Pavement Rehabilitation by In-Situ Recycling - A Case Study on - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

pavement rehabilitation by in situ recycling
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Pavement Rehabilitation by In-Situ Recycling - A Case Study on - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

16 th SINGAPORE SYMPOSIUM ON PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGY (SPT 2011) 16 th SINGAPORE SYMPOSIUM ON PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGY (SPT 2011) 27 May 2011 Engineering Auditorium, National University of Singapore, Singapore Pavement Rehabilitation by In-Situ Recycling


slide-1
SLIDE 1

16th SINGAPORE SYMPOSIUM ON PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGY (SPT 2011) 16th SINGAPORE SYMPOSIUM ON PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGY (SPT 2011) 27 May 2011 Engineering Auditorium, National University of Singapore, Singapore

Pavement Rehabilitation by In-Situ Recycling

  • A Case Study on Seaport Container Yard & Road

Tan, P. C., Daud, Lee, M. Dr Wu, D.Q. Chemilink Technologies Group, Singapore

slide-2
SLIDE 2

16th SINGAPORE SYMPOSIUM ON PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGY (SPT 2011)

Contents

  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Evaluation Criteria
  • 3. In-Situ Stabilization Process & Technical

Performances

  • 4. Benefits of In-Situ Recycling in Environment Aspect
  • 5. Conclusions
  • 6. Acknowledgements
slide-3
SLIDE 3

16th SINGAPORE SYMPOSIUM ON PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGY (SPT 2011)

1. Introduction * Due to weak and soft foundation, most of the seaports in this region experience substantial settlement issue over time * Northport (Port Klang) is one of the oldest seaport in Malaysia encountered serious differential settlement in most port facilities including container yards and internal roads * Maintenance and upgrading of G-Block Container Yard was conducted in 2010 to rectify differential settlement issue and upgrade the container stacking capacity

slide-4
SLIDE 4

16th SINGAPORE SYMPOSIUM ON PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGY (SPT 2011)

Existing Condition

slide-5
SLIDE 5

16th SINGAPORE SYMPOSIUM ON PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGY (SPT 2011)

2. Evaluation Criteria 2-2 Construction Speed and Timing 2-1 Structural Design & Reliability 2-4 Environmental Impact 2-3 Cost Effectiveness

Major Considerations:

slide-6
SLIDE 6

16th SINGAPORE SYMPOSIUM ON PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGY (SPT 2011)

2. Evaluation Criteria  High Loading  Sub-grade conditions – marine clay with high tidal level  Long term performances and reliability

2-1 Structural Design & Reliability

slide-7
SLIDE 7

16th SINGAPORE SYMPOSIUM ON PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGY (SPT 2011)

Typical Container Stacking Section

91

slide-8
SLIDE 8

16th SINGAPORE SYMPOSIUM ON PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGY (SPT 2011)

High localized point loading – 30 ton per point

slide-9
SLIDE 9

16th SINGAPORE SYMPOSIUM ON PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGY (SPT 2011)

2. Evaluation Criteria  Higher construction unit rate  Shorter project duration  Safer construction activities

2-2 Construction Speed

slide-10
SLIDE 10

16th SINGAPORE SYMPOSIUM ON PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGY (SPT 2011)

2. Evaluation Criteria

2-3 Cost Effectiveness

 Overall Costs  Short Term Construction & related costs  Long Term Maintenance & related costs

slide-11
SLIDE 11

16th SINGAPORE SYMPOSIUM ON PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGY (SPT 2011)

2. Evaluation Criteria

2-4 Environmental Impact

 Environment friendly  Less excavation and backfilling  Less ground movements caused by vehicles, machines and manpower  Less port security control and coordination works

slide-12
SLIDE 12

16th SINGAPORE SYMPOSIUM ON PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGY (SPT 2011)

2. Evaluation Criteria

 Final Pavement Design

Typical Cross Section of Container Yard Rehabilitation

slide-13
SLIDE 13

16th SINGAPORE SYMPOSIUM ON PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGY (SPT 2011)

2. Evaluation Criteria

 Final Pavement Design

Typical Cross Section of Container Yard Rehabilitation Combination of Rigid Pavement and In-situ Recycling

slide-14
SLIDE 14

16th SINGAPORE SYMPOSIUM ON PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGY (SPT 2011)

3. In-Situ Recycling Process & Technical Performances

 Definition:

“Mixing proper chemicals with in-situ soils to improve/strengthen the soil properties through chemical reactions for engineering purposes.”

 Design requirements:

 UCS  2.0 MPa (7-d)  CBR  120% (7-d)  Compaction Degree  95%

slide-15
SLIDE 15

16th SINGAPORE SYMPOSIUM ON PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGY (SPT 2011)

3. In-Situ Recycling Process & Technical Performances

 3 Major Steps Step 1: Spreading Step 2: In-Situ Mixing Step 3: Compaction

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16th SINGAPORE SYMPOSIUM ON PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGY (SPT 2011)

3. In-Situ Recycling Process & Technical Performances

 Quality Control Field Density Test Re-mould UCS Test Re-mould CBR Test

slide-17
SLIDE 17

16th SINGAPORE SYMPOSIUM ON PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGY (SPT 2011)

3. In-Situ Recycling Process & Technical Performances  Quality Control – Chemilink SS-108/SS-111 Stabilization Ave UCS (7-d): 2.9MPa Ave CBR (7-d): 141.5%

Project: Proposed Development of RTG G-Block and Associated Work at Container Terminal 1 For Northport (Malaysia) Berhad. Project Duration: June 2010-March 2011 Testing carried out by: Geolab(M) Sdn Bhd (Accredited Lab)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

16th SINGAPORE SYMPOSIUM ON PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGY (SPT 2011)

First Phase in Operation

slide-19
SLIDE 19

16th SINGAPORE SYMPOSIUM ON PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGY (SPT 2011)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

16th SINGAPORE SYMPOSIUM ON PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGY (SPT 2011)

4. Benefits of In-Situ Recycling in the Environment Aspect Benefits

 Better Technical Performances  Cost Saving and Overall Cost Effectiveness  Simpler and Faster Construction  Less Materials Transportation  Limited Disturbances to Port Operations  Environment Friendly

slide-21
SLIDE 21

16th SINGAPORE SYMPOSIUM ON PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGY (SPT 2011)

4. Benefits of In-Situ Recycling in the Environment Aspect

Comparison Item Conventional Replacement Method In-Situ Recycling Method Imported Material? Yes Graded Aggregate Yes Stabilizing Agent Quantity of Imported Materials 58,650 ton 1380 ton Construction Waste Created? Yes No Quantity of Construction Waste 25,500 m3 ZERO Transportation Required 7,200 trips 69 trips

slide-22
SLIDE 22

16th SINGAPORE SYMPOSIUM ON PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGY (SPT 2011)

  • 5. Conclusions

1) Rehabilitation of Northport G-Block container yard and roads were completed in mid 2011 2) Comprehensive project planning and methodology evaluation are critical for the smooth and on-time project completion 3) The In-situ Stabilization Method was adopted with significant advantages and benefits 4) Technical performance to-date is satisfactory

slide-23
SLIDE 23

16th SINGAPORE SYMPOSIUM ON PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGY (SPT 2011)

Acknowledgements

 Northport (Malaysia) Bhd  Emenea Engineering Services Sdn Bhd  Trans Resources Corporation Bhd  MTS Construction Sdn Bhd

slide-24
SLIDE 24

16th SINGAPORE SYMPOSIUM ON PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGY (SPT 2011)