polyphosphazene based gas separation membranes pushing
play

Polyphosphazene-based gas separation membranes: Pushing the - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Polyphosphazene-based gas separation membranes: Pushing the boundaries 254th ACS National Meeting in Washington, DC, August 20-24, 2017 Dr. Hunaid Nulwala CEO Liquid Ion S olutions LLC Pittsburgh, PA Membrane/ S olvent Integrated Process


  1. Polyphosphazene-based gas separation membranes: Pushing the boundaries 254th ACS National Meeting in Washington, DC, August 20-24, 2017 Dr. Hunaid Nulwala CEO Liquid Ion S olutions LLC Pittsburgh, PA

  2. Membrane/ S olvent Integrated Process Advantages • Tail-end technology which is Makeup easily used in retrofits Clean Flue Gas Air +CO 2 Solvent To • Combustor No steam extraction is Lean Solution Rich Solution required Expansion Valve • Heat pump is seamlessly Heat Pump Membrane Cycle integrated into the cooling and Unit Stripper Stripper Absorber heating of absorption/ stripping Flue Gas process Vapor Compressor • Operating pressure of the Vacuum stripper will be very flexible Pump Cross Heat Exchanger depending on the low quality Air CO 2 heat Lean Solution Rich Disadvantage Solution • Capital cost could be intensive 2

  3. S ynthetic Membranes Permeability/Selectivity Material Property Material Processing • Used in variety of industrial, medical, and environmental applications. – desalination, dialysis, sterile filtration, food processing, dehydration • Low energy requirements • Compact design • No moving parts and modular Accessing thin membranes Stages 3 Ho Bum Park et al. S cience 2017;356:eaab0530

  4. Membrane Terms • Permeability is a mat erial property: describes rate of permeation of a solute through a material, normalized by its thickness and the pressure driving force • Permeance is a membrane property: calculated as solute flux through the membrane normalized by the pressure driving force (but not thickness) • Ideal selectivity describes the ratio of the permeabilities (or permeances) of two different permeating species through a membrane, and is a mat erial property • High membrane permeance is achieved by both material selection (high permeability) and membrane design (low thickness) 4

  5. CO 2 S eparation Using Membranes • Mechanism of separation: diffusion through a non-porous membrane • A pressure driven process - the driving force is the partial pressure difference of each gas in the feed and permeate. – Selective removal of fast l permeating gases from slow permeating gases. N 2 – The solution-diffusion process can CO 2 + be approximated by Fick’s law: CO 2 ∆ P electivity - separation factor, α (typical selectivity for CO 2 / N 2 is 20-45) • S • Permeability = solubility (k) x diffusivity (D) (normalized over thickness) • Either high selectivity or high permeability – Trade-off. 5

  6. Permeance Vs. Permeability • Current state-of-the-art fully commercialized membrane materials for CO 2 / N 2 separations: 250 permeability with selectivity of 35-50. • These are cast @ 100nm thickness, giving permeance of 2500 GPU. The scale bar is in microns to illustrate permeability and permeance for a membrane material which as permeability of 1000 Barrers. Mechanical Properties, Film Forming Ability 6

  7. Membrane Material Advances Needs • Various approaches to exceed the • More stable and robust membranes upper bound and access better – Mechanically performing membranes. – Chemically – S urface modification – Thermally – Phase separated polymer blends • Higher permeability and selectivity – Mixed-matrix membranes (MMMs) • Fundamental structure-property- • Inorganic membranes (superior in performance but are difficult to make processing relations needs to be large thin films) incorporated. – S upported ionic liquids – Facilitated transport 7

  8. Mixed Matrix Membranes 8

  9. The Trouble with Mixed Matrix Membranes • Poor compatibility of the polymer and inorganic particles that leads to poor adhesion at the organic-inorganic interface. • General trade-off between selectivity and permeability • S olutions: - Addition of interfacial agents - S urface modification of inorganic particles - Chemical modification of polymers - Use of flexible polymers 9

  10. Insight Permeability Selectivity No MOF C10 O NH2 O HO J. Mat er. Chem. A , 2015 , 3 , 5014-5022 10 U.S . Pat ent Applicat ion number: 14/ 519,743

  11. Interface If you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em! Interfacially-Controlled Envelope (ICE) Membranes Makes use of envelopment effects which have plagued mixed matrix membranes • Diffusion phenomena determined by interactions with the particle and polymer • surface Possibility of using simple nanoparticle fillers • 11 Advanced polymers allow an excellent starting point •

  12. Plan of Attack for Mixed Matrix Membranes CO 2 N 2 5-10 nm • Use simple nanoparticle fillers • S urface modify the particles to tune optimal interactions with CO 2 and the polymer • Employ an advanced polymer with good compatibility and CO 2 transport properties • Create a membrane in which diffusion phenomena are determined by interactions with the particle and polymer surface 12

  13. S urface Functionalized Nanoparticles • Careful and detailed screening of the surface modifier was carried out. • Nanoparticles have been synthesized @ 200g levels for 3 different loadings Polymer particle interface 13

  14. Polymer of Choice Macromolecular substitution R 2 R 3 P N P N R 1 R 4 Ultra Flexible chains High chain mobility Improved gas solubility and diffusion Excellent chemical and thermal stability C-C =607 Δ Hf kJ/mol vs. P-N =617 Δ Hf kJ/mol 14

  15. Polyphosphazenes R N P Organic-Inorganic Hybrid Polymeric System R n Living Cationic Polymerization Ring Opening Polymerization Cl Cl Cl Cl 250 o C PCl 5 P SiMe 3 N N P P N N Cl CH 2 Cl 2 , 25 o C n Cl Cl P P Cl Cl N Cl Cl Poly(dichlorophosphazene) Reactive Intermediate • Relatively Lower MW • High Molecular Weight (MW) • Well-controlled MW and PD • Relatively Large Scale Preparation • Room Temperature • Poor Molecular Weight Control • Small Scale Preparation • Broad Poly-disperity (PD) • End-chain Modifications • No End-chain Modifications 15

  16. Polyphosphazenes Macromolecular Substitution NHR NR 2 or P N P N H N n n R 2 r o H 2 NHR NR 2 N R Library of Over 700 Cl NHR NR 2 Combination Different or P N P N P N Polyphosphazenes n n n NaOR Cl OR OR OR P N n OR • Synthetic Simplicity : Nucleophilic S ubstitutions • Synthetic Tunability : Homo-substitutions OR Mix-substitutions • Property Tunability : Glass Transition Temperature, S olubility, Degradability, Hydrophobicity 16

  17. Polymer S creening O O O z HN z N P x N P x NH NH y y O O O z O O O O O O N P z z x N P N P x O x O O y=2% y y 250 Barrers 62 Selectivity O O O O O O z z N P x N P x NH NH y y 17 J. Mem. S ci. , 2001 , 186 , 249-256

  18. Material Optimization Solution = Inter Penetrating Networks (IPN) Challenges • Not a film former • S ticky • Does not have required mechanical properties O O O z N P x O y=3% 18

  19. Glass Transition S tudies Thermal Studies of Polyphosphazene IPN • Difference T g of uncrosslinked and ICE membranes Polyphoshazene vs. IPN is observed • Minor difference is observed between IPN vs. ICE membranes in Polyphosphazene T g studies. IPN membrane – Effect of extremely chain mobility ICE 40% -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 • 30 compositions of ICE membranes Temperature (° C) have been evaluated for their R 2 R 3 thermal properties. P N P N – Long-term stability test are on going. 19 R 1 R 4

  20. Membrane Casting Screening is done using films cast by hand Knife Polymer dope 20

  21. 10-12 microns 21

  22. Polymer Membrane Results O Temperature Study O O z N P 560 x 50°C O 540 y=2% 250 Barrers 520 45°C CO 2 Permeability (Barrer) 62 Selectivity 40°C 500 480 35°C 460 30°C 440 R² = 0.9792 420 400 35 40 45 50 55 60 Selectivity CO 2 /N 2 22

  23. Membrane Performance % wt. Loading of Nanoparticles Cast number Characterization Membrane results S electivity O Permeability O O z 30% unmodified particles LS -01-45A Turned into a gel N/ A N/ A N P x O with white y=2% precipitates (not useable) 10% surface modified 10 nm LIS -01-41 A S EM, TGA, DS C, 659 41 particles Membrane testing 20% surface modified 10 nm LS -01-51 B* Membrane 675-1025 20-33 particles testing 40% surface modified 10 nm LIS -01-41 B, LIS -01- S EM, TGA, DS C, 1609 44 particles 43 membrane testing 60% loading 60% surface modified 10 nm LIS -01-51A* TGA, DS C, 250-400 25-30 particles Membrane 23 testing

  24. Membrane Performance • Membrane of half a micron would yield permeance of 3200 1000 Literature data GPU with a selectivity of 44 for This work Robeson upper bound CO 2 / N 2 separation. CO 2 /N 2 selectivity 100 • Work is being performed to convert these materials properties into membranes ― 10 Open for collaborations • Module design― Open for 1 1 10 100 1,000 10,000 collaborations and j oint research. CO 2 permeability (Barrer) 24

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend