pnrp provisions relating to
play

PNRP provisions relating to treated wastewater discharges WWTP - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

PNRP provisions relating to treated wastewater discharges WWTP consents in the Wairarapa Carterton, Martinborough, Greytown and Featherston examples discharge of treated wastewater to water with gradual reduction over time to


  1. PNRP provisions relating to treated wastewater discharge’s

  2. WWTP consents in the Wairarapa • Carterton, Martinborough, Greytown and Featherston examples • discharge of treated wastewater to water with gradual reduction over time to land • all have significant adverse effects on waterbodies and Section 107 issues

  3. Policy Framework • NPSFM – maintain or improve water quality • PNRP – needs objectives and policies to implement both maintenance and improvement • RMA - Section 107 links in to this – effects and intent of the plan

  4. Objectives • O23 – water quality maintained or improved • 024 – contact recreation and maori customary use • 025 – aquatic ecosystems • objective framework is good - needs to work with policy framework for the ‘how’

  5. Objectives - Discharges • overall intent of the plan – discharge to land over water (O49) and discharges of wastewater to water are reduced (O50) • t hese objectives go ‘one step’ towards helping us improve water quality

  6. P71- as notified • critical policy for processing existing WWTP discharges to water • existing WWTP discharges, discharging to water and all having significant adverse effects • enables us to manage effects to an acceptable level and meet intent of the plan

  7. P71- as notified • gave effects interpretation at a local scale (s107) • PNRP needs to help ‘pull effects up’ to acceptable levels (s107, P71)

  8. P71- as proposed • makes it very difficult to improve water quality – leads to legal arguments • n eed to ensure no ‘degrade down to’ situation – not likely now but possible in future

  9. P71 – issues with recent WWTP applications • Martinborough and Greytown – had no policy guidance – problematic • Featherston example

  10. Other policies • P80(a) – limits, targets and standards – needs P71 to define • P70(a)(ii) – helpful to have limits for conditions of consent to improve water quality – cant leave it to good management practice • P67(e) as notified – worked well with P71

  11. New discharges versus existing discharges • WWTP – have existing authorised consents at time of lodging application for new resource consent • However definition of new discharge says ‘ …or otherwise altered by a new resource consent ’ • A ll ‘ altered ’– non-complying activities

  12. New discharges versus existing discharges • Section 42a proposed change to definition of new discharge defines ‘ in volume or contaminants ’ but still says ‘ or otherwise altered ’ • ‘Altered’ - defaults to scale intensity, character

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend