Oregon Learns K-12 Achievement C Compact t Implementation p - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Oregon Learns

K-12 Achievement C t Compact Implementation p

Oregon Education Investment Board April 12 2012 April 12, 2012

1

30% 29% 40% 18% 17% 30% 29% 40% 42% 41% 40% 10% 13% 42% 41% 20% 10% 13%

All working-age adults (2010) Young adults (2010) Goal (2025) adults (2010) (2010) Less than high school High school only High school only Associate's degree or credential Bachelor's degree or higher

2

A hi t C t Achievement Compacts are…

Forward looking: A roadmap to 40/40/20 Forward-looking: A roadmap to 40/40/20 About student outcomes, not inputs A tool to budget a plan, not plan a budget A way to showcase best practices and promote collaboration Succinct: Key leverage points for reaching statewide priorities for student achievement Evolving

3

Oregon accountability system

Waiver from certain NCLB provisions filed in January, final decision expected late May, early January, final decision expected late May, early

• June. Achievement compacts are anchor for the

accountability system:

• At a district level
• About support, collective impact and prioritizing

investments

• A system to set goals and incentivize annual

progress, aligned with 40/40/20 Achievement compacts are high level snapshots, not the only tool in Oregon’s accountability system.

4

Achievement Compact Achievement Compact

School & District Report Card

Priority/Focus/Model Designation

School & District Report Card

Policymakers

• State &

District Parents &

Student-level data

y g

Guide budget & policy tti t & Public Provide Educators & Community setting at state & local level to improve achievement ratings & information about school & district lit Focus state & district school Community Students, Families, & Teachers quality school improvement efforts. Inform teaching & learning 5

Reducing Regulatory Burdens

For 2012-13

• Division 22 reporting requirements waived

Division 22 reporting requirements waived

• Implement online tool to streamline reporting

By July 31, 2012 ODE will report to the OEIB on: Streamlining improvement planning for Focus &

• Streamlining improvement planning for Focus &

Priority Schools

• Including Achievement Compacts in the overall

Including Achievement Compacts in the overall reporting system

• A plan to seek repeal or waiver of unnecessary or

y redundant CIP requirements

6

Timeline for 2012-13 Compacts

April 5 to June 30 District boards complete their compacts April 12 Data validation process begins May 4 Deadline to request corrections May 4 Deadline to request corrections Mid-May Technical assistance on goal setting and trajectory toward 40/40/20 trajectory toward 40/40/20 July 2 Districts return completed compacts July 31 Chief Education Officer accepts compacts and local priority measures D dli t t bli h hi t t

• Sept. 30

Deadline to establish achievement compact advisory committees

7

College and Career Ready: Are students completing high school ready for college or career?

9th graders of 2006-07 Dis- advantaged 9th graders of 2007-08 Dis- advantaged 9th graders of 2008-09 Dis- advantaged 9th graders of 2009-10 Dis- advantaged 9th graders of 2012-13** Dis- advantaged 4 Y C h G d i O i l O i l R i d R i d O i l O i l

Final K-12/ESD Achievement Compact Template

4-Year Cohort Graduation Optional Optional Required Required Optional Optional 5-year Cohort Graduation Optional Optional Optional Optional Required Required Optional Optional 5-Year Completion Optional Optional Optional Optional Required Required Optional Optional Post-Secondary Enrollment Pending Pending Optional Optional Optional Optional Required Required Optional Optional Earning 9+ College Credits Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Required Required Optional Optional Disadvantaged is aggregate of disadvantaged student groups (details on pp. 2-4) G h d d b di t i t id d j ti d g l **2012 13 g l ti l Gray shaded boxes are district-provided projections and goals **2012-13 goals are optional

Progression: Are students making sufficient progress toward college and career readiness?

2009-10 All Dis- advantaged 2010-11 All Dis- advantaged 2011-12 All* Dis- advantaged 2012-13 Goal All Dis- advantaged 4-Year Goal (2015-16)** Dis- advantaged Ready for School Kindergarten readiness assessment under development 3rd Gr. Reading Proficiency Optional Optional Required Required Optional Optional 3rd Gr Math Proficiency Optional Optional Required Required Optional Optional 3rd Gr. Math Proficiency Optional Optional Required Required Optional Optional 6th Grade On-Track Optional Optional Required Required Optional Optional 9th Grade On-Track Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Required Required Optional Optional *Estimate based on most recent available data **2016 Goals are optional

Equity: Are students succeeding across all buildings and populations?

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 Goal 4-Year Goal (2015-16)** Priority & Focus Schools* Required Optional DISAGGREGATED DATA AND GOALS FOR EACH DISADVANTAGED STUDENT GROUP LISTED ON PP 2-4 *Prior to 2012-13, school in federal AYP "Need Improvement" status **4-year Goals are optional

Local Priorities: What other measures reflect key priorities in the district? (optional, up to 3)

Year Dis- advantaged Year Dis- advantaged Year Dis- advantaged 1-Year Goal Dis- advantaged 4-Year Goal** Dis- advantaged Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional **4-year Goal optional

Investment: What is the public investment in the district? (does not include capital investments)

2010-11 2011-12* 2012-13* 2012-13 QEM calculation of Formula Revenue District Share Local Revenue not passed through formula District Official Local Revenue not passed through formula District Official Federal Revenue State Grants not passed through formula OEIB Chief Education Officer NOTE: The gray fields for current and past data are optional, as are the tan fields for local priorities. Districts should fill in the blue fields with their targets, provided student counts are six or more.

8

College and Career Ready: Are students completing high school ready for college or career? y g

4-year cohort graduation 5-year cohort graduation 5-year completion Post-secondary enrollment Earning 9+ college credits Earning 9+ college credits

9

Progression: Are students making ffi i t t d ll d sufficient progress toward college and career readiness?

Ready for School (under development) 3rd Grade Reading Proficiency 3rd Grade Math Proficiency 6th Grade On Track (attendance) 9th Grade On Track (attendance and credits)

10

E it A t d t di Equity:Are students succeeding across all buildings and populations?

P i it & F S h l Priority & Focus Schools Disaggregated data and goals for each disadvantaged student group listed on disadvantaged student group listed on pp 2-4

11

Equity: Are students succeeding across all populations?

Economically disadvantaged Economically disadvantaged Limited English Proficient Students with Disabilities Students with Disabilities Black (not of Hispanic origin) Hi i i i Hispanic origin American Indian/Alaska Native Pacific Islander (when available) Asian (not included in “Disadvantaged” aggregate) TAG (not included in “Disadvantaged” aggregate)

12

Local Priorities: What other measures reflect key priorities in the district? y p

O i l Optional Optional Optional

13

Investment: What is the public Investment: What is the public investment in the district? (does not include capital investments) include capital investments)

Form la Re en e Formula Revenue Local Revenue not passed through formula Local Revenue not passed through formula Federal Revenue State Grants not passed through formula

14

Information to come

Age-out data for special education students g p Recalculated pass rates for reading and math under new cut scores approved by the State Board of Education Technical methodologies for district data staff Post-secondary enrollment for 2010 grads

15

16

17

18

Contact us

• Comments to the OEIB

Education investment@state or us Education.investment@state.or.us

• Questions

Questions

Margie Lowe, 503-689-5194, Margie.Lowe@state.or.us g @

• On the Web

www.education.oregon.gov, Scroll down and click on “Oregon Education Investment Board”

19