POTENTIAL USES OF CA Di Discussion: W n: Wha hat d do y you a - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

POTENTIAL USES OF CA

Di Discussion: W n: Wha hat d do y you a alr lready kno y know a about C CA?

2

POTENTIAL USES OF CA CA a as me metho hodolo logy / y / C CA a as a a b body o y of e empirical f l find nding ngs

3

CA AS A METHODOLOGY

Task 1 1 Sele lect a a s sequenc nce a and nd e exami mine ne t the he o

• peni

ning ng a and nd c clo losing ng a as a achi hieveme ment nts. . Task 2 2 Sele lect a a t turn w n withi hin t n the he s sequenc nce f for c clo lose a ana nalys lysis. . Task A A Cha haracterize t the he a actions ns p performe med i in t n the he t

• turn. C
• n. Cons

nsider ho how t the he a actions ns f fit withi hin s n sequenc nces o

• f a

actions ns. . Task B B De Describe t the he me metho hods u used t to p perform t m the he a actions

• ns. C

. Cons nsider t the he und nderstand nding ngs p provided b by t y the he u use o

• f t

tho hose me metho hods. . Task C C De Describe t the he me metho hods u used f for t taki king ng, k , keeping ng, a , and nd t trans nsitioni ning ng b between n turns

• ns. C

. Cons nsider t the he u und nderstand nding ngs p provided b by t y the he u use o

• f t

tho hose me metho hods. . Task D D Cons nsider t the he w ways ys i in w n whi hich t h the he int nteractant nts e ena nact i ident ntities, r , role les a and nd/or rela lations nshi hips. . Task 3 3 Sele lect o

• the

her t turns ns w withi hin t n the he s sequenc nce a and nd d do T Tasks ks A A–D f D for e each o h of t the he t turns ns. . (Pome merant ntz & & F Fehr hr, 2 , 2011)

4

CA AS A METHODOLOGY

• Carol: (.hh) Oh y’know what I think it is¿=It’s

like the [li:ne (.) (that/fat) arrow is the= Carol: [((traces the acceleration vector with forefinger of her right hand))

• 5

CA AS A METHODOLOGY

CA f fello llow t travele lers: :

• Int

Interaction A n Ana nalys lysis ( (Jordan & n & H Hend nderson, 1 n, 1995)

• C

Cont ntext A Ana nalys lysis ( (McDe Dermo mott, 1 , 1976; ; Kend ndon, 1 , 1990)

• a

ana nalyz lyzing ng c cha hat i int nteraction ( n (Ga Garcia & & J Jacobs, 1 , 1999)

6

CA AS A METHODOLOGY

Metho hod i in d n descriptive r research h (int ntro, a , ana nalys lysis, c , conc nclu lusions ns)

7

CA AS A BODY OF EMPIRICAL FINDINGS

Di Discussion: W n: Wha hat ha have y you he heard a about ethno hnome metho hodolo logy? y?

8

CA AS A BODY OF EMPIRICAL FINDINGS

“simple lest s sys ystema matics” (Sacks ks, , Sche heglo loff, & , & J Jefferson, 1 n, 1974)

9

CA AS A BODY OF EMPIRICAL FINDINGS

Sequenc nce o

• rgani

nization n (Sche heglo loff & & S Sacks ks, 1 , 1973; ; Sche heglo loff, 2 , 2007)

10

CA AS A BODY OF EMPIRICAL FINDINGS

Repair / / c correction s n sequenc nces (Sche heglo loff, J , Jefferson & n & S Sacks ks, 1 , 1977)

11

WRAP UP

Di Discussion: W n: Whe here mi might ht C CA ma make a a c cont ntribution i n in t n the he le learni ning ng s scienc nces?

12

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Ga Garcia, A , A., & ., & J Jacobs, J , J. ( . (1999). T . The he e eyes o

• f t

the he b beho hold lder: U : Und nderstand nding ng t the he t turn- n- taki king ng s sys ystem i m in q n quasi-s

• sync

ynchr hrono nous c computer-me

• mediated c

commu mmuni nication. n. Res esea earch o

• n L

Language a e and S Social In Inter eraction, 3 , 32(4), 3 , 337-3

• 368.

. Jordan, B n, B., & ., & H Hend nderson, A n, A. ( . (1995). Int . Interaction a n ana nalys lysis: F : Found ndations ns a and nd p practice. . Journal o

• f t

the L e Lea earning S Scien ences es, 4 , 4(1), 3 , 39-1

• 104.

. Kend ndon, A , A. ( . (1990). . Conducting i inter eraction: P : Patter erns o

• f b

beh ehavior i in f focused ed en encounter

• ers. N

. New Y York: C k: Camb mbridge U Uni niversity P y Press. . McDe Dermo mott, R , R. ( . (1976). K . Kids ma make s sens nse: A : An e n ethno hnographi hic a account nt o

• f t

the he i int nteractiona nal l ma mana nageme ment nt o

• f s

success a and nd f failu lure i in o n one ne f first-g

• grade c

cla

• lassroom. (
• m. (PhD)

hD), S , Stanf nford Uni niversity, P , Palo lo A Alt lto, C , CA. . 13

BIBLIOGRAPHY (CONT.)

Pome merant ntz, A , A., & ., & F Fehr hr, B , B. J . J. ( . (2011). C . Conversation A n Ana nalys lysis: A : An a n approach t h to t the he a ana nalys lysis o

• f

social i l int

• nteraction. In T
• n. In T. A

. A. v . van n Di Dijk jk ( (Ed.) .), , Discourse S e Studies es: A m : A multidisciplinary in introduct uctio ion ( (2nd nd e ed., p ., pp. 1 . 165-1

• 190). T

. Tho housand nd O Oaks ks, C , CA: S : Sage. . Rosche helle lle, J , J. ( . (1992). L . Learni ning ng b by c y colla llaboration: C n: Convergent nt c conc nceptual c l cha hang

• nge. J

. Journa nal o l of the he L Learni ning ng S Scienc nces, 2 , 2(3), 2 , 235-2

• 276.

. Sacks ks, H , H., ., Sche heglo loff, E , E., & ., & J Jefferson, G. ( n, G. (1974). T . The he s simple lest s sys ystema matics f for t the he

• rgani

nization o n of t turn-t n-taki king ng f for c conversation.

• n. Language, 5

e, 50(4), 6 , 696-7

• 735.

. Sche heglo loff, E , E. ( . (2007). S . Sequenc nce o

• rgani

nization i n in i n int nteraction: A n: A p prime mer i in C n Conversation n Ana nalys

• lysis. N

. New Y York: C k: Camb mbridge U Uni niversity P y Press. .

14

BIBLIOGRAPHY (CONT.)

Sche heglo loff, E , E., J ., Jefferson, G., & n, G., & S Sacks ks, H , H. ( . (1977). T . The he p preferenc nce f for s self lf-c

• correction i

n in n the he o

• rgani

nization o n of r repair i in c n conversation.

• n. Language, 5

e, 53(2), 3 , 361-3

• 382.

. Sche heglo loff, E , E., & ., & S Sacks ks, H , H. ( . (1973). O . Openi ning ng u up c clo losing ngs. . Sem emiotica, 8 , 8(4), 2 , 289-3

• 327.

. 15