Ev Evaluating aluating Im Impact: act: Tu Turning ning Promises
- mises in
into to Ev Evid idence ence
Ahmadzai, Azmat, Celine, Ismati, Shahim Kathmandu, Nepal February 2010
Phase II of National Solidarity Program (NSP) Ahmadzai, Azmat, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Ev Evaluating aluating Im Impact: act: Tu Turning ning Promises omises in into to Ev Evid idence ence Phase II of National Solidarity Program (NSP) Ahmadzai, Azmat, Celine, Ismati, Shahim Kathmandu, Nepal February 2010 1.
Ahmadzai, Azmat, Celine, Ismati, Shahim Kathmandu, Nepal February 2010
2
The National Solidarity Programme (NSP) first began as a component of the Emergency Community Empowerment & Public Works Project in June 2002.
It became a full fledged National Priority Programme (NPP) in 2003 under Afghanistan’s National Development Framework
Over the last several years has grown to become the government’s flagship programme that is nationally executed.
Social Capital – Creation of CDCs, Training, used as the local institution,
Physical Capital – CDCs receive block grants, prioritize its projects and implement
Financial Capital – CDCs receive fund in their bank account, control over financial resources, contribute minimum 10%, practice collection of fund for immediate needs.
Current status:
75% of rural Afghanistan is covered, 29000 villages, 22000 CDCs,
$700 Million, provided to CDCs as Block grants since 2003
35000 small scale sub projects are completed and more than 15000 are ongoing,
Achieve national coverage, 22000 to 31000 CDCs, 29000 villages to 42000.
3
Inputs Activities Outputs Outcomes Long term Outcomes
recognized as village council and managed village budgets
the developmenta l funds and interventions
economic activities
resources
partners
prioritize sub projects
members
projects
and government authorities
governance policy (SNGP)
community as the legitimate local government institution
Inclusively, development funds managed in accountable manner
government and other development actors
cohesion strengthened within the community
/contracted in 34 provinces of the country
the sub projects are identified
CDCS
implemented and completed
entry point for development activities
4
Who is the most effective and efficient at
Which approach of monitoring is the most
5
Mobilization: Number of steps followed in
Transparency: Secret ballot election carried out Accountability: Social audit meetings conducted Training: Number of trainings conducted Number of completed sub projects Number of sub projects used by community Sustainability: Number of CDCs functional,
Number of sub projects functional
6
Using ex-ante matching method to find
Randomly allocate implementing agencies
Compare performance between
7
Pilot in subset of the country (34
NSP will hire a specialist to compute the
To be determined number of villages in
Village level data Mix existing evaluation data, monitoring
8
Three years: whole length of project cycle Work plan: two surveys
9
NSP budget