Phase II of National Solidarity Program (NSP) Ahmadzai, Azmat, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

phase ii of national
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Phase II of National Solidarity Program (NSP) Ahmadzai, Azmat, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Ev Evaluating aluating Im Impact: act: Tu Turning ning Promises omises in into to Ev Evid idence ence Phase II of National Solidarity Program (NSP) Ahmadzai, Azmat, Celine, Ismati, Shahim Kathmandu, Nepal February 2010 1.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Ev Evaluating aluating Im Impact: act: Tu Turning ning Promises

  • mises in

into to Ev Evid idence ence

Ahmadzai, Azmat, Celine, Ismati, Shahim Kathmandu, Nepal February 2010

Phase II of National Solidarity Program (NSP)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

  • 1. Background

The National Solidarity Programme (NSP) first began as a component of the Emergency Community Empowerment & Public Works Project in June 2002.

It became a full fledged National Priority Programme (NPP) in 2003 under Afghanistan’s National Development Framework

Over the last several years has grown to become the government’s flagship programme that is nationally executed.

Social Capital – Creation of CDCs, Training, used as the local institution,

Physical Capital – CDCs receive block grants, prioritize its projects and implement

Financial Capital – CDCs receive fund in their bank account, control over financial resources, contribute minimum 10%, practice collection of fund for immediate needs.

Current status:

75% of rural Afghanistan is covered, 29000 villages, 22000 CDCs,

$700 Million, provided to CDCs as Block grants since 2003

35000 small scale sub projects are completed and more than 15000 are ongoing,

Achieve national coverage, 22000 to 31000 CDCs, 29000 villages to 42000.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

  • 2. Results Chain

Inputs Activities Outputs Outcomes Long term Outcomes

  • CDCs

recognized as village council and managed village budgets

  • CDCs
  • versee all

the developmenta l funds and interventions

  • Increased

economic activities

  • fund
  • Human

resources

  • Material
  • Hire facilitating

partners

  • Re-elect the CDCs
  • Revise CDP and

prioritize sub projects

  • Training of CDC

members

  • Provision of funds
  • Implementation of sub

projects

  • Link CDCs to INGOs

and government authorities

  • Assist the finalization
  • f sub national

governance policy (SNGP)

  • CDCs recognized by

community as the legitimate local government institution

  • decisions made

Inclusively, development funds managed in accountable manner

  • CDCs reached by

government and other development actors

  • Solidarity and

cohesion strengthened within the community

  • FPs hired

/contracted in 34 provinces of the country

  • CDCs re elected
  • CDPs revised and

the sub projects are identified

  • Fund received by

CDCS

  • CDCs trained
  • Sub projects

implemented and completed

  • CDCs are used as

entry point for development activities

  • SNGP is finalised
slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

  • 3. Primary Research Questions

 Who is the most effective and efficient at

implementing NSP:

  • NGOs
  • NSP staff
  • MRRD

 Which approach of monitoring is the most

effective and efficient way?

  • Community Participatory Monitoring

(CPM)

  • Third Party Monitoring
slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

  • 4. Outcome Indicators

 Mobilization: Number of steps followed in

  • perational manual

 Transparency: Secret ballot election carried out  Accountability: Social audit meetings conducted  Training: Number of trainings conducted  Number of completed sub projects  Number of sub projects used by community  Sustainability: Number of CDCs functional,

Number of sub projects functional

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

  • 5. Identification Strategy/Method

 Using ex-ante matching method to find

three sets of three similar districts each;

 Randomly allocate implementing agencies

within each set of similar districts;

 Compare performance between

implementing agencies using district fixed effects and controlling for village characteristics

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

  • 6. Sample and data

 Pilot in subset of the country (34

provinces, 359 districts and 25,000 communities)

 NSP will hire a specialist to compute the

power calculation for sample size

 To be determined number of villages in

each district (randomly chosen)

 Village level data  Mix existing evaluation data, monitoring

data and ad-hoc surveys

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

  • 7. Time Frame/Work Plan

 Three years: whole length of project cycle  Work plan: two surveys

  • First

survey before starting the implementation of sub projects

  • End line survey by completion of sub

projects and full utilization of block grant

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

  • 8. Sources of Financing

 NSP budget