Evalutation of E Evalutation of E-
- newspaper
Evalutation of E- -newspaper newspaper Evalutation of E - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Evalutation of E- -newspaper newspaper Evalutation of E prototypes prototypes E- -newspaper prototypes: newspaper prototypes: E User evaluations and tests User evaluations and tests Evaluations of 3 E Evaluations of 3 E- -newspaper
5 minutes of free browsing/reading to let the user get familiar with the prototype with the prototype
A number of tasks were then given the user. The first tasks lead the reader to the first page, index page and the index of the the reader to the first page, index page and the index of the different sections of the paper different sections of the paper
The main test continued with task oriented navigation (finding articles). Problems were observed and noted and after every articles). Problems were observed and noted and after every finished task, questions about perceived problems were asked finished task, questions about perceived problems were asked
The test was finished with an interview about usability and navigation specific questions navigation specific questions
Observations and interviews: Observations and interviews:
A lot of respondents had trouble to know under which section an article could be found an article could be found
Half of the testpersons used the t.o.c during their search for
Most people had trouble finding information on the t.o.c due to the amount of presented information the amount of presented information
Non of the users really browsed the newspaper, most users navigated through the section index’s thumbnails to the navigated through the section index’s thumbnails to the articles articles
Concluding interviews: Concluding interviews:
– ”... if links from the main index would have worked it would be great”.
Concluding interviews (cont.): Concluding interviews (cont.):
Support movement of hand and change of grip grip
– Thumb moves and ends up where you put your hand (”thumb”)
The basic functions of ”the thumb” navigation navigation
– Sequential reading – ”Hide function” (step1 & 2) – Forward and backward ”page turning” (step1 & 2) – Access to menu (step 2)
– Access to Index (step 2)
Step 1 Step 2
Observations and interviews: Observations and interviews:
Most of the navigational aid was used without any trouble.
3 users had big problems using ”the thumb navigation”, the rest used used mainly this navigational aid mainly this navigational aid
In all but one case the test persons misunderstood the index page e which only contained links to sections and not articles which only contained links to sections and not articles
In most cases there was no trouble finding information on the index dex page and therefore most users got to the right section. Half of page and therefore most users got to the right section. Half of the the users reported perceived problems as: users reported perceived problems as:
– ”I want a shortcut.” – ”I don’t want to browse to find what I’m looking for.” – ”I had to browse a long time.”
For the other half of the users there were no observations of any y critical problems regarding navigation and these users did not critical problems regarding navigation and these users did not perceive any problems. perceive any problems.
Concluding interviews: Concluding interviews:
11 persons felt it was easy to find, but most of them had comments like: comments like:
– ”The news were far inside the newspaper” – ”Relatively easy, however, I would like the headings of the articles function as hyperlinks”
The suggested changes from the users were to incorporate hyperlinks to the articles on the index page and the possibility hyperlinks to the articles on the index page and the possibility to browse back on the article level. to browse back on the article level.
Half of the test persons thought the “thumb navigation” was easy to use. easy to use.
All but one thought the navigational aid was easy to learn
Concluding interviews (cont.): Concluding interviews (cont.):
Overall the users were positive to the information structure. Some users suggested that the index page should be Some users suggested that the index page should be rearranged to match the traditional paper rearranged to match the traditional paper
Some users also reported that it was hard to find information
8 users thought it was easy to get an overview of the information and 4 of these mentioned the first page as the information and 4 of these mentioned the first page as the reason and 3 mentioned the index page reason and 3 mentioned the index page
11 users said it was hard to get a feeling of how much information the prototype contained and 8 users said it was information the prototype contained and 8 users said it was hard to get a feeling for what was read and what was not. hard to get a feeling for what was read and what was not.
(first page, section index and articles)
hyperlinks on the right menu and on the first page and section indexes
through the arrows in the bottom menu
Observations and interviews: Observations and interviews:
Concluding interviews: Concluding interviews:
All 12 users said it was easy to navigate and find information. The The most mentioned reason was the menu on the right, but also the most mentioned reason was the menu on the right, but also the
s (and also the structure of the section indexes) (and also the structure of the section indexes)
All users said that they understood how to browse.
2 users suggested to change the browse function (the arrows in the he menu) to mimic the functionality on the web: menu) to mimic the functionality on the web:
– ”More as on the web, back to where i were and not one page back. I would probably read in the same way as on the web and not as I read on paper”.
All users were positive to the menus in the prototype and reported that ed that the navigational aid was easy to learn the navigational aid was easy to learn
The test persons were also very positive regarding the information
structure of the newspaper structure of the newspaper
Concluding interviews (cont.): Concluding interviews (cont.):
9 users thought it was easy to get an overview of the information due to the right menu information due to the right menu
2 users said that they would like more informative pages and said that the first page did not support an overview said that the first page did not support an overview
Only 2 users reported to get a feeling of what was read and what not: what not:
– ”That is harder, maybe easier if you browse” – ”Not as well as in the traditional newspaper”. – ”Hard to know how much information the paper contains [pause], very hard”. (The user did not notice the section and pagination marker in the bottom of the newspaper)
Based on the results, the following “guidelines” can be suggested be suggested: :
– 4 “levels” of information seems preferred:
– The index page should be structured based on the traditional newspaper and it is preferred to present page numbers to support sequential reading – The E-newspaper should contain the same sections as the traditional newspaper – Don’t present to much information in to few sections (task oriented navigation) – The users need a navigational aid that support direct navigation from all information levels (task oriented navigation)
– To support an overview of the information, thumbnails of pages seems to provide a good solution – The most preferred pagination system was the one based on the traditional newspaper. – The users preferred a pagination system that also incorporate the total amount of pages to support the feeling of how much information the E- newspaper contained – Feedback that an article is spanning over many pages should be incorporated