On Vizings edge-colouring question Marthe Bonamy July 28, 2020 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

on vizing s edge colouring question
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

On Vizings edge-colouring question Marthe Bonamy July 28, 2020 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

On Vizings edge-colouring question Marthe Bonamy July 28, 2020 Marthe Bonamy On Vizings edge-colouring question 1/10 Edge colouring Marthe Bonamy On Vizings edge-colouring question 2/10 Edge colouring : Minimum number of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

On Vizing’s edge-colouring question

Marthe Bonamy July 28, 2020

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 1/10

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Edge colouring

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 2/10

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Edge colouring

χ′: Minimum number of colors to ensure that a b ⇒ a = b.

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 2/10

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Edge colouring

χ′: Minimum number of colors to ensure that a b ⇒ a = b. ∆: Maximum degree of the graph. ∆ ≤ χ′

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 2/10

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Vizing’s theorem and Kempe equivalence

Theorem (Vizing ’64) For any graph G, ∆(G) ≤ χ′(G) ≤ ∆(G) + 1.

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 3/10

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Vizing’s theorem and Kempe equivalence

Theorem (Vizing ’64) For any graph G, ∆(G) ≤ χ′(G) ≤ ∆(G) + 1. Proof through “Kempe changes”.

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 3/10

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Vizing’s theorem and Kempe equivalence

Theorem (Vizing ’64) For any graph G, ∆(G) ≤ χ′(G) ≤ ∆(G) + 1. Proof through “Kempe changes”.

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 3/10

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Vizing’s theorem and Kempe equivalence

Theorem (Vizing ’64) For any graph G, ∆(G) ≤ χ′(G) ≤ ∆(G) + 1. Proof through “Kempe changes”.

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 3/10

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Vizing’s theorem and Kempe equivalence

Theorem (Vizing ’64) For any graph G, ∆(G) ≤ χ′(G) ≤ ∆(G) + 1. Proof through “Kempe changes”.

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 3/10

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Vizing’s theorem and Kempe equivalence

Theorem (Vizing ’64) For any graph G, ∆(G) ≤ χ′(G) ≤ ∆(G) + 1. Proof through “Kempe changes”.

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 3/10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Vizing’s theorem, revisited

Theorem (Vizing ’64) For any graph G, for any proper edge colouring α of G, there is a proper (∆(G) + 1)-edge colouring β of G such that α and β are Kempe-equivalent.

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 4/10

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Vizing’s theorem, revisited

Theorem (Vizing ’64) For any graph G, for any proper edge colouring α of G, there is a proper (∆(G) + 1)-edge colouring β of G such that α and β are Kempe-equivalent. Conjecture (Vizing ’65) For any graph G, for any proper edge colouring α of G, there is a proper χ′(G)-edge colouring β of G such that α and β are Kempe-equivalent.

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 4/10

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Vizing’s theorem, revisited

Theorem (Vizing ’64) For any graph G, for any proper edge colouring α of G, there is a proper (∆(G) + 1)-edge colouring β of G such that α and β are Kempe-equivalent. Theorem (Misra Gries ’92 (Inspired from the proof)) For any simple graph G = (V , E), a (∆ + 1)-edge-coloring can be found in O(|V | × |E|). Conjecture (Vizing ’65) For any graph G, for any proper edge colouring α of G, there is a proper χ′(G)-edge colouring β of G such that α and β are Kempe-equivalent.

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 4/10

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Vizing’s theorem, revisited

Theorem (Vizing ’64) For any graph G, for any proper edge colouring α of G, there is a proper (∆(G) + 1)-edge colouring β of G such that α and β are Kempe-equivalent. Theorem (Misra Gries ’92 (Inspired from the proof)) For any simple graph G = (V , E), a (∆ + 1)-edge-coloring can be found in O(|V | × |E|). Conjecture (Vizing ’65) For any graph G, for any proper edge colouring α of G, there is a proper χ′(G)-edge colouring β of G such that α and β are Kempe-equivalent. Theorem (Holyer ’81) It is NP-complete to compute χ′.

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 4/10

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Mohar’s conjecture

Conjecture (Vizing ’65) For any graph G, for any proper edge colouring α of G, there is a proper χ′(G)-edge colouring β of G such that α and β are Kempe-equivalent.

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 5/10

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Mohar’s conjecture

Conjecture (Vizing ’65) For any graph G, for any proper edge colouring α of G, there is a proper χ′(G)-edge colouring β of G such that α and β are Kempe-equivalent. Only interesting for χ′(G) = ∆(G).

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 5/10

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Mohar’s conjecture

Conjecture (Vizing ’65) For any graph G, for any proper edge colouring α of G, there is a proper χ′(G)-edge colouring β of G such that α and β are Kempe-equivalent. Only interesting for χ′(G) = ∆(G). Conjecture (Mohar ’06) For any graph G, for any two (∆(G) + 2)-edge colourings α and β

  • f G, they are Kempe-equivalent.

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 5/10

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Mohar’s conjecture

Conjecture (Vizing ’65) For any graph G, for any proper edge colouring α of G, there is a proper χ′(G)-edge colouring β of G such that α and β are Kempe-equivalent. Only interesting for χ′(G) = ∆(G). Conjecture (Mohar ’06) For any graph G, for any two (∆(G) + 2)-edge colourings α and β

  • f G, they are Kempe-equivalent.

True if χ′(G) = ∆(G).

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 5/10

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Mohar’s conjecture

Conjecture (Vizing ’65) For any graph G, for any proper edge colouring α of G, there is a proper χ′(G)-edge colouring β of G such that α and β are Kempe-equivalent. Only interesting for χ′(G) = ∆(G). Conjecture (Mohar ’06) For any graph G, for any two (∆(G) + 2)-edge colourings α and β

  • f G, they are Kempe-equivalent.

True if χ′(G) = ∆(G). (Vizing’s conjecture) ⇒ (Mohar’s conjecture): induction on ∆(G).

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 5/10

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Small Delta

Theorem (McDonald, Mohar, Scheide ’10) Vizing’s conjecture is true for ∆ = 3.

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 6/10

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Small Delta

Theorem (McDonald, Mohar, Scheide ’10) Vizing’s conjecture is true for ∆ = 3. Theorem (Asratian, Casselgren ’16) Vizing’s conjecture is true for ∆ = 4.

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 6/10

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Small Delta

Theorem (McDonald, Mohar, Scheide ’10) Vizing’s conjecture is true for ∆ = 3. Theorem (Asratian, Casselgren ’16) Vizing’s conjecture is true for ∆ = 4. Theorem (B., Defrain, Klimoˇ sov´ a, Lagoutte, Narboni ’20) Vizing’s conjecture is true for triangle-free graphs.

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 6/10

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Small Delta

Theorem (McDonald, Mohar, Scheide ’10) Vizing’s conjecture is true for ∆ = 3. Theorem (Asratian, Casselgren ’16) Vizing’s conjecture is true for ∆ = 4. Theorem (B., Defrain, Klimoˇ sov´ a, Lagoutte, Narboni ’20) Vizing’s conjecture is true for triangle-free graphs. Theorem (B., Defrain, Klimoˇ sov´ a, Lagoutte, Narboni ’20) For any triangle-free graph, all (χ′ + 1)-edge-colourings are Kempe-equivalent.

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 6/10

slide-24
SLIDE 24

General structure

By induction on χ′(G).

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 7/10

slide-25
SLIDE 25

General structure

By induction on χ′(G). It suffices to consider χ′(G)-regular graphs.

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 7/10

slide-26
SLIDE 26

General structure

By induction on χ′(G). It suffices to consider χ′(G)-regular graphs. Consider a target χ′(G)-edge-colouring α, and M one of its color classes (M is a perfect matching).

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 7/10

slide-27
SLIDE 27

General structure

By induction on χ′(G). It suffices to consider χ′(G)-regular graphs. Consider a target χ′(G)-edge-colouring α, and M one of its color classes (M is a perfect matching). Goal: make M monochromatic (say with colour 1).

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 7/10

slide-28
SLIDE 28

General structure

By induction on χ′(G). It suffices to consider χ′(G)-regular graphs. Consider a target χ′(G)-edge-colouring α, and M one of its color classes (M is a perfect matching). Goal: make M monochromatic (say with colour 1). Good (∈ M, coloured 1), bad (∈ M, not coloured 1), ugly (∈ M, coloured 1) edges.

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 7/10

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Fan-like tools

u v 2

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 8/10

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Fan-like tools

u v 2

✁ ❆

3

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 8/10

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Fan-like tools

u v 2

✁ ❆

3

✁ ❆

3

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 8/10

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Fan-like tools

u v 2

✁ ❆

3

✁ ❆

4

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 8/10

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Fan-like tools

u v 2

✁ ❆

3

✁ ❆

4 w 3

✁ ❆

4

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 8/10

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Fan-like tools

u v 2

✁ ❆

3

✁ ❆

4 w 3

✁ ❆

5 x 5

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 8/10

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Fan-like tools

u v 2

✁ ❆

3

✁ ❆

4 w 3

✁ ❆

5 x 5

✁ ❆

3

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 8/10

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Fan-like tools

u v 2

✁ ❆

3

✁ ❆

4 w 3

✁ ❆

5 x 5

✁ ❆

3 − → Dv: vy → vz if vz is coloured with the colour missing at y. uv vw vx

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 8/10

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Fan-like tools

u v 2

✁ ❆

3

✁ ❆

4 w 3

✁ ❆

5 x 5

✁ ❆

3 − → Dv: vy → vz if vz is coloured with the colour missing at y. uv vw vx Xu: sequence of vertices of − → Dv reached from uv. Path:

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 8/10

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Fan-like tools

u v 2

✁ ❆

3

✁ ❆

4 w 3

✁ ❆

5 x 5

✁ ❆

3 − → Dv: vy → vz if vz is coloured with the colour missing at y. uv vw vx Xu: sequence of vertices of − → Dv reached from uv. Path: Cycle:

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 8/10

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Fan-like tools

u v 2

✁ ❆

3

✁ ❆

4 w 3

✁ ❆

5 x 5

✁ ❆

3 − → Dv: vy → vz if vz is coloured with the colour missing at y. uv vw vx Xu: sequence of vertices of − → Dv reached from uv. Path: Cycle: Comet: (sort of)

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 8/10

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Back to the general picture

We can argue the existence of: u v w 1

✁ ❆

1 M

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 9/10

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Back to the general picture

We can argue the existence of: u v w 1

✁ ❆

1 M Then Xv in − → Dw is a cycle.

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 9/10

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Back to the general picture

We can argue the existence of: u v w 1

✁ ❆

1 M Then Xv in − → Dw is a cycle. Xw in − → Dv is also a cycle.

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 9/10

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Back to the general picture

We can argue the existence of: u v w 1

✁ ❆

1 M Then Xv in − → Dw is a cycle. Xw in − → Dv is also a cycle. Two cycles ⇒ (unless there is a triangle vwx with ✁

1 at x).

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 9/10

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Conclusion

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 10/10

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Conclusion Danke sch¨

  • n!

Marthe Bonamy On Vizing’s edge-colouring question 10/10