out of equilibrium field theories coupled to strong
play

Out-of-equilibrium field theories coupled to strong external sources - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Out-of-equilibrium field theories coupled to strong external sources Kyoto University, December 2013 Franois Gelis IPhT, Saclay Outline 1 Preamble : classical statistical method in Quantum Mechanics 2 QFT with strong sources, Inclusive


  1. Out-of-equilibrium field theories coupled to strong external sources Kyoto University, December 2013 François Gelis IPhT, Saclay

  2. Outline 1 Preamble : classical statistical method in Quantum Mechanics 2 QFT with strong sources, Inclusive observables at LO and NLO 3 Instabilities and resummation 4 Example : Schwinger mechanism

  3. Quantum Mechanics

  4. Classical phase-space formulation of Quantum Mechanics • Consider the von Neumann equation for the density operator : �� � ∂ � ρ τ ∂τ = i ¯ h H, � ρ τ (**) • Introduce the Wigner transforms : � d s e i p · s � � � � x + s � x − s �� W τ ( x , p ) ≡ ρ τ 2 2 � d s e i p · s � � � � x + s � x − s �� H ( x , p ) ≡ H (classical Hamiltonian) 2 2 (**) is equivalent to : � i ¯ �� � ← ∂W τ H ( x , p ) 2 h → ← → = ∂ x − W τ ( x , p ) h sin ∂ p ∂ x ∂ p ∂τ i ¯ 2 � � h 2 ) = H , W τ + O ( ¯ � �� � Poisson bracket François Gelis Field theories with strong sources 1/39 Kyoto, December 2013

  5. Classical statistical method in Quantum Mechanics h 2 ) corrections • Quantum effects in the time evolution are O ( ¯ (i.e. they appear at NNLO and beyond) • O ( ¯ h ) (NLO) contributions can only come from the initial state Uncertainty principle : ∆ x · ∆ p ≥ ¯ h The initial Wigner distribution W τ = 0 ( x , p ) must have a support of area at least ¯ (minimal area realized by coherent states) h • All the O ( ¯ h ) effects can be accounted for by a Gaussian initial distribution W τ = 0 ( x , p ) Classical statistical method • Sample by a Monte-Carlo the Gaussian distribution that approximates the initial distribution W τ = 0 ( x , p ) • For each initial ( x , p ) , solve the classical equation of motion up to the time of interest François Gelis Field theories with strong sources 2/39 Kyoto, December 2013

  6. Decoherence and micro-canonical equilibration P Q • For non-harmonic oscillators, the oscillation frequency depends on the initial condition François Gelis Field theories with strong sources 3/39 Kyoto, December 2013

  7. Decoherence and micro-canonical equilibration P Q • For non-harmonic oscillators, the oscillation frequency depends on the initial condition • Because of QM, the initial ensemble is a set of width � ¯ h François Gelis Field theories with strong sources 3/39 Kyoto, December 2013

  8. Decoherence and micro-canonical equilibration P Q • For non-harmonic oscillators, the oscillation frequency depends on the initial condition • Because of QM, the initial ensemble is a set of width � ¯ h • This ensemble of initial configurations spreads in time François Gelis Field theories with strong sources 3/39 Kyoto, December 2013

  9. Decoherence and micro-canonical equilibration P Q • For non-harmonic oscillators, the oscillation frequency depends on the initial condition • Because of QM, the initial ensemble is a set of width � ¯ h • This ensemble of initial configurations spreads in time François Gelis Field theories with strong sources 3/39 Kyoto, December 2013

  10. Decoherence and micro-canonical equilibration P Q • For non-harmonic oscillators, the oscillation frequency depends on the initial condition • Because of QM, the initial ensemble is a set of width � ¯ h • This ensemble of initial configurations spreads in time • At large times, the ensemble fills densely all the region allowed by energy conservation ⇒ microcanonical equilibrium François Gelis Field theories with strong sources 3/39 Kyoto, December 2013

  11. Quantum Field Theory w/ Strong Sources

  12. Typical situation 1 2 ( ∂ µ φ )( ∂ µ φ ) − V ( φ ) + Jφ • In general, the source J is space and time dependent • The system starts at t = − ∞ from a known initial state (example: vacuum state) • The source may be turned off at some point, and the system evolves by itself afterwards Strong source : J ∼ inverse coupling • Non-perturbative can we expand in powers of the coupling? ⇒ = • Spectrum of produced particles? • After the sources are switched off : how does the system equilibrate? François Gelis Field theories with strong sources 4/39 Kyoto, December 2013

  13. Example I : Schwinger mechanism • Consider a constant and uniform electrical field � E ext • Perturbatively, energy conservation prevents the production of e + e − pairs • Pairs can be produced via a vacuum instability • Rate : exp (− πm 2 /eE ) (non analytic in the coupling e ) • In Quantum Field Theory, can be obtained at one loop (but one must use the propagator dressed by the external field) François Gelis Field theories with strong sources 5/39 Kyoto, December 2013

  14. Example II : Nucleus-Nucleus collisions at high energy ? L = − 1 4 F µν F µν + ( J µ 1 + J µ ) A µ 2 � �� � J µ • Given the sources J 1,2 in each projectile, how do we calculate observables? Is there some kind of perturbative expansion? • Loop corrections, factorization? • Thermalization? François Gelis Field theories with strong sources 6/39 Kyoto, December 2013

  15. Strong source regime • Weak sources : perturbative treatment François Gelis Field theories with strong sources 7/39 Kyoto, December 2013

  16. Strong source regime • Weak sources : perturbative treatment • Strong sources : non-perturbative (when J ∼ 1/g ) François Gelis Field theories with strong sources 7/39 Kyoto, December 2013

  17. Power counting François Gelis Field theories with strong sources 8/39 Kyoto, December 2013

  18. Power counting Order of connected subdiagram when J ∼ g − 1 : 1 g 2 g # produced gluons g 2 ( # loops ) François Gelis Field theories with strong sources 8/39 Kyoto, December 2013

  19. Power counting • Example : single particle spectrum : � � dN 1 p = 1 c 0 + c 1 g 2 + c 2 g 4 + · · · d 3 � g 2 • The coefficients c 0 , c 1 , · · · are themselves series that resum all orders in ( gJ ) n . For instance, ∞ � c 0,n ( gJ ) n c 0 = n = 0 • We want to calculate at least the entire c 0 /g 2 contribution, and a subset of the higher order terms François Gelis Field theories with strong sources 9/39 Kyoto, December 2013

  20. Inclusive observables • Inclusive observables do not veto any final state Example: moments of the transition probabilities : � ∞ dN 1 � 1 2 � � � �� � � p ∼ ( n + 1 ) dΦ 1 · · · dΦ n pp 1 · · · p n out � 0 in � � d 3 � ( n + 1 )! � �� � � � n = 0 n part. phase-space (single inclusive particle distribution) Equivalent definition : � � � � dN 1 � a † � 0 in p ∼ 0 in out ( p ) a out ( p ) d 3 � (completeness of the out-states) François Gelis Field theories with strong sources 10/39 Kyoto, December 2013

  21. Bookkeeping • Start with transition amplitudes : sources → particles François Gelis Field theories with strong sources 11/39 Kyoto, December 2013

  22. Bookkeeping • Start with transition amplitudes : sources → particles • Consider squared amplitudes (including interferences) François Gelis Field theories with strong sources 11/39 Kyoto, December 2013

  23. Bookkeeping • Start with transition amplitudes : sources → particles • Consider squared amplitudes (including interferences) • See them as cuts through vacuum diagrams Cut propagator ∼ δ ( p 2 ) François Gelis Field theories with strong sources 11/39 Kyoto, December 2013

  24. Bookkeeping • Start with transition amplitudes : sources → particles • Consider squared amplitudes (including interferences) • See them as cuts through vacuum diagrams Cut propagator ∼ δ ( p 2 ) Weight each cut by z ( p ) generating functional → � � � 1 2 � � �� � � F [ z ] ≡ dΦ 1 · · · dΦ n z ( p 1 ) · · · z ( p n ) p 1 · · · p n out � 0 in � � n ! � � n François Gelis Field theories with strong sources 11/39 Kyoto, December 2013

  25. Generating functional • Observables are given by derivatives of F [ z ] , e.g. � � dN 1 p = δF [ z ] � � d 3 � δz ( p ) z = 1 (inclusive observables are derivatives at the point z = 1 ) unitarity implies F [ 1 ] = 1 Exact formula for the first derivative : � δ log F [ z ] d 4 xd 4 y e ip · ( x − y ) � x � y � � = A + ( x ) A − ( y ) + G +− ( x, y ) δz ( p ) where A ± and G +− are connected 1- and 2-point functions in the Schwinger-Keldysh formalism, with cut propagators weighted by z ( p ) François Gelis Field theories with strong sources 12/39 Kyoto, December 2013

  26. Schwinger-Keldysh formalism • Set of Feynman rules to compute directly transition probabilities (i.e. AA ∗ ) • This can be achieved as follows : • A vertex is − ig on one side of the cut, and + ig on the other side • There are four propagators, depending on the location w.r.t. the cut of the vertices they connect : ++ ( p ) = i/ ( p 2 − m 2 + iǫ ) G 0 ( standard Feynman propagator ) −− ( p ) = − i/ ( p 2 − m 2 − iǫ ) G 0 ( complex conjugate of G 0 ++ ( p )) +− ( p ) = 2π z ( p ) θ (− p 0 ) δ ( p 2 − m 2 ) G 0 • At each vertex of a given diagram, sum over the types + and − ( 2 n terms for a diagram with n vertices) François Gelis Field theories with strong sources 13/39 Kyoto, December 2013

  27. Inclusive Observables at Leading Order

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend