Phase 2 Working Group Meeting #1 April 29, 2019 3 Agenda 2 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

phase 2 working group meeting 1
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Phase 2 Working Group Meeting #1 April 29, 2019 3 Agenda 2 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Phase 2 Working Group Meeting #1 April 29, 2019 3 Agenda 2 Introduction Recap of Phase 1 results Phase 2 implementation plan review Public comment 4 Introduction 3 Welcome Secretary Jennifer Cohan, Delaware


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Phase 2 Working Group Meeting #1

April 29, 2019

3

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda

  • Introduction
  • Recap of Phase 1 results
  • Phase 2 implementation plan review
  • Public comment

2

4

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction

  • Welcome
  • Secretary Jennifer Cohan,

Delaware Department of Transportation

  • Todd Lawson, Sussex County
  • Self-introductions
  • Summary of notebook materials
  • Agenda
  • Presentation
  • Phase 2 implementation plan
  • Discussion of Working Group guidelines

3

5

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Working group guidelines

  • Expectations
  • Participate actively

throughout the process

  • 11 of the 20 Working Group members

must be present to meet

  • Represent broader views

in addition to individual views

  • Offer suggestions to

DelDOT and Sussex County

4

6

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Working group guidelines

  • How we treat each other
  • Each member has an equal right to speak and ask questions.
  • Each member is encouraged to share individual viewpoints.

Individual opinions are valid whether others agree with them

  • r not.
  • We will listen to, respect and seek to understand the views of
  • thers, particularly those perspectives that differ from our
  • wn.
  • Disagreements will be explored, not suppressed.
  • We will be courteous when addressing other committee

members, staff and consultants.

  • We will refrain from interrupting each other, staff or

consultants.

  • We will keep our comments relevant to the topic under

discussion.

  • We will focus on opportunities for the future, not past issues.

5

7

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Working group guidelines

  • How we communicate
  • Ideas discussed within the Working Group should not be

presented as representing the position of the Working Group without the agreement of the Working Group.

  • When speaking about the work of the Working Group outside
  • f meetings, members are speaking for themselves only

unless speaking from approved documents or positions of the Working Group.

  • In order to comply with FOIA, email communications between

members of the Working Group should be sent through the DelDOT project team.

6

8

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Recap of Phase 1 results

9

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Recap of Phase 1 results

  • Partnership between

DelDOT and Sussex County

  • Goal of Phase 1 was to develop

recommendations to improve local traffic circulation at Five Points and in the surrounding area

  • Guided by a Working Group representing a

cross section of the community

8

10

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Recap of Phase 1 results

9

11

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Recap of Phase 1 results

I.G. Burton Todd Lawson George Cole

  • Sen. Ernesto B. Lopez

Robert Fischer Lloyd Schmitz Dennis Forney

  • Rep. Peter Schwartzkopf

Scott Green

  • Rep. Steve Smyk
  • R. Keller Hopkins

Josh Thomas Christian Hudson Ann Marie Townshend DJ Hughes Gail Van Gilder

10

  • 10 WG meetings
  • 2 public workshops

12

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Recap of Phase 1 results

78 recommendations in five categories (see handout)

11

13

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Recap of Phase 1 results

7 recommendations (Category A) are being addressed by current DelDOT projects and initiatives, including:

  • Modifications to current capital projects:

Route 1/Minos Conaway Road, Route 24, Plantation Road

  • Route 24 North Millsboro Bypass
  • Route 1 Corridor Capacity Preservation

Program

12

14

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Recap of Phase 1 results

27 recommendations (Category B) are to “implement policies and procedures to make the area more efficient, sustainable and beautiful.” Eight priorities were identified, including:

  • Updates to development regulations
  • Signing improvements
  • Advancing TIDs
  • Parking management system
  • Advance acquisition process improvements

(now complete)

13

15

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Recap of Phase 1 results

20 recommendations (Category C) are to “make the most of existing roadway infrastructure.” Ten priorities were identified, including:

  • Study to widen US 9
  • Various intersection improvements
  • Canary Creek bridge on New Road
  • Selected improvements on existing roads
  • Continued signal timing/phasing improvements

14

16

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Recap of Phase 1 results

15 recommendations (Category D) are to “make walking, bicycling, and transit more viable as alternatives to driving.” Six priorities were identified, including:

  • Transit service improvements
  • Walking/bicycling connections between

neighborhoods

  • Filling sidewalk gaps
  • Studying pedestrian bridges over Route 1

15

17

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Recap of Phase 1 results

9 recommendations (Category E) are to “invest in new infrastructure to support anticipated growth.” Three priorities were identified:

  • Study a grade separation at Five Points
  • Study a new road parallel to and west of

Plantation Road

  • Plan for grid road patterns in the area

16

18

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Recap of Phase 1 results

17

Implement policies and procedures to make the area more efficient, sustainable and beautiful (8 priorities out of 27 recommendations) Make the most of existing roadway infrastructure (8 priorities out of 20 recommendations) Make walking, bicycling, and transit more viable as alternatives to driving (5 priorities out of 15 recommendations) Invest in new infrastructure to support anticipated growth (3 priorities out of 9 recommendations)

19

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Recap of Phase 1 results

  • Commitments made

in Phase 1:

