outcomes in total knee replacement it s in your hands
play

Outcomes in Total Knee Replacement: Its in your hands! Douglas E - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Outcomes in Total Knee Replacement: Its in your hands! Douglas E Padgett, MD Chief, Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Hospital For Special Surgery New York, NY Disclosures Consultant: DJO Global: Hip Products


  1. Outcomes in Total Knee Replacement: “It’s in your hands!” Douglas E Padgett, MD Chief, Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Hospital For Special Surgery New York, NY

  2. Disclosures Consultant: – DJO Global: Hip Products – PixarBio: biopharma company Validated the HOOS Jr, and KOOS Jr. rating instruments: NO $$$ ! Research Support: Trump Institute Boards: – Hip Society – American Joint Replacement Registry – Journal of Arthroplasty

  3. Special Thanks

  4. What to speak about ?

  5. Why not ? Boring, Pedantic, Useless

  6. I turned to my yogi for spiritual guidance and inspiration:

  7. Observations on Outcomes after Total Knee It’s in your hands !

  8. What do we want after TKR ? A happy patient ! No complications ! A simple thanks !

  9. What do the patients want ? Now that’s a great question ! We all think that it’s simply – Pain relief – Improvement in function – A better life style

  10. The Millennial Patient

  11. Millennial Misperception about TKR “It can’t be that big a deal, they do it as outpatients !” “I had my knee scoped a few years back, how bad could this be” “I had a friend who had a knee and he was back at work in 3 days”

  12. “Back in the Game”

  13. In reality, TKR is more like this !

  14. My personal strategy to get a better outcome ! Focus on the things that work Forget about the things that : – Don’t work – Can’t work – Won’t work

  15. The Things That Work Patient Selection Technical Execution Perioperative / Postop Mgt

  16. How to achieve success ? Step 1 Patient selection – Make sure the patient has arthritis – Make sure the symptoms fit the clinical picture

  17. Patient Selection Make sure the patient has arthritis!

  18. Patient Selection

  19. Patient Selection

  20. Patient Selection Inferior outcomes – 1700 TKR’s – 44 pt’s with Kellegren Lawrence score 2 or less – Significantly lower knee scores – Dissatisfaction rate: 32% – 18% reoperation rate Peck et al, Knee 2014

  21. Lessons learned: Examine hip & knee !

  22. Patient Selection: Disability Level of disability: 7 questions: – How best assess ? – Stiffness – 4 questions pain Twist Validated measures: Straightening – WOMAC Stairs – KOOS standing – KOOS Jr – Function Rising from sitting Bending to floor

  23. Patient Selection: Disability KOOS Jr. Survey results Mild stiffness Mild pain Still plays golf I don’t care what his xray looks like: I’m not operating !!

  24. Patient Selection: Evidence for Disability HSS Registry data: – 2300 TKR’s – PROM’s including patient satisfaction collected 2 yr results – Greatest satisfaction in patients with more pain, worse function but ….general health still good: most likely to be satisfied ! Maratt et al J Arthroplasty 2015

  25. Patient Selection: Review of Risk Factors The “modifiable” risk factors The “not so modifiable” risk factors

  26. Patient Selection: Modifiable Risk Factors Risk Factors: – Usual suspects: Diabetes Obesity Smoking Cardiopulmonary Disease Prior history of VTE

  27. Patient Selection: How to handle ? Diabetes: – Evidence is clear: HgbA1c < 8.0 Smoking: – Clear: STOP ! Cardiac Disease – Optimize VTE history: – Get your consults – Bleeding vs VTE discussion

  28. Patient Selection: The Obesity Dilemma Numerous studies demonstrate obese patients have improved outcomes after TJR ! – London group: Super obese improvement = normal weight group! Anecdotally, they are among our most Rajgopal et al, JBJS 2013 appreciative patients !

  29. Patient Selection: So you can do it? Do you want to?

  30. Patient Selection: The Obesity Dilemma How many more articles do we need to demonstrate the linear relationship between obesity and the risk of complications ?

  31. Obesity and TKR: It’s your personal decision

  32. Patient Selection: The “not so modifiable risks” The depressed or major psychiatric disorder patient The narcotic dependent patient The “just plain pain in the ass patient”

  33. Patient Selection: The Depressed Patient Data is quite concerning: – Study out of Berlin: 150 pt’s undergoing TKR evaluated with Patient Health Quest. – Pain and somatization were assessed At 1 yr: pt’s with depressive symptoms had higher pain scores / lower knee function and worse satisfaction

  34. Patient Selection: The Depressed Patient Good News: – Recent 1 and 5 yr study of 266 patients At 1 yr, anxiety / depression led to worse WOMAC and KSS scores However, at 5 yrs, those patients were found to be at the same level of function and same pain/satisfaction as the non- psychosocial group Wylde et al, Acta Ortho 2017 Proceed with caution!

  35. Patient Selection: The Opioid User Data from the Brigham is clear: – 156 TKR’s – Preop opioid use of at least 1 script – Greater preop pain in opioid group – Greater postop pain – Worse WOMAC improvement Smith, Katz, Losina; JBJS 2017

  36. Patient Selection: The Opioid User Strategies: – Intervene with pain management – Even if the patient can’t be weaned, at least they can map out an after surgery program – ? Contract for pain management beyond 8-12 weeks

  37. Patient Selection: The Sociopath You’ll never change their behaviour. They can be an emotional sink-hole for your practice. DEP’s rules: – Never insult / demean any member of the team. – If you do, you’re out ! Older I get, less tolerant of these folks.

  38. Things that Work: Technical Execution

  39. Technical Execution Practice the basics: – Surgical Exposure is paramount ! The data on MIS TKR is weak (at best) You can’t kill what you can’t see !

  40. Things that Work: Technical Execution Cut the tibia at 90 degrees I suppose if you cut it in varus, you can always convince yourself that it is kinematically aligned !

  41. Technical Execution: The Varus Tibia Consequence Merrill Ritter: – “a varus tibia will kill you” – Highest risk for loosening / failure HSS Retrieval Data – Varus tibial alignment associated with increased damage modes of pitting, delamination Zi et al, CORR 2017

  42. Things that Work: Technical Execution Practice the basics: – Understand the deformity: – What is tight ? – What is loose ? – How to get them balanced ? What soft tissues can do ? What can “realignment do ?

  43. Get Comfortable with Releases (regardless of technique)

  44. Technical Execution: Get Rotation Correct

  45. Technical Execution: The Patella Decide if you want to resurface: – Factors: Age of patient ? Accept some anterior knee pain You live in a city where you won’t get thrown under the bus Do it correctly !

  46. Things that Matter ! Perioperative Postoperative Mgt.

  47. Perioperative Things that Matter Tranexamic Acid – Not a pro-coagulant ! – An anti fibrinolytic ! – A GAME CHANGER ! Less blood loss Less draining wounds Lower transfusion rates Lower infection rates IV / Topical / Oral – ? Optimal dose / route ?

  48. Perioperative Things that Matter Pain Protocols Pre-emptive: – Steroids – Anti-emetics

  49. Pain Protocols Better Press Ganey Scores Improved patient satisfaction Opportunity to work with your anesthesia team

  50. Postop Things that Matter: Rehab Mobility after TKR – Controversial ? – Perhaps ! – Hard to argue that a mobility program won’t benefit the patient Ideal method to employ: – Prehab: some data even 1 visit helps More than this: No effect ! – Postop: Self vs facility ?

  51. Postop Things That Matter: Rehabilitation Patients convinced it’s essential ! If you are in bundle: – Have to keep an eye on usage PT’s can be your eyes / ears Outline a weaning program: – Self directed gym – “silver sneakers”

  52. Things That Don’t Impact Outcomes

  53. Type of Implant Sorry !

  54. Which Implant Should I Get ? “the 30 year knee?” “the knee that goes around?” “I’m a woman, maybe I should have one of the ladies knees?”

  55. “I want this implant because it ……” “I’ve heard …..” “I’ve read ……” “My daughters hairdressers brother had a knee replacement and he is doing great”

  56. Is there a “best in class implant”

  57. What Data Can You Use ?

  58. Registry Data Good validity especially in countries with NHS Excellent for tracking revisions but ….exact reason for failure may not be clear !

  59. Australian Registry 2017: Challenges 516 different prostheses types / combinations 114 prostheses types with > 400 procedures In general, lowest revision rate NexGen for both cemented / c’less Confidence levels wide

  60. Registry Limitations It doesn’t give you any functional information Its largely – descriptive – survivorship

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend