Optimal Positioning of Flying Relays for Wireless Networks Junting - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

optimal positioning of flying relays for wireless networks
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Optimal Positioning of Flying Relays for Wireless Networks Junting - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Optimal Positioning of Flying Relays for Wireless Networks Junting Chen 1 and David Gesbert 2 1 Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Southern California, USA 2 Department of Communication Systems, EURECOM,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Optimal Positioning of Flying Relays for Wireless Networks

Junting Chen1 and David Gesbert2

1Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Southern California, USA 2Department of Communication Systems, EURECOM, Sophia-Antipolis, France

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the ERC under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (Agreement no. 670896)

9 July 2017

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Relaying from the Air

9 July 2017

2

Ground relays:

  • Constrained / fixed positions
  • Shadowing
  • Non-adaptive to user

mobility / ad-hoc loading Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) relays:

  • Flexible positions
  • Shadowing avoidance
  • User mobility adaptive

Feasibility / opportunity:

  • Decreasing fabrication cost
  • mmWave applications
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Microscopic Viewpoint of UAV Relaying

9 July 2017

3

Traditional application scenario:

  • Establish connectivity from tens

to hundreds kilometers away

  • Path loss dominant
  • Service to an area

Application to cellular networks:

  • Fill the coverage / capacity hole

within 1 kilometers

  • Shadowing dominant
  • Avoid propagation blockage
  • Service to a selected group of users
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Key Challenge: How to model the air-to-ground propagation?

Traditional relay problem

§ Relay positions are fixed § Communication channels are known or can be estimated

9 July 2017

4

UAV positioning problem

§ Relay positions are to be optimized § Comm channels are unknown, before the UAV is in position § UAV-user, UAV-BS channels are functions of the UAV position, and the environment (e.g., blockage) etc.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Macroscopic Propagation Models versus Fine-grained Structure Exploitation

Existing works usually based on macroscopic propagation models

§ Line-of-sight (LOS) propagation assumption § Probability model for LOS propagation

9 July 2017

5 [Hourani14] A. Al-Hourani, S. Kandeepan, and S. Lardner, “Optimal LAP Altitude for Maximum Coverage”, IEEE Comm. Lett., 2014. [Mozaffari16] M. Mozaffari, W. Saad, M. Bennis, and M. Debbah, “Optimal Transport Theory for Power-Efficient Deployment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles”, IEEE ICC, 2016.

Limitations

§ Not performance guaranteed for individual users! E.g., a QoS-demanding user in the “shadow of a building” (say, in low mobility case) § The local fine-grained terrestrial structure has not been exploited!

slide-6
SLIDE 6

UAV Positioning in Dense Urban Areas

9 July 2017

6

To place a UAV to relay the signal to a QoS-demanding user on the ground

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Where to Place the UAV Relay?

9 July 2017

7

View the dense urban area from the top Received power of UAV-user link End-to-end capacity of BS-UAV-user link A possibly good UAV relay position

Simplest scenario: To increase the end-to-end transmission rate to one target user on the ground, by placing the UAV relay to the best position.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Problem Formulation

End-to-end rate maximization for a simple single user case where More generally,

§ Challenge 1: Simple mathematical description on the channels gB and gD in terms of the drone position, such that the fine-grained environment structure is preserved (i.e., LOS/NLOS). § Challenge 2: Efficient algorithm to find the optimal UAV position xD.

9 July 2017

8

maximize

xD

min {rB(xD), rD(xD)} rB(xD) = log2 ⇣ 1 + PB · gB(xD) ⌘ rD(xD) = log2 ⇣ 1 + PD · gD(xD) ⌘ minimize

x∈R3

F(gU(x), gB(x))

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Ray-tracing Propagation Model with Segmented Approximation

Classical log-distance model

9 July 2017

9

10 log10

  • gU(x)
  • = 10 log10(β) 10α log10
  • kx xUk
  • + ξ

Shadowing (LOS/NLOS, etc), reflection, diffraction, etc.

Conventional relay literature,

  • btained by online estimation

Recent UAV literature: LOS model,

  • r probabilistic LOS model
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Ray-tracing Propagation Model with Segmented Approximation

Classical log-distance model Segmented model

§ Partition the space of (x, xU) into K disjoint segments, each corresponding to a type of propagation (LOS, NLOS, etc.) where

9 July 2017

10

gU(x) = X

k

gk(x)I{(x, xU) ∈ Dk} 10 log10

  • gU(x)
  • = 10 log10(β) 10α log10
  • kx xUk
  • + ξ

Shadowing (LOS/NLOS, etc), reflection, diffraction, etc. Propagation segment, e.g., LOS/NLOS

10 log10

  • gk(x)
  • = 10 log10(βk) 10αk log10
  • kx xUk
  • ξk + ˜

ξk

ignored

  • Q. Feng, J. McGeehan, E. K.

Tameh, and A. R. Nix, “Path loss models for air-to-ground radio channels in urban environments,” in Proc. IEEE Semiannual Veh.

  • Technol. Conf., vol. 6, 2006,
  • pp. 2901–2905.
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Geometry Property

9 July 2017

11

Assumption / restriction

§ Assume LOS propagation for the BS-UAV link. § For the UAV-user link, propagation parameters and the segments known perfectly § Propagation segments arranged in order § UAV flies at a fixed height

Intuition:

§ the key is to search for the LOS propagation segment (D1) § it will be convenience to work in the polar-coordinate system

ρ

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Special case for two segments: k = 1 for LOS and k = 2 for NLOS

§ When UAV is in NLOS, search along the contour of § When UAV is in LOS, increases (moving away from the user) § Repeat until some stopping criterion is met Theorem: The continuous trajectory constructed by the above algorithm finds the global optimal UAV position

Algorithm

9 July 2017

12

F(g1(x), g1(x)) = C ρ

slide-13
SLIDE 13

UAV Search Trajectory

9 July 2017

13

  • The search trajectory scales only linearly

with L (user-BS distance)

  • Significant improvement over exhaustive

search L2

L

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Numerical Results

9 July 2017

14

10,000 random user locations, buildings 5 - 45 meters, UAV 50 meter height Simple UAV positioning: Only search

  • ver the BS-user line segment

Offline UAV positioning: First, learn the empirical LOS probability function Then, compute the optimal UAV position based on channel gain Direct BS-user link: Directly BS à user transmission without UAV relaying

P(LOS, θ) = ⇥ 1 + a exp(−b[θ − a]) ⇤−1

Significant gains for cell edge users

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Conclusions

Problem: UAV positioning for relaying between a BS to a ground user

§ Dense urban scenario § Key challenge to avoid obstacle blockage § UAV fixed height (2D optimization)

Applications:

§ Quality-demanding service, first aid (road side assistant), surveillance, etc. § Communications in very high frequencies

Segmented propagation model

§ Simple; able to exploit the structure for blockage avoidance

Positioning algorithm

§ Online algorithm § Exploit the segmented propagation model § Global optimal convergence

9 July 2017

15