online structure learning for traffic management
play

Online Structure Learning for Traffic Management Evangelos - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Online Structure Learning for Traffic Management Evangelos Michelioudakis 1 , Alexander Artikis 2 , 1 and Georgios Paliouras 1 1 Institute of Informatics and Telecommunications, NCSR Demokritos 2 Department of Maritime Studies, University of


  1. Online Structure Learning for Traffic Management Evangelos Michelioudakis 1 , Alexander Artikis 2 , 1 and Georgios Paliouras 1 1 Institute of Informatics and Telecommunications, NCSR “Demokritos” 2 Department of Maritime Studies, University of Piraeus 26 th International Conference on Inductive Logic Programming September 6, 2016

  2. Introduction ◮ Event recognition applications in sensor environments: ◮ Mostly based on manually constructed patterns ◮ Patterns may be very hard to identify manually ◮ Learning relational structures in the presence of uncertainty is desirable ◮ We applied OSL α to learning definitions for traffic congestions ◮ Real sensor data provided in the context of the SPEEDD project 1 ◮ Learned definitions are used for event detection 1 www.speedd-project.eu 1 / 13 Evangelos Michelioudakis Online Structure Learning for Traffic Management

  3. Event Recognition I NPUT ◮ R ECOGNITION ◮ O UTPUT � . . . . . . . . . . . . Event Recognition Streams of SDEs Recognised CEs System . . . . . . . . . . . . CE Definitions ◮ Event Calculus & Axiomatization ◮ Logic formalism to represent and reason about events and their effects ◮ CE initiations and terminations define whether a fluent holds or not ◮ Law of inertia : Fluents persist over time, unless affected by an event 2 / 13 Evangelos Michelioudakis Online Structure Learning for Traffic Management

  4. Learning CE Definitions I NPUT ◮ ◭ I NPUT CE D EFINITION C ONSTRUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . Machine Learning Streams of SDEs Annotated CEs System . . . . . . . . . . . . CE Definitions 3 / 13 Evangelos Michelioudakis Online Structure Learning for Traffic Management

  5. Procedure of OSL α OSL α Data Stream/Training Examples Learnt Hypothesis H t : 0 . 4 HoldsAt ( congestion ( lid ) , t +1) ⇐ Micro-Batch D t HappensAt ( fast Slt20 ( lid ) , t ) ∧ HappensAt ( fast Slt25 (53708) , 99) HappensAt ( fast Ogt45 ( lid ) , t ) HappensAt ( fast Ogt55 (53708) , 99) HappensAt ( slow Slt15 (53708) , 99) HappensAt ( slow Ogt65 (53708) , 99) Next (99 , 100) HoldsAt ( congestion (53708) , 100) . . . − EC Axioms : MLN HoldsAt ( f, t +1) ⇐ InitiatedAt ( f, t ) HoldsAt ( f, t +1) ⇐ HoldsAt ( f, t ) ∧ ¬ TerminatedAt ( f, t ) ¬ HoldsAt ( f, t +1) ⇐ TerminatedAt ( f, t ) ¬ HoldsAt ( f, t +1) ⇐ ¬ HoldsAt ( f, t ) ∧ ¬ InitiatedAt ( f, t ) 4 / 13 Evangelos Michelioudakis Online Structure Learning for Traffic Management

  6. Procedure of OSL α OSL α Data Stream/Training Examples Learnt Hypothesis H t : 0 . 4 HoldsAt ( congestion ( lid ) , t +1) ⇐ Inference Micro-Batch D t HappensAt ( fast Slt20 ( lid ) , t ) ∧ HappensAt ( fast Slt25 (53708) , 99) HappensAt ( fast Ogt45 ( lid ) , t ) HappensAt ( fast Ogt55 (53708) , 99) HappensAt ( slow Slt15 (53708) , 99) HappensAt ( slow Ogt65 (53708) , 99) Next (99 , 100) HoldsAt ( congestion (53708) , 100) . . . − EC Axioms : MLN HoldsAt ( f, t +1) ⇐ InitiatedAt ( f, t ) HoldsAt ( f, t +1) ⇐ HoldsAt ( f, t ) ∧ ¬ TerminatedAt ( f, t ) ¬ HoldsAt ( f, t +1) ⇐ TerminatedAt ( f, t ) ¬ HoldsAt ( f, t +1) ⇐ ¬ HoldsAt ( f, t ) ∧ ¬ InitiatedAt ( f, t ) 4 / 13 Evangelos Michelioudakis Online Structure Learning for Traffic Management

