on the rigidity of riemannian manifolds
play

On the rigidity of Riemannian manifolds PhD defense Thibault - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The marked length spectrum Techniques used in the proofs Other results and perspectives On the rigidity of Riemannian manifolds PhD defense Thibault Lefeuvre Joint works with Yannick Guedes Bonthonneau, Sbastien Goezel, Colin Guillarmou,


  1. The marked length spectrum Techniques used in the proofs Other results and perspectives On the rigidity of Riemannian manifolds PhD defense Thibault Lefeuvre Joint works with Yannick Guedes Bonthonneau, Sébastien Goüezel, Colin Guillarmou, Gerhard Knieper Institut de Mathématique d’Orsay December 19th 2019 Thibault Lefeuvre On the rigidity of Riemannian manifolds

  2. The marked length spectrum Techniques used in the proofs Other results and perspectives The marked length spectrum 1 Setting of the problem New results Techniques used in the proofs 2 The X-ray transform Microlocal techniques Other results and perspectives 3 Other results Perspectives Thibault Lefeuvre On the rigidity of Riemannian manifolds

  3. The marked length spectrum Setting of the problem Techniques used in the proofs New results Other results and perspectives ( M , g 0 ) smooth closed (compact, ∂ M = ∅ ) Riemannian manifold with negative sectional curvature → “chaotic” geodesic flow Figure: Image courtesy of Frédéric Faure Question: What are the geometric quantities which determine the Riemannian manifold ( M , g 0 ) ? In other words, can we find a isom quantity A ( g 0 ) such that if A ( g ) = A ( g 0 ) , then g ∼ g 0 ? Example: On the topological side, an oriented surface is determined by a single number: its genus g ∈ N . A first guess? The spectrum of the Laplacian { 0 = λ 0 < λ 1 ≤ ... } ? Milnor ’55, Kac ’66: “Can one hear the shape of a drum?” Thibault Lefeuvre On the rigidity of Riemannian manifolds

  4. The marked length spectrum Setting of the problem Techniques used in the proofs New results Other results and perspectives ( M , g 0 ) smooth closed (compact, ∂ M = ∅ ) Riemannian manifold with negative sectional curvature → “chaotic” geodesic flow Figure: Image courtesy of Frédéric Faure Question: What are the geometric quantities which determine the Riemannian manifold ( M , g 0 ) ? In other words, can we find a isom quantity A ( g 0 ) such that if A ( g ) = A ( g 0 ) , then g ∼ g 0 ? Example: On the topological side, an oriented surface is determined by a single number: its genus g ∈ N . A first guess? The spectrum of the Laplacian { 0 = λ 0 < λ 1 ≤ ... } ? Milnor ’55, Kac ’66: “Can one hear the shape of a drum?” Thibault Lefeuvre On the rigidity of Riemannian manifolds

  5. The marked length spectrum Setting of the problem Techniques used in the proofs New results Other results and perspectives ( M , g 0 ) smooth closed (compact, ∂ M = ∅ ) Riemannian manifold with negative sectional curvature → “chaotic” geodesic flow Figure: Image courtesy of Frédéric Faure Question: What are the geometric quantities which determine the Riemannian manifold ( M , g 0 ) ? In other words, can we find a isom quantity A ( g 0 ) such that if A ( g ) = A ( g 0 ) , then g ∼ g 0 ? Example: On the topological side, an oriented surface is determined by a single number: its genus g ∈ N . A first guess? The spectrum of the Laplacian { 0 = λ 0 < λ 1 ≤ ... } ? Milnor ’55, Kac ’66: “Can one hear the shape of a drum?” Thibault Lefeuvre On the rigidity of Riemannian manifolds

  6. The marked length spectrum Setting of the problem Techniques used in the proofs New results Other results and perspectives ( M , g 0 ) smooth closed (compact, ∂ M = ∅ ) Riemannian manifold with negative sectional curvature → “chaotic” geodesic flow Figure: Image courtesy of Frédéric Faure Question: What are the geometric quantities which determine the Riemannian manifold ( M , g 0 ) ? In other words, can we find a isom quantity A ( g 0 ) such that if A ( g ) = A ( g 0 ) , then g ∼ g 0 ? Example: On the topological side, an oriented surface is determined by a single number: its genus g ∈ N . A first guess? The spectrum of the Laplacian { 0 = λ 0 < λ 1 ≤ ... } ? Milnor ’55, Kac ’66: “Can one hear the shape of a drum?” Thibault Lefeuvre On the rigidity of Riemannian manifolds

  7. The marked length spectrum Setting of the problem Techniques used in the proofs New results Other results and perspectives The marked length spectrum Answer: No! Counterexamples in constant curvature ( Vigneras ’80 ). The length spectrum i.e. the collection of lengths of closed geodesics is (under some mild assumptions) determined by the spectrum of the Laplacian. Conclusion: One needs a stronger notion to be able to determine the geometry of a manifold. 1-to-1 C = set of free homotopy classes ↔ closed g 0 -geodesics (i.e. ∀ c ∈ C , ∃ ! γ g 0 ( c ) ∈ c ) γ g 0 ( c ) ( M; g 0 ) c Thibault Lefeuvre On the rigidity of Riemannian manifolds

