Performance Evaluations Workshop Districtwide Managers Meeting - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

performance evaluations workshop
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Performance Evaluations Workshop Districtwide Managers Meeting - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Performance Evaluations Workshop Districtwide Managers Meeting Presented by: Dr. Paul Parnell, Chancellor Samerah Campbell, Director of Human Resources Julianna D. Mosier, Vice Chancellor, Human Resources November 2, 2018 Agenda


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Performance Evaluations Workshop

Districtwide Managers’ Meeting Presented by:

  • Dr. Paul Parnell, Chancellor

Samerah Campbell, Director of Human Resources Julianna D. Mosier, Vice Chancellor, Human Resources November 2, 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda

  • Introduction – Dr. Parnell
  • Importance of Evaluations
  • Addressing Accreditation Recommendation
  • Overcoming Barriers
  • Instructions
  • Report Out
  • Actions Plans
  • Instructions
  • Report Out
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Importance of Performance Evaluations

 Communication tool

  • Critical tool for supervisors, managers

and peer evaluators to ensure regular, constructive feedback to employees

  • S

hould be utilized to give honest, clear, relevant, and meaningful feedback

  • If properly done,
  • Recognizes good performance; and
  • Identifies specific performance

deficiencies

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Importance of Performance Evaluations

 Recruitment/ Advancement Tool

  • Develop faculty and staff to

support students and programs

  • Assessment tool during hiring

process and for promotional

  • pportunities
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Importance of Performance Evaluations

 Legal tool

  • S

erve as the District’s official record of the employee’s work performance.

  • S

upport disciplinary actions

  • S

erve as important evidence in legal proceedings

  • Help defend grievances and other

legal claims

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Importance of Performance Evaluations

Accreditation, Standard III, A. “ 5. The institution assures the effectiveness of its human resources by evaluating all personnel systematically and at stated intervals. The institution establishes written criteria for evaluating all personnel, including performance of assigned duties and participation in institutional responsibilities and

  • ther activities appropriate to their expertise.

Evaluation processes seek to assess effectiveness of personnel and encourage improvement. Actions taken following evaluations are formal, timely, and documented.”

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Performance Management Cycle

Set goals and

  • bjectives

Provide continual feedback Isolate performance issues, provide coaching/ training Evaluate & measure performance progress Recognize & reinforce positive performance Review job description and duties Ensure employee trained to perform essential duties

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Employee Type Initial Evaluation Regular Evaluation Cycle New Employee 4 month probationary Annually on original hire date Lateral Transfer N/ A Annually on original hire date Transfer to new classification 4 month probationary Annually on transfer date Promotion 4 month probationary Annually on promotion date Employee Type Initial Evaluation Schedule Regular Evaluation Cycle Confidential 2, 5, 11 month probationary Every other year on hire date or in case of promotion or transfer, new hire date is established (with the exception of lateral transfers) POA 5, 11 month probationary Annually on hire date or in case of promotion a new hire date is established Employee Type Initial Evaluations Regular Evaluation Cycle New Manager or Promotion/ Transfer 3rd month 8th month 11th month Annually for next 3 years Every other year (after 4th year)

CSEA Employee Evaluations Confidential & POA Employee Evaluations Classified Management Evaluations

(CS EA full-time, part-time, seasonal, and flexible employees)

Evaluation Intervals

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Employee Type Initial Evaluation Regular Evaluation Cycle Tenure Track Faculty (Contract) Every Fall semester Note: Zero semester Annually on original hire date Tenure Faculty S ee above Once every three (3) academic years Categorical Faculty/ Temporary Full Time/ Part Time 1st semester 2nd and/ or 3rd semester Every six (6) semesters of service thereafter Non-Cabinet Level Academic Administrators Annually for the first two (2) years on June 30th Every two (2) years thereafter due on June 30th Cabinet Level Academic Administrators Annually Annually on June 30th

Faculty and Academic Administrator Evaluations

Evaluation Intervals

slide-10
SLIDE 10

District Recommendation #2 (Compliance) In order to meet the standard, the team recommends that the District ensure all personnel are systematically evaluated at stated intervals in accordance with the bargaining agreements and Board policies. (III.A.5)

Accreditation Recommendation

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Follow-up report due: October 1, 2019

  • Less than 12 months to bring evaluations

current

  • 340+ classified and classified management

evaluations past due

  • 360+ full-time faculty and academic

management evaluations past due

  • 1,000+ part-time faculty evaluations past

due

Accreditation Recommendation

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Table Exercise #1 (15 minutes): With the colleagues at your table, spend 15 minutes identifying barriers manager’s have to completing past due evaluations and ensuring going forward that all evaluations are completed by the stated intervals. Then identify solutions to how we as a district can overcome those barriers. Report Out (10 minutes): Identify one person as your table’s spokesperson to report out.

Overcoming Barriers

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Table Exercise #2 (45 minutes): With your VC or VP , develop action plans to (1) complete past due evaluations and (2) ensure future evaluations are completed at stated intervals. Report Out (20 minutes): Identify one person as your table’s spokesperson to report out.

Action Plans

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Any Questions? You Can Do It!