SLIDE 1 6/4/2019 1
MWDOC Joint Board Workshop June 5, 2019
Supplies Demands
2018: Balanced Supplies and Demands 2019: Prepared for a Range
SPW
Adaptive Operations
SWP Allocation Demands Water Balance 15% High ‐700 TAF 40% Normal Balanced
CRW SPW
Maintained high end‐of‐year storage reserves (~2.5 MAF)
Break Even: ~40% SWP Allocation
Meeting Member Agency Demands
Item No. 3
SLIDE 2
6/4/2019 2
Adheres to the Administrative Code Provides a framework for strategic operations and continued reliability Communicates expected future operations to member agencies and partners
January 3, 2018 April 2, 2018
SLIDE 3
6/4/2019 3
Early 2018: High Deliveries of SWP Supplies (~75% Blends) April‐May 2018: Minimized Deliveries of SWP Supplies (~0% Blends)
SLIDE 4 6/4/2019 4
June‐December 2018: Moderate Deliveries
- f SWP Supplies (~25‐35% Blends)
1.1 1.1 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.8 2.2 1.8 1.1 1.0 1.7 2.4 2.7 2.3 1.2 0.9 1.3 2.5 2.5
1 2 3 4 5
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Million Acre‐Feet
Emergency Storage Dry‐Year Storage
SLIDE 5
6/4/2019 5
Operating Principles
Meet member agency demands Meet water quality requirements Manage storage according to WSDM principles Manage maintenance and shutdowns Meet blending objectives Maximize hydroelectric power production
SLIDE 6 6/4/2019 6
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Million Acre‐Feet State Water Project Allocation Colorado River Supplies State Water Project Supplies
*Does not include transfers or other WSDM actions; agricultural adjustments also not included Low Demands Normal Demands High Demands
Conditions Under Normal Hydrology Current Trend Conditions
Provide guidelines to prioritize the use of storage in shortage conditions and the replenishment of storage in surplus conditions
SLIDE 7
6/4/2019 7
Priority is not meant to be a strict order Store water for most effective use in future droughts Priority can be adapted to current conditions
Priority Surplus Action (Fill) 1 DVL 2 Flex Storage 3 Conjunctive Use / Cyclic Storage 4 SWP Carryover 5 Lake Mead ICS 6 Banking Programs Surface Groundwater Surface Groundwater In‐Region Out‐of‐Region
WSDM Plan – Surplus Action Priorities
May Vary
Priority is not meant to be a strict order Take water strategically to be better prepared for future droughts Priority can be adapted to current conditions
Priority Drought Action (Withdraw) 1 DVL 2 Banking Programs 3 Lake Mead ICS 4 SWP Carryover 5 Conjunctive Use / Cyclic Storage 6 Flex Storage Groundwater Surface Groundwater Surface Out‐of‐Region In‐Region
WSDM Plan – Drought Action Priorities
May Vary
SLIDE 8 6/4/2019 8
Surplus Conditions
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 Storage Fill (Thousand Acre‐Feet) Lake Mead ICS Banking Programs CUP/Cyclic Lake Mead ICS DVL
General Guideline General Guideline
Fill according to the max put capacity Fill according to max put capacity Additional put in Lake Mead ICS Fill the remaining capacity in DVL Initial put in Lake Mead ICS
Shortage Conditions
‐1,400 ‐1,200 ‐1,000 ‐800 ‐600 ‐400 ‐200 Storage Fill (Thousand Acre‐Feet) Lake Mead ICS Banking CUP DVL
General Guideline General Guideline
Max take capacity Create space in reservoir for additional
Preserve for last, meeting remaining system demands SWP Carryover SWP Carryover DVL Flex Storage Initial amount Available take capacity Amount needed to meet demands in areas that can only receive water from SWP Down to one‐third of dry‐year capacity Go to 8‐pump flow on CRA & drought actions Remaining amount above emergency storage DVL
SLIDE 9 6/4/2019 9
‐1,000 ‐500 500 1,000 1,500 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100% Thousand Acre‐Feet State Water Project Allocation
Storage Withdraw
2019 WSDM Strategy Implementation
Storage Fill Storage Fill Storage Withdraw Storage Withdraw Storage Fill Storage Fill
‐1,000 ‐500 500 1,000 1,500 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100% Thousand Acre‐Feet State Water Project Allocation ‐1,000 ‐500 500 1,000 1,500 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100% Thousand Acre‐Feet State Water Project Allocation
Lake Mead ICS Lake Mead ICS Banking Programs DVL CUP/Cyclic Additional Actions CUP Banking Programs SWP Carryover Lake Mead ICS DVL DVL SWP Carryover
Conditions Under 15% SWP Allocation
Managing the System
SLIDE 10
6/4/2019 10
SLIDE 11
6/4/2019 11
Emergency deliveries of agency water in Metropolitan’s system should be considered in a proactive and measured way, rather than ad‐hoc after a significant natural disaster or emergency
Providing options after a significant emergency
Infrastructure Reliability
Rehabilitation of prestressed concrete cylinder pipe Seismic upgrades of treatment plants and conveyance systems
Emergency Response
In‐house manufacturing and construction capability Emergency communications Mutual assistance agreements with partners
Addressing seismic vulnerabilities and system resiliency
SLIDE 12 6/4/2019 12
Utilize flexibility in Metropolitan’s system to deliver water from multiple supply sources, feeders and/or reservoirs Utilize interconnections
agreements with other agencies
Agencies may benefit from a proactive approach for utilizing Metropolitan’s system during emergencies Approach would only be used if there is no other way to deliver water to a portion of the agency service area Approach would not substitute for local agencies to take steps to improve emergency preparedness
SLIDE 13
6/4/2019 13
An area within Metropolitan’s system is out of service for a prolonged period after an earthquake There are no other delivery options for part of the impacted area Metropolitan’s system could be used to supply a portion of the local system that has no other delivery options, subject to specific conditions, until
repairs are complete
MWD Water Treatment Plant
Agency A Agency A
Normal Operations
Agency A Water Supply = Service Connection
SLIDE 14
6/4/2019 14
MWD Water Treatment Plant
Agency A Agency A Damage Zone
Agency A fed with water thru MWD system
Emergency Operations
Agency A Water Supply = Service Connection = Service Connection Agency A Agency A Agency B
Normal Operations
MWD Water Treatment Plant Agency A Water Supply
SLIDE 15
6/4/2019 15
MWD Water Treatment Plant = Service Connection Agency A Agency A Agency B
Emergency Operations
Damage Zone
Agencies A and B fed with Agency A’s water thru MWD system Agencies A and B fed with Agency A’s water thru MWD system Agency A Water Supply
Provide member agencies with the option of using Metropolitan’s system for agency water deliveries in an emergency, under specific conditions Board and member agency feedback is essential for policy development “Emergency” definition
Metropolitan is physically unable to make deliveries to a member agency service connection for a specified period after an emergency, as determined by Metropolitan’s General Manager
SLIDE 16
6/4/2019 16
Use of Metropolitan’s system for emergency deliveries Ability to serve Water quality standards and liability Indemnification System integrity Compensation Operational requirements Term for emergency deliveries
SLIDE 17
6/4/2019 17
Emergency water deliveries in Metropolitan’s system should be considered in a proactive and measured way before a major emergency Emergency deliveries must not displace other agency efforts to prepare for emergencies Amendments to Metropolitan’s Administrative Code would be required