  8. The marked length spectrum Setting of the problem Techniques used in the proofs New results Other results and perspectives The marked length spectrum Definition ( Marked length spectrum ) L g 0 : C → R ∗ + , c �→ ℓ g 0 ( γ c ) , where ℓ g 0 ( γ c ) Riemannian length computed with respect to g 0 . This map is invariant by the action of Diff 0 ( M ) , the group of diffeomorphisms isotopic to the identity i.e. L φ ∗ g 0 = L g 0 . Conjecture ( Burns-Katok ’85 ) The marked length spectrum of a negatively-curved manifold determines the metric (up to isometries) i.e.: if g and g 0 have negative sectional curvature, same marked length spectrum L g = L g 0 , then ∃ φ : M → M smooth diffeomorphism isotopic to the identity such that φ ∗ g = g 0 . Thibault Lefeuvre On the rigidity of Riemannian manifolds

  9. The marked length spectrum Setting of the problem Techniques used in the proofs New results Other results and perspectives Known results: Guillemin-Kazhdan ’80, Croke-Sharafutdinov ’98 : proof of the infinitesimal version of the problem (for a deformation ( g s ) s ∈ ( − 1 , 1 ) of φ ∗ the metric g 0 ): L g s = L g 0 = ⇒ ∃ φ s , s g s = g 0 , Croke ’90 , Otal ’90 : proof for negatively-curved surfaces, Katok ’88 : proof for g conformal to g 0 , Besson-Courtois-Gallot ’95 , Hamenstädt ’99 : proof when ( M , g 0 ) is a locally symmetric space. Theorem (Guillarmou-L. ’18) Let ( M , g 0 ) be a negatively-curved manifold. Then ∃ k ∈ N ∗ , ε > 0 such that: if � g − g 0 � C k < ε and L g = L g 0 , then g is isometric to g 0 . Thibault Lefeuvre On the rigidity of Riemannian manifolds

  10. The marked length spectrum Setting of the problem Techniques used in the proofs New results Other results and perspectives Theorem (Guillarmou-L. ’18) Let ( M , g 0 ) be a negatively-curved manifold. Then ∃ k ∈ N ∗ , ε > 0 such that: if � g − g 0 � C k < ε and L g = L g 0 , then g is isometric to g 0 . Still holds in the more general setting of Anosov manifolds (i.e. manifolds on which the geodesic flow is uniformly hyperbolic), under an additional assumption of nonpositive curvature in dim ≥ 3. Proof relies on finding good stability estimates for the differential of the operator g �→ L ( g ) = L g / L g 0 : � ℓ ( γ g 0 ( c )) 1 d L g 0 f = 1 / 2 × I g 0 2 f : c �→ f γ ( t ) (˙ γ ( t ) , ˙ γ ( t )) d t , ℓ ( γ g 0 ( c )) 0 with γ g 0 ( c ) unique closed geodesic in c ∈ C , that is: � f � C 0 ≤ C � d L g 0 ( f ) � θ ℓ ∞ � f � 1 − θ ∀ f ∈ ker δ C 1 , Proof heavily relies on microlocal analysis and hyperbolic dynamical systems. Thibault Lefeuvre On the rigidity of Riemannian manifolds

  11. The marked length spectrum Setting of the problem Techniques used in the proofs New results Other results and perspectives Theorem (Guillarmou-L. ’18) Let ( M , g 0 ) be a negatively-curved manifold. Then ∃ k ∈ N ∗ , ε > 0 such that: if � g − g 0 � C k < ε and L g = L g 0 , then g is isometric to g 0 . Still holds in the more general setting of Anosov manifolds under an additional assumption of nonpositive curvature in dim ≥ 3. Proof relies on finding good stability estimates for the differential of the operator g �→ L ( g ) = L g / L g 0 : � ℓ ( γ g 0 ( c )) 1 d L g 0 f = 1 / 2 × I g 0 2 f : c �→ f γ ( t ) (˙ γ ( t ) , ˙ γ ( t )) d t , ℓ ( γ g 0 ( c )) 0 with γ g 0 ( c ) unique closed geodesic in c ∈ C . Theorem (Guillarmou-L. ’18, Goüezel-L. ’19) For all 0 < α < β , there exists C , θ > 0 such that: � f � C α ≤ C � I g 0 2 ( f ) � θ ℓ ∞ � f � 1 − θ ∀ f ∈ ker δ C β , Thibault Lefeuvre On the rigidity of Riemannian manifolds

  12. The marked length spectrum Setting of the problem Techniques used in the proofs New results Other results and perspectives Theorem (Guillarmou-Knieper-L. ’19) Let ( M , g 0 ) be a negatively-curved manifold. Then ∃ k ∈ N ∗ , ε > 0 such that if � g − g 0 � C k < ε , there exists φ : M → M such that: � φ ∗ g − g 0 � H − 1 / 2 ≤ C lim sup | log L g ( c j ) / L g 0 ( c j ) | 1 / 2 . j → + ∞ Proof relies on the notion of geodesic stretch ( Croke-Fathi ’90, Knieper ’95 ) and the thermodynamic formalism ( Bowen, Ruelle ’70s ...) This can be seen as a distance on isometry classes. Thibault Lefeuvre On the rigidity of Riemannian manifolds

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend