Performance Measures Performance Management Why & Who As part - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

performance measures performance management why who
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Performance Measures Performance Management Why & Who As part - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MPO Safety Performance Measures Performance Management Why & Who As part of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) a federal rule making (23 CFR 490) was established to enact national performance management


slide-1
SLIDE 1

MPO Safety Performance Measures

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Performance Management – Why & Who

  • As part of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the

21st Century Act (MAP-21) a federal rule making (23 CFR 490) was established to enact national performance management requirements to ensure that State DOTs and Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) choose the most efficient investments for Federal transportation funds.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Performance Management – When & Where

  • Safety Performance Management Final

Rule first published to Federal Register March 15, 2016

– 23 CFR Part 924 updated Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) – 23 CRF Part 490 added National Performance Management Measures for Safety

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Performance Management - What

To address this 5 performance measures to assess performance and carry out the Highway Safety Improvement Program were established:

  • 1. Number of fatalities
  • 2. Rate of fatalities per 100 Million VMT
  • 3. Number of serious injuries
  • 4. Rate of serious injuries per 100 Million VMT
  • 5. Number of combined non-motorized fatalities and non-

motorized serious injuries

slide-5
SLIDE 5

2017 Strategic Highway Safety Plan

http://www.penndot.gov/TravelInPA/Safety/Documents/P A%20SHSP%202017-02-15%20(HRRR%20Errata).pdf

  • The goal established in

the SHSP was to reduce fatalities and serious injuries by 2% annually

  • This would result in a

PA specific SHSP goal to reduce 120 fatalities and 305 serious injuries over 5 years

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Considerations for Performance Goal

  • Nationally there was an increase of over 7% in

each of the last two years

  • Toward Zero Deaths Vision sets a national

aspirational goal to eliminate fatalities

  • National goal established by National Highway

Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to eliminate fatalities in 30 years

  • Autonomous vehicles will become more evolved

between 2025 and 2030 but the impacts remain unknown

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Considerations for Performance Goal

  • PA data has shown a 1% fatality reduction based
  • n historical state data
  • Based on all these considerations a 2% reduction

goal was established to continue to push numbers downward to support national goals. The Department felt this was a stretch goal but still obtainable based on PA’s current data.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Recent PA Trends

1,365 1,329 1,277 1,265 1,240 1,220 1,191 1,178 3,693 3,556 3,432 3,340 3,235 3,434 3,605 3,800 2,000 2,200 2,400 2,600 2,800 3,000 3,200 3,400 3,600 3,800 4,000 1,100 1,150 1,200 1,250 1,300 1,350 1,400

Serious Injuries Fatalities

5-year Average Fatalities 5-year Average Fatality Goals 5-year Average Serious Injuries 5-year Average Serious Injury Goals

* Definition change occurred for serious injuries *

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Serious Injury Definition

  • Agencies must use the definition for "Suspected

Serious Injury (A)" from the MMUCC, 4th edition by April 15, 2019.

  • Pennsylvania converted to this definition in

January of 2016.

  • This conversion resulted in approximately 1,000

more suspected serious injuries than we previously had major injuries.

  • As a result, the targets for serious injuries and

serious injury rate will appear to be going up for the next 4 years even though we are targeting a 2% reduction annually.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Performance Management - Statewide

For each of the 5 measures the State will be using a 2% annual reduction as our target.

Performance Measure 5-year Rolling Averages TARGET ACTUAL BASELINE 2014-2018 2014-2018 2012-2016 Number of Fatalities 1,177.6 1,220.2 Fatality Rate 1.161 1.220 Number of Serious Injuries 3,799.8 3,434.0 Serious Injury Rate 3.746 3.433 Number of Non-motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries 654.4 602.4

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Performance Management – Scranton / WB

For planning purposes the MPO should consider the above values to support the State in meeting the 2% annual reduction target.

Performance Measure 5-year Rolling Averages TARGET ACTUAL BASELINE 2014-2018 2014-2018 2012-2016 Number of Fatalities 53.2 55.6 Fatality Rate 1.154 1.230 Number of Serious Injuries 172.0 146.4 Serious Injury Rate 4.344 3.612 Number of Non-motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries 27.9 27.6

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Performance Management - When

PennDOT targets established Aug. 31, 2017 MPOs establish targets or support PennDOT targets by Feb. 28, 2018

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Performance Management - When

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Performance Management - When

Language being developed to help describe how STIP/TIP contributes to achieving performance targets

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Supporting Links

  • FHWA Safety Performance

Management Fact Sheet

  • FHWA Metropolitan Planning

Organization Safety Performance Measures Fact Sheet

  • 2017 Pennsylvania Strategic

Highway Safety Plan

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Questions

Kristin Mulkerin

Transportation Planning Manager (717) 783-2430 kmulkerin@pa.gov