Plant Breeding & Genetics Group Shaun T ownsend Co-Director - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

plant breeding amp genetics group
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Plant Breeding & Genetics Group Shaun T ownsend Co-Director - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Plant Breeding & Genetics Group Shaun T ownsend Co-Director PBG Outline Introduction PBG Genetic Research Program personnel Research areas Questions Introduction PBG is one part of a larger genetic research


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Plant Breeding & Genetics Group

Shaun T

  • wnsend

Co-Director PBG

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

 Introduction  PBG Genetic

Research

 Program

personnel

 Research areas

 Questions

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction

 PBG is one part of a larger genetic

research component at OSU

 Plant-based genetic research

 Primarily in support of plant

breeding efforts

 Initially formed by members of Crop

& Soil Sciences and Horticulture

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Hops

 T

wo programs:

 Shaun T

  • wnsend,

OSU, Aroma Hops

 John Henning,

USDA, Aroma and bittering hops

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Hop Challenges

 Expensive production system

 Infrastructure & labor

 Plants immature until third growing season  Brewing chemistry extremely complex  Dioecy

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Genetic Approaches

 Traditional (statistical)

 Heritability, co-inheritance, BLUP

 Induced mutations  Molecular biology

 Marker development, genetic diversity,

gene discovery

 Possibly gene editing and

transformation

slide-7
SLIDE 7

OSU Aroma Hops

 T

ask is to develop new aroma hop cultivars suitable for the craft beer industry and adapted to Oregon growing conditions.

 Traits include yield, maturity date,

disease resistance, brewing profile

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Traditional Approaches

 Understanding heritability of important

traits

 Best Linear Unbiased Predictor (BLUP)  Provides information to guide breeding

strategy by partitioning observed or measured variation for a trait into genetic and non-genetic causes

 Superior male genotypes identified

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Traditional Approaches

 Induced mutations

 Subtle changes  Limited genetic

change

 Replacement

hop cultivars

slide-10
SLIDE 10

USDA Hops Program

 Led by John

Henning

 Started in 1933  Most public hop

cultivars developed by this program

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Molecular Approaches

 Marker development for Marker-Assisted

Selection (MAS)

 Disease resistance, plant sex

 Sequence the genome

 Gene discovery

 Fix pedigree errors  Assess genetic diversity

slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Barley Hordeum vulgare

2n = 2x = 14 5.3 Gbp ~ 30,000 genes Self-pollinated (hermaphroditic)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

The OSU Barley Project Genetics and Breeding Publication, Variety/Germplasm release Doubled haploids