  7. Procedure of OSL α OSL α Data Stream/Training Examples Learnt Hypothesis H t : 0 . 4 HoldsAt ( congestion ( lid ) , t +1) ⇐ Hypergraph Inference Micro-Batch D t HappensAt ( fast Slt20 ( lid ) , t ) ∧ HappensAt ( fast Slt25 (53708) , 99) HappensAt ( fast Ogt45 ( lid ) , t ) HappensAt ( fast Ogt55 (53708) , 99) HappensAt ( slow Slt15 (53708) , 99) HappensAt ( slow Ogt65 (53708) , 99) Next (99 , 100) HoldsAt ( congestion (53708) , 100) . . . − EC Axioms : MLN HoldsAt ( f, t +1) ⇐ InitiatedAt ( f, t ) HoldsAt ( f, t +1) ⇐ HoldsAt ( f, t ) ∧ ¬ TerminatedAt ( f, t ) ¬ HoldsAt ( f, t +1) ⇐ TerminatedAt ( f, t ) ¬ HoldsAt ( f, t +1) ⇐ ¬ HoldsAt ( f, t ) ∧ ¬ InitiatedAt ( f, t ) 4 / 13 Evangelos Michelioudakis Online Structure Learning for Traffic Management

  8. Procedure of OSL α OSL α Data Stream/Training Examples Learnt Hypothesis H t : 0 . 4 HoldsAt ( congestion ( lid ) , t +1) ⇐ Hypergraph Inference Micro-Batch D t HappensAt ( fast Slt20 ( lid ) , t ) ∧ HappensAt ( fast Slt25 (53708) , 99) HappensAt ( fast Ogt45 ( lid ) , t ) HappensAt ( fast Ogt55 (53708) , 99) HappensAt ( slow Slt15 (53708) , 99) HappensAt ( slow Ogt65 (53708) , 99) Next (99 , 100) HoldsAt ( congestion (53708) , 100) . . . Paths to EC Axioms : MLN − Clauses HoldsAt ( f, t +1) ⇐ InitiatedAt ( f, t ) HoldsAt ( f, t +1) ⇐ HoldsAt ( f, t ) ∧ ¬ TerminatedAt ( f, t ) ¬ HoldsAt ( f, t +1) ⇐ TerminatedAt ( f, t ) Weight Clause Learning Evaluation ¬ HoldsAt ( f, t +1) ⇐ ¬ HoldsAt ( f, t ) ∧ ¬ InitiatedAt ( f, t ) 4 / 13 Evangelos Michelioudakis Online Structure Learning for Traffic Management

  9. Procedure of OSL α OSL α Data Stream/Training Examples Learnt Hypothesis H t : . . . 0 . 4 HoldsAt ( congestion ( lid ) , t +1) ⇐ Hypergraph Inference Micro-Batch D t HappensAt ( fast Slt20 ( lid ) , t ) ∧ HappensAt ( fast Slt25 (53708) , 99) HappensAt ( fast Ogt45 ( lid ) , t ) HappensAt ( fast Ogt55 (53708) , 99) + HappensAt ( slow Slt15 (53708) , 99) HappensAt ( slow Ogt65 (53708) , 99) Next (99 , 100) HoldsAt ( congestion (53708) , 100) . . . Paths to EC Axioms : MLN − Clauses HoldsAt ( f, t +1) ⇐ InitiatedAt ( f, t ) Micro-Batch D t +1 HoldsAt ( f, t +1) ⇐ HappensAt ( fast Sgt70 (53708) , 200) HoldsAt ( f, t ) ∧ HappensAt ( fast Olt25 (53708) , 200) ¬ TerminatedAt ( f, t ) HappensAt ( slow Sgt40 (53708) , 200) HappensAt ( slow Olt18 (53708) , 200) ¬ HoldsAt ( f, t +1) ⇐ Next (200 , 201) TerminatedAt ( f, t ) Weight Clause ¬ HoldsAt ( congestion (53708) , 201) Learning Evaluation ¬ HoldsAt ( f, t +1) ⇐ . . . ¬ HoldsAt ( f, t ) ∧ ¬ InitiatedAt ( f, t ) . . . 4 / 13 Evangelos Michelioudakis Online Structure Learning for Traffic Management

  10. Dataset ◮ Real data collected from sensors ◮ Mounted on the southern part of the Grenoble ring road ◮ 19 collection points along 12 km stretch on the highway ◮ Each collection point has a sensor per lane ◮ Consists of one month of data ( ≈ 3 . 3 GiB) ◮ Annotated by human traffic controllers for traffic congestion ◮ Sensor data are collected every 15 seconds and contain: ◮ Total number of vehicles passing through a lane ◮ Average speed and sensor occupancy 5 / 13 Evangelos Michelioudakis Online Structure Learning for Traffic Management

  11. Learning Challenges (1/3) ◮ Traffic congestion annotation is largely incomplete ◮ Leading to the incorrect penalization of good rules 60 100 55 90 50 80 average speed (km/hour) 45 occupancy (% of time) 70 40 60 35 30 50 25 40 20 30 15 20 10 10 5 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 timepoints (x15 sec) timepoints (x15 sec) 6 / 13 Evangelos Michelioudakis Online Structure Learning for Traffic Management

  12. Learning Challenges (2/3) ◮ Quality of information of each sensor differs 120 120 110 110 100 100 average speed (km/hour) average speed (km/hour) 90 90 80 80 70 70 60 60 50 50 40 40 30 30 20 20 10 10 7100 7150 7200 7250 7300 7350 7400 7450 7500 7100 7150 7200 7250 7300 7350 7400 7450 7500 timepoints (x15 sec) timepoints (x15 sec) (a) Fast (b) Queue 7 / 13 Evangelos Michelioudakis Online Structure Learning for Traffic Management

  13. Learning Challenges (3/3) ◮ Generic location- and lane-agnostic rules are not sufficient ◮ They capture the concept of traffic congestion in a few locations, and completely fail in others. InitiatedAt ( congestion ( lid ) , t ) ⇐ HappensAt ( aggr ( lid, occupancy, avgspd ) , t ) ∧ avgspd < 50 ∧ occupancy > 25 8 / 13 Evangelos Michelioudakis Online Structure Learning for Traffic Management

  14. Experimental Setup ◮ Data are stored in a database ◮ Micro-batches were constructed dynamically by querying the database ◮ Input events were produced by discretizing the numerical data ◮ The total length of the training sequence consists of 172799 timepoints ◮ We consider only SDEs in fast lanes ◮ 10 -fold cross-validation ◮ Compare OSL α vs AdaGrad online weight learner ◮ OSL α starting from an empty hypothesis ◮ AdaGrad operating on manually constructed definitions 9 / 13 Evangelos Michelioudakis Online Structure Learning for Traffic Management

  15. Experimental Results Structure Learning Structure Learning 0.65 12 avg. batch processing (seconds) 11.4362 10 0.6 8 F 1 score 0.5911 0.5984 6.3153 0.5796 6 0.55 0.5495 4 2.8938 2 0.5 0.6913 50 0 10 1500 40 3000 20 2500 1000 30 30 2000 20 1500 500 40 1000 batch size (minutes) 10 50 0 500 batch size (minutes) batch size (SDEs) #batches Weight Learning Only Weight Learning Only 0.65 12 avg. batch processing (seconds) 0.6331 10 0.6 8 F 1 score 0.6062 0.6115 6 0.6077 0.55 4 3.012 0.5387 2 0.864 0.5 0.397 0.064 600 0 0 15000 3000 400 200 10000 2000 200 400 5000 1000 batch size (minutes) 0 batch size (minutes) 600 0 0 #batches batch size (SDEs) 10 / 13 Evangelos Michelioudakis Online Structure Learning for Traffic Management

  16. Summary & Future Work ◮ OSL α achieves comparable predictive accuracy to manually curated rules ◮ OSL α can process data batches efficiently ◮ Faster search procedure may match AdaGrad processing time ◮ Low predictive accuracy of the learned model ◮ Extend OSL α to handle missing supervision 11 / 13 Evangelos Michelioudakis Online Structure Learning for Traffic Management

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend