ontology aware partitioning for knowledge graph
play

Ontology-Aware Partitioning for Knowledge Graph Identification Jay - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Ontology-Aware Partitioning for Knowledge Graph Identification Jay Pujara, Hui Miao, Lise Getoor, William Cohen Workshop on Automatic Knowledge Base Construction 10/27/2013 Knowledge Graph Ingredients: Entities Baltimore Orioles Giants


  1. Ontology-Aware Partitioning for Knowledge Graph Identification Jay Pujara, Hui Miao, Lise Getoor, William Cohen Workshop on Automatic Knowledge Base Construction 10/27/2013

  2. Knowledge Graph Ingredients: Entities Baltimore Orioles Giants Giants New York San Francisco Football Baseball Maryland New York California

  3. Knowledge Graph Ingredients: Labels SportsTeam Baltimore Orioles City Giants Giants New York San Francisco Location Football Baseball Maryland State Sport New York California

  4. Knowledge Graph Ingredients: Relations SportsTeam Baltimore Orioles City Giants Giants New York San Francisco Location Football Baseball Maryland State Sport New York California

  5. Knowledge Graph Nuisance: Noise! SportsTeam Baltimore Orioles City Giants Giants New York San Francisco Location Football Baseball Maryland State Sport New York California

  6. Knowledge Graph Ingredients: Ontology SportsTeam Baltimore Orioles City Giants Giants New York San Francisco Location Football Baseball Maryland State Sport New York California

  7. Ontological rules for Knowledge Graphs Inverse: ˜ w O : Inv ( R, S ) ∧ Rel ( E 1 , E 2 , R ) ⇒ Rel ( E 2 , E 1 , S ) Selectional Preference: ˜ w O : Dom ( R, L ) ∧ Rel ( E 1 , E 2 , R ) ⇒ Lbl ( E 1 , L ) ˜ w O : Rng ( R, L ) ∧ Rel ( E 1 , E 2 , R ) ⇒ Lbl ( E 2 , L ) Subsumption: ˜ w O : Sub ( L, P ) ∧ Lbl ( E, L ) ⇒ Lbl ( E, P ) ˜ w O : RSub ( R, S ) ∧ Rel ( E 1 , E 2 , R ) ⇒ Rel ( E 1 , E 2 , S ) Mutual Exclusion: ˜ w O : Mut ( L 1 , L 2 ) ∧ Lbl ( E, L 1 ) ⇒ ˜ ¬ Lbl ( E, L 2 ) ˜ w O : RMut ( R, S ) ∧ Rel ( E 1 , E 2 , R ) ⇒ ˜ ¬ Rel ( E 1 , E 2 , S ) Adapted from Jiang et al., ICDM 2012

  8. Knowledge Graph Identification (KGI) • Joint inference over possible knowledge graphs • Resolves co-referent entities • Removes spurious labels and relations • Infers missing labels and relations • Uses many uncertain sources • Enforces ontological constraints Pujara, Miao, Getoor, Cohen, "Knowledge Graph Identification" International Semantic Web Conference, 2013

  9. KGI: Under the Hood • Define a probability distribution over knowledge graphs: P ( G | D ) = 1 $ & ∑ Z exp − w r ϕ r ( G ) % ' r ∈ R weighted potential Grounding of logical rule takes the form of a in model hinge-loss • Hinge-Loss Markov Random Fields • Templated: easy to define with probabilistic soft logic • Continuous: atoms have continuous truth values in [0,1] range • Efficient: inference via convex optimization in O(|R|) • Superior speed and quality for KGI (Pujara, ISWC13) Pujara, Miao, Getoor, Cohen, "Knowledge Graph Identification" International Semantic Web Conference, 2013

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend