P.U .U.S .S.H .H Por ortsm tsmouth outh Us User ers s Sel - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

P.U .U.S .S.H .H Por

• rtsm

tsmouth

• uth Us

User ers s Sel elf He f Help lp

 23 years chaotic addiction  Waiting for a service 9 months + detox  Volunteering/training/education  Employment

 Lack of compassion or empathy  Prejudice/discriminatory attitudes  Target/tick box driven management  Chaotic services and systems

 National Treatment Agency (NTA)  Waiting Times  Very little and Tokenistic Involvement  Reality almost completely Absent

 Organised  Empowered to be independent  Supported  Respectfully received

 Structure beyond services/treatment  Peer support/genuine empathy/lived

experience

 Training/education opportunities  Fulfil a need to give back (transcending shame)

by helping others providing HOPE

 Pathways

thways to em empl ployme

• yment/citiz

nt/citizensh enship ip

 Mean

anin ing g and d purp urpos

• se

 Long term sustainable recovery and community  CHA

HANGE NGE

 A vo

voice ce for the e vo voiceless eless

 Peer Advocacy  2 sessions per week Job Centre Plus  Treatment/recovery system  Housing  GP’s  Hospitals/Prisons  Benefits appeals

 Contract reviews  Joint

t Commissioning

• ning Group – full member

bershi hip

 Planning system development and re-commissioning  Attendance and input at all stakeholder events  Standards of Practice Document  Constant

tant stream m of fe feedba back ck on t the realit ity y of how the syste tem is worki king ng or no not

 Make recovery a visible viable option to all those they encounter  School

• l talks in partner

nership with h HIDS PCC, pheno nomen menal l feedback ack from teache chers rs and students dents

 OD worksho

kshops, targe geti ting ng active ve chaoti tic c users rs with h south h centra ntral ambulance ance serv rvice. ice.

 Currently planning a recovery march to challenge stigma  Partnership probation IOM drop in/through the gate  Provide

de a weekly y open forum m access to P PUSH activit ities ies and beyond nd. attend ndance ance 40 plus weekly kly

 SMART groups, RAW and LGBT support group  Delivering co facilitating ACT groups across the system

 Someone with a lived experience  Have achieved sustainable recovery  Have received training  Volunteers – making recovery a visible

achievable aspiration for all



Ps Psycho ychoacti active ve Subs bstance tance Awa warenes eness. s.



Ph Phys ysic ical al & Ps Psycho ycholo logic gical al Addic icti tion.

• n.



Group

• up Facili

litatio tation. n.



Counsell nselling ing Skills. ls.



Motivati vational

• nal Interv

erviewing ewing



Safeg eguardin uarding



Info forma rmati tion

• n sharing

aring/c /confi

• nfiden

dentiali iality ty



Pe Personal rsonal professional fessional devel velopm

• pmen

ent/refl t/reflecti ective ve practi actice e supervis pervisio ion n

 Hope and inspiration  Support in recovery planning  Genuine empathy  Role models  Peer Support  Access to recovery community and Life

 Co-production emphasises that people are not passive

ve recipi pients nts of servi vices ces and have assets and expertise which can help improve services.

 Co-production is a potentially trans

nsfor

• rma

mati tive ve way of t thinking nking about power, resour

• urce

ces, partners nershi hips ps, risks and outco comes mes, not an off-the- shelf model of service provision or a single magic solution.

 ‘To act as partners, both users and providers must be empowered’.

Co-production means involving citizens in collaborati ative ve relati tions

• nshi

hips with h more empower wered frontl tlin ine staff ff who are able and confide ident to sh share re power r and accept pt user r exper perti tise.

 Staff should be trained in the benefits of co-production, support

rted in positive ve risk-taking aking and encouraged to identify new opportunities for collaboration with people who use services.

 People should be encouraged to access co-productive initiatives,

recognising and supporting diversity among the people who use services.

 The

e creati ation

• n of new

w st structu uctures res, regul gulato atory y and commissioni ssioning ng practices ces and financia ncial l streams ms is ne nece cessary ary to e embed co-prod

• ducti

uction

• n

as a long-te term rather her than n ad ho hoc solution.

• n.

 Learning from existing international case studies of co-production

while recognising the contribution of initiatives reflecting local needs is important. (Social Care

e Institut ute e for Excell llenc nce) e)