on the algebraic quantization of a scalar field in anti
play

On the algebraic quantization of a scalar field in anti-de Sitter - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

On the algebraic quantization of a scalar field in anti-de Sitter spacetime Hugo Ferreira Joint work with Claudio Dappiaggi Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 12, 125016; arXiv:1610.01049 [gr-qc] arXiv:1701.07215 [math-ph] INFN Pavia / Universit degli


  1. On the algebraic quantization of a scalar field in anti-de Sitter spacetime Hugo Ferreira Joint work with Claudio Dappiaggi Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 12, 125016; arXiv:1610.01049 [gr-qc] arXiv:1701.07215 [math-ph] INFN Pavia / Università degli Studi di Pavia 23 June 2017, Leipzig 40th LQP

  2. 0. Introduction We discuss the algebraic quantization of a Klein-Gordon field in anti-de Sitter (AdS), a simple example of a non-globally hyperbolic spacetime, extending the work of Avis, Isham, Storey (1978), Allen & Jacobson (1986) and others. We consider Robin boundary conditions at infinity, by treating the system as a Sturm-Liouville problem, complementing the work of Wald & Ishibashi (2004). We show that it is possible to associate an algebra of observables enjoying the standard properties of causality, time-slice axiom and F-locality. We characterize the wavefront set of the ground state and propose a natural generalization of the definition of Hadamard states in AdS.

  3. 1 Anti-de Sitter spacetime 2 Klein-Gordon equation and causal propagator 3 AQFT and Hadamard condition for AdS 4 Conclusions

  4. Outline 1 Anti-de Sitter spacetime 2 Klein-Gordon equation and causal propagator 3 AQFT and Hadamard condition for AdS 4 Conclusions

  5. 1. Anti-de Sitter spacetime Definition: Anti-de Sitter AdS d +1 ( d ≥ 2 ) is the maximally symmetric solution to the vacuum Einstein’s equations with a negative cosmological constant Λ < 0 . It is defined as the hypersurface in R d +2 with line element d +1 � d s 2 = − d X 2 0 − d X 2 d X 2 1 + i i =2 given by the relation d +1 � = − d ( d − 1) ℓ . i = − ℓ 2 , − X 2 0 − X 2 X 2 1 + . Λ i =2 Anti-de Sitter spacetime is not globally hyperbolic: it possesses a timelike boundary at spatial infinity.

  6. 1. Anti-de Sitter spacetime Poincaré patch ( t, z, x i ) , t ∈ R , z ∈ R > 0 and x i ∈ R , i = 1 , . . . , d − 1 , d s 2 = ℓ 2 � � − d t 2 + d z 2 + δ ij d x i d x j . z 2 The region covered by this chart is the Poincaré fundamental domain , PAdS d +1 .

  7. 1. Anti-de Sitter spacetime H d +1 . = R > 0 × R d via a conformal rescaling PAdS d +1 can be mapped to ˚ d s 2 �→ z 2 ℓ 2 d s 2 = − d t 2 + d z 2 + δ ij d x i d x j . We can attach a conformal boundary as the locus z = 0 and obtain H d +1 . = R ≥ 0 × R d , the half Minkowski spacetime . Remark: From now on, we set ℓ = 1 .

  8. Outline 1 Anti-de Sitter spacetime 2 Klein-Gordon equation and causal propagator 3 AQFT and Hadamard condition for AdS 4 Conclusions

  9. 2. Klein-Gordon equation and causal propagator 2.1. Klein-Gordon equation and boundary conditions Klein-Gordon equation. Poincaré domain ( PAdS d +1 , g ) , φ : PAdS d +1 → R , � � � g − m 2 Pφ = 0 − ξR φ = 0 . 1 − d H d +1 → R is a solution of Lemma: In (˚ 2 φ : ˚ H d +1 , η ) , Φ = z � � � η − m 2 P η Φ = Φ = 0 , z 2 with m 2 . 0 − ( ξ − d − 1 = m 2 4 d ) R .

  10. 2. Klein-Gordon equation and causal propagator 2.1. Klein-Gordon equation and boundary conditions Klein-Gordon equation. Poincaré domain ( PAdS d +1 , g ) , φ : PAdS d +1 → R , � � � g − m 2 Pφ = 0 − ξR φ = 0 . 1 − d H d +1 → R is a solution of Lemma: In (˚ 2 φ : ˚ H d +1 , η ) , Φ = z � � � η − m 2 P η Φ = Φ = 0 , z 2 with m 2 . 0 − ( ξ − d − 1 = m 2 4 d ) R . Fourier expansion. Fourier representation of Φ : � x . k . R d d d k e ik · x � Φ = Φ k , = ( t, x 1 , . . . , x d − 1 ) , = ( ω, k 1 , . . . , k d − 1 ) , where � Φ k are solutions of the ODE � � d − 1 � − d 2 d z 2 + m 2 Φ k ( z ) . λ . = ω 2 − L � Φ k ( z ) = λ � � k 2 = Φ k ( z ) , i z 2 i =1 This is a Sturm-Liouville problem on z ∈ (0 , + ∞ ) with spectral parameter λ .

  11. 2. Klein-Gordon equation and causal propagator 2.1. Klein-Gordon equation and boundary conditions Definition: For any z 0 ∈ (0 , ∞ ) we call maximal domain associated to L � � D max ( L ; z 0 ) . Ψ : (0 , z 0 ) → C | Ψ , dΨ d z ∈ AC loc (0 , z 0 ) and Ψ , L (Ψ) ∈ L 2 (0 , z 0 ) = , where AC loc (0 , z 0 ) is the collection of all complex-valued, locally absolutely continuous functions on (0 , z 0 ) . Fundamental pair of solutions of L Φ = λ Φ . = q 2 Φ as � π 2 q − ν √ z J ν ( qz ) , Φ 1 ( z ) =  � π 2 q ν √ z J − ν ( qz ) ,    − ν ∈ (0 , 1) , � π � � Φ 2 ( z ) = √ z Y 0 ( qz ) − 2   − π log( q ) ν = 0 ,  , 2 √ where ν . 1 + 4 m 2 ≥ 0 . Only Φ 1 ∈ L 2 (0 , z 0 ) for ν ≥ 1 . = 1 2

  12. 2. Klein-Gordon equation and causal propagator 2.1. Klein-Gordon equation and boundary conditions Definition: Ψ α : (0 , ∞ ) → C satisfies an α -boundary condition at the endpoint 0, or equivalently that Ψ α ∈ D max ( L ; α ) , if the following two conditions are satisfied: 1 there exists z 0 ∈ (0 , ∞ ) such that Ψ α ∈ D max ( L ; z 0 ) ; 2 there exists α ∈ (0 , π ] such that � � lim cos( α ) W z [Ψ α , Φ 1 ] + sin( α ) W z [Ψ α , Φ 2 ] = 0 , z → 0 where W z [Ψ α , Φ i ] . = Ψ α dΦ i d z − Φ i dΨ α d z , i = 1 , 2 , is the Wronskian.

  13. 2. Klein-Gordon equation and causal propagator 2.1. Klein-Gordon equation and boundary conditions Definition: Ψ α : (0 , ∞ ) → C satisfies an α -boundary condition at the endpoint 0, or equivalently that Ψ α ∈ D max ( L ; α ) , if the following two conditions are satisfied: 1 there exists z 0 ∈ (0 , ∞ ) such that Ψ α ∈ D max ( L ; z 0 ) ; 2 there exists α ∈ (0 , π ] such that � � lim cos( α ) W z [Ψ α , Φ 1 ] + sin( α ) W z [Ψ α , Φ 2 ] = 0 , z → 0 where W z [Ψ α , Φ i ] . = Ψ α dΦ i d z − Φ i dΨ α d z , i = 1 , 2 , is the Wronskian. If ν ∈ [0 , 1) , Ψ α may then be written as Ψ α = cos( α )Φ 1 + sin( α )Φ 2 . If ν ≥ 1 , no boundary conditions at z = 0 are imposed and we may take Ψ ≡ Ψ π . These boundary conditions are also commonly known as Robin boundary conditions .

  14. 2. Klein-Gordon equation and causal propagator 2.2. Causal propagator The building block necessary for the algebraic quantization is the causal propagator G α ∈ D ′ ( PAdS d +1 × PAdS d +1 ) . The propagator in PAdS d +1 can be reconstructed via d − 1 G α = ( zz ′ ) 2 G H ,α . with G H ,α ∈ D ′ � ˚ H d +1 � H d +1 × ˚ . The latter satisfies ( P η ⊗ I ) G H ,α = ( I ⊗ P η ) G H ,α = 0 , � ˚ H d +1 � ∀ f, f ′ ∈ C ∞ G H ,α ( f, f ′ ) = − G H ,α ( f ′ , f ) , 0 d − 1 � δ ( x i − x ′ i ) δ ( z − z ′ ) . G H ,α | t = t ′ = 0 , ∂ t G H ,α | t = t ′ = ∂ t ′ G H ,α | t = t ′ = i =1

  15. 2. Klein-Gordon equation and causal propagator 2.2. Causal propagator The building block necessary for the algebraic quantization is the causal propagator G α ∈ D ′ ( PAdS d +1 × PAdS d +1 ) . The propagator in PAdS d +1 can be reconstructed via d − 1 G α = ( zz ′ ) 2 G H ,α . with G H ,α ∈ D ′ � ˚ H d +1 � H d +1 × ˚ . The latter satisfies ( P η ⊗ I ) G H ,α = ( I ⊗ P η ) G H ,α = 0 , � ˚ H d +1 � ∀ f, f ′ ∈ C ∞ G H ,α ( f, f ′ ) = − G H ,α ( f ′ , f ) , 0 d − 1 � δ ( x i − x ′ i ) δ ( z − z ′ ) . G H ,α | t = t ′ = 0 , ∂ t G H ,α | t = t ′ = ∂ t ′ G H ,α | t = t ′ = i =1 We consider a mode expansion for the integral kernel of G H ,α , � d d k e ik · ( x − x ′ ) � G H ,α ( x − x ′ , z, z ′ ) = G k,α ( z, z ′ ) , d (2 π ) R d 2 where � G k,α ( z, z ′ ) is a symmetric solution of = − d 2 d z 2 + m 2 L . G k,α ( z, z ′ ) = q 2 � q 2 = k · k . ( L ⊗ I ) � G k,α ( z, z ′ ) = ( I ⊗ L ) � G k,α ( z, z ′ ) , z 2 ,

  16. 2. Klein-Gordon equation and causal propagator 2.2. Causal propagator = � d − 1 � x i − x ′ i � 2 and Let r 2 . i =1 �� � � ∞ � k � d − 3 k 2 + q 2 ( t − t ′ − iǫ ) sin I ǫ ( q, r, t, t ′ ) . 2 = d k k 2 ( kr ) q � J d − 3 . 2 π ( k 2 + q 2 ) r 0 Proposition: The causal propagator G H ,α ∈ D ′ � ˚ H d +1 � H d +1 × ˚ for different values of ν ∈ [0 , ∞ ) has integral kernel given by the following expressions. 1 If ν ∈ [1 , ∞ ) , � ∞ √ G H ,π ( x, x ′ ) = lim d q I ǫ ( q, r, t, t ′ ) J ν ( qz ) J ν ( qz ′ ) . zz ′ ǫ → 0 + 0 2 If ν ∈ (0 , 1) and c α . = cot( α ) ≤ 0 , that is, α ∈ [ π 2 , π ] , � ∞ √ ψ c α ( z ) ψ c α ( z ′ ) G H ,α ( x, x ′ ) = lim d q I ǫ ( q, r, t, t ′ ) zz ′ α − 2 c α q 2 ν cos( νπ ) + q 4 ν , c 2 ǫ → 0 + 0 where ψ c α ( z ) = c α J ν ( qz ) − q 2 ν J − ν ( qz ) . Remark: There is no ground state for Robin boundary conditions with c > 0 and for ν = 0 , so these cases will not be further considered.

  17. 2. Klein-Gordon equation and causal propagator 2.2. Causal propagator Proposition: Let: � �� − 2 �   � � √ 2 σ ǫ d 2 + ν, 1 F 2 + ν ; 1 + 2 ν ; cosh   2 G (D) ( x, x ′ ) = lim   − ( ǫ ↔ − ǫ )  , � � √ 2 σ ǫ �� d  2 + ν ǫ → 0 + cosh 2 � �� − 2 �   � � √ 2 σ ǫ d 2 − ν, 1 2 − ν ; 1 − 2 ν ; F cosh   2 G (N) ( x, x ′ ) = lim   − ( ǫ ↔ − ǫ )  , � � √ 2 σ ǫ �� d  2 − ν ǫ → 0 + cosh 2 where σ ǫ . = σ + 2 iǫ ( t − t ′ ) + ǫ 2 and F is the Gaussian hypergeometric function. The integral kernel of the causal propagator on PAdS d +1 is � � cos( α ) G (D) ( u ) + sin( α ) G (N) ( u ) G α ( u ) = N α where N α is a normalization constant, ν ∈ (0 , 1) and α ∈ [ π 2 , π ] .

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend