p a r k p o t o m a c o f f i c e b u i l d i n g e
play

P a r k P o t o m a c O f f i c e B u i l d i n g E Kyle Wagner l - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

P a r k P o t o m a c O f f i c e B u i l d i n g E Kyle Wagner l Structural Option AE Senior Thesis l Spring 2010 Faculty Consultant l Prof. Kevin Parfitt Presentation Overview Project Information Existing Structural System g y


  1. P a r k P o t o m a c O f f i c e B u i l d i n g “ E ” Kyle Wagner l Structural Option AE Senior Thesis l Spring 2010 Faculty Consultant l Prof. Kevin Parfitt

  2. Presentation Overview • Project Information • Existing Structural System g y • Problem Statement and Solution • Structural Depth Study • Cost and Schedule Analysis • Additional Topics • Conclusions • Acknowledgements • Questions and Comments

  3. Presentation Overview Project Information • Project Information • Existing Structural System • Located off I ‐ 270 in Potomac, MD • Problem Statement and Solution • Part of Park Potomac Place • Townhomes, Office Space, Retail, Dining • Structural Depth Study • Prominent location within Community • Cost and Schedule Analysis • Focal point from Cadbury Ave. • Additional Topics p • Face of community from I ‐ 270 • Conclusions • Acknowledgements View from Cadbury Ave www.parkpotomacplace.com • Questions and Comments

  4. Presentation Overview Project Information • Project Information • Two levels mostly underground parking • Existing Structural System • 100 000+ SF each • 100,000+ SF each • Problem Statement and Solution • Seven levels of mostly office space • Structural Depth Study • Approx. 25,000 SF each • Cost and Schedule Analysis • Additional Topics p • Conclusions • Acknowledgements North Entrance to Parking Levels • Questions and Comments Building Footprint

  5. Presentation Overview Existing Structural System • Project Information • Existing Structural System • Underground Parking all Cast ‐ in ‐ place concrete • 7” Thick slab post ‐ tensioned in N ‐ S direction 7” Thi k l b t t i d i N S di ti • Problem Statement and Solution • 72” x 20” D Beams post ‐ tensioned in E ‐ W direction • Structural Depth Study • Concrete Moment Frames • Cost and Schedule Analysis in both directions • Additional Topics p • Long Spans accomplished L S li h d • Conclusions • Flexibility for Tenant • Acknowledgements • 12’ Cantilever at N, S ends • Questions and Comments Existing Structural System

  6. Presentation Overview Problem Statement • Project Information • Existing Structural System • Concrete structure results in large building self weight • Problem Statement and Solution • Larger gravity members result • Large mat foundations at soil level • Structural Depth Study • Central Foundation 52’ x 64’ x 60” Deep • Cost and Schedule Analysis • Longer schedule duration from concrete construction • Additional Topics p • Conclusions • End Result: Negative Cost and Schedule Implications Existing Foundation Plan • Acknowledgements • Questions and Comments

  7. Presentation Overview Problem Solution • Project Information • Existing Structural System • Reduce building self weight by utilizing a steel structure • Problem Statement and Solution • Composite Beams and lightweight concrete used • To maintain integrity of existing design: • Structural Depth Study • Maintain current column layout • Cost and Schedule Analysis • Maintain current ceiling heights in Tenant Spaces • Additional Topics p • Maintain current MEP Spaces • Maintain current MEP Spaces • Conclusions • Braced Frames used to resist lateral forces • Steel construction likely to reduce construction schedule • Acknowledgements • Parking levels will remain unchanged • Questions and Comments

  8. Presentation Overview Project Goals • Project Information • Existing Structural System • Reduce building self weight • Problem Statement and Solution • Maintain integrity of tenant spaces • Reduce overall cost • Structural Depth Study • Reduce schedule duration • Cost and Schedule Analysis • Additional Topics p • Conclusions • Acknowledgements • Questions and Comments

  9. Presentation Overview Design Loads • Project Information Floor Live Loads Area Design Load (psf) ASCE 7 ‐ 05 Load (psf) • Existing Structural System Assembly Areas 100 100 • Design Loads Corridors 100 100 • Problem Statement and Solution Corridors Above First Floor 80 80 • ASCE 7 ‐ 05 Lobbies 100 100 Marquees & Canopies 75 75 • Structural Depth Study • Superimposed Dead Loads Mechanical Rooms 150 125 Offices 80 + 20 psf Partitions 50 + 20 psf Partitions • 5 psf Floor Parking Garages 50 40 • Cost and Schedule Analysis Plaza, Top Floor Parking Fire Truck Load or 250 psf 250 Retail ‐ First Floor 100 100 • 10 psf Roof Stairs and Exitways 100 100 • Additional Topics p Storage (Light) Storage (Light) 125 125 125 125 • Flat Roof Snow Load • Conclusions Live Load Values • 21 psf • Acknowledgements • Questions and Comments