52_0206 0.0 A10133 3.2 A11281 A11283 3.7 A3012 12.5 A61467 13.0 A17246 13.2 5149877 15.8 5232930 19.1 52_1426 21.7 A9236 A9242 27.1 A35937 45.5 A6527 49.9 A32314 53.6 A34399 54.8 A45497 55.7 A58614 56.3 A17329 A15122 A38678 A33142 A11195 A39423 A10578 A33144 56.9 A35635 57.2 A23020 A19878 A57310 57.5 A23663 57.8 A52323 A45139 A54566 58.1 A21751 59.2 53_0654 61.6 51_1128 62.2 A62366 A16750 A62372 A14013 64.6 A27948 65.2 A58627 65.8 A28098 66.0 A23036 66.2 A53775 66.4 A13235 66.5 A52324 67.1 A28510 A40667 A25784 A38634 70.6 51_1221 51_0671 72.3 52_0441 72.9 A39562 74.6 A59246 74.8 A2132 75.5 A21727 76.0 A31634 A39567 A8401 76.4 A33667 77.6 A33802 A24436 78.8 52_0713 80.0 52_0392 80.6 A4388 A44540 82.9 A60826 92.5 A16532 A40446 A16546 93.1 A16543 93.7 A28760 97.3 A56808 A56807 A15768 A10413 101.6 A39511 A62319 102.2A39701 102.851_1355 53_1427 105.751_0518 52_0526 111.9A40885 A40886 120.152_0018 53_0098 133.252_0549 52_1168 52_0795 135.7A29949 138.1A35656 139.352_1061 A50994 A50443 A42576 A57844 139.9 A50995 140.5A42579 141.1A56719 161.6 A3016 162.8A56725 163.1A15237 163.4A56720 163.8A15242 164.2A26145 A6950 165.15366981 168.953_0524 180.3A17309 185.4A47689 A52248 187.2A61559 189.0A19829 A19833 A19834 191.451_0805 194.451_0783 200.451_0095 53_0929 53_0930 201.1A10668 202.6A10672 A10673 204.1A25187 208.353_0635 210.151_0819 214.4A10187 216.2A11995 216.9A45575 227.0 A3583 229.0A39117 229.6A12032 236.1A44849 A61082 237.4 A6348 237.8A32892 238.6A45211 244.4A23407 52_1018 A43929 A43332 247.8 A44323 A44334 249.0A55919 A51223 250.252_0829 251.951_0869 254.0A63287 A60753 A60754 262.6A10542 263.252_1141 264.9A31352 268.5A32988 A32982 A31257 276.8A14908 279.8A12049 A12052 280.4A61914 283.1A44414 A22962 A59718 287.1A19168 A55993 288.8A54195 289.4A37358 290.053_0382 291.251809_R 293.65784_F 569307 294.151_0857 51_0322 294.753_0958 295.95140269 53_1481 51_0401 297.15128167 52448_R 298.351881_F 547507 52048_F 298.953_1292 5139089 300.6548097 301.2546054 302.552_1155 303.753_0769 305.6 C13P_LOD:2.7_a:-1.3 C14SPS_LOD:2.9_a:-0.8 C13BP_LOD:3.1_a:0.4 C13BC_LOD:3.1_a:-2.3 C13BC_LOD:3.2_a:-2.3 C15HD_LOD:3.3_a:-1.6 C14LR_LOD:3.5_a:5.6 C13ST_LOD:3.7_a:-1.9 C14L_LOD:3.7_a:-4.6 C14L_LOD:4.8_a:-5.2 C13BG_LOD:5_a:66.7 C13P_LOD:5.1_a:-1.8 M15M_LOD:5.3_a:6.8 C14H_LOD:5.5_a:-4.8 C15BSR_LOD:5.5_a:7.1 M15H_LOD:5.8_a:-1.7 C13BG_LOD:5.9_a:75.1 C15HD_LOD:6.3_a:-2.1 C13BC_LOD:6.4_a:-3.3 C14BSR_LOD:6.6_a:5.5 C14H_LOD:6.7_a:-5.4 C14TW_LOD:6.8_a:-0.9 C14Y_LOD:6.9_a:-318.1 C14HD_LOD:7.4_a:-1.7 C14TW_LOD:7.6_a:-1 M15H_LOD:8.2_a:-2 M15HD_LOD:8.3_a:-1.5 C13HD_LOD:8.6_a:-2.8 C14P_LOD:9.4_a:-6.1 C13H_LOD:10.3_a:-5.2 C13ME_LOD:11.4_a:-0.9 C13H_LOD:12.3_a:-5.6 C13TKW_LOD:14.3_a:-2.9 C13WC_LOD:16.5_a:-0.3 C13WP_LOD:30.1_a:-0.6 C13ST_LOD:31.2_a:-4.6 C13ST_LOD:35.2_a:-4.7 C13AA_LOD:35.3_a:-18.7 C13FAN_LOD:36.9_a:-39.6

5H

The Relationships between Development and Low Temperature Tolerance in Barley Near Isogenic Lines Differing for Flowering Behavior. Cuesta- Marcos, A. et al. 2015. Plant and Cell Physiology Volume 56, Issue 12 Pp. 2312-2324.

Crossing

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Integrating genetics and breeding at a Land Grant University

Locus/alleles Phenotype Mechanism Vrn1, Vrn2, Vrn3 Growth habit Loss of function deletions Ppd1, Ppd2 Flowering time Loss of function deletions

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Barley contributions to beer flavor Deschutes + 6 and the Oregon Promise

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Hazelnut Program

 Led by Shawn

Mehlenbacher

 Only hazelnut

breeding program in the U.S.

 Hazelnut

production is centered in Oregon

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Hazelnut Breeding Objectives

  • A. Blanched kernel market (for chocolate, baked goods)

(93% of world crop is sold as kernels, 7% sold in-shell)

  • 1. Bud mite resistance
  • 5. Easy pellicle removal
  • 2. Round nut shape
  • 6. Few defects
  • 3. High percent kernel
  • 7. Early maturity
  • 4. Precocity
  • 8. Free-falling nuts
  • 5. High yield
  • B. Resistance to eastern filbert blight (EFB)
  • 1. Simply inherited resistance (‘Gasaway’ & >50 others)
  • 2. Quantitative resistance (e.g. ‘Tonda di Giffoni’, ‘Sacajawea’)
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Hazelnut Quantitative Traits

Trait Heritability (%)

Good Kernels 42 Doubles 84 Moldy Kernels 61 Poorly Filled Nuts 25 Nut Length 68 Nut Shape Index 65 Nut Compression Index 88 Nut Weight 63 Percent Kernel 87 Fiber 56 Blanching 64 Relative Husk Length 91 Nuts per Cluster 67 Catkin Elongation Time 68 Nut Maturity 86

Most traits are highly heritable.

Mehlenbacher et al., 1993; Yao & Mehlenbacher, 2000

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Eastern Filbert Blight

Fungus Anisogramma anomala, 2-year life cycle. Cankers girdle and kill branches. We now have > 100 sources of resistance. We use single R-genes and quantitative resistance.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Sources of Very High EFB Resistance in C.

avellana (greenhouse tests)

Accession Origin LG* S-alleles

  • 1. Gasaway

Unknown 6 3 26

  • 1. Zimmerman

Barcelona x Gasaway 6 1 3

  • 2. Ratoli

Spain 7 2 10

  • 3. Georgian OSU 759.010
  • Rep. of Georgia

2 4 20

  • 4. OSU 408.040
  • Univ. Minnesota

6 15 27

  • 5. OSU 495.072

Southern Russia (VIR) 6 6 30

  • 6. Culpla

Spain 6 9 10

  • 7. Crvenje

Serbia 6 6 23

  • 8. Uebov

Serbia 6 12 16

  • 9. Moscow N02

Russia (Moscow) ? 6 20

  • 10. Moscow N23

Russia (Moscow) ? 6 30

  • 11. Moscow N26

Russia (Moscow) ? 1 29

  • 12. Moscow N27

Russia (Moscow) ? 19 23

  • 13. Moscow N37

Russia (Moscow) ? 1 6

  • 14. Farris OSU 533.029

Lansing, Michigan ? 3 11

  • 15. C. avellana COR 157

Finland ? 9 25

  • 16. Amarillo Tardio

Chile (Chillan) ? 2 2 *Linkage Group assigned using microsatellite markers

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Pacific Northwest Potato Breeding and Variety Development Program

Jointly funded by USDA-NIFA & Potato Commissions of ID, OR & WA

slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • Range of ploidy: 2X, 3X, 4X and

5X

  • Most cultivated potatoes are

tetraploid (2n=4x=48)

  • The basic chromosome number

is 12

  • Haploid genome size is ~900 mb

Solanum sp.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

64 % 21% 10%

NASS 2014

PNW North Central Eastern Southwest

5%

Adapted from Knowles et al (2010)

USA Potato Production 2014

slide-25
SLIDE 25

PNW Potato Industry

  • Processing Industry
  • Fresh Market – Table stock Russets
  • Chipping
  • Specialty – Reds, yellows, etc.
  • Dehy Industry – Potato starch, flour,

etc.

slide-26
SLIDE 26
  • Develop new russet potatoes
  • Dual purpose russet varieties (ID)
  • Individual market oriented russet varieties (OR)
  • Breeding for resistance to major pests and diseases
  • PVY, Verticillium wilt, Zebra Chip, TRV, PMTV, CRKN, Scab etc.
  • Breeding of specialty potatoes
  • Reds/yellows/purples
  • High anthocyanins, minerals, carotenoids, Nutrients, Flavor
  • Breeding for cold sweetening resistance and high nutrient

efficiency

  • Low acrylamide, low N input

Breeding Objectives

Overall Goal: Release & commercialize new potato varieties that will directly benefit all segments of the PNW potato industry

slide-27
SLIDE 27
  • Serious pathogen -

cause severe disease

  • n potato
  • A gene, RMc1(blb),

controlling resistance derived from Solanum bulbocastanum has been identified and used in breeding resistant potato lines.

