Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets: Evidence from Indias - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

political punishment and financial safety nets evidence
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets: Evidence from Indias - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets: Evidence from Indias Demonetization Gaurav Khanna Priya Mukherjee UCSD William & Mary Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets: Evidence from India’s Demonetization

Gaurav Khanna Priya Mukherjee

UCSD William & Mary

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 1 / 42

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Motivation

Are Politicians Rewarded/Punished for policies?

Are voters rational? Who is blamed/gets credit? Does salience matter?

Unique Context: India’s Demonetization

Sudden announcement: 86% of currency deemed illegal (Negative) economic consequences immediately afterwards Highly salient, and no ambiguity in who implemented policy Narratives exist on how citizens responded and why - but no clear evidence

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 2 / 42

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Demonetization suddenly announced by PM

November 8, 2016: invalidate 86% of currency in circulation

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 3 / 42

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Demonetization suddenly announced

PM Modi on November 8, 2016:

Demonetized 500 and 1000 rupee notes. 86% of the total currency in circulation Issuance of new 500 and 2000 rupee notes in exchange Could only draw rupee 4000 (USD 62) per person-day Deposit notes by end of year

Government-stated goal: Curtail shadow economy, fight terrorism, tackle counterfeit Stock Market crash next day. GDP growth projections lowered

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 4 / 42

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 5 / 42

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 6 / 42

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 6 / 42

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 6 / 42

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 6 / 42

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 7 / 42

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 8 / 42

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

“Demonetisation was a very big mistake...this was a shock to 86 percent of the value of currency in the market...it was no surprise that the economy went into a short recoil” - Kaushik Basu

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 9 / 42

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion Praveen Kumar/HT The man who became the face of demonetisation misery last year questioned the Bharatiya Janata Party-led government’s decision to make Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 notes illegal, the Hindustan Times reported on

  • Wednesday. Nand Lal, a retired soldier who lives in Gurugram, was photographed crying after failing to

collect his pension despite standing for three days in a queue outside a bank. Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 10 / 42

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 11 / 42

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Electoral Consequences?

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 12 / 42

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Electoral Consequences?

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 12 / 42

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 13 / 42

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

What We Show

Was BJP punished for ‘poorly implemented’ demonetization?

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 14 / 42

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

What We Show

Was BJP punished for ‘poorly implemented’ demonetization? Those in regions with fewer banks adversely affected

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 14 / 42

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

What We Show

Was BJP punished for ‘poorly implemented’ demonetization? Those in regions with fewer banks adversely affected Leverage policy experiment: (by the opposition Congress party) Congress (opposition party) increased access to banks/cash, encouraged private sector banks to enter RD design: Selected unbanked districts Implementing regime not rewarded (Less salient, slow policy)

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 14 / 42

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

What We Show

Was BJP punished for ‘poorly implemented’ demonetization? Those in regions with fewer banks adversely affected Leverage policy experiment: (by the opposition Congress party) Congress (opposition party) increased access to banks/cash, encouraged private sector banks to enter RD design: Selected unbanked districts Implementing regime not rewarded (Less salient, slow policy) After demonetization: (by the BJP party), less banked regions: Negative economic outcomes (nightlights) (replicate Chodorow-Reich et al) Less support for policy (survey data) Lower BJP vote share (election outcomes) Significant heterogeneity: Little to No Effects in Stronghold Areas

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 14 / 42

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Economists on Demonetization

Lahiri (2019): Negative economic impacts; not achieve goals Chodorow-Reich et al 2018: contractions in

employment, nightlights-based output, bank credit effects dissipate over time

Banerjee & Kala 2017: surveyed 400 wholesale/retail traders

20% reported a fall in sales > 40%. Sales were 20% lower on average.

Supply side effects, Subramaniam (2019); increase in deposits, Chanda and Cook (2019); perhaps other effects: for example ↑ in bank a/c or card take-up (?)

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 15 / 42

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Are Politicians Rewarded/Punished by Citizens?

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 16 / 42

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Are Politicians Rewarded/Punished by Citizens?

Rational Voters

Targeted programs (Manacorda et al 2011, De La O (2013) Switch to Oppositions (Blattman et al 2017)

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 16 / 42

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Are Politicians Rewarded/Punished by Citizens?

Rational Voters

Targeted programs (Manacorda et al 2011, De La O (2013) Switch to Oppositions (Blattman et al 2017)

Random Shocks (?)

Shark attacks (Achen and Bartels 2012) Oil shocks (Wolfers 2002) Rainfall shocks (Cole et al 2012)

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 16 / 42

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Are Politicians Rewarded/Punished by Citizens?

Rational Voters

Targeted programs (Manacorda et al 2011, De La O (2013) Switch to Oppositions (Blattman et al 2017)

Random Shocks (?)

Shark attacks (Achen and Bartels 2012) Oil shocks (Wolfers 2002) Rainfall shocks (Cole et al 2012)

Who is blamed/gets credit?

Information/salience matters (Ferraz and Finan 2008, 2011) Claiming credit (Guiteras and Mobarak 2014, Dietrich and Winters 2014, Zimmerman 2018)

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 16 / 42

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Are Politicians Rewarded/Punished by Citizens?

Rational Voters

Targeted programs (Manacorda et al 2011, De La O (2013) Switch to Oppositions (Blattman et al 2017)

Random Shocks (?)

Shark attacks (Achen and Bartels 2012) Oil shocks (Wolfers 2002) Rainfall shocks (Cole et al 2012)

Who is blamed/gets credit?

Information/salience matters (Ferraz and Finan 2008, 2011) Claiming credit (Guiteras and Mobarak 2014, Dietrich and Winters 2014, Zimmerman 2018)

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 16 / 42

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Empirical Strategy

Voter Behaviorc = β0 + β1Exposure to Demonetizationc + ǫc Need exogenous variation in exposure to demonetization

Access to banks/cash/ATMs

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 17 / 42

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Empirical Strategy

Voter Behaviorc = β0 + β1Exposure to Demonetizationc + ǫc Need exogenous variation in exposure to demonetization

Access to banks/cash/ATMs

Leverage the Congress’ 2005 Banking Reform Made bank branch licensing easier in underbanked districts

Underbanked: branches per person < average Regression Discontinuity in growth of banking + can use diff-in-disc.

Young (2018): Improves agriculture, manufacturing, GDP

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 17 / 42

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Data

Banking Data:

Central bank of India (RBI) 2002-2016 Bank branches, accounts, credit at the branch level Branch addresses (including district)

Election Data:

Votes by candidate name and party: states that had elections after November 2016, through Dec. 2018 Create coalitions variable (based on 2016)

Nightlights: August 2016-May 2017 Mood of the Nation Survey:

May 2017 across 19 states, 146 constituencies Support for Modi, economic conditions, bank access Views on demonetization

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 18 / 42

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Probability of Receiving Banking Policy

(a) First Stage (b) District Density at RD cutoff

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 19 / 42

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

First Stage

Table: Unbanked Status, and growth in branches at the RD cutoff P(Unbanked Status) ∆Log(New Branches) RD Cutoff 0.971*** 0.968*** 0.960*** 1.757*** (0.0179) (0.0182) (0.0369) (0.553) Bandwidth [-2; 2] [-2; 2] [-1.3 ;1.3] [-.6 ;.6] Specification Linear Quadratic MSE MSE

Optimal Bandwidths (Cattaneo et al 2017)

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 20 / 42

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Did the Banking Policy Increase Access to Banks?

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 21 / 42

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

(a) New branches (2006-10) (b) New branches MOF data (c) Growth in branches (d) Old Branches 2002-5

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 22 / 42

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Branches

Panel A ∆Log(Branches) RD Estimate 0.960** 1.275** 0.737** 0.729** (0.425) (0.523) (0.314) (0.316) Bandwidth [-2.3 ;.7] [-1.8 ;.6] [-2; 2] [-2; 2] Mean 1.751 1.755 1.761 1.761 Specification MSE2 CER2 Linear Quadratic Panel B Log(Old Branches) RD Estimate

  • 0.141
  • 0.189

0.0403 0.0447 (0.225) (0.250) (0.198) (0.198) Bandwidth [-2.4 ;1.3] [-1.9 ;1] [-2; 2] [-2; 2] Mean 0.391 0.396 0.363 0.363 Specification MSE2 CER2 Linear Quadratic

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 23 / 42

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Accounts and Credit Limit by 2012

(a) Number of Accounts (b) Credit Limit

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 24 / 42

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Credit

Panel A Total Credit Limit RD Estimate 886.9** 937.3** 1,002* 1,105* (377.4) (432.6) (580.4) (591.2) Bandwidth [-.7 ;1.8] [-.5 ;1.3] [-2; 2] [-2; 2] Mean 658.03 766.321 938.6 938.6 Specification MSE2 CER2 Linear Quadratic Panel B Total Credit Outstanding RD Estimate 523.4** 519.3* 710.1* 761.4* (255.0) (282.7) (381.0) (388.3) Bandwidth [-.8 ;1.5] [-.5 ;1.1] [-2; 2] [-2; 2] Mean 521.537 586.171 650.2 650.2 Specification MSE2 CER2 Linear Quadratic

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 25 / 42

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Financial Access - CSDS Household Survey

Table: Survey Data: Bank Accounts and Credit Access

Bank/Post Office Acc. Debit/Credit Card RD Estimate 0.0853*** 0.00271 0.212*** 0.304*** (0.0208) (0.0274) (0.0472) (0.0655) Observations 1970 1385 2504 1715 BW Type MSE2 CER2 MSE2 CER2 Mean DV .883 .862 0.553 .545 BW [-1 ;.5] [-.6 ;.3] [-1.6 ;.5] [-1 ;.3] Robust p-value 0.002 0.909 0.000 0.000

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 26 / 42

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Was the Congress rewarded for banking expansion?

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 27 / 42

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Electoral Effects of Bank Policy Pre-Demonetization

Prob(Winning) Congress UPA Received Banks

  • 0.0880

0.00739

  • 0.0372
  • 0.0155

(0.0645) (0.0416) (0.0449) (0.0380) BW Type MSE1 MSE2 MSE1 MSE2 Robust p-value 0.230 0.891 0.297 0.559 BW [-.7 ;.7] [-2.6 ;1] [-1.2 ;1.2] [-2.2 ;1.4] Vote Shares Congress UPA Received Banks

  • 0.0315

0.0215 0.00726 0.0158 (0.0214) (0.0171) (0.0219) (0.0153) BW Type MSE1 MSE2 MSE1 MSE2 Robust p-value 0.120 0.320 0.993 0.581 BW [-.6 ;.6] [-1.5 ;.6] [-.7 ;.7] [-1.3 ;1]

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 28 / 42

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

No Discontinuity in Pre-Demonetization Vote Shares

(a) Vote Shares in Pre-period (b) Number of votes in pre-period

Why was the Congress party not rewarded? Salience? Attributing credit? Gains manifest over time?

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 29 / 42

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Economic Impacts of Demonetization

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 30 / 42

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Economic Impacts of Demonetization

Difference-in-Discontinuities: Lightspt = β(Postt × 1RD) + µt + ψp + ǫ in bandwidth

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 30 / 42

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Economic Impacts of Demonetization

Difference-in-Discontinuities: Lightspt = β(Postt × 1RD) + µt + ψp + ǫ in bandwidth

Log Nightlights Post*Banks 0.0977*** 0.0895*** (0.0202) (0.0199) Observations 4,591 4,839 R-squared 0.894 0.900 Mean DV .0.537 0.576 BW [-5; 5] [-10; 10]

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 30 / 42

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Correlates of Support for Demonetization

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 31 / 42

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Correlates of Support for Demonetization

CSDS Survey: 12K respondents, 146 constituencies in May 2017 40% believed policy was “right move” 16% thought it wasn’t. 32% right move, but done in hurry

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 31 / 42

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Correlates of Support for Demonetization

CSDS Survey: 12K respondents, 146 constituencies in May 2017 40% believed policy was “right move” 16% thought it wasn’t. 32% right move, but done in hurry

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 31 / 42

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Views on Demonetization

Right move but Was right move w/ bad prep. RD Estimate 0.0867 0.168**

  • 0.123*
  • 0.156**

(0.0748) (0.0728) (0.0655) (0.0606) Observations 10,318 10,882 10,318 10,882 R-squared 0.018 0.011 0.015 0.013 BW [-5; 5] [-10; 10] [-5; 5] [-10; 10] Mean DV 0.452 0.458 0.318 0.317 CSDS survey in May 2017: 11,835 respondents across 146 constituencies

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 32 / 42

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Was the BJP punished for demonetization?

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 33 / 42

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Elections

1979 constituencies across 21 states held elections post demonetization (2017 and 2018) RD and Difference-in-discontinuities: Votesp,t = β(Postt × 1RD) + µt + ψp + ǫ in bandwidth

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 34 / 42

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

(a) Change in P(Ruling Party Victory) (b) Change in Vote Shares for Ruling Party (c) Changes in Votes for Ruling Coalition (d) Change in Vote Shares for Ruling Coalition

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 35 / 42

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Election Outcomes: Vote Shares

Regression Discontinuity Vote shares BJP or ally BJP Received Banks 0.113*** 0.103*** 0.101*** 0.0930** (0.0334) (0.0285) (0.0307) (0.0397) BW Type MSE1 MSE2 MSE1 MSE2 Robust p-value 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.010 BW [-.7 ;.7] [-2 ;.5] [-.6 ;.6] [-1.7 ;.4] Difference in Discontinuities Vote shares BJP or ally BJP Post*Banks 0.0973*** 0.0990*** 0.0485** 0.0476** (0.0234) (0.0226) (0.0209) (0.0200) Observations 9,021 9,465 10,633 11,220 R squared 0.662 0.660 0.520 0.515 BW [-5; 5] [-10; 10] [-5; 5] [-10; 10]

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 36 / 42

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Robustness

Bandwidth Selection Falsification tests (Diff-in-disc. analysis using some other year as demonetization year) Including all constituencies - even where parties did not field candidates (coded as zero)

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 37 / 42

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

What happened in Strongholds?

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 38 / 42

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

What happened in Strongholds?

Not much!

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 38 / 42

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

What happened in Strongholds?

Not much!

Table: Impact on Elections: Heterogeneity NDA Vote Shares Post*Banks 0.171*** 0.176*** 0.193*** 0.205*** (0.0420) (0.0395) (0.0324) (0.0305) Post*Banks*NDA-Stronghold

  • 0.0953**
  • 0.101**

(0.0418) (0.0400) Post*Banks*BJP-Stronghold

  • 0.177***
  • 0.198***

(0.0342) (0.0326) Observations 10,289 10,853 10,289 10,853 R-squared 0.519 0.515 0.524 0.521 BW [-5; 5] [-10; 10] [-5; 5] [-10; 10] Mean DV 0.318 0.318 0.318 0.318

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 38 / 42

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Table: Impact on Elections: Heterogeneity BJP Vote Shares Post*Banks 0.137*** 0.146*** 0.123*** 0.134*** (0.0460) (0.0447) (0.0360) (0.0356) Post*Banks*NDA-Stronghold

  • 0.106**
  • 0.121***

(0.0436) (0.0422) Post*Banks*BJP-Stronghold

  • 0.120***
  • 0.139***

(0.0378) (0.0372) Observations 8,705 9,130 8,705 9,130 R-squared 0.667 0.665 0.669 0.667 BW [-5; 5] [-10; 10] [-5; 5] [-10; 10] Mean DV 0.265 0.266 0.265 0.266

Notes: Dependent variable is BJP’s vote share *** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, * p < 0.1.

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 39 / 42

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

But it is not the case that stronghold areas were less badly impacted economically...

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 40 / 42

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

But it is not the case that stronghold areas were less badly impacted economically...

Table: Economic Impact of Demonetization: Heterogeneity Log (Nightlights) Post*Banks 0.0791** 0.0405 0.106*** 0.0863*** (0.0401) (0.0418) (0.0301) (0.0312) Post*Banks*NDA-Stronghold 0.0443 0.0994 (0.0590) (0.0604) Post*Banks*BJP-Stronghold

  • 0.0104

0.0203 (0.0490) (0.0500) Observations 4,543 4,771 4,543 4,771 R-squared 0.860 0.872 0.860 0.872 BW [-5; 5] [-10; 10] [-5; 5] [-10; 10] Mean DV

  • 0.351
  • 0.346
  • 0.351
  • 0.346

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 40 / 42

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Discussion

Using a unique episode in monetary policy, and an RD, we find Ruling party had growing support in the aggregate, but was punished: In districts with less access to cash / banks Ironically, ruling party rewarded more in districts with more banks - a result of opposition’s policy a decade prior Banking expansion vs demonetization: Salience matters? Effects driven by non-stronghold areas No impacts in BJP/ally stronghold areas (despite same econ. impacts), where voters are more aligned Multi-dimensional policy space + citizens get one vote (Besley and Coate, 2008) Other results: No effects on incumbents, similar (but not significant) effects on NDA in 2019 national elections

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 41 / 42

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Introduction Literature Empirical Strategy Results Discussion

Please email us your thoughts and suggestions. Thank you!

Gaurav Khanna, Priya Mukherjee Political Punishment and Financial Safety Nets 42 / 42