on the road to dynamical gauge fields in cold atoms
play

On the road to dynamical gauge fields in cold atoms Fred - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Synthetic SynQS Quantum Systems Kerim Lilo Alexander M Fabin Apoorva Kai Jan Alexander H On the road to dynamical gauge fields in cold atoms Fred Jendrzejewski Jrgen Torsten Valentin Florian Markus Philipp | e c ( x )


  1. Synthetic SynQS Quantum Systems Kerim Lilo Alexander M Fabián Apoorva Kai Jan Alexander H On the road to dynamical gauge fields in cold atoms Fred Jendrzejewski Jürgen Torsten Valentin Florian Markus Philipp

  2. | e ⟩ Ω c ( x ) Ω | r ⟩ | g ⟩ geometric scalar potential Goldman et al. RPP 77 126401 (2014) Jendrzejewski et al. PRA 94 063422 (2016) Lacki et al. PRL 117 233001 (2016)

  3. ̂ ( ̂ a j +1 ) H = − t ∑ j +1 e iaeA j ̂ j e − iaeA j ̂ a † a † a j + ̂ i Gauge field Particle Dean et al.Nature 497, 598 (2013) M. Aidelsburger et al. PRL 111, 185301 (2013)

  4. add a picture of CERN and the definition of charge Simulation of Higgs decay from CMS ψ ( i γ μ D μ − m ) ψ − 1 ℒ QED = ¯ 4 F μν F μν ψ fi ( i γ μ D μ ij − m f ) ψ fi − 1 2 g 2 Tr ( G μν G μν ) ℒ QCD = ∑ ¯ fi

  5. Conserved Conserved = local charges local gauge symmetry div E ( r ) = e ρ ( r )

  6. ̂ Quantum link approach E ∝ L z L E L + ∝ e ieaA eA Wiese, Ann. Phys. 525 777 (2013) S. Chandrasekharan and U.-J. Wiese, Nucl. Phys. B 492 , 455 (1997).

  7. m F = 0 E E E m F = − 1 eA eA eA Stern-Gerlach

  8. m F = 0 m F = − 1 m f = 0 Fraction of m F = 0 m F = − 1

  9. Kasper et al. NJP 19 023030 (2017) ψ ( i γ μ D μ − m ) ψ − 1 ℒ QED = ¯ 4 F μν F μν ( a † n a n +1 ) + M ∑ n a n + χ ∑ − J ∑ L 2 n L − n +1 L + n a n + a † ( − 1) n a † H KS = z , n n n n One-axis twisting Hamiltonian onian @Oberthaler group, Heidelberg

  10. Kasper et al. NJP 19 023030 (2017) ψ ( i γ μ D μ − m ) ψ − 1 ℒ QED = ¯ 4 F μν F μν ( a † n a n +1 ) + χ ∑ − J ∑ + M ∑ L 2 n L − ( − 1) n a † n +1 L + n a n + a † H KS = n a n z , n n n n Particle filled Dirac sea Anti-Particle

  11. Zache et al. Quantum Sci. Technol. 3 034010 (2018) ψ ( i γ μ D μ − m ) ψ − 1 ℒ QED = ¯ 4 F μν F μν ( a † n a n +1 ) + χ ∑ − J ∑ + M ∑ L 2 n +1 L + n a n + a † n L − ( a † n , ↑ a n , ↓ + h . c .) H Wilson = z , n n n n see the talks by Nigel Cooper, Xiong-Jun Liu, Christoph Weitenberg, … more from the Hauke group in weeks ! | 0 ⟩ + ⋯ + | n ⟩

  12. Kasper et al. NJP 19 023030 (2017) ψ ( i γ μ D μ − m ) ψ − 1 ℒ QED = ¯ 4 F μν F μν ( a † n a n +1 ) + χ ∑ − J ∑ + M ∑ L 2 n L − ( − 1) n a † n +1 L + n a n + a † H KS = n a n z , n n n n PhD of Spin-changing Arno Trautmann collisions: 0.1 fraction of 0.05 Li up time 0 4 6 2

  13. Kasper et al. NJP 19 023030 (2017) ( a † n a n +1 ) + χ ∑ − J ∑ + M ∑ L 2 n +1 L + n a n + a † n L − ( − 1) n a † n a n H KS = z , n n n n e − E e + Spontaneous (Schwinger) pair production for large electric fields 2 z , n > 2 M + χ ( L z , n − 1 ) χ L 2 χ L z , n > M

  14. ψ ( i γ μ D μ − m ) ψ − 1 ℒ QED = ¯ 4 F μν F μν Staggered fermions Wilson fermions Fermions |e |g Bosons |e |g Zache et al. QST 3 034010 (2018) Kasper et al. NJP 19 023030 (2017) [G. Eisner]

  15. Supplemental slides

  16. Electric vacuum Platform Refrigeration Dyn Gauge Fields instability e - e - e + e + Wiese, Ann. Phys. 525 777 (2013) [G. Eisner] Zohar et al.,Rep. Prog. Phys. 79 014401 (2016) � 16

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend