On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

on univariate extreme value statistics and the estimation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of Reinsurance Premiums B. Vandewalle J. Beirlant Katholieke Universiteit Leuven University Center of Statistics Actuarial Science Team G oteborg 2005 On Univariate Extreme Value


slide-1
SLIDE 1

On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of Reinsurance Premiums

  • B. Vandewalle
  • J. Beirlant

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven University Center of Statistics Actuarial Science Team

  • teborg 2005

On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of Reinsurance Premiums – p. 1/29

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Or ...

... on univariate extreme value statistics and the estimation of insurance premiums for excess-of-loss reinsurance policies in excess

  • f a high retention level ... with special

attention to heavy-tailed distributions and Wang’s premium principle as a generalization to the net premium principle.

On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of Reinsurance Premiums – p. 2/29

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Overview

(Re)insurance premium calculation Net premium principle Wang’s premium principle applied to excess-of-loss reinsurance setting Extreme value statistics Motivation Extreme value theory (first order framework) Estimating reinsurance premiums Finite sample behavior Simulated data (Fréchet, Burr) Reinsurance premiums (net premium, dual-power transform)

On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of Reinsurance Premiums – p. 3/29

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Overview

Asymptotic results Motivation Extreme value theory (second order framework) Premium approximation error Asymptotic normality and bias Finite sample behavior Secura Belgian Re data Simulated data (Fréchet, Burr) Reinsurance premiums (net premium, dual-power transform)

On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of Reinsurance Premiums – p. 4/29

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Insurance premium calculation

Net premium principle

Insurance premium calculation ... at the heart of actuarial science ... X non-negative random variable denoting the total claim amount resulting from a single insurance policy

  • decumulative distribution function ¯

F(x) = P(X > x)

  • Net premium principle

Under the assumption that risk is essentially non-existing if the insurer sells enough identically distributed and independent policies,

  • n average the insurer will not lose any money when using premium

Π = E(X) = ∞ ¯ F(x)dx

On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of Reinsurance Premiums – p. 5/29

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Insurance premium calculation

Wang’s premium principle

However ... experienced losses hardly ever equal expected losses ... extra loading for risk is desirable if the insurer on average does not want to lose any money

  • Π ≥ E(X)
  • The search for sound premium calculation principles has been the

subject of numerous actuarial papers and remains debatable with respect to choice ... Wang’s premium principle

  • Wang, 1996
  • With g an increasing, concave function, called the distortion, that

maps [0, 1] onto [0, 1] Π = ∞ g ¯ F(x)

  • dx

On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of Reinsurance Premiums – p. 6/29

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Insurance premium calculation

Wang’s premium principle

Examples:

g(x) = x Net premium principle (Π = EX) g(x) = x1/α (α ≥ 1) Proportional hazard transform principle g(x) = 1 − (1 − x)α (α ≥ 1) Dual-power transform principle g(x) = (1 + α)x − αx2 (0 ≤ α ≤ 1) Gini principle g(x) =

√1+αx−1 √1+α−1

(α > 0) Square root function principle g(x) = 1−e−αx

1−e−α

(α > 0) Exponential function principle g(x) = log(1+αx)

log(1+α)

(α > 0) Logarithmic function principle

On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of Reinsurance Premiums – p. 7/29

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Insurance premium calculation

Wang’s premium principle

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 x On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of Reinsurance Premiums – p. 8/29

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Reinsurance premium calculation

Excess-of-loss reinsurance setting

XR = (X − R)+ = max (0, X − R) total claim amount resulting from a single excess-of-loss reinsurance policy in excess of a high retention level R

  • decumulative distribution function ¯

FR(x) = ¯ F(x + R)

Π (R) = ∞

R

g ¯ F(x)

  • dx

premium given as a function of the decumulative distribution function ¯ F of the original claim amount for the layer from R to infinity

On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of Reinsurance Premiums – p. 9/29

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Extreme value statistics

Motivation

In reinsurance applications, emphasis often lies on the modelling of extreme events, i.e. mostly events with low frequency high and often disastrous impact A very practical tool in the analysis of such extreme events can be found in extreme value statistics, where the tail behavior of a distribution is characterized mainly by the extreme value index γ theoretical framework some estimators (extreme value index, small exceedance probabilities ... reinsurance premiums)

On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of Reinsurance Premiums – p. 10/29

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Extreme value statistics

Extreme value theory (first order framework)

Consider X1,n ≤ . . . ≤ Xn,n independent and identically distributed random variables with common distribution function F Maximum domain of attraction condition lim

n→∞ P

Xn,n − bn an ≤ x

  • = H(x)

Limit necessarily of generalized extreme value type Hγ(x) =    exp

  • − (1 + γx)− 1

γ

  • ,

1 + γx > 0, γ = 0 exp

  • − exp (−x)
  • ,

x ∈ R, γ = 0 Then F is said to belong to the maximum domain of attraction of the extreme value distribution Hγ, denoted as F ∈ D(Hγ)

On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of Reinsurance Premiums – p. 11/29

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Extreme value statistics

Extreme value theory (first order framework)

γ < 0 F belongs to the Weibull class (e.g. uniform, beta and reversed Burr distribution) γ = 0 F belongs to the Gumbel class (e.g. exponential, normal and gamma distribution) γ > 0 F belongs to the Fréchet class (e.g. Fréchet, Pareto and Burr distribution)

On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of Reinsurance Premiums – p. 12/29

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Extreme value statistics

Extreme value theory (first order framework)

γ < 0 F belongs to the Weibull class (e.g. uniform, beta and reversed Burr distribution) γ = 0 F belongs to the Gumbel class (e.g. exponential, normal and gamma distribution) γ > 0 F belongs to the Fréchet class (e.g. Fréchet, Pareto and Burr distribution)

  • ¯

F(x) = x−1/γlF(x) Pareto-type tail

(lF slowly varying at infinity, i.e. lF (tx)

lF (t) t→∞

− → 1 for all x > 0)

U(x) = Q(1 − 1/x) = xγlU(x)

(lU slowly varying at infinity)

On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of Reinsurance Premiums – p. 12/29

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Extreme value statistics

Estimating reinsurance premiums (Karamata theorem)

Assume G(t) = g(1/t) to be regularly varying at infinity with index

  • f regular variation β, i.e. G(t) = tβlG(t)

(lG slowly varying at infinity)

⇓ ¯

F(x) = x−1/γlF (x)

Π (R) = ∞

R

xβ/γlGF(x)dx

(lGF slowly varying at infinity) Karamata ⇓ γ < −β

Π (R) ∼ ˙ Π (R) = 1 −β/γ − 1Rg ¯ F(R)

  • when the retention level R tends to infinity

On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of Reinsurance Premiums – p. 13/29

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Extreme value statistics

Estimating reinsurance premiums

Π (R) ∼ ˙ Π (R) = 1 −β/γ − 1Rg( ¯ F(R)) ⇓ Premium estimator: ˆ Π (R) =

1 −β/ˆ γ−1Rg(ˆ

pR) large retention level regularly varying distortion

On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of Reinsurance Premiums – p. 14/29

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Extreme value statistics

Estimating reinsurance premiums

Π (R) ∼ ˙ Π (R) = 1 −β/γ − 1Rg( ¯ F(R)) ⇓ Premium estimator: ˆ Π (R) =

1 −β/ˆ γ−1Rg(ˆ

pR) large retention level regularly varying distortion Net premium principle

g(x) = x        G(x) = x−1, β = −1, lG(x) = 1.

On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of Reinsurance Premiums – p. 14/29

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Extreme value statistics

Estimating reinsurance premiums

Π (R) ∼ ˙ Π (R) = 1 −β/γ − 1Rg( ¯ F(R)) ⇓ Premium estimator: ˆ Π (R) =

1 −β/ˆ γ−1Rg(ˆ

pR) large retention level regularly varying distortion Dual-power transform principle (α > 1)

g(x) = 1 − (1 − x)α

      G(x) = x−1{α − α(α−1)

2

x−1 + o

  • x−1

} β = −1 lG(x) = α − α(α−1)

2

x−1 + o

  • x−1

On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of Reinsurance Premiums – p. 14/29

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Extreme value statistics

Estimating reinsurance premiums

Π (R) ∼ ˙ Π (R) = 1 −β/γ − 1Rg( ¯ F(R)) ⇓ Premium estimator: ˆ Π (R) =

1 −β/ˆ γ−1Rg(ˆ

pR) large retention level regularly varying distortion Needed: estimator ˆ pR of small exceedance probability pR = ¯ F(R) estimator ˆ γ of the tail index γ

On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of Reinsurance Premiums – p. 14/29

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Extreme value statistics

Estimating reinsurance premiums (pRn → 0, as n → ∞)

¯ F(x) = x−1/γlF(x) with lF slowly varying at infinity lim

t→∞

¯ F(λt) ¯ F(t) = λ−1/γ lim

t→∞

lF(λt) lF(t) = λ−1/γ for all λ > 0 for large values y = λt we can approximate ¯ F(y) by ¯ F(y) ≈ ¯ F(t) y t −1/γ with a large threshold t = Xn−k,n and estimator ˆ γk this leads to ˆ pk,Rn = k + 1 n + 1 Rn Xn−k,n −1/ˆ

γk

On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of Reinsurance Premiums – p. 15/29

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Extreme value statistics

Estimating reinsurance premiums (γ > 0)

Consider scaled log-spacings Zjk = j

  • log Xn−j+1,n − log Xn−j,n
  • for j = 1, . . . , k above a large threshold t = Xn−k,n

γ > 0 : Feuerverger and Hall (1999), Beirlant et al. (1999) Zjk ≈d γgjk with gjk i.i.d. standard exponential random variables Maximum likelihood estimator on the scaled log-spacings Zjk for large threshold Xn−k,n (1 ≤ j ≤ k) ˆ γk,H = 1 k

k

  • j=1

Zjk Hill (1975)

On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of Reinsurance Premiums – p. 16/29

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Finite sample behavior

Fréchet distribution

We consider 100 simulated samples of size 500 from a Fréchet(η) distribution with η = 4 (γ = 1/4) ¯ F(x) = 1 − exp(−x−η) and retention level R = U(x) with x = 1.025n

(Net) (DP α = 1.366)

k Net premium (median) 100 200 300 400 500 0.0 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 k Dual Power premium (median) 100 200 300 400 500 0.0 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025

On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of Reinsurance Premiums – p. 17/29

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Finite sample behavior

Burr distribution

We consider 100 simulated samples of size 500 from a Burr(β, τ, λ) distribution with β = 1, τ = 4 and λ = 1 (γ = 1/4) ¯ F(x) = βλ (β + xτ)−λ and retention level R = U(n)

(Net) (DP α = 1.366)

k Net premium (median) 100 200 300 400 500 0.0 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 k Dual Power premium (median) 100 200 300 400 500 0.0 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025

On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of Reinsurance Premiums – p. 18/29

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Asymptotic results

Motivation

In order for these extreme value estimators of reinsurance premiums to become practically applicable, an optimal selection of the tail sample fraction k seems to be desirable A bias-variance trade off through a minimizing asymptotic mean squared error criterion seems preferable in order to find an optimal tail sample fraction ko asymptotic bias term due to estimating ˙ Π (R) by ˆ Π (R) asymptotic error term due to approximating Π (R) by ˙ Π (R)

On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of Reinsurance Premiums – p. 19/29

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Asymptotic results

Extreme value theory (second order framework)

Most extreme value estimators suffer from bias due to a slow convergence rate in lim

x→∞

l(λx) l(x) = 1 for all λ > 0

On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of Reinsurance Premiums – p. 20/29

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Asymptotic results

Extreme value theory (second order framework)

Most extreme value estimators suffer from bias due to a slow convergence rate in lim

x→∞

l(λx) l(x) = 1 for all λ > 0 Parametrization of the rate of convergence: A slowly varying function l satisfies (Rρ,b) for some constant ρ < 0 and rate function b satisfying b(x) → 0, as x → ∞, if for all λ > 1

l(λx) l(x) − 1

  • b(x)

→ λρ − 1 ρ , as x → ∞ Bingham et al. (1987)

On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of Reinsurance Premiums – p. 20/29

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Asymptotic results

Premium approximation error

LEMMA 1. Suppose that lU ∈ R˜

ρ,˜ b and lG ∈ Rρ∗,b∗, then as R → ∞, the rate of

convergence of the premium approximation ˙ Π (R) can be characterized as Π (R) ˙ Π (R) = 1 − 1 β + ρ∗ + γ b∗ 1/ ¯ F(R)

  • +

β γ(β + ˜ ρ + γ) ˜ b

  • 1/ ¯

F(R)

  • + o
  • r
  • 1/ ¯

F(R)

  • where the remainder function r is defined as

r = ˜ b in case b∗(x) = o ˜ b(x)

  • r = b∗ in case ˜

b(x) = o

  • b∗(x)
  • r = ˜

b or r = b∗ in case ˜ b(x) ∼ cb∗(x), with c = 0

On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of Reinsurance Premiums – p. 21/29

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Asymptotic results

Asymptotic normality and bias

THEOREM 1. Suppose that lU ∈ R˜

ρ,˜

  • b. Let ABias(ˆ

γk) ∼ Iγ,˜

ρ˜

b(n/k) and assume that as k, n → ∞ such that k/n → 0 and √ k ˜ b(n/k) → 0, √ k (ˆ γk − γ) →d N(0, σ2

γ) for some asymptotic variance σ2 γ. Then the tail

estimator ˆ pk,Rn satisfies as Rn → ∞ such that ˜ an =

k+1 (n+1)pRn → ∞ and log ˜ an √ k

→ 0, that ABias(ˆ pk,Rn) ∼ pRn log ˜ an γ Iγ,˜

ρ˜

b(n/k) and furthermore, as k, n → ∞ such that k/n → 0 and √ k ˜ b(n/k) → 0, that γ log ˜ an √ k ˆ pk,Rn pRn − 1

