or excessive demands and uncertainty? Miles Bore, Peta Apostolatos, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

or excessive demands and
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

or excessive demands and uncertainty? Miles Bore, Peta Apostolatos, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Why are they not flourishing: late adolescence, emerging adulthood or excessive demands and uncertainty? Miles Bore, Peta Apostolatos, Emma Prowse, Suzanne Stevens, Colin James. School of Psychology, University of Newcastle, Australia


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Why are they not flourishing: late adolescence, emerging adulthood

  • r excessive demands and

uncertainty?

Miles Bore, Peta Apostolatos, Emma Prowse, Suzanne Stevens, Colin James. School of Psychology, University of Newcastle, Australia

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Flourishing?

 Our students

 Majority are18 to 25 year olds  Educated  Through the adolescence stage  Greater freedom and choice (?)  Peak of physical fitness (although

development still occurring)

 Relatively strong social support

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Levels of psychological distress

 Brief Symptom Inventory

 Derogatis L. R. (1975, 2004)

 Instructions

 How much has each problem bothered you in the

last 7 days

 53 items, e.g,

 Pains in heart or chest  Thoughts of ending your life  Feeling lonely  Difficulty making decisions

 5 point scale

0 not at all ……..4 Extremely

slide-4
SLIDE 4

BSI Scores

 Global Severity Index (GSI)

 Responses summed and dived by 53  GSI score range 0 to 5

 Nine symptoms cluster scores

 Obsessive-Compulsive  Interpersonal Sensitivity  Anxiety  Depression  Hostility  Paranoid Ideation  Psychoticism  Somatization  Phobic Anxiety

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Combined Samples

Males Females Median Age Medical students 156 244 20 Psychology students 92 356 19 Law students 145 190 20 Total 393 790

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Global Severity Index

3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 GSI Frequency

slide-7
SLIDE 7

With norms

Sample mean = .81 Diff to: Adult NP p < .000 Adol NP ns Adult PI p < .000 Adult PO p < .000

slide-8
SLIDE 8

GSI by Discipline

Law Psych Med 4 3 2 1 Discipline GSI Adult NP Adult IP Adol NP Adult OP

Proportion > than Adult IP norm: Med 19% Psyc 27% Law 22% Psyc higher than Med p < .05 Law ns Med

  • r Psyc
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Reliability and Validity

 Alpha = .96  Females score higher

than males .75 vs .84, p = .02

 Correlates strongly with

Big 5 Neuroticism r = .58

 Correlates strongly with

 K10 r = .63  GHQ12 r = .61  SWB r = -.52  Sat W Life r = -.48  EQ r = -.38

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Factor Analysis

Extracted two factors, Oblimin rotation: Depression factor and Anxiety factor, r = .68

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Two factors

Discipline F2Anxiety F1Depression Law Psych Med Law Psych Med 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0

  • 0.1
  • 0.2
  • 0.3

Data

Factor mean scores by group with 95% CIs

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Symptom Dimensions

P h

  • b

A n x S

  • m

a P s y c h

  • t

i c P a r a n

  • i

d H

  • s

t i l i t y D e p r e s s A n x i e t y I n t S e n O C D 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Data

Students Adult norm Adoles norm Adult IP norm

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Symptom Dimensions by Group

PhobAnx Soma Psychotic Paranoid Hostility Depress Anxiety IntSen OCD 1.50 1.25 1.00 0.75 0.50 Data

Med Psych Law Discipline

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Top 5 rated items

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Item with greatest differential: ‘Getting into frequent arguments’

Discipline Gender Law Psyc Med Female Male Female Male Female Male 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Getting into frequent arguments

Main effect of Discipline significant: F = 10.3, p <.001 Law ‘getting into frequent arguments’ significantly more than Med or Psyc 

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Symposium Summary

 A significant proportion of students report high levels

  • f

 General psychological distress

 K10, GHQ, GSI

 OC anxiety symptoms  Personality disorder symptoms  Eating disorder symptoms

 BSI profile looks more like adolescent (15 y.o.) profile

 With greater OC symptoms and lesser Hostility and

Paranoid Ideation symptoms

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Causes?

 High scorers likely made up of people who:

 have a mental illness  are experiencing developmental delay

 Delay in moving from adolescent stage?

 are typical of a new stage?

 Emerging Adulthood stage (Arnett, 2000)

  • Period between adolescence and young adulthood
  • 18 to 25 years old
  • Delayed marriage and parenting
  • Extended education
  • Period of high ‘volition’
slide-18
SLIDE 18

 are experiencing significant stressors

 Death of grandparents  Change in family/social support  Relationship issues  Work and finance  High need to achieve  University stressors

 are susceptible/have low ‘resilience’?

slide-19
SLIDE 19

What is ‘Resilience’

 Schetter and Dolbier, (2011)

 “the process involving an ability to withstand

and cope with ongoing or repeated demands and maintain healthy functioning in different domains of life such as work and family’ (p. 637)

 Present a taxonomy of resilience resources >

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Taxonomy of Resilience Resources

Schetter and Dolbier, (2011)

 Personality/dispositional

 Neuroticism (all Big 5), hardiness, sense of coherence

 Self and Ego

 Mastery, control, agency, self confidence, autonomy, identity

 Interpersonal/Social

 Support, connectedness, relationships

 Cultural Beliefs

 Spirituality, values

 Behavioural and Cognitive Skills

 Mindfulness, coping, reframing, flexibility, communication,

emotional regulation etc

 Other Resources

 Physical fitness, diet, SEC, intelligence, healthy practices

slide-21
SLIDE 21

What we can do for our students

 Embed resilience skill development within our

courses

 Helen Stallman (UQ):

 Universities could include resilience as a

graduate attribute

 Future research

 Working with University Counselling Service  Design a resilience intervention  Embedded and evaluate in 1st year course

slide-22
SLIDE 22

For Psychology students

 The learning and

application of resilience skills can compliment the theory and research knowledge

 Application to self of

intervention strategies