Practical Guidelines to Assess Poultry Litter AAAP Welfare - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

practical guidelines to assess poultry litter
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Practical Guidelines to Assess Poultry Litter AAAP Welfare - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Practical Guidelines to Assess Poultry Litter AAAP Welfare Committee Litter Subcommittee Mission As proper litter management can impact poultry health and comfort in a number of ways, it is directly involved with welfare. Thus the goal of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Practical Guidelines to Assess Poultry Litter

AAAP Welfare Committee Litter Subcommittee

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Mission

 As proper litter management can impact

poultry health and comfort in a number of ways, it is directly involved with welfare. Thus the goal of this committee is:

 To provide practical guidance to welfare

auditors on how best to assess litter conditions in the field from a welfare perspective

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Methods to Accomplish Mission

 Develop a written litter assessment model

  • utlining litter quality factors of importance if

an objective measurement is required

 Provide digital images and comments where

applicable to help illustrate important criteria

  • utlined in the litter assessment model

 Update any new, practical methodologies

which could be used in the field to help assess litter

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Litter Management Assessment Model

AAAP – PAACO Litter Management Assessment Model

AUDIT CRITERIA - Litter Quality Factors: Points

Caked litter present?

Not evident 100

Donuts under waterline nipples 90

Strip under waterlines < 12 inches wide 80

Strip under waterlines > 12 inches wide 70

Along sidewall footings only 60

End doors and corners only 50

In front of “Cool Cell” pads only 50

Sidewall to outermost nipple drinker line 40

Sidewall to centermost nipple drinker line 20

Wall to wall caked litter 0

Litter Moisture – estimated

Dry, friable, free flowing on compression 100

Extremely dry/dusty and very fine particles 80

“Sticky” on hand when compressed, clod crumbles 80

Forms “clod” when compressed 50

Very wet on compression?

Bedding/Litter Quality

Uniform size bedding particles 100

Some larger wood chips or sharp particles 75

Some “chucks” of cake 75

Extensive large and sharp bedding particles 25

Extensive residual cake from previous flock 25

Ammonia (at time of inspection)

<25 ppm 100

25-50 ppm* 50

50-75 ppm* 25

75 -100 ppm*

*Deduct 25 additional points if birds <2 wks old.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Caked Litter Present?

 Not evident  Donuts under waterlines  Strip < 12 inches / > 12 inches  Along sidewalls  End doors and corners  Front of Cool Cells  Sidewall to outer waterline / inner line  Wall–to-wall cake  100%  90%  80 / 70  60%  50%  50%  40 / 20  -0-

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Important Field Realities

 You will often find a small amount of caking

under the water and feeder lines

 These are the primary areas that birds will be

stimulated to excrete feces as they eat and drink, which adds moisture to the litter under these locations

 This is not necessarily indicative of a problem  Take the rest of the litter area between the

feeder and drinker lines into consideration

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Caking Under the Drinkers

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Caking in Used Litter Around Feeders

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Old Litter Without Caking

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Significant Caking in Curtain Sided, Turkey House

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Donuts

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Caking Under Nipple Drinkers

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Caked Litter Management - FYI

 Most companies will remove old cake crust

  • ut of the poultry house or till it into the litter

between flocks

 This is a common, acceptable practice for

built-up litter

 The degree of caking will be impacted by a

number of other factors such as litter depth, litter age, stocking density, and type of housing/ ventilation

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Before Removing Cake

slide-15
SLIDE 15

After Removing Cake – Old Litter

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Management Factors Impacting Litter

 Ventilation has a major impact, as it is the

primary way to remove moisture from the poultry house

 Proper temperature control, insulation, and

mixing of incoming air will influence the degree of caking along the sidewalls/fans, especially during cooler weather

 Water line maintenance and management

also play a big factor

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Litter Moisture Management

 Height Adjustment  Drinker Nipple Maintenance  “Donuts”

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Corner Caking

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Cake in the Corner and Along Wall

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Caking Around Fans, Cool Cells

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Sidewall Caking

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Sidewalls, Endwalls

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Litter Moisture

 Dry, friable, free-flowing  Dry, dusty, very fine texture  Sticky on compression, crumbles  Clod on compression  Wet  100  80  80  50  -0-

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Litter Moisture – Practical Estimate Too damp About right

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Devices Are Available to Measure Litter Moisture

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Bedding / Litter Quality

 Uniform size particles  Large wood chips  Chunks of cake  Extensive large / sharp particles  Extensive residual cake  100  75  75  25  25

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Good House Litter Conditions

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Good, New Litter

slide-29
SLIDE 29

New Poult Set-Up with Rings

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Old Litter – Good Condition

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Undesirable Bedding Materials

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Poor Quality Bedding – Large Pieces

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Types of Material Used for Litter

 Various materials have been used for litter  Pine shavings/sawdust, hardwood shavings,

rice hulls, oat hulls, sand, newspaper pellets, and possibly other materials

 Wood shavings or rice/oat hulls are the

primary materials used by the poultry industry

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Pinewood Shavings

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Pinewood Shavings

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Sawdust

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Oat Hulls

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Litter Thickness – Will Vary from Company to Company

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Ammonia

 < 25 ppm  25-50 ppm  51-75 ppm  75 -100 ppm  Deduct 25 additional

points if birds less than 2 weeks of age

 100  50  25  -0-

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Measure Ammonia Objectively

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Ammonia – at Bird level

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Committee Members

 H.L Goodwin, PhD – University of Arkansas  Jesse Grimes, PhD – NCSU  Joe Hess – PhD, Auburn University  Theresia Lavergne, PhD – LSU  Bud Malone, MS – University of Delaware  Ken Opengart, DVM, PhD – Keystone  Randy Chick, DVM – USDA (Original Chair)  Tim Cummings, DVM – Concluding Chair

Mississippi State University