On 2 n 2D M Mate terials & s & Thei heir Defects ects - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

on 2 n 2d m mate terials s thei heir defects ects under
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

On 2 n 2D M Mate terials & s & Thei heir Defects ects - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

On 2 n 2D M Mate terials & s & Thei heir Defects ects under electron irradiatjon Jani K ni Kotakoski Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna, Austria htup:/ /dim.univie.ac.at/ jani.kotakoski@univie.ac.at Conference on Physics


slide-1
SLIDE 1

On 2 n 2D M Mate terials & s & Thei heir Defects ects under electron irradiatjon

Jani K ni Kotakoski

Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna, Austria

htup:/ /dim.univie.ac.at/ jani.kotakoski@univie.ac.at Conference on Physics of Defects in Solids: Quantum Mechanics Meets Topology 9.–13.7.2018 @ ICTP, Trieste, Italy

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2D Materials

Xia et al., Nat. Photon. 8, 899–907 (2014) Nature 499, 419 (2013) Nan et al., ACS Nano 8, 5738 (2014)

MoS2

Tsen et al., Science 336, 1143 (2012) González-Herrero et al., Science 352, 437 (2016)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Transmission Electron Microscopy

  • U. Ludacka, FEI Titan 80-300 @ Vienna

Jinschek, Chem. Commun. 50, 2696-2706 (2014)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Krivanek et al., Ultramicroscopy 108, 179 (2008)

Nion UltraSTEM 100 @ Vienna

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Pennycook et al., MRS Bulletjn 31, 36 (2006)

Nion UltraSTEM 100 @ Vienna

slide-6
SLIDE 6

JK et al., Nat. Commun. 5, 4991 (2014) Krivanek et al., Nature 464, 571 (2010) Ramasse et al, Nano Letu. 13, 4989 (2013) Susi, JK, et al. ,2D Mater. 4, 021013 (2017)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

knock-on excitatjons & ionizatjon chemical efgects

O OH O H H

Electron Beam Efgects in the (S)TEM

Characteristjc cross sectjons and tjme scales for carbon @ 100 kV Kno nock-on dyna namics Ioniza zatj tjon Plasmons cross sectjon: < 1 barn cross sectjon: 106 barn cross sectjon: 106 barn tjme scale: 10-15 s tjme scale: 10-15 s tjme scale: 10-13 s Phonons ns (elastj stjc collision) Core hole cross sectjon: 106 barn cross sectjon: 104 barn tjme scale: 10-12 s tjme scale: 10-14 s

Egerton, Ultramicroscopy 127, 100–108 (2013), Brühwiler et al., Phys. Rev. Letu. 74, 614–617 (1995), Yan et al., Nature Photon. 7, 394–399 (2013), Kang et al., Phys. Rev. B 81, 165405 (2010), Banhart, Rep. Prog. Phys. 62, 1181 (1999), Cossletu, J. Microsc. 113, 113-129 (1978)

Beam Current: 30 pA

  • ca. 1 e- / nm2 / 10-9 s
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Knock-On Process

Conservatjon of energy Conservatjon of momentum Maximum energy transfer occurs for the back scatuering electron and yields

Banhart, Rep. Prog. Phys. 62, 1181 (1999)

Electron energy: eU Initjal velocity of the nucleus

  • r

for v = 0

slide-9
SLIDE 9

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 50 100 150 200 250 300 Tmax (eV) U (kV) Carbon-12 Carbon-13

6

C

Carbon 12, 13.01

m: 0.51 MeV/c2 M: Z x 931.49 MeV/c2 Velocity here from kinetjc theory: Betuer, phonon DOS:

Susi, …, JK, Nat. Commun. 7, 13040 (2016)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Graphene @ 90 kV, TEM

Meyer, JK et al., Phys. Rev. Letu. (2012)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Graphene @ 95 kV, STEM

Susi, …, JK, Nat. Commun. 7, 13040 (2016)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Displacement Cross Sectjon

Coulomb Interactjon: Nucleus: Q2 = Z Electron: Q1 = 1 Rutherford scatuering: (valid for charges at low energies) Extended for spin and relatjvistjc electrons by Motu & approximated by McKinley and Feshbach:

See: Zobelli et al., Phys. Rev. B 75, 245402 (2007) McKinley and H. Feshbach, Phys. Rev. 74, 1759 (1948)

Using

  • ne gets

Energy of nucleus afuer scatuering Electron scatuering angle Assuming isotropic displacement threshold Ed and integratjng over T > Ed leads to:

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Meyer, JK, et al., Phys. Rev. Letu. 108, 196102 (2012)

Theory vs. experiment

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 Cross sectjon (barn) Electron energy (keV) 5 10 15 20 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Cross sectjon (barn) Electron energy (keV) 22 eV 22 eV 18 eV Experiment Experiment 18 eV

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Susi, …, JK, Nat. Commun. 7, 13040 (2016)

Velocity distributjon of nuclei Extended model:

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Sub-threshold Knock-On Efgects

Dynamical process due to an impact on one atom

JK et al., Phys. Rev. B 83, 245420 (2011) — Susi, …, JK, 2D Mater. 4, 042004 (2017) Kurasch, JK, et al., Nano Letu. 12, 3168 (2012) — JK et al., Nat. Commun. 5, 4991 (2014)

Stone-Wales „Flower defect“ Divacancy

slide-16
SLIDE 16

From Single- to Multjvacancies

Kotakoski et al., Phys. Rev. Letu. 106, 105505 (2011) & Kotakoski et al., Phys. Rev. B 89, 201406 (2014)

@ 100 kV

slide-17
SLIDE 17

… and to Amorphous 2D Carbon

Kotakoski et al., Phys. Rev. Letu. 106, 105505 (2011) & Eder, JK et al., Sci. Rep. 4, 4060 (2014)

@ 100 kV

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Impurity Atom Dynamics

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Observed dynamics

Susi, JK, et al. Phys. Rev. Letu. 113, 115501 (2014), Yang et al., Angewandte Chemie 126, 9054 (2014), Lee et al., Nature 4, 1650 (2013), Lin et al., Nano Letuers 15, 74087413 (2015), Kepaptsoglou et al., ACS Nano 9, 11398 (2015) Susi, …, JK, 2D Mater. 4, 042004 (2017)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Hints Towards 2D Silicon Carbide?

Sample: reduced graphene oxide Imaging: Nion UltraSTEM 100 @ 60 kV, ca. 30 pA @ 10-9 mbar

Susi, JK, et al. ,Sci. Rep. 7, 4399 (2017)

14

Si

Silicon 28.09

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 50 100 150 200 250 300 Tmax (eV) U (kV) Silicon

@ 60 kV ~ 4–6 eV (Si) ~ 10–13 eV (C)

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 50 100 150 200 250 300 Tmax (eV) U (kV) Carbon-12 Carbon-13

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Susi, JK, et al. ,Sci. Rep. 7, 4399 (2017)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Susi, JK, et al. ,Sci. Rep. 7, 4399 (2017)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Knock-On vs. Ionizatjon, or Both?

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Electron irradiatjon of hBN

5

B

Boron 10.01, 11.01 7

N

Nitrogen 14.00, 15.00

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 50 100 150 200 250 300 Tmax (eV) U (kV) Boron-10 Boron-11 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 50 100 150 200 250 300 Tmax (eV) U (kV) Nitrogen-14 Nitrogen-15

@ 120 kV

Jin et al., Phys. Rev. Letu. 102, 195505 (2009) Meyer et al., Nano Letu. 9, 2683 (2009)

@ 80 kV

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Kotakoski et al., Phys. Rev. B 82, 113404 (2010)

(a) 80 kV (b) 120 kV (c) 200 kV

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Sulfur Vacancies in MoS2

16

S

Sulfur 32.06

5 10 15 20 25 30 50 100 150 200 250 300 Tmax (eV) U (kV) Sulfur

42

Mo

Molybdenum 95.95

5 10 15 20 25 30 50 100 150 200 250 300 Tmax (eV) U (kV) Molybdenum

@ 80 kV

Komsa, JK et al., Phys. Rev. Letu. 109, 035503 (2012)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Komsa, JK et al., Phys. Rev. Letu. 109, 035503 (2012)

MoS2, HRTEM STEM @ 70 kV

Geo.mean: 1.1x108 e/nm2

2 4 6 8 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 cases dose (1e9 e/nm2)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

From Knock-On to Ionizatjon

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Heavier TMDs: MoTe2

Kuc, Chemical Modelling 11, 1-29 (2014)

42

Mo

Molybdenum 95.95 74

W

Tungsten 183.84 16

S

Sulfur 32.06 34

Se

Selenium 78.971 52

Te

Tellurium 127.60

5 10 15 20 25 30 50 100 150 200 250 300 Tmax (eV) U (kV) Molybdenum 5 10 15 20 25 30 50 100 150 200 250 300 Tmax (eV) U (kV) Tellurium

@ 60 kV < 1.5 eV @ 60 kV < 2.0 eV

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Elibol, … , JK, Chem. Mater. 30, 1230 (2018)

Non-knock-on dynamics

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Elibol, … , JK, Chem. Mater. 30, 1230 (2018)

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Intrinsic defects

Elibol, … , JK, Chem. Mater. 30, 1230 (2018) TMD-protectjon through sandwiching: Algara-Siller et al., Appl. Phys. Letu. 103, 203107 (2013)

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Graphene Edges under the Electron Beam

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Typical Results in a HRTEM: Growing Holes

Meyer, JK, et al., Phys. Rev. Letu. 108, 196102 (2012) See also: Girit et al., Science 323, 1705 (2009)

slide-35
SLIDE 35

What Should We Expect?

Kotakoski et al., ACS Nano 6, 671 (2012)

Knock-on damage at various edges

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Experimental setup in Vienna

slide-37
SLIDE 37

… in a STEM at 10-7 to 10-6 mbar (O2)

Leuthner et al., in preparatjon

STEM imaging at 60 kV unst nstable edges Typical orientatj tjon: Zigza zag

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Leuthner et al., in preparatjon

slide-39
SLIDE 39

How About in UHV?

Leuthner et al., in preparatjon

STEM imaging at 60 kV and ca. 2x10-10 mbar Si-driven dyna namics Most stly: stable armcha hair edges

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Etching-Induced Cleaning @ 10-7 mbar (Air)

Leuthner et al., in preparatjon

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Jannik Meyer Toma S Susi Clemens Mangler Moha hammad M Mona naza zam Kimmo Mustonen Tim Pennycook Bernhard Bayer Viera Skakalova Franz Eder Giacomo Argentero Rasim Mirzayev Kenan Elibol Andreas Mituelberger Stefan Hummel Greg egor L Leuthn euthner Ursula ula L Lud udack cka Muk ukes esh Tripathi Chr hristo toph h Hofer er Geo eorg Zagler ler Heena ena I Ina nani Ale lex C Chi hirita M Miha haila la And ndrea eas P Postl tl Tobias Görlich Daryoush Nosraty Alamdary Manuel Längle Michael Somma Michael Treacy University of Ulm, Germany Ute Kaiser Ossi Lehtjnen Simon Kurasch SuperSTEM, UK Quentjn Ramasse Demie Kepaptsoglou Trinity College Dublin, Ireland Georg Duesberg Niall McEvoy Maria O‘Brien Nion Co. Ondrej Krivanek Tracy Lovejoy Mike Hotz Aalto University, Finland Hannu-Pekka Komsa HZDR, Germany Arkady Krasheninnikov AIST, Japan Kazu Suenaga