver , we weigh killing vs killing, but in Transplant , we weigh killing vs letting die • Proposed Principle : Killing is worse than letting die How does Thomson reply to this?

  12. •  (from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/10/us/10foot.html?_r=0)

  13. • Thomson constructs a Trans- new case where it’s plant killing vs letting die in both cases • But: we still judge the killing vs letting die cases differently By- stander killing vs letting die

  14. • • • •

  15. Trans- Trolley killing one to save five plant Driver killing vs killing vs killing letting die ... more examples, By- counterexamples, stander problems killing vs letting die

  16. • •  • • 

  17. Exercise

  18. • •

  19. • •

  20. •    

  21. • Information for this slide and the next taken from Sinnott- Armstrong’s paper “Framing Moral Intuitions” on http ://sites.duke.edu/wsa/papers/files/2011/05/wsa- framingmoralintuitions2008.pdf.

  22. (Petrinovich, Lewis, and Philip O’Neil. 1996. “Influence of Wording and Framing Effects on Moral Intuitions.” Ethology and Sociobiology 67:145-171.)

  23. Fig. 5 from Weinberg , Jonathan M., Shaun Nichols, and Stephen Stich. “Normativity and Epistemic Intuitions.” Philosophical Topics, 29, no. 1 – 2 (2001): 429 – 460.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend