PNRP provisions relating to treated wastewater discharges WWTP - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

pnrp provisions relating to
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

PNRP provisions relating to treated wastewater discharges WWTP - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

PNRP provisions relating to treated wastewater discharges WWTP consents in the Wairarapa Carterton, Martinborough, Greytown and Featherston examples discharge of treated wastewater to water with gradual reduction over time to


slide-1
SLIDE 1

PNRP provisions relating to treated wastewater discharge’s

slide-2
SLIDE 2

WWTP consents in the Wairarapa

  • Carterton, Martinborough, Greytown

and Featherston examples

  • discharge of treated wastewater to

water with gradual reduction over time to land

  • all have significant adverse effects on

waterbodies and Section 107 issues

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Policy Framework

  • NPSFM –maintain or improve water

quality

  • PNRP – needs objectives and policies

to implement both maintenance and improvement

  • RMA - Section 107 links in to this –

effects and intent of the plan

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Objectives

  • O23 – water quality maintained or

improved

  • 024 – contact recreation and maori

customary use

  • 025 – aquatic ecosystems
  • bjective framework is good - needs to

work with policy framework for the ‘how’

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Objectives - Discharges

  • verall intent of the plan – discharge to

land over water (O49) and discharges

  • f wastewater to water are reduced

(O50)

  • these objectives go ‘one step’ towards

helping us improve water quality

slide-6
SLIDE 6

P71- as notified

  • critical policy for processing existing

WWTP discharges to water

  • existing WWTP discharges,

discharging to water and all having significant adverse effects

  • enables us to manage effects to an

acceptable level and meet intent of the plan

slide-7
SLIDE 7

P71- as notified

  • gave effects interpretation at a local

scale (s107)

  • PNRP needs to help ‘pull effects up’ to

acceptable levels (s107, P71)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

P71- as proposed

  • makes it very difficult to improve water

quality – leads to legal arguments

  • need to ensure no ‘degrade down to’

situation – not likely now but possible in future

slide-9
SLIDE 9

P71 – issues with recent WWTP applications

  • Martinborough and Greytown – had no

policy guidance – problematic

  • Featherston example
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Other policies

  • P80(a) – limits, targets and standards

– needs P71 to define

  • P70(a)(ii) – helpful to have limits for

conditions of consent to improve water quality – cant leave it to good management practice

  • P67(e) as notified – worked well with

P71

slide-11
SLIDE 11

New discharges versus existing discharges

  • WWTP – have existing authorised

consents at time of lodging application for new resource consent

  • However definition of new discharge

says ‘…or otherwise altered by a new resource consent’

  • All ‘altered’– non-complying activities
slide-12
SLIDE 12

New discharges versus existing discharges

  • Section 42a proposed change to

definition of new discharge defines ‘in volume or contaminants’ but still says ‘or otherwise altered’

  • ‘Altered’ - defaults to scale intensity,

character