P i k e P l a c e M a r k e t , P C - 1 N o r t h
W R C P r o j e c t U p d a t e
F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 3
P i k e P l a c e M a r k e t , P C - 1 N o r t h W R C P r o j - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
P i k e P l a c e M a r k e t , P C - 1 N o r t h W R C P r o j e c t U p d a t e F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 3 Agenda: 1. recap concept design + coordination efforts with Waterfront team 2. review typical project schedule 3. review the
W R C P r o j e c t U p d a t e
F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 3
Shared Design Objectives for PC1-N and OLW:
1) reduce the scale of the structural wall on the west side of the site and re-introduce potential for a slope for steps, public art, children’s playscapes, and other treatments to integrate PC-1 N with the Overlook Walk 2) explore ways to widen the public space along the west side of PC-1 N, connections from Victor Steinbrueck Park, and connections from Western to the Overlook Walk 3) integrate Miller Hull’s concept for a public roof on the PC-1 N building that connects the Desimone Bridge into the overall public space concept 4) add more green areas to the public spaces designed for PC-1 N, incorporating features from the Overlook Walk 5) explore ways to refine the Overlook Walk in response to the emerging PC-1 N design, including potentially raising slightly the overall grade of the ramp or lifting the platform around the train overlook to relate more to the public spaces on the PC-1 N
Play spaces reintroduced and expanded Wall hidden by play space and landscape ‘Bosque’ of trees reintroduced Hardscape/Landscape relationship from OLW brought into PC1-N 5% ramps in lieu of steps Green roofs as possible
26’ 16’ 16’ 12’ 26’ 26’ 18’ 100’ 30’ 18’
42’ 10’ 16’ 16’ 30’
cost estimate
GC selection cost estimate
submit for site development permit Design Review submit for building permit building permit released
Construction
validate program and site
Pre-Design
layout
systems
utilities
materials
Schematic Design
primary systems
finishes
Design Development
finishes & colors
Construction Documents
Approval of MACC NTP for G.C.
cost estimate
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
Miller Hull DD for Substructure and Parking
SCHEMATIC DESIGN STARTS
Next phase of Miller Hull work to include refinement of Concept Design and Schematic Design
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
Approval of Consulting Contract so that Pro Forma Baseline can be started based on Conceptual Design
MOU APPROVAL PDA COUNCIL
PDA Council Approved MOU with City of Seattle
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
Full Council Approves Development Agreement
January 2013 February 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 September 2013
MOU APPROVAL CITY COUNCIL
City Council Approves MOU, access to City matching funds up to $1M in 2013
WSDOT CONTRACT
Execution of WSDOT parking mitigation contract and access to portion of $5M in funding GC/CM SELECTION Begin process for selection GC/CM
MUP/ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Approval from City
PC1-N CONSTRUCTION ENDS
End date no later than 2016
October 2013
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
Approval of Development Agreement by City Council DESIGN DEVELOPMENT Miller Hull DD for retail, restaurant, housing and public space
October 2013 December 2013 June 2014 2015 2016 2016-2018
COMMITTED DOLLARS
$1M (PDA) $1M (City of Seattle) $730K (State Parking Mitigation)
PC1-N CONSTRUCTION STARTS
Start date no later then June, 2014
VIADUCT COMES DOWN, 2016 Central Waterfront Construction Underway
21
22
Identify Space Needs Establish Goals & Objectives Create Scenarios Perform Quantitative & Qualitative Analysis Synthesize Data Oversee Construction Manage Design Obtain Entitlement and Permit Outcome: Lease/ Build/Buy Facilitate Move-In and Start Up
Advisory Services Project Management
Support Transaction Secure Project Financing Assemble Team
23
PIKE PLACE MARKET PDA PC1-NORTH FINANCIAL ANALYSIS - FORMAT FOR DYNAMIC MODEL February 5, 2013 CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS TIME 0 YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 YEAR 6 YEAR 7 YEAR 8 YEAR 9 YEAR 10 YEAR 11 YEAR 12 YEAR 13
XX,XXX XX,XXX
XX,XXX XX,XXX
(XXX) (XXX) XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX
XX,XXX
(XXX) (XXX) XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XX,XXX
(XXX) (XXX) XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XX,XXX
(XXX) (XXX) XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XX,XXX
X,XXX (NPV, IRR, etc.)
1. BASELINE FINANCIAL MODEL (February 2013)
(1) Construction (2) Design & permitting
(3) Other “Soft” costs
(1) City (2) State
(3) Project
(1) Formulate assumptions (2) Build dynamic financial model (3) Compute decision-making criterion or criteria
and results.
24
2. SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS (March 2013)
assumptions and results.
25
W R C P r o j e c t U p d a t e
F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 3