  • DelDOT and Sussex County will start to act
  • n the Working Group’s recommendations
  • The Working Group will remain involved in

Phase 2

  • DelDOT and Sussex County will report on

progress on a regular basis

18

20

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Phase 2 implementation plan

21

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Phase 2 implementation plan

  • Progress is already being made
  • 8 recommendations are complete or being

incorporated into other projects

  • 13 initiatives are in progress
  • 15 additional recommendations will be

addressed starting in 2019

  • Examples of progress to date:

20

22

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Phase 2 implementation plan

SR 1 Intersection and Median Crossover Assessment (see handout)

21

  • Collected July 2017 traffic

counts

  • Analyzed crash data from

January 2012 to March 2019

  • Developed

recommendations and compared to 2007 Corridor Capacity Preservation Program

23

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Phase 2 implementation plan

Nine short-term recommendations (see handout) Three currently in design

  • SR 5
  • Hudson Road/Steamboat

Landing Road

  • Oyster Rocks Road/Eagle

Crest Road

22

24

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Phase 2 implementation plan

Bike box on Dartmouth Drive at SR 1

23

25

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Phase 2 implementation plan

Category B complete:

  • B-4: Advance acquisition process

improvements

  • B-23: App to warn people of congestion and

recommend alternative routes

24

26

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Phase 2 implementation plan

Category B in progress:

  • B-7: Continue TID studies east and west of

Route 1

  • B-9: Study New Road per Byway Master Plan
  • B-13: Study alternatives to both meter and slow

southbound traffic approaching Five Points

  • B-21: Study emergency vehicle pre-emption
  • B-22: Require bike parking in new developments

25

27

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Phase 2 implementation plan

Category B priorities for 2019:

  • B-1: Require new development to plan for

interconnections

  • B-2: Consider additional buffers/setbacks
  • B-3: Study modifying SB signage in Milford
  • B-5: Study Arby’s driveway

26

28

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Phase 2 implementation plan

Category C complete:

  • C-2: Signal warrant study at Route 9 and Minos

Conaway Road

27

29

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Phase 2 implementation plan

  • Category C in progress:
  • C-3: Improve Old Landing and Warrington Road
  • C-4: Improve Canary Creek bridge
  • C-5: Improve Cave Neck/Sweet Briar/Hudson
  • C-9: Short-term improvements at Route

9/Plantation/Beaver Dam

  • C-10: Continue to improve traffic signal phasing,

timing, and coordination

  • C-13: Study crossovers on Route 1

28

30

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Phase 2 implementation plan

  • Category C priorities for 2019:
  • C-1: Corridor study on Route 9
  • C-7: Feasibility study for improving Minos

Conaway Road

  • C-8: Feasibility study for restriping sections of

Savannah Road with a two-way left-turn lane

  • C-19: Study all-way STOP at Beaver

Dam/Kendale

29

31

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Phase 2 implementation plan

Category D in progress:

  • D-14: Feasibility study for bicyclist left turns

from Dartmouth Drive

  • D-15: Study opportunities for pedestrian

crossings on Kings Highway and Freeman Highway

30

32

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Phase 2 implementation plan

Category D priorities for 2019:

  • D-1: Feasibility study for van or jitney service

loop

  • D-4: Study of sidewalk gaps along New Road

and Old Orchard Road

  • D-5: Study of sidewalk gaps along Savannah

Road between Lewes and Five Points

  • D-7: Feasibility study for transit service in the

Milton/Red Mill Pond/Minos Conaway Road area

31

33

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Phase 2 implementation plan

Category E priorities for 2019:

  • E-2: Study a new road parallel to and west of

Plantation Road

  • E-3: Plan for grid road patterns in the area

32

34

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Phase 2 implementation plan

  • DelDOT and Sussex County will start to act
  • n the Working Group’s recommendations
  • Draft implementation plan is in place
  • Individual projects, as they move forward,

will remain connected to the overall Five Points framework

  • Your effort will help us establish “purpose

and need” for these projects

33

35

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Phase 2 implementation plan

  • The Phase 2 Working Group

will advise on implementation

  • DelDOT and the County appreciate the

Working Group providing the local knowledge needed to implement projects successfully

34

36

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Phase 2 implementation plan

  • What will the group do?
  • Meet 2-3 times per year
  • Monitor the progress of the

implementation plan

  • Support the project development process

as champions and advocates for individual projects that arise from the Five Points Transportation Study

35

37

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Phase 2 implementation plan

  • DelDOT and Sussex County

will report on progress on a regular basis

  • Public outreach, including an annual public

workshop for the overall Five Points Transportation Study, will continue

  • An annual report will be prepared
  • As usual, public workshops will be held for

individual capital projects as they proceed

36

38

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Phase 2 implementation plan

  • Proposed next steps
  • Email stakeholders to make the public

aware of the implementation plan

  • Begin work on 2019 priorities
  • Convene the Working Group again in the fall
  • Prepare the first annual report, showing

progress made in 2019, in early 2020

  • Hold the first annual Phase 2 public

workshop in spring 2020

37

39

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Public comment

38

40

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Thank you for your participation!

Jenn Cinelli-Miller

Project Planner Delaware Department of Transportation jennifer.cinelli@delaware.gov 302.760.2549

39

41