overview of storage and indexing
play

Overview of Storage and Indexing CMPSCI 645 Feb 28, 2008 Slides - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Overview of Storage and Indexing CMPSCI 645 Feb 28, 2008 Slides Courtesy of R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke 1 DBMS Architecture Query Parser Query Rewriter Query Optimizer Query Executor File & Access Methods Lock Manager Log Manager


  1. Overview of Storage and Indexing CMPSCI 645 Feb 28, 2008 Slides Courtesy of R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke 1

  2. DBMS Architecture Query Parser Query Rewriter Query Optimizer Query Executor File & Access Methods Lock Manager Log Manager Buffer Manager Disk Space Manager 2

  3. Data on External Storage  Disks: Can retrieve random page at fixed cost  But reading several consecutive pages is much cheaper than reading them in random order  Tapes: Can only read pages in sequence  Cheaper than disks; used for archival storage  Page: Unit of information read from or written to disk  Size of page: DBMS parameter, 4KB, 8KB  Disk space manager:  Abstraction: a collection of pages.  Allocate/de-allocate a page.  Read/write a page.  Page I/O:  Pages read from disk and pages written to disk  Dominant cost of database operations 3

  4. Buffer Management  Architecture:  Data is read into memory for processing  Data is written to disk for persistent storage  Buffer manager stages pages between external storage and main memory buffer pool.  Access method layer makes calls to the buffer manager. 4

  5. Access Methods  Access methods: routines to manage various disk-based data structures.  Files of records  Various kinds of indexes  File of records:  Important abstraction of external storage in a DBMS!  Record id (rid) is sufficient to physically locate a record  Indexes:  Auxiliary data structures  Given values in index search key fields, find the record ids of records with those values 5

  6. File organizations & access methods Many alternatives exist, each ideal for some situations, and not so good in others:  Heap (unordered) files: Suitable when typical access is a file scan retrieving all records.  Sorted Files: Best if records must be retrieved in some order, or only a `range’ of records is needed.  Indexes: Data structures to organize records via trees or hashing. • Like sorted files, they speed up searches for a subset of records, based on values in certain (“search key”) fields • Updates are much faster than in sorted files. 6

  7. Indexes  An index on a file speeds up selections on the search key fields for the index.  Any subset of the fields of a relation can be the search key for an index on the relation.  Search key is not the same as key (minimal set of fields that uniquely identify a record in a relation).  An index contains a collection of data entries , and supports efficient retrieval of all data entries k* with a given key value k .  Data entry versus data record.  Given data entry k*, we can find record with key k in at most one disk I/O. (Details soon …) 7

  8. B+ Tree Indexes Non-leaf Pages Leaf Pages (Sorted by search key)  Leaf pages contain data entries , and are chained (prev & next)  Non-leaf pages have index entries; only used to direct searches: index entry P0 K 1 P 1 K 2 P m P 2 K m 8

  9. Example B+ Tree Note how data entries Root in leaf level are sorted 17 Entries <= 17 Entries > 17 27 5 13 30 2* 3* 6* 7* 8* 22* 24* 27* 29* 33* 34* 38* 39* 14* 16*  Equality selection: find 28*? 29*?  Range selection: find all > 15* and < 30*  Insert/delete: Find data entry in leaf, then change it. Need to adjust parent sometimes.  And change sometimes bubbles up the tree 9

  10. Hash-Based Indexes  Good for equality selections. Search key  Index is a collection of value k buckets. h  Bucket = primary page plus zero or more overflow pages. 1 2 3 … … … … … … N-1  Buckets contain data entries.  Hashing function h : h ( k ) = bucket of data entries of the search key value k .  No need for “index entries” in this scheme. 10

  11. Alternatives for Data Entry k* in Index  In a data entry k* we can store:  Alt1: Data record with key value k  Alt2: < k , rid of data record with search key value k >  Alt3: < k , list of rids of data records with search key k >  Choice of alternative for data entries is orthogonal to indexing technique used to locate data entries with a key value k .  Indexing techniques: B+ tree index, hash index  Typically, indexes contain auxiliary information that directs searches to the desired data entries 11

  12. Alternatives for Data Entries (Contd.)  Alternative 1:  Index structure is a file organization for data records (instead of a Heap file or sorted file).  At most one index on a given collection of data records can use Alternative 1. • Otherwise, data records are duplicated, leading to redundant storage and potential inconsistency.  If data records are very large, # of pages containing data entries is high. • Implies size of auxiliary information in the index is also large, typically (e.g., B+ tree). 12

  13. Alternatives for Data Entries (Contd.)  Alternatives 2 and 3:  Data entries, with search keys and rid(s), typically much smaller than data records. • Index structure used to direct search, which depends on size of data entries, is much smaller than with Alternative 1. • So, better than Alternative 1 with large data records, especially if search keys are small.  Alternative 3 more compact than Alternative 2  Alternative 3 leads to variable sized data entries, even if search keys are of fixed length. • Variable sizes records/data entries are hard to manage. 13

  14. Index Classification  Key? Primary key? Candidate key?  Primary index vs. secondary index:  If search key contains primary key, then called primary index.  Other indexes are called secondary indexes.  Unique index: Search key contains a candidate key.  No data entries can have the same value. 14

  15. Index Classification (Contd.)  Clustered vs. unclustered : If order of data records is the same as (or `close to’), order of data entries, then it’s a clustered index.  Alternative 1 implies clustered  Alternatives 2 and 3 are clustered only if data records are sorted on the search key field.  A file can be clustered on at most one search key.  Cost of retrieving data records through index varies greatly based on whether index is clustered or not! 15

  16. Clustered vs. Unclustered Index  Suppose that Alternative (2) is used for data entries, and that the data records are stored in a Heap file.  To build clustered index, first sort the Heap file (with some free space on each page for future inserts).  Overflow pages may be needed for inserts. (Thus, order of data recs is `close to’, but not identical to, the sort order.) Index entries UNCLUSTERED CLUSTERED direct search for data entries Data entries Data entries (Index File) (Data file) Data Records Data Records 16

  17. Cost Model for Our Analysis We ignore CPU costs, for simplicity:  B: The number of data pages  R: Number of records per page  D: (Average) time to read or write disk page  Measuring number of page I/O’s ignores gains of pre-fetching a sequence of pages; thus, even I/O cost is only approximated.  Average-case analysis; based on several simplistic assumptions.  Good enough to show the overall trends! 17

  18. Comparing File Organizations Heap files (random order; insert at eof)  Sorted files, sorted on <age, sal>  Clustered B+ tree file, Alternative (1), search  key <age, sal> Heap file with unclustered B + tree index on  search key <age, sal> Heap file with unclustered hash index on  search key <age, sal> 18

  19. Operations to Compare Scan: Fetch all records from disk  Equality search  Range selection  Insert a record  Delete a record  19

  20. Assumptions in Our Analysis  Heap Files:  Equality selection on key; exactly one match.  Sorted Files:  Files compacted after deletions.  Indexes:  Alt (2), (3): data entry size = 10% size of record  Hash: No overflow chains. • 80% page occupancy => File size = 1.25 data size  B+Tree: • 67% occupancy (typical): implies file size = 1.5 data size • Balanced with fanout F (133 typical) at each non-level 20

  21. Assumptions (contd.)  Scans:  Leaf levels of a tree-index are chained.  Index data-entries plus actual file scanned for unclustered indexes.  Range searches:  We use tree indexes to restrict the set of data records fetched, but ignore hash indexes. 21

  22. # of leaf pages: B*0.1/67%=0.15B; Cost of index I/O: 0.15BD # of data entries on a leaf page: R*10*0.67=6.7R; Cost of data I/O: 0.15B*6.7R*D=BDR Key: unclustered B+tree, one I/O per data entry! # of data entry pages: B*0.1/80%=0.125B; Cost of index I/O: 0.125BD # of data entries on a hash page: R*10*0.80=8R; Cost of data I/O: 0.125B*8R*D=BDR Key: unclustered hash index, one I/O per data entry! 22

  23. Cost of Operations Scan Equality Range Insert Delete Heap File BD .5BD BD 2D Search + D Sorted File BD Dlog 2 B Search + Search + D(log 2 B + #matching BD BD pages) Clustered 1.5BD Dlog F 1.5 Search + Search + D(log F 1.5B + #matching Tree Index B D D pages) Unclustered BD(R+. D(1+log F. D(log F .15B + Search + Search + #matching Tree Index 15) . 15B) 3D 3D recs ) Unclustered BD(R+. 2D BD 4D 4D Hash Index 125)  Several assumptions underlie these (rough) estimates!

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend