Post-processing for AO-corrected images Inverse Problems in Imaging - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

post processing for ao corrected images
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Post-processing for AO-corrected images Inverse Problems in Imaging - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Post-processing for AO-corrected images Inverse Problems in Imaging May 23 rd , 2018 Summer school - Lake Como Supervisors Co-supervisors Thierry FUSCO (ONERA/LAM) Benoit NEICHEL (LAM) Laurent MUGNIER (ONERA) Aurlie BONNEFOIS (ONERA)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Post-processing for AO-corrected images

Inverse Problems in Imaging

May 23rd, 2018 Summer school - Lake Como

24/05/2018 24/05/2018

Romain JL. FETICK Supervisors Thierry FUSCO (ONERA/LAM) Laurent MUGNIER (ONERA) Co-supervisors Benoit NEICHEL (LAM) Aurélie BONNEFOIS (ONERA)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Summary

  • I. Imaging with adaptive
  • ptics in astronomy
  • II. Theory on deconvolution

and myopic deconvolution

  • III. PSF parametrization
  • IV. Tests on VLT SPHERE

and MUSE data

  • V. Future developments

Paris Marseille Como Toulouse

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Observation with Adaptive Optics

Object Blurred Noisy Image Atmosphere, Telescope AO system, CCD

CCD WFS

  • Residual turbulence with AO still

produces “blurring“

  • Photon and detector read-out noise
  • Better images required (noiseless,

sharp edges, visible structures)

  • Observation of satellites and asteroids
  • Adaptive Optics (AO) partially corrects

the atmospheric turbulence

  • AO greatly improves imaging

performances

Context Issues

Post-processing required to further improve image quality

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Deconvolution

Estimated object Object Blurred Noisy Image Observed PSF

Deconvolution MISTRAL

Atmosphere, Telescope AO system, CCD Star

CCD WFS

Data fidelity A priori

→ Noise statistics → A priori on object

Criterion to minimize

  • Observed PSF may significantly differ

from the real system PSF

  • Errors on estimated object
slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Myopic deconvolution

Estimated object and PSF Object Blurred Noisy Image Observed PSF

Deconvolution MISTRAL

Atmosphere, Telescope AO system, CCD Star

CCD WFS

A priori

→ Noise statistics → A priori on object → PSD on the PSF

Criterion to minimize

Myopic term Data fidelity

  • Better results than fixed-PSF
  • High number of unknowns
slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Solution: parametrize the PSF

AO correction quality Turbulence Kolmogorov Strehl Diffraction & static artifacts Data Moffat MPHD 500ηm 600ηm 700ηm 800ηm 900ηm

VLT / MUSE VLT / SPHERE MPHD PSF modelling

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

PSF from star

Deconvolution MISTRAL PSF

t t+Δt

Star

→Deconvolutional issues: mismatch true PSF (linked to object) / observed PSF (star)

Asteroid

Image

Estimated object

State of the art

Image VLT - SPHERE Credit: P. Vernazza (LAM)

Protected Data Protected Data

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Myopic deconvolution

Myopic Deconvolution MISTRAL PSF

t t+Δt

Star

→Deconvolutional issues →Low statistical contrast: data (N pixels) << unknown (2 x N)

Asteroid

Image

Estimated PSF Estimated object

State of the art

Statistics on the PSF variations

Protected Data Protected Data

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Parametric myopic deconvolution

Parametric Myopic Deconvolution MISTRAL

t

Telemetry

→Suitable PSF for deconvolution → Physical meaning of the PSF’s parameters →High statistical contrast: data (N pixels) ≈ unknown (N+10) → No need for on-sky PSF observation: astronomical & military usage

Asteroid Estimated PSF

Parametric PSF

Goals of the thesis

Estimated object

Fried Strehl Jitter...

Statistics on the parameters variations

Protected Data

Image

Protected Data

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Work objectives

  • Evaluate improvements of

deconvolution using parametric PSF

  • Stability toward parameters
  • Myopic deconvolution
  • Apply method on data

– Simulations – VLT (asteroids) – ONERA (satellites)

  • Error maps on estimated
  • bjects

Protected Data

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Toulouse