  • →d N(0, σ2

γ)

On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of Reinsurance Premiums – p. 22/29

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Asymptotic results

Asymptotic normality and bias

THEOREM 2. Suppose that lU ∈ R˜

ρ,˜ b and lG ∈ Rρ∗,b∗. Moreover let

ABias(ˆ γk) ∼ Iγ,˜

ρ˜

b(n/k), and assume that as k, n → ∞ such that k/n → 0 and √ k ˜ b(n/k) → 0, √ k (ˆ γk − γ) →d N(0, σ2

γ) for some asymptotic variance σ2 γ.

Then, when γ < −β, the premium estimator ˆ Π (R) based on tail estimator ˆ pk,Rn satisfies as Rn → ∞ such that ˜ an =

k+1 (n+1)pRn → ∞ and log ˜ an √ k

→ 0, that ABias( ˆ Π (R)) ∼ −β log ˜ anΠ (R) γ Iγ,˜

ρ˜

b(n/k)+ Π (R) β + ρ∗ + γ bρ∗ 1/ ¯ F(R)

  • and furthermore, as k, n → ∞ such that k/n → 0,

√ k ˜ b(n/k) → 0 and

√ k log ˜ an b∗(1/pR) → 0, that

− γ β log ˜ an √ k ˆ Π (R) Π (R) − 1

  • →d N(0, σ2

γ)

On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of Reinsurance Premiums – p. 23/29

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Asymptotic results

Asymptotic normality and bias (AMSE)

In order to find an optimal threshold for ˆ Π (R), the asymptotic mean squared error that has to be minimized with respect to k then is proportional to β2(log ˜ an)2 γ2 σ2

γ

k +

  • 1

β + ρ∗ + γ bρ∗ 1/pR

  • − β log ˜

an γ Iγ,˜

ρ˜

b(n/k) 2 Example: Hill based estimator (Haeusler and Teugels, 1985) σ2

γ = γ2

Iγ,˜

ρ = 1 1−˜ ρ

⇓ Need are second order estimates of γ, ˜ b(n/k), ˜ ρ and pR

On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of Reinsurance Premiums – p. 24/29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Asymptotic results

Asymptotic normality and bias (second order estimates)

γ > 0 : Feuerverger and Hall (1999), Beirlant et al. (1999) with ˜ bn,k = ˜ b(n/k) Zjk ≈d

  • γ + ˜

bn,k

  • j

k + 1 −˜

ρ

gjk, Maximum likelihood estimator on the scaled log-spacings Zjk for large threshold Xn−k,n (1 ≤ j ≤ k) Matthys et al. (2004) numerical inversion of approximation for quantile function xp = Q(1 − p) given by xp ≈ Xn−k,n k + 1 (n + 1)p γ exp   ˜ bn,k

  • k+1

(n+1)p

˜

ρ

− 1 ˜ ρ   

On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of Reinsurance Premiums – p. 25/29

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Finite sample behavior

Secura Belgian Re data

We consider the Secura Belgian Re data set on automobile claims from 1998 until 2001, as can be found in Beirlant et al. (2004). The data set consists of n = 371 claims which are at least as large as 1, 200, 000 Euro.

k Net premium 100 200 300 50000 100000 150000 200000 k AMSE Net premium 100 200 300 0.0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25

R = 5, 000, 000 Euro

  • (Net) ko = 95

ˆ Πko(R) = 41, 798.13

On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of Reinsurance Premiums – p. 26/29

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Finite sample behavior

Fréchet(4) distribution

(Net) (DP α = 1.366)

k Net premium (median) 100 200 300 400 500 0.0 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 k Dual Power premium (median) 100 200 300 400 500 0.0 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 0.0 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 Net premium 0.0 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 Dual Power premium

On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of Reinsurance Premiums – p. 27/29

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Finite sample behavior

Burr(1,4,1) distribution

(Net) (DP α = 1.366)

k Net premium (median) 100 200 300 400 500 0.0 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 k Dual Power premium (median) 100 200 300 400 500 0.0 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 0.0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 Net premium 0.0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 Dual Power premium

On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of Reinsurance Premiums – p. 28/29

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Conclusion

... on univariate extreme value statistics and the estimation of insurance premiums for excess-of-loss reinsurance policies in excess

  • f a high retention level ... with special attention to heavy-tailed

distributions and Wang’s premium principle as a generalization to the net premium principle ...

On Univariate Extreme Value Statistics and the Estimation of Reinsurance Premiums – p. 29/29