Participating centers USA: 6 Europe: 8 Australia: 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

participating centers
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Participating centers USA: 6 Europe: 8 Australia: 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Participating centers USA: 6 Europe: 8 Australia: 1 Classification system based on degree of atrial structural remodeling/fibrosis DECAAF Results Total Enrolled n=329 poor quality useable pre-ablation MRIs pre-ablation MRIs n=57


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Participating centers

USA: 6 Europe: 8 Australia: 1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Classification system based on degree

  • f atrial structural remodeling/fibrosis
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Total Enrolled n=329 poor quality pre-ablation MRIs n=57 (17.3%) useable pre-ablation MRIs n=272 (82.7%) Lost to follow-up n=12 (4.4%) Completed follow-up n=260 (95.6%)

DECAAF Results

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Model 1: Unadjusted Model 2: Adjusted for participating center Model 3: Adjusted for age, gender and participating center Model 4: Adjusted for age, gender, hypertension (HTN), congestive heart failure (CHF), mitral valve disease (MVD), diabetes (DM) and participating center Model 5: Adjusted for age, gender, HTN, CHF, MVD, DM, paroxysmal/persistent AF, LA volume, left ventricular ejection fraction and participating center.

Association of Recurrence with Fibrosis/SRM %

Multivariate analysis

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Recurrence based on the Fibrosis/ SRM staging system

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Residual fibrosis was quantified from the baseline MRI by subtracting ablated scar area from post ablation DE-MRI.

Post-ablation Scar Overlap of Scar + Fibrosis

− =

Residual Fibrosis PA view Pre-ablation Fibrosis

+

Scar + Fibrosis

=

Detection of residual fibrosis (fibrotic tissue not covered with ablation lesions) after ablation at follow-up

Post-ablation Scar

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Recurrence based on residual fibrosis by quartiles

85.1% 74.4% 62.8% 36.4%