  10. Presentation Overview G r a v i t y S y s t e m D e s i g n • Project Information • Existing Structural System • 5 ½” Thick Slab on 2”, 18 Gage Metal Decking • Provides adequate 2 hour fire rating between floors P id d t 2 h fi ti b t fl • Problem Statement and Solution • Beams spacing does not exceed 10’ • Structural Depth Study • Unshored • Cost and Schedule Analysis • Minimize number • Additional Topics p of beams required of beams required • Conclusions • Columns spliced every other floor • Acknowledgements Typical Floor Layout RAM Model • Questions and Comments

  11. Presentation Overview Cantilevered Ends • Moment connection at • Project Information interior to balance • Existing Structural System • 12’ Cantilever on North and South Ends moment at column • Unobstructed glass around building • Unobstructed glass around building • Problem Statement and Solution corners • Structural Depth Study • Moment from cantilever: 575 ft ‐ k • Cost and Schedule Analysis • Moment from interior: 376 ft ‐ k • Four beams used to transfer • Moment to column: 199 ft ‐ k • Additional Topics p load back to columns • Design for moment and axial due to • Conclusions • Beam required: gravity load • Acknowledgements • Final Design shown at right • W18x55 • Questions and Comments

  12. Presentation Overview Floor Depth Comparison • Project Information • Existing Structural System • Existing post ‐ tensioned system • Maintain ceiling heights and MEP Spaces • 20” depth at beams • 20 depth at beams • Problem Statement and Solution • Structural Depth Study • Steel Design • Increase overall building height • Cost and Schedule Analysis • Deepest Beam: W27x84 • No code restrictions • Additional Topics p • Increase by 12” per floor • Conclusions • Overall height increase by 7’ • Acknowledgements • Recalculate lateral loads • Questions and Comments • Floor Depth Approx. 32”

  13. Presentation Overview Lateral Loads • Project Information • Existing Structural System • Wind: Method 2 of ASCE 7 ‐ 05 Chapter 6 • Problem Statement and Solution • Assume wind negligible beneath plaza level • Structural Depth Study • Seismic: ELFP of ASCE 7 ‐ 05 Chapter 11 • Seismic Design Category B • Cost and Schedule Analysis • Seismic Base Level taken at plaza level • Additional Topics p • Wind controlled for strength and serviceability Wi d t ll d f t th d i bilit • Conclusions • Acknowledgements • Questions and Comments

  14. Presentation Overview ETABS Model • Project Information • Existing Structural System • 7 Load combinations, 4 wind cases, accidental • Problem Statement and Solution torsion (5% ecc.) due to seismic all manually included • Structural Depth Study • Floors modeled as rigid diaphragms • Loads distributed based on relative stiffnesses of frames • Cost and Schedule Analysis • Only lateral system modeled • Additional Topics p • Gravity loads applied using additional area mass to diaphragm G i l d li d i ddi i l di h • Conclusions ETABS Model • Acknowledgements • Questions and Comments

  15. Presentation Overview Braced Frame Design • Project Information • Existing Structural System • Symmetry in Geometry and Stiffness • Problem Statement and Solution • Loads distributed evenly to each frame • Structural Depth Study • Cost and Schedule Analysis • SAP used to calculate forces in braces • Additional Topics p for critical load combination for critical load combination • Critical load combination used to design columns • Conclusions • Final Brace Frame Design shown at right • Acknowledgements • E ‐ W Frames larger than N ‐ S Frames N-S Braced Frame E-W Braced Frame • Questions and Comments

  16. Presentation Overview Lateral Analysis • Project Information • Existing Structural System • Primary controlling load case was 0.9D+1.6W • Problem Statement and Solution • Controlling wind case was Wind Case 1 • Structural Depth Study • Center of mass and rigidity both at geometric center • Overall building torsion was negliglible • Cost and Schedule Analysis • Wind drift within L/400 • Additional Topics p • Seismic drift found to be well within limitations • Seismic drift found to be well within limitations • Conclusions • Acknowledgements • Questions and Comments

  17. Presentation Overview Foundation Design • Project Information • Existing Structural System • Problem Statement and Solution • Structural Depth Study • Cost and Schedule Analysis • Additional Topics p • Conclusions • Existing foundations • Steel Structure Foundations • Acknowledgements • 17’ x 17’ x 34” Deep (U.N.O.) • Questions and Comments

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend