Order properties of bases in products David Milovich Texas A&M - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

order properties of bases in products
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Order properties of bases in products David Milovich Texas A&M - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Order properties of bases in products David Milovich Texas A&M International University http://www.tamiu.edu/ dmilovich david.milovich@tamiu.edu Joint work with Guit-Jan Ridderbos and Santi Spadaro Mar. 20, 2010 Spring Topology and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Order properties of bases in products

David Milovich Texas A&M International University http://www.tamiu.edu/∼dmilovich david.milovich@tamiu.edu Joint work with Guit-Jan Ridderbos and Santi Spadaro

  • Mar. 20, 2010

Spring Topology and Dynamics Conference Mississippi State University

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Order theory preliminaries

Definition

◮ A preorder P is κ-directed if every subset smaller than κ has

an (upper) bound in P.

◮ Directed means ℵ0-directed.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Order theory preliminaries

Definition

◮ A preorder P is κ-directed if every subset smaller than κ has

an (upper) bound in P.

◮ Directed means ℵ0-directed.

Conversely:

◮ A preorder P is κ-founded if every bounded subset is smaller

than κ.

◮ Flat means ℵ0-founded.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Order theory preliminaries

Definition

◮ A preorder P is κ-directed if every subset smaller than κ has

an (upper) bound in P.

◮ Directed means ℵ0-directed.

Conversely:

◮ A preorder P is κ-founded if every bounded subset is smaller

than κ.

◮ Flat means ℵ0-founded.

Definition

A preorder P is almost κ-founded if it has a κ-founded cofinal suborder.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Order theory preliminaries

Definition

◮ A preorder P is κ-directed if every subset smaller than κ has

an (upper) bound in P.

◮ Directed means ℵ0-directed.

Conversely:

◮ A preorder P is κ-founded if every bounded subset is smaller

than κ.

◮ Flat means ℵ0-founded.

Definition

A preorder P is almost κ-founded if it has a κ-founded cofinal suborder.

Convention

Order sets like κ, [λ]κ, and 2<κ by ⊆.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Topological preliminaries

Convention

◮ All spaces are Hausdorff (T2). ◮ Families of open sets are ordered by ⊇.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Topological preliminaries

Convention

◮ All spaces are Hausdorff (T2). ◮ Families of open sets are ordered by ⊇.

Notation

◮ τ(X) is the set of open subsets of X. ◮ τ +(X) is the set of nonempty open subsets of X ◮ τ(p, X) is the set of open neighborhoods of p in X.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Topological preliminaries

Convention

◮ All spaces are Hausdorff (T2). ◮ Families of open sets are ordered by ⊇.

Notation

◮ τ(X) is the set of open subsets of X. ◮ τ +(X) is the set of nonempty open subsets of X ◮ τ(p, X) is the set of open neighborhoods of p in X.

Definition

◮ A local base at p is a cofinal subset of τ(p, X). ◮ A π-base is a cofinal subset of τ +(X). ◮ A base is a subset B of τ(X) that includes a local base at

every point.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

The weight The Noetherian type w(X) of X is Nt (X) of X is the least κ ≥ ℵ0 such that the least κ ≥ ℵ0 such that X has a base that is X has a base that is

  • f size ≤ κ.

κ-founded. The π-weight The Noetherian π-type π(X) of X is πNt (X) of X is the least κ ≥ ℵ0 such that the least κ ≥ ℵ0 such that X has a π-base that is X has a π-base that is

  • f size ≤ κ.

κ-founded. The character The local Noetherian type χ(p, X) of p in X is χNt (p, X) of p in X is the least κ ≥ ℵ0 such that the least κ ≥ ℵ0 such that p has a local base that is p has a local base that is

  • f size ≤ κ.

κ-founded. χ(X) = supp∈X χ(p, X) χNt (X) = supp∈X χNt (p, X)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

History

◮ Malykhin, Peregudov, and ˇ

Sapirovski˘ i studied the properties Nt (X) ≤ ℵ1, πNt (X) ≤ ℵ1, Nt (X) = ℵ0, and πNt (X) = ℵ0 in the 1970s and 1980s.

◮ Peregudov introduced Noetherian type and Noetherian π-type

in 1997.

◮ Bennett and Lutzer rediscovered the property Nt (X) = ℵ0 in

1998.

◮ In 2005, Milovich introduced local Noetherian type and

rediscovered Noetherian type and Noetherian π-type.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Easy upper bounds

Lemma

Every preorder P is almost cf(P)-founded.

Corollary

For all spaces X,

◮ χNt (p, X) ≤ χ(p, X); ◮ χNt (X) ≤ χ(X); ◮ πNt (X) ≤ π(X).

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Easy upper bounds

Lemma

Every preorder P is almost cf(P)-founded.

Corollary

For all spaces X,

◮ χNt (p, X) ≤ χ(p, X); ◮ χNt (X) ≤ χ(X); ◮ πNt (X) ≤ π(X).

Even easier:

Every P is |P|+-founded, so Nt (X) ≤ w(X)+.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Easy upper bounds

Lemma

Every preorder P is almost cf(P)-founded.

Corollary

For all spaces X,

◮ χNt (p, X) ≤ χ(p, X); ◮ χNt (X) ≤ χ(X); ◮ πNt (X) ≤ π(X).

Even easier:

Every P is |P|+-founded, so Nt (X) ≤ w(X)+.

Example

Nt (βN) = w(βN)+ = c+ because π(βN) = ℵ0 < cf(w(βN)).

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Easy upper bounds for products

Theorem

If p ∈ X =

i∈I Xi, then: ◮ Nt (X) ≤ supi∈I Nt (Xi) (Peregudov, 1997) ◮ πNt (X) ≤ supi∈I πNt (Xi) ◮ χNt (p, X) ≤ supi∈I χNt (p(i), Xi) ◮ χNt (X) ≤ supi∈I χNt (X)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Large products

Theorem (essentially (Malykhin, 1981))

If X =

α<κ Xα and |Xα| > 1 for all α < κ, then ◮ κ ≥ χ(p, X) ⇒ χNt (p, X) = ℵ0; ◮ κ ≥ χ(X) ⇒ χNt (X) = ℵ0; ◮ κ ≥ π(X) ⇒ πNt (X) = ℵ0 ; ◮ κ ≥ w(X) ⇒ Nt (X) = ℵ0.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Corollary

◮ Nt

  • X × 2w(X)

= ℵ0. (Malykhin, 1981)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Corollary

◮ Nt

  • X × 2w(X)

= ℵ0. (Malykhin, 1981)

◮ πNt

  • X × 2π(X)

= ℵ0.

◮ χNt

  • X × 2χ(X)

= ℵ0.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Corollary

◮ Nt

  • X × 2w(X)

= ℵ0. (Malykhin, 1981)

◮ πNt

  • X × 2π(X)

= ℵ0.

◮ χNt

  • X × 2χ(X)

= ℵ0.

◮ Nt

  • X w(X)

= ℵ0.

◮ πNt

  • X π(X)

= ℵ0.

◮ χNt

  • X χ(X)

= ℵ0.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Finite powers

Definition

◮ In a product space X = i∈I Xi, let Ntbox(X) denote the

least κ for which X has κ-founded base (π-base, local base at p) that consists only of boxes.

◮ Similarlly define χNtbox(p, X). ◮ χNtbox(p, X) = supp∈X χNtbox(p, X).

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Finite powers

Definition

◮ In a product space X = i∈I Xi, let Ntbox(X) denote the

least κ for which X has κ-founded base (π-base, local base at p) that consists only of boxes.

◮ Similarlly define χNtbox(p, X). ◮ χNtbox(p, X) = supp∈X χNtbox(p, X).

Theorem (M.)

For all n ∈ [1, ω), for all spaces X: χNt (pn, X n) = χNtbox(pn, X n) = χNt (p, X) χNt (X n) = χNtbox(X n) = χNt (X) Ntbox(X n) = Nt (X)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Could Nt (X n) = Ntbox(X n)?

Passing to subsets

◮ If B is a local base at p in X, then B includes a

χNt (X)-founded local base at p in X.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Could Nt (X n) = Ntbox(X n)?

Passing to subsets

◮ If B is a local base at p in X, then B includes a

χNt (X)-founded local base at p in X.

◮ If B is a π-base of X, then B includes a πNt (X)-founded

π-base of X.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Could Nt (X n) = Ntbox(X n)?

Passing to subsets

◮ If B is a local base at p in X, then B includes a

χNt (X)-founded local base at p in X.

◮ If B is a π-base of X, then B includes a πNt (X)-founded

π-base of X.

◮ The analogous claim for bases is false.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Could Nt (X n) = Ntbox(X n)?

Passing to subsets

◮ If B is a local base at p in X, then B includes a

χNt (X)-founded local base at p in X.

◮ If B is a π-base of X, then B includes a πNt (X)-founded

π-base of X.

◮ The analogous claim for bases is false.

Theorem (Bennett, Lutzer, 1998)

Every metrizable space has a flat base. Proof: For each n < ω, pick a locally finite open cover refining the balls of radius 2−n. Take the union of these covers.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Could Nt (X n) = Ntbox(X n)?

Passing to subsets

◮ If B is a local base at p in X, then B includes a

χNt (X)-founded local base at p in X.

◮ If B is a π-base of X, then B includes a πNt (X)-founded

π-base of X.

◮ The analogous claim for bases is false.

Theorem (Bennett, Lutzer, 1998)

Every metrizable space has a flat base. Proof: For each n < ω, pick a locally finite open cover refining the balls of radius 2−n. Take the union of these covers.

Example (M., 2009)

Set X = ωω. Let B be the set of all sets of the form Us,n where s ∈ ω<ω, n < ω, and Us,n is the set of all f ∈ X such that s⌢i ⊆ f for some i ≤ n. B a base of X, but B has no flat subcover.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

The Square Problem

Open Question

Is Nt

  • X 2

= Nt (X) possible? (Recall Nt (X) = Ntbox(X 2).)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

The Square Problem

Open Question

Is Nt

  • X 2

= Nt (X) possible? (Recall Nt (X) = Ntbox(X 2).) (Balogh, Bennett, Burke, Gruenhage, Lutzer, and Mashburn (2001) asked if Nt

  • X 2

= Nt (X) = ℵ0 is possible.)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

The Square Problem

Open Question

Is Nt

  • X 2

= Nt (X) possible? (Recall Nt (X) = Ntbox(X 2).) (Balogh, Bennett, Burke, Gruenhage, Lutzer, and Mashburn (2001) asked if Nt

  • X 2

= Nt (X) = ℵ0 is possible.)

Partial answers (M., Spadaro)

“No,” if:

◮ X is locally compact and metrizable;

slide-29
SLIDE 29

The Square Problem

Open Question

Is Nt

  • X 2

= Nt (X) possible? (Recall Nt (X) = Ntbox(X 2).) (Balogh, Bennett, Burke, Gruenhage, Lutzer, and Mashburn (2001) asked if Nt

  • X 2

= Nt (X) = ℵ0 is possible.)

Partial answers (M., Spadaro)

“No,” if:

◮ X is locally compact and metrizable; ◮ X is σ-compact and metrizable;

slide-30
SLIDE 30

The Square Problem

Open Question

Is Nt

  • X 2

= Nt (X) possible? (Recall Nt (X) = Ntbox(X 2).) (Balogh, Bennett, Burke, Gruenhage, Lutzer, and Mashburn (2001) asked if Nt

  • X 2

= Nt (X) = ℵ0 is possible.)

Partial answers (M., Spadaro)

“No,” if:

◮ X is locally compact and metrizable; ◮ X is σ-compact and metrizable; ◮ X is compact and χ(p, X) = w(X) for all p ∈ X

slide-31
SLIDE 31

The Square Problem

Open Question

Is Nt

  • X 2

= Nt (X) possible? (Recall Nt (X) = Ntbox(X 2).) (Balogh, Bennett, Burke, Gruenhage, Lutzer, and Mashburn (2001) asked if Nt

  • X 2

= Nt (X) = ℵ0 is possible.)

Partial answers (M., Spadaro)

“No,” if:

◮ X is locally compact and metrizable; ◮ X is σ-compact and metrizable; ◮ X is compact and χ(p, X) = w(X) for all p ∈ X

(a special case: X is a compact group);

slide-32
SLIDE 32

The Square Problem

Open Question

Is Nt

  • X 2

= Nt (X) possible? (Recall Nt (X) = Ntbox(X 2).) (Balogh, Bennett, Burke, Gruenhage, Lutzer, and Mashburn (2001) asked if Nt

  • X 2

= Nt (X) = ℵ0 is possible.)

Partial answers (M., Spadaro)

“No,” if:

◮ X is locally compact and metrizable; ◮ X is σ-compact and metrizable; ◮ X is compact and χ(p, X) = w(X) for all p ∈ X

(a special case: X is a compact group);

◮ X is compact, has regular weight κ, and has a dense set of

points with π-character < κ

slide-33
SLIDE 33

The Square Problem

Open Question

Is Nt

  • X 2

= Nt (X) possible? (Recall Nt (X) = Ntbox(X 2).) (Balogh, Bennett, Burke, Gruenhage, Lutzer, and Mashburn (2001) asked if Nt

  • X 2

= Nt (X) = ℵ0 is possible.)

Partial answers (M., Spadaro)

“No,” if:

◮ X is locally compact and metrizable; ◮ X is σ-compact and metrizable; ◮ X is compact and χ(p, X) = w(X) for all p ∈ X

(a special case: X is a compact group);

◮ X is compact, has regular weight κ, and has a dense set of

points with π-character < κ (a special case: X is T5, compact, and has regular weight);

slide-34
SLIDE 34

The Square Problem

Open Question

Is Nt

  • X 2

= Nt (X) possible? (Recall Nt (X) = Ntbox(X 2).) (Balogh, Bennett, Burke, Gruenhage, Lutzer, and Mashburn (2001) asked if Nt

  • X 2

= Nt (X) = ℵ0 is possible.)

Partial answers (M., Spadaro)

“No,” if:

◮ X is locally compact and metrizable; ◮ X is σ-compact and metrizable; ◮ X is compact and χ(p, X) = w(X) for all p ∈ X

(a special case: X is a compact group);

◮ X is compact, has regular weight κ, and has a dense set of

points with π-character < κ (a special case: X is T5, compact, and has regular weight);

◮ X is compact, homogeneous, and has regular weight.

slide-35
SLIDE 35

A surprising finite product

◮ For directed sets P, Q, the relation P ≤T Q means there is

map from Q to P sending cofinal sets to cofinal sets.

slide-36
SLIDE 36

A surprising finite product

◮ For directed sets P, Q, the relation P ≤T Q means there is

map from Q to P sending cofinal sets to cofinal sets.

◮ (Todorˇ

cevi´ c, 1985) If cf(κ) = κ = κℵ0, then there exist directed P, Q with P, Q <T P × Q ≡T [κ]<ℵ0.

slide-37
SLIDE 37

A surprising finite product

◮ For directed sets P, Q, the relation P ≤T Q means there is

map from Q to P sending cofinal sets to cofinal sets.

◮ (Todorˇ

cevi´ c, 1985) If cf(κ) = κ = κℵ0, then there exist directed P, Q with P, Q <T P × Q ≡T [κ]<ℵ0.

◮ (M., 2010) Using these P and Q, we can build compact X, Y

such that χNt (X) = χNt (Y ) = ℵ1 and χNt (X × Y ) = ℵ0.

slide-38
SLIDE 38

A surprising finite product

◮ For directed sets P, Q, the relation P ≤T Q means there is

map from Q to P sending cofinal sets to cofinal sets.

◮ (Todorˇ

cevi´ c, 1985) If cf(κ) = κ = κℵ0, then there exist directed P, Q with P, Q <T P × Q ≡T [κ]<ℵ0.

◮ (M., 2010) Using these P and Q, we can build compact X, Y

such that χNt (X) = χNt (Y ) = ℵ1 and χNt (X × Y ) = ℵ0. We can set Z = X ⊕ Y to get p, q, Z with χNt

  • p, q, Z 2

= ℵ0 < ℵ1 = χNt (p, Z) = χNt (q, Z).

slide-39
SLIDE 39

A surprising finite product

◮ For directed sets P, Q, the relation P ≤T Q means there is

map from Q to P sending cofinal sets to cofinal sets.

◮ (Todorˇ

cevi´ c, 1985) If cf(κ) = κ = κℵ0, then there exist directed P, Q with P, Q <T P × Q ≡T [κ]<ℵ0.

◮ (M., 2010) Using these P and Q, we can build compact X, Y

such that χNt (X) = χNt (Y ) = ℵ1 and χNt (X × Y ) = ℵ0. We can set Z = X ⊕ Y to get p, q, Z with χNt

  • p, q, Z 2

= ℵ0 < ℵ1 = χNt (p, Z) = χNt (q, Z).

◮ (Spadaro, 2010) Using a hyperspace-like construction, we can

modify X and Y to get Nt (X) , Nt (Y ) ≥ ℵ1 and Nt (X × Y ) = ℵ0.

slide-40
SLIDE 40

A surprising finite product

◮ For directed sets P, Q, the relation P ≤T Q means there is

map from Q to P sending cofinal sets to cofinal sets.

◮ (Todorˇ

cevi´ c, 1985) If cf(κ) = κ = κℵ0, then there exist directed P, Q with P, Q <T P × Q ≡T [κ]<ℵ0.

◮ (M., 2010) Using these P and Q, we can build compact X, Y

such that χNt (X) = χNt (Y ) = ℵ1 and χNt (X × Y ) = ℵ0. We can set Z = X ⊕ Y to get p, q, Z with χNt

  • p, q, Z 2

= ℵ0 < ℵ1 = χNt (p, Z) = χNt (q, Z).

◮ (Spadaro, 2010) Using a hyperspace-like construction, we can

modify X and Y to get Nt (X) , Nt (Y ) ≥ ℵ1 and Nt (X × Y ) = ℵ0.

◮ Open: Are there compact X, Y with

Nt (X × Y ) < min{Nt (X) , Nt (Y )}?

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Connections with PCF theory and large cardinals

Definition

(κ)

i∈I Xi denotes the set i∈I Xi with the topology generated by

(< κ)-supported products of open subsets of the factors.

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Connections with PCF theory and large cardinals

Definition

(κ)

i∈I Xi denotes the set i∈I Xi with the topology generated by

(< κ)-supported products of open subsets of the factors.

Example

◮ Let p ∈ X = (ℵ1) α<ℵω 2. We then have π(X) = w(X) = ℵℵ0 ω .

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Connections with PCF theory and large cardinals

Definition

(κ)

i∈I Xi denotes the set i∈I Xi with the topology generated by

(< κ)-supported products of open subsets of the factors.

Example

◮ Let p ∈ X = (ℵ1) α<ℵω 2. We then have π(X) = w(X) = ℵℵ0 ω . ◮ ℵ1 ≤ πNt (X) ≤ Nt (X) ≤ c+.

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Connections with PCF theory and large cardinals

Definition

(κ)

i∈I Xi denotes the set i∈I Xi with the topology generated by

(< κ)-supported products of open subsets of the factors.

Example

◮ Let p ∈ X = (ℵ1) α<ℵω 2. We then have π(X) = w(X) = ℵℵ0 ω . ◮ ℵ1 ≤ πNt (X) ≤ Nt (X) ≤ c+. ◮ (Kojman) If ℵω and ℵℵ0 ω = ℵω+1, then Nt (X) = ℵ1.

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Connections with PCF theory and large cardinals

Definition

(κ)

i∈I Xi denotes the set i∈I Xi with the topology generated by

(< κ)-supported products of open subsets of the factors.

Example

◮ Let p ∈ X = (ℵ1) α<ℵω 2. We then have π(X) = w(X) = ℵℵ0 ω . ◮ ℵ1 ≤ πNt (X) ≤ Nt (X) ≤ c+. ◮ (Kojman) If ℵω and ℵℵ0 ω = ℵω+1, then Nt (X) = ℵ1. ◮ (Kojman) Nt (X) ≤ cf

  • [ℵω]ℵ0
slide-46
SLIDE 46

Connections with PCF theory and large cardinals

Definition

(κ)

i∈I Xi denotes the set i∈I Xi with the topology generated by

(< κ)-supported products of open subsets of the factors.

Example

◮ Let p ∈ X = (ℵ1) α<ℵω 2. We then have π(X) = w(X) = ℵℵ0 ω . ◮ ℵ1 ≤ πNt (X) ≤ Nt (X) ≤ c+. ◮ (Kojman) If ℵω and ℵℵ0 ω = ℵω+1, then Nt (X) = ℵ1. ◮ (Kojman) Nt (X) ≤ cf

  • [ℵω]ℵ0

< ℵω4 (Shelah).

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Connections with PCF theory and large cardinals

Definition

(κ)

i∈I Xi denotes the set i∈I Xi with the topology generated by

(< κ)-supported products of open subsets of the factors.

Example

◮ Let p ∈ X = (ℵ1) α<ℵω 2. We then have π(X) = w(X) = ℵℵ0 ω . ◮ ℵ1 ≤ πNt (X) ≤ Nt (X) ≤ c+. ◮ (Kojman) If ℵω and ℵℵ0 ω = ℵω+1, then Nt (X) = ℵ1. ◮ (Kojman) Nt (X) ≤ cf

  • [ℵω]ℵ0

< ℵω4 (Shelah).

◮ (Spadaro) c ≤ ℵω+1 ⇒ Nt (X) ≤ ℵω+1.

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Connections with PCF theory and large cardinals

Definition

(κ)

i∈I Xi denotes the set i∈I Xi with the topology generated by

(< κ)-supported products of open subsets of the factors.

Example

◮ Let p ∈ X = (ℵ1) α<ℵω 2. We then have π(X) = w(X) = ℵℵ0 ω . ◮ ℵ1 ≤ πNt (X) ≤ Nt (X) ≤ c+. ◮ (Kojman) If ℵω and ℵℵ0 ω = ℵω+1, then Nt (X) = ℵ1. ◮ (Kojman) Nt (X) ≤ cf

  • [ℵω]ℵ0

< ℵω4 (Shelah).

◮ (Spadaro) c ≤ ℵω+1 ⇒ Nt (X) ≤ ℵω+1. Open: can we have

Nt (X) > ℵω+1?

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Connections with PCF theory and large cardinals

Definition

(κ)

i∈I Xi denotes the set i∈I Xi with the topology generated by

(< κ)-supported products of open subsets of the factors.

Example

◮ Let p ∈ X = (ℵ1) α<ℵω 2. We then have π(X) = w(X) = ℵℵ0 ω . ◮ ℵ1 ≤ πNt (X) ≤ Nt (X) ≤ c+. ◮ (Kojman) If ℵω and ℵℵ0 ω = ℵω+1, then Nt (X) = ℵ1. ◮ (Kojman) Nt (X) ≤ cf

  • [ℵω]ℵ0

< ℵω4 (Shelah).

◮ (Spadaro) c ≤ ℵω+1 ⇒ Nt (X) ≤ ℵω+1. Open: can we have

Nt (X) > ℵω+1?

◮ (Soukup) (ℵω+1, ℵω) ։ (ℵ1, ℵ0) ⇒ Nt (X) ≥ ℵ2.

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Connections with PCF theory and large cardinals

Definition

(κ)

i∈I Xi denotes the set i∈I Xi with the topology generated by

(< κ)-supported products of open subsets of the factors.

Example

◮ Let p ∈ X = (ℵ1) α<ℵω 2. We then have π(X) = w(X) = ℵℵ0 ω . ◮ ℵ1 ≤ πNt (X) ≤ Nt (X) ≤ c+. ◮ (Kojman) If ℵω and ℵℵ0 ω = ℵω+1, then Nt (X) = ℵ1. ◮ (Kojman) Nt (X) ≤ cf

  • [ℵω]ℵ0

< ℵω4 (Shelah).

◮ (Spadaro) c ≤ ℵω+1 ⇒ Nt (X) ≤ ℵω+1. Open: can we have

Nt (X) > ℵω+1?

◮ (Soukup) (ℵω+1, ℵω) ։ (ℵ1, ℵ0) ⇒ Nt (X) ≥ ℵ2.(The

hypothesis is consistent with GCH, relative to (roughly) a huge cardinal (Levinski, Magidor, Shelah, 1990).)

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Connections with PCF theory and large cardinals

Definition

(κ)

i∈I Xi denotes the set i∈I Xi with the topology generated by

(< κ)-supported products of open subsets of the factors.

Example

◮ Let p ∈ X = (ℵ1) α<ℵω 2. We then have π(X) = w(X) = ℵℵ0 ω . ◮ ℵ1 ≤ πNt (X) ≤ Nt (X) ≤ c+. ◮ (Kojman) If ℵω and ℵℵ0 ω = ℵω+1, then Nt (X) = ℵ1. ◮ (Kojman) Nt (X) ≤ cf

  • [ℵω]ℵ0

< ℵω4 (Shelah).

◮ (Spadaro) c ≤ ℵω+1 ⇒ Nt (X) ≤ ℵω+1. Open: can we have

Nt (X) > ℵω+1?

◮ (Soukup) (ℵω+1, ℵω) ։ (ℵ1, ℵ0) ⇒ Nt (X) ≥ ℵ2.(The

hypothesis is consistent with GCH, relative to (roughly) a huge cardinal (Levinski, Magidor, Shelah, 1990).)

◮ Open: Can we have πNt (X) > ℵ1? Equivalently, can

Fn(ℵω, 2, ℵ1), ⊆ fail to be almost ℵ1-founded?

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Van Douwen’s Problem

Definition

The cellularity c (X) of X is the least infinite upper bound of the cardinalities of its cellular families, i.e., pairwise disjoint open families.

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Van Douwen’s Problem

Definition

The cellularity c (X) of X is the least infinite upper bound of the cardinalities of its cellular families, i.e., pairwise disjoint open families.

Patterns

◮ Every known compact homogeneous space (CHS) is a

continuous image of a product of compacta with weight at most c.

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Van Douwen’s Problem

Definition

The cellularity c (X) of X is the least infinite upper bound of the cardinalities of its cellular families, i.e., pairwise disjoint open families.

Patterns

◮ Every known compact homogeneous space (CHS) is a

continuous image of a product of compacta with weight at most c.

◮ It follows that every known CHS has cellularity at most c.

(Why? Easy: c+ is a caliber of any such space.)

◮ Van Douwen’s Problem asks whether c (X) ≤ c for every CHS

  • X. This is open after ∼40 years, in all models of ZFC.
slide-55
SLIDE 55

Van Douwen’s Problem

Definition

The cellularity c (X) of X is the least infinite upper bound of the cardinalities of its cellular families, i.e., pairwise disjoint open families.

Patterns

◮ Every known compact homogeneous space (CHS) is a

continuous image of a product of compacta with weight at most c.

◮ It follows that every known CHS has cellularity at most c.

(Why? Easy: c+ is a caliber of any such space.)

◮ Van Douwen’s Problem asks whether c (X) ≤ c for every CHS

  • X. This is open after ∼40 years, in all models of ZFC.

◮ (M., 2007) It also follows that every known CHS has

Noetherian type at most c+. (Why? Not as easy. . . )

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Sharp bounds

Example (Maurice, 1964)

The lexicographically ordered space X = 2ω·ω

lex is a CHS satisfying

c (X) = c.

Example (Peregudov, 1997)

The double-arrow space X is compact, homogeneous, and Nt (X) = c+.

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Does every CHS have a flat local base?

Another Pattern

Every known CHS X satisfies πNt (X) ≤ ℵ1 and χNt (X) = ℵ0.

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Does every CHS have a flat local base?

Another Pattern

Every known CHS X satisfies πNt (X) ≤ ℵ1 and χNt (X) = ℵ0.

Theorems (M., 2007)

◮ If X is a separable CHS and w(X) < p, then χNt (X) = ℵ0

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Does every CHS have a flat local base?

Another Pattern

Every known CHS X satisfies πNt (X) ≤ ℵ1 and χNt (X) = ℵ0.

Theorems (M., 2007)

◮ If X is a separable CHS and w(X) < p, then χNt (X) = ℵ0 ◮ Assuming GCH, χNt (X) ≤ c (X) if X is a CHS.

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Does every CHS have a flat local base?

Another Pattern

Every known CHS X satisfies πNt (X) ≤ ℵ1 and χNt (X) = ℵ0.

Theorems (M., 2007)

◮ If X is a separable CHS and w(X) < p, then χNt (X) = ℵ0 ◮ Assuming GCH, χNt (X) ≤ c (X) if X is a CHS.

Attacking Van Douwen’s Problem

◮ If we found a model of GCH with a CHS X with a local base

B such that B is not almost ℵ1-founded, then c (X) > c.

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Does every CHS have a flat local base?

Another Pattern

Every known CHS X satisfies πNt (X) ≤ ℵ1 and χNt (X) = ℵ0.

Theorems (M., 2007)

◮ If X is a separable CHS and w(X) < p, then χNt (X) = ℵ0 ◮ Assuming GCH, χNt (X) ≤ c (X) if X is a CHS.

Attacking Van Douwen’s Problem

◮ If we found a model of GCH with a CHS X with a local base

B such that B is not almost ℵ1-founded, then c (X) > c.

◮ X = 2ω lex × 2ω1 lex × 2ω2 lex is compact, and not local base of X is

almost ℵ1-founded, but X is not homogeneous.

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Does every CHS have a flat local base?

Another Pattern

Every known CHS X satisfies πNt (X) ≤ ℵ1 and χNt (X) = ℵ0.

Theorems (M., 2007)

◮ If X is a separable CHS and w(X) < p, then χNt (X) = ℵ0 ◮ Assuming GCH, χNt (X) ≤ c (X) if X is a CHS.

Attacking Van Douwen’s Problem

◮ If we found a model of GCH with a CHS X with a local base

B such that B is not almost ℵ1-founded, then c (X) > c.

◮ X = 2ω lex × 2ω1 lex × 2ω2 lex is compact, and not local base of X is

almost ℵ1-founded, but X is not homogeneous.

◮ (Arhangel′ski˘

ı, 2005) If a product of linear orders is a CHS, then all factors are first countable, and hence have cellularity at most c.

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Power homogeneous compacta

Definition (Van Douwen)

A space X is power homogeneous if X α is homogeneous for some α > 0.

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Power homogeneous compacta

Definition (Van Douwen)

A space X is power homogeneous if X α is homogeneous for some α > 0.

◮ Many results about homogeneous compact spaces have been

generalized to power homogeneous compact (PHC) spaces.

◮ (Ridderbos, 2006) For example, 2χ(X) ≤ 2πχ(X)c(X) for all

PHC X.

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Power homogeneous compacta

Definition (Van Douwen)

A space X is power homogeneous if X α is homogeneous for some α > 0.

◮ Many results about homogeneous compact spaces have been

generalized to power homogeneous compact (PHC) spaces.

◮ (Ridderbos, 2006) For example, 2χ(X) ≤ 2πχ(X)c(X) for all

PHC X.

◮ However, it is unknown whether every PHC X satisfies

c (X) ≤ c.

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Power homogeneous compacta

Definition (Van Douwen)

A space X is power homogeneous if X α is homogeneous for some α > 0.

◮ Many results about homogeneous compact spaces have been

generalized to power homogeneous compact (PHC) spaces.

◮ (Ridderbos, 2006) For example, 2χ(X) ≤ 2πχ(X)c(X) for all

PHC X.

◮ However, it is unknown whether every PHC X satisfies

c (X) ≤ c.

◮ It is also unknown whether every PHC X has a flat local base.

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Power homogeneous compacta

Definition (Van Douwen)

A space X is power homogeneous if X α is homogeneous for some α > 0.

◮ Many results about homogeneous compact spaces have been

generalized to power homogeneous compact (PHC) spaces.

◮ (Ridderbos, 2006) For example, 2χ(X) ≤ 2πχ(X)c(X) for all

PHC X.

◮ However, it is unknown whether every PHC X satisfies

c (X) ≤ c.

◮ It is also unknown whether every PHC X has a flat local base. ◮ Perhaps an easier question: Does GCH imply

χNt (X) ≤ c (X) for all PHC X?

slide-68
SLIDE 68

A partial answer

Perhaps an even easier question:

Does GCH imply χNt (X) ≤ d(X) for all PHC X?

slide-69
SLIDE 69

A partial answer

Perhaps an even easier question:

Does GCH imply χNt (X) ≤ d(X) for all PHC X?

Theorem (M., Ridderbos, 2007)

Given GCH, X PHC, and maxp∈X χ(p, X) = cf(χ(X)) > d(X), there is a nonempty open U ⊆ X such that χNt (p, X) = ℵ0 for all p ∈ U.

slide-70
SLIDE 70

Local bases in powers

◮ (M., 2007) If f : X → Y is continuous and open at p, then

χNt (p, X) ≤ χNt (f (p), Y ).

slide-71
SLIDE 71

Local bases in powers

◮ (M., 2007) If f : X → Y is continuous and open at p, then

χNt (p, X) ≤ χNt (f (p), Y ). Hence, 0 < α < β ⇒ χNt

  • p, X β

≤ χNt (p ↾ α, X α).

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Local bases in powers

◮ (M., 2007) If f : X → Y is continuous and open at p, then

χNt (p, X) ≤ χNt (f (p), Y ). Hence, 0 < α < β ⇒ χNt

  • p, X β

≤ χNt (p ↾ α, X α).

◮ (M., 2009) If 0 < γ < ω1, then χNt (pγ, X γ) = χNt (p, X)

and χNt (X γ) = χNt (X).

slide-73
SLIDE 73

Local bases in powers

◮ (M., 2007) If f : X → Y is continuous and open at p, then

χNt (p, X) ≤ χNt (f (p), Y ). Hence, 0 < α < β ⇒ χNt

  • p, X β

≤ χNt (p ↾ α, X α).

◮ (M., 2009) If 0 < γ < ω1, then χNt (pγ, X γ) = χNt (p, X)

and χNt (X γ) = χNt (X). However, there are examples of χNt (X ω1) < χNt (X) with ℵ1 < cf(χ(X)).

slide-74
SLIDE 74

Local bases in powers

◮ (M., 2007) If f : X → Y is continuous and open at p, then

χNt (p, X) ≤ χNt (f (p), Y ). Hence, 0 < α < β ⇒ χNt

  • p, X β

≤ χNt (p ↾ α, X α).

◮ (M., 2009) If 0 < γ < ω1, then χNt (pγ, X γ) = χNt (p, X)

and χNt (X γ) = χNt (X). However, there are examples of χNt (X ω1) < χNt (X) with ℵ1 < cf(χ(X)).

◮ (Ridderbos, 2007) If 0 < γ < cf(χ(p, X)), then

χNt (pγ, X γ) = χNt (p, X).

slide-75
SLIDE 75

Local bases in powers

◮ (M., 2007) If f : X → Y is continuous and open at p, then

χNt (p, X) ≤ χNt (f (p), Y ). Hence, 0 < α < β ⇒ χNt

  • p, X β

≤ χNt (p ↾ α, X α).

◮ (M., 2009) If 0 < γ < ω1, then χNt (pγ, X γ) = χNt (p, X)

and χNt (X γ) = χNt (X). However, there are examples of χNt (X ω1) < χNt (X) with ℵ1 < cf(χ(X)).

◮ (Ridderbos, 2007) If 0 < γ < cf(χ(p, X)), then

χNt (pγ, X γ) = χNt (p, X).

◮ (M., 2009) If cf(χ(p, X)) ≤ γ < χ(p, X), then

χNt (pγ, X γ) ≤ χNt (p, X) ≤ χNt (pγ, X γ)+.

slide-76
SLIDE 76

Local bases in powers

◮ (M., 2007) If f : X → Y is continuous and open at p, then

χNt (p, X) ≤ χNt (f (p), Y ). Hence, 0 < α < β ⇒ χNt

  • p, X β

≤ χNt (p ↾ α, X α).

◮ (M., 2009) If 0 < γ < ω1, then χNt (pγ, X γ) = χNt (p, X)

and χNt (X γ) = χNt (X). However, there are examples of χNt (X ω1) < χNt (X) with ℵ1 < cf(χ(X)).

◮ (Ridderbos, 2007) If 0 < γ < cf(χ(p, X)), then

χNt (pγ, X γ) = χNt (p, X).

◮ (M., 2009) If cf(χ(p, X)) ≤ γ < χ(p, X), then

χNt (pγ, X γ) ≤ χNt (p, X) ≤ χNt (pγ, X γ)+.

◮ (M., 2005) If χ(p, X) ≤ γ and |X| > 1, then

χNt (pγ, X γ) = ℵ0.

slide-77
SLIDE 77

Singular character and box products

Definition

(κ)

i∈I Xi denotes the set i∈I Xi with the topology generated by

(< κ)-supported products of open subsets of the factors.

slide-78
SLIDE 78

Singular character and box products

Definition

(κ)

i∈I Xi denotes the set i∈I Xi with the topology generated by

(< κ)-supported products of open subsets of the factors.

Example (M., 2009)

◮ Let p ∈ X = (ℵ1) α<ω1

(ℵω)

β<α 2.

slide-79
SLIDE 79

Singular character and box products

Definition

(κ)

i∈I Xi denotes the set i∈I Xi with the topology generated by

(< κ)-supported products of open subsets of the factors.

Example (M., 2009)

◮ Let p ∈ X = (ℵ1) α<ω1

(ℵω)

β<α 2. ◮ χ(p, X) = ω1.

slide-80
SLIDE 80

Singular character and box products

Definition

(κ)

i∈I Xi denotes the set i∈I Xi with the topology generated by

(< κ)-supported products of open subsets of the factors.

Example (M., 2009)

◮ Let p ∈ X = (ℵ1) α<ω1

(ℵω)

β<α 2. ◮ χ(p, X) = ω1. ◮ χNt (p, X) = ℵ+ ω .

slide-81
SLIDE 81

Singular character and box products

Definition

(κ)

i∈I Xi denotes the set i∈I Xi with the topology generated by

(< κ)-supported products of open subsets of the factors.

Example (M., 2009)

◮ Let p ∈ X = (ℵ1) α<ω1

(ℵω)

β<α 2. ◮ χ(p, X) = ω1. ◮ χNt (p, X) = ℵ+ ω . ◮ χNt (pω1, X ω1) = ℵω.