Russet Burbank root s susceptible to

  • M. chitwoodi

SB 22 roots resistant to

  • M. chitwoodi

External Symptom Internal Symptom

Columbia Root Knot Nematode

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Solanum bulbocastanum Dunal

  • Wild, diploid potato
  • Source of late blight resistance genes
  • Source of tuber resistance to

Columbia Root Knot Nematode (CRKN)

  • Accession SB22

(PI 275187)

slide-29
SLIDE 29

BWA VCF Tools Samtools

Resistant Susceptible Illumina Hi-seq 2000 SB22 genome Resistant Susceptible

SNP calling 68,180 contigs

Genome alignments

Identification of Molecular Markers

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Steve Strauss Distinguished Professor Oregon State University Steve.Strauss@OregonState.Edu

Genetically Engineered Trees

slide-31
SLIDE 31
  • Genetic engineering approaches to tree breeding,

with a focus on poplar (cottonwood) and eucalypts

  • Emphasis on containment for social and regulatory

acceptance given wild relatives, long distance gene flow capability

  • Genomic analysis of role of structural

polymorphisms in poplar heterosis

  • GWAS analysis of genes that control variation in

capability for genetic engineering (major new, $4 million NSF project)

Focus in Strauss lab

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Study organisms: Poplar plantations

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Rapid cycling eucalypts recently proven in Strauss laboratory

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Field trials: Coleopteran resistant Bt- cottonwoods in eastern Oregon field trial

Control GE

slide-35
SLIDE 35

August 2015

RNA interference for sterility (suppression of endogenous flowering genes)

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Policy analysis relevant to GE crops and trees – many lab contributions

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Vegetable Breeding & Genetics

 Various species

 Snap beans  Snap peas  Broccoli  Tomatos  Cucurbits

 Traditional and

  • rganic production
slide-38
SLIDE 38

Disease Resistance in Bean

 Genetic resistance in beans to Fusarium

root rot

 Screened 148 bean varieties in Oregon  Associated morphological traits to

resistance

 Used Single Nucleotide Polymorphism

(SNP) to identify markers for MAS

 Created a linkage map

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Indigo Rose Tomato

 Introgressed

chromosomal segments from a wild relative into tomato

 High levels of

healthful flavanoids

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Ornamental Breeding & Genetics

 Various landscape

  • rnamentals

 Maples  Cape hyacinth  Sweetbox  Flowering currant  Many others

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Plant Sterility

 Genetic work to support plant

breeding effort

 Ploidy manipulation to induce sterility

(ie. triploids) in nonnative species

 Mutagenesis via chemical and physical

means

 Traditional genetic research (ex.

heritability)

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Genetic Work

 Interspecific

hybridization in Lilac

 Heritability of floral

traits in Hibiscus syriacus

 Cytogenetics of

various woody shrubs

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Winter Wheat Breeding Program

 Soft white winter wheat

 Cakes, cookies, pancakes

 Hard white winter wheat

 Noodles, bread

 Hard red winter wheat

 Bread, rolls, cereal

Bob Zemetra

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Program Goal

 Increase profitability of growing

wheat for Oregon producers

 How:

 Boost production - yield  Decrease costs - disease resistance  Boost demand - high quality

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Disease Resistance

 In some cases, genetic resistance is

the only option

 Barley Yellow Dwarf (BYDV)  Wheat Mosaic Virus (sbWMV)

 Viruses have a great impact on yield

and quality

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Barley Yellow Dwarf Virus

 30-40% yield

loss

 Resistance gene

bdv2 from Oklahoma germplasm

 Moving gene into

Oregon germplasm

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Wheat Mosaic Virus

 Soil-borne  Only control is

genetic resistance

 sbwm1 gene

from midwest and New York

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Infected seed Non-infected seed Disease can also reduce quality

  • Fusarium head blight
slide-49
SLIDE 49

Fusarium head blight

  • Fungal disease that infects the head

and seed

  • Disease reduces yield and seed quality
  • Pathogen produces a toxin making the

seed useless for animal and human consumption

  • Source of resistance gene Fhb1 and

QTLs – Michigan and New York germplasm

  • Breeding program transferring Fhb1

and QTL for FHB resistance into OSU germplasm

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Other Programs

 Jennifer Kling - Quantitative genetics  Kelly Vining - Mint breeding &

genomics

 Laurent Deluc - Grape genomics  Chad Finn - USDA, Berry breeding &

genetics