participant direction 201
play

Participant Direction 201: Medicaid Authorities Supporting - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Participant Direction 201: Medicaid Authorities Supporting Participant Direction June 28, 2012 Suzanne Crisp NRCPDS Learning Objectives Brief history of Medicaid Examine specific authorities Discuss significance for FMS vendors


  1. Participant Direction 201: Medicaid Authorities Supporting Participant Direction June 28, 2012 Suzanne Crisp NRCPDS

  2. Learning Objectives  Brief history of Medicaid  Examine specific authorities  Discuss significance for FMS vendors  Resources  Questions

  3. Medicaid  President Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society  Enacted into law – Medicaid, Medicare and the Older Americans Act in 1965 with Social Security Act  Medical care for Americans with low income and resources  Joint Federal/State partnership  Offered mandatory and optional state plan services

  4. Medicaid  Initially designed to pay for nursing home care for 21 & older and optional coverage for home health  Within Federal guidelines, States have great flexibility but all plans and changes must be approved by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)  Financial Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP)  50% for administration  50% to 83% - based on State’s per capita income

  5. Home and Community-Based Service (HCBS)  Waivers are named after the Section of the Social Security Act that authorizes each  In 1981, Congress authorized certain Federal requirements may be waived (comparability & statewideness)  Allows services not usually covered by Medicaid so long as services are required to prevent institutionalization

  6. A Watershed Moment  States adopt HCBS waivers from 1982 to 1990s  Growth is steady but system continued to support institutionalization  Olmsted decision 1999  “ Unjustified isolation….is properly regarded as discrimination based on disability”  By not providing HCBS, the Americans with Disabilities Act is violated  States are at risk of litigation if HCBS is not offered

  7. Strong Federal Support  Since 1999 – CMS has aided States to avoid litigation by supporting HCBS  President’s New Freedom Initiative 2001  Deficit Reduction Act of 2005  Two authorities 1915(i) & 1915(j)  Affordable Care Act of 2010  Community First Option  Changes to the 1915(i)

  8. Additional Support of HCBS  PACE – Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly  MFP – Money Follows the Person  BIP – Balancing Initiative Program  ADRC – Aging and Disability Resource Centers  Health Homes

  9. Questions/Comments? Ask your questions or share your comments now via phone or using the Q&A box on your screen

  10. Section 1915(c)  First of the modifications to the Social Security Act to directly support HCBS & community living  Targeted to individuals who could be admitted to an institution (level of care)  Complements State Plan services  Initially approved by CMS for 3 years, 5 year increments thereafter  Largest HCBS authority:  283 Programs; serving 1.2 million people at a cost of almost $27 billion

  11. Section 1915(c) and Participant Direction  Introduces Independence Plus initiative 2002  Ability to mainstream introduced in 2005 with new application and instructions  CMS “ urges that all states afford waiver participants the opportunity to direct some or all of their waiver services ”  Substantial growth in PD occurs

  12. Section 1915(c) and Participant Direction  First defined 1915(c) application instructions  Budget and employer authority  Financial management services (FMS)  Recognized F/EA and Awl models  Person-centered expectation  Identified support system  Information & assistance  FMS  Identified as a service or administrative function

  13. Sections 1915 (a) and 1915(b)  Section 1915(a)  Allows States to use a voluntary managed care delivery system  Waives comparability, statewideness and free choice of providers  Thirteen states use this authority to administer 24 voluntary managed care programs  Section 1915(b)  Allows states to waive comparability, statewideness and free choice of providers  May require dual eligible's to participant  May be voluntary or involuntary  Currently 48 approved 1915(b)s operate in 28 states

  14. Section (a) or (b) and 1915 (c)  Allows State to operate HCBS waivers and specified State Plan services under a managed care arrangement  Allows selective contracting with entities using capitation  Example states: MI, TX and NY

  15. Section 1915(j)  Section 6078 of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005  Effective July, 2007  Uses participant direction to provide personal assistance services  Follows the original Cash & Counseling program design  Cash payment may be prospectively paid  Requires employer and budget authority

  16. Section 1915(j)  Allows goods and services that substitute or reduce the reliance on human assistance or increase independence  Goods and services must be tied to an assessed need  Seven states have active programs: AL, AR, CA, FL, NJ, OR, & TX  ACA disposition will not impact

  17. Section 1915(j) & FMS  States must make available assistance with employment and insurance tasks  May perform:  Directly  Contract with an FMS entity or execute a provider agreement with an agency  Participant may manage  FMS reimbursed administratively only  Recognizes F/EA or Awl  FMS must flag significant budget variances  State must monitor activity

  18. Questions/Comments? Ask your questions or share your comments now via phone or using the Q&A box on your screen

  19. Section 1915(k) Community First Option  Section 6078 of the Affordable Care Act 2010  Could be affected with Supreme Court Ruling  Provides vehicle to use self direction (consumer control) to provide personal assistance services  Self direction (consumer control)  Individual exercises as much control as desired to select, train, supervise, schedule, determine duties, and dismiss the attendant care provider

  20. Section 1915(k) Continued  Allows a cash benefit  Prospective payments allowed  Target population must meet level of care  FMS reimbursed at service or admin rate  Requires creation of a Development and Implementation Council  Enhanced FMAP at 6%  Requires a face-to-face assessment (telemedicine) annually  Person-centered planning required

  21. Section 1915(k) Continued  Services include ADL, IADL, & health related tasks  May be hands-on assistance, supervision, or cueing  Include acquisition, maintenance, and enhancement of skills  Back-up systems required  Voluntary training on how to select, manage or dismiss workers  Must offer transition services

  22. 1915(k) Recognizes Three Models  Agency-provider model  Entity contracts to provide services directly through employees or arranges for the services under the direction of the individual  Agency acts as the employer of record  Individual must have significant and meaningful role in management of services  Self-directed model with service budget  FMS must be available  Reimbursed at service or administrative FMAP rate  Cash or vouchers permitted  Participant is employer of record  Other service delivery model  States may propose other models

  23. All Service Models Recognized by 1915(k)  Operate with person-centeredness  Provide support system  Assesses and counsels  Provides information  Includes information on risks and responsibilities including tools  Develops a backup plan  Assessors are free from conflict  Data collection

  24. Section 1915(k) Continued  May offer goods and services  Home modification excluded unless tied to increased independence or sub for human asst.  Targeting not permitted  Must offer statewide  Current activity – CA, MN, AK, NY, AZ  Differences between the (j) and (k)  Enhanced funding (k)  Level of Care (k)  FMS reimbursement limited (j)  Development & Implementation Council (k)

  25. Questions/Comments? Ask your questions or share your comments now via phone or using the Q&A box on your screen

  26. Section 1915(i)  Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 created  Affordable Care Act of 2010 modified  Proposed rule currently under review  Offers new flexibility in providing necessary and appropriate services  Eliminates requirement of admittance to a nursing home  Allows less stringent application of medical eligibility  Services include case management, homemaker, personal care, adult day health, habilitation, respite, behavioral health services and “other” (ACA change)  Must be statewide (ACA change)  May not limit number of individuals (ACA change)

  27. Section 1915(i) Continued  Allows targeting – may define a specific population  More than one 1915(i) is allowed  Allows for a new eligibility group  Conflict free evaluation and assessments  Encourages self-direction  Must develop an independent advocacy system  May not limit participants

  28. Section 1915(i) and Participant Direction  CMS “urges” states to offer  Recognizes employer & budget authority  Cash allowance not permitted  Person-centered planning required  Risk management process required

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend