Offic e o f the Pre side nt Administra tive / Ope ra tio na l - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Offic e o f the Pre side nt

Administra tive / Ope ra tio na l Suppo rt * Spe c ia l Pro je c ts * Co mmunity & Go ve rnme nt Re la tio ns T itle I X & I nc lusio n * I nstitutio na l Re se a rc h, Pla nning a nd E ffe c tive ne ss

MISSION

As ste wa rds o f the CI Missio n, the Offic e o f the Pre side nt c o ntrib ute s e xc e ptio na l e duc a tio na l e xpe rie nc e fo r a ll stude nts a nd suppo rts the Pre side nt thro ug h a hig h le ve l o f se rvic e a nd c o llabo ratio n within a nd b e yo nd the c a mpus fo r a ll c o mmunity me mb e rs.

VISION

T he Offic e o f the Pre side nt is kno wn fo r its e xc e ptio na l se rvic e , inno va tive pra c tic e s a nd fa c ilita ting so lutio ns fo r a dive rse c o mmunity.

VAL UE S

Pro fe ssio na l Gro wth, Optimism, I nc lusive ne ss, Se rvic e a nd E xc e lle nc e

PRE SI DE NT

Dire c to r o f Co mmunity & Go v. Re la tio ns Dire c to r o f Spe c ia l Pro je c t & Ope ra tio ns Dire c to r o f I RPE Chie f o f Sta ff T itle I X & I nc lusio n Offic e r

Suppo rt Ana lyst to Chie f o f Sta ff Co o rdina to r o f Co mmunic a tio n & Do c ume nt Mg mt. Ope ra tio ns Co o rdina to r

• Admin. Assista nt

Pro je c t Spe c ia list Co mmunity & Go ve rnme nt Re la tio ns Spe c ialist Pre side ntia l Aide Se nio r Re se a rc h Ana lyst Da ta Ana lyst

Budg e t Ove rvie w

2013/ 14 2014/ 15 2015/ 16

$1,247,047* $1,617,634 $1,927,895

De par tme nt Salar y 2015/ 16

(w/ o be ne fits)

Ope r ating 2015/ 16 T OT AL 2015/ 16

Offic e o f the Pre side nt $1,148,742 $231,632 $1,380,375 T itle I X & I nc lusio n $156,800 $52,108 $208,908 I RPE $291,439 $47,174 $338,613

T OT AL $1,596,981 $330,914 $1,927,895

* T itle I X & I nc lusio n did no t e xist at this time

Offic e o f the Pre side nt Stra te g ic I nitia tive s

 S uppo rt the Pre side nt in his visio n, g o a ls a nd va lue s (3c , 3d)  E

nsure c o mplianc e o f lo c a l, CSU, sta te , a nd fe de ra l re q uire me nts, rule s a nd re g ula tio ns g o ve rning hig he r e duc a tio n institutio ns (3d)

 Suppo rt a nd e xpa nd e xte rnal re latio ns (3c , 3d)  T

a ke a n a c tive ro le in the c re a tio n o f the ide a l c ampus c ulture (3c , 3d)

 Se rve a s a mo de l o f CI

's c o mmitme nt to e xc e lle nc e b y pro viding a se rvic e

• rie nte d, pro fe ssio na l a nd c o nfide ntia l e nviro nme nt whic h se rve s the c a mpus

c o mmunity a nd the pub lic (3c , 3d)

 L

e a d the c a mpus in c re a ting a c ulture o f asse ssme nt, e vide nc e -b a se d de c isio n-ma king a nd the re spo nsib le use o f da ta (3a , 3b , 3d)

Administra tive / Ope ra tio na l Suppo rt

Pur pose : T

• pr
• vide administr

ative and ope r ational suppor t to the Pr e side nt and the Division of the Offic e of the Pr e side nt.

 Suppor

t the Pr e side nt in his vision, goals and value s (3c , 3d)

 T

ake an ac tive r

• le in the c r

e ation of the ide al c ampus c ultur

e (3c , 3d)

 E

nsur e c omplianc e of loc al, CSU, state , and fe de r al r e quir e me nts, r ule s and r e gulations gove r ning highe r e duc ation institutions (3d)

 Suppo rt a nd e xpa nd e xte rnal re latio ns (3c , 3d)

 Se r

ve as a mode l of CI's c ommitme nt to e xc e lle nc e by pr

• viding a se r

vic e or ie nte d, pr

• fe ssional and c onfide ntial e nvir
• nme nt whic h se r

ve s the c ampus c ommunity and the public (3c , 3d)

 L e a d the c a mpus in c re a ting a c ulture o f asse ssme nt, e vide nc e -ba se d de c isio n-ma king a nd the re spo nsible use

• f da ta (3a , 3b , 3d)

Administra tive / Ope ra tio na l Suppo rt

 Re se a rc h a nd me e ting pre pa ra tio n  I ssue re so lutio n

 F

utur e Status

 Unde te rmine d ne w Pre side ntia l ne e ds 

R isk Mitigation



F e de ra l, Sta te a nd CSU re po rting de a dline s a nd re g ula tio ns



F isc al re spo nsibility



Unive rsity re puta tio n  Me e ting a nd e ve nt lo g istic s  T ra ve l c o o rdina tio n  Custo me r se rvic e  Budg e t de ve lo pme nt a nd o ve rsig ht  Gra nt ma na g e me nt  Do c ume nt a nd c o mmunic a tio n ma na g e me nt  Re po rting de a dline tra c king  Sig na ture a utho rity  Po lic y de ve lo pme nt

 Cur

r e nt Status

Spe c ia l Pro je c ts

Pur pose : T

• fac ilitate spe c ial pr
• je c ts on be half of the Pr

e side nt, wor king c lose ly with unive r sity c olle ague s and c ommunity le ade r s, to fur the r the Mission of the Unive r sity and to assist in de ve loping str

• ng c ollabor

ative r e lationships ac r

• ss the County in

suppor t of the e duc ational pipe line .

 Suppor

t the Pr e side nt in his vision, goals and value s (3c , 3d)

 T

ake an ac tive r

• le in the c r

e ation of the ide al c ampus c ultur

e (3c , 3d)

 E

nsur e c omplianc e of loc al, CSU, state , and fe de r al r e quir e me nts, r ule s and r e gulations gove r ning highe r e duc ation institutions (3d)

 Suppor

t and e xpand e xte r

nal r e lations (3c , 3d)

 Se r

ve as a mode l of CI's c ommitme nt to e xc e lle nc e by pr

• viding a se r

vic e

• r

ie nte d, pr

• fe ssional and c onfide ntial e nvir
• nme nt whic h se r

ve s the c ampus c ommunity and the public (3c , 3d)

 L e a d the c a mpus in c re a ting a c ulture o f asse ssme nt, e vide nc e -ba se d de c isio n-ma king a nd the re spo nsib le use o f da ta (3a , 3b , 3d)

Spe c ia l Pro je c ts

 Cur

r e nt Status

 Suppo rt the Pre side nt  E sta b lish CI a s a le a de r in the c o mmunity  F a c ilita te o ppo rtunitie s fo r CI  Pro mo te CI a nd a c o lle g e -g o ing c ulture

Spe c ia l Pro je c ts

 F

utur e Status

 Co ntinue fa c ilita tio n o f c o mmunity c o lla bo ra tio ns to furthe r the Unive rsity Missio n.

 R

isk Mitigation

 L

• ss o f o ppo rtunitie s to le ve ra g e re so urc e s

 L

• ss o f suppo rt o f lo c a l c o mmunity

Co mmunity & Go ve rnme nt Re la tio ns

Pur pose : Community and Government Relations serves two purposes:

The first is to advance California State University Channel Islands’ positive presence and goodwill at all levels throughout the culturally diverse service region, the state, the nation and internationally by planning, directing, and implementing a comprehensive

proactive program of community and government relations.

The second purpose is to establish and maintain strong relationships with local elected officials, legislators in Sacramento, and U.S. Congressional representatives in Washington D.C. and their staffs to communicate positions on issues and obtain support for resources on behalf of the campus. Both of these functions have a direct link to the support and development of campus

• perations, infrastructure and academic programs.

The Director of Community and Government Relations provides council to the President on matters affecting the University in community and governmental affairs and serves to represent the President as assigned.

Co mmunity & Go ve rnme nt Re la tio ns

 Suppor

t the Pr e side nt in his vision, goals and value s (3c , 3d)

 T a ke a n a c tive ro le in the c re a tio n o f the ide a l c ampus c ulture (3c , 3d)

 E

nsur e c omplianc e of loc al, CSU, state , and fe de r al r e quir e me nts, r ule s and r e gulations gove r ning highe r e duc ation institutions (3d)

 Suppor

t and e xpand e xte r

nal r e lations (3c , 3d)

 Se rve a s a mo de l o f CI 's c o mmitme nt to e xc e lle nc e b y pro viding a se rvic e o rie nte d, pro fe ssio na l a nd c o nfide ntia l e nviro nme nt whic h se rve s the c a mpus c o mmunity a nd the pub lic (3c , 3d)  L e a d the c a mpus in c re a ting a c ulture o f asse ssme nt, e vide nc e -ba se d de c isio n-ma king a nd the re spo nsib le use o f da ta (3a , 3b , 3d)

Co mmunity a nd Go ve rnme nt Re la tio ns

 Cur

r e nt Status

 Cre a te a nd fo ste r stro ng re la tio nships with lo c al, re g io nal, sta te a nd na tio nal le g isla to rs a nd c o ng re ssio nal re pre se nta tive s.  I nc re a se c o mmunity a wa re ne ss, c ultiva te re la tio nships a nd de ve lo p pa rtne rships.

 F

utur e Status

 Co ntinue o utre a c h e ffo rts  E le c tio n ye a r – o ppo rtunitie s fo r e duc a tio n a nd e ng a g e me nt

 R

isk Mitigation

 L

• ss o f Vo ic e

 L

• ss o f F

unding  L

• ss o f Pa rtne rships

 L

• ss o f Co mmunity

Suppo rt

T itle I X & I nc lusio n

Pur pose : T

• advanc e and le ad the Unive r

sity's T itle IX, dive r sity and e quity initiative s thr

• ugh

de ve lopme nt of pr

• gr

ams, initiative s and polic ie s whic h align the c ampus mission, goals, and obje c tive s with all applic able fe de r al and state e qual oppor tunity laws.

 S uppo rt the Pre side nt in his visio n, g o a ls a nd va lue s (3c , 3d)

 T

ake an ac tive r

• le in the c r

e ation of the ide al c ampus c ultur e (3c , 3d)

 E

nsur e c omplianc e of loc al, CSU, state , and fe de r al r e quir e me nts, r ule s and r e gulations gove r ning highe r e duc ation institutions (3d)

 Suppor

t and e xpand e xte r

nal r e lations (3c , 3d)

 Se r

ve as a mode l of CI's c ommitme nt to e xc e lle nc e by pr

• viding a se r

vic e

• r

ie nte d, pr

• fe ssional and c onfide ntial e nvir
• nme nt whic h se r

ve s the c ampus c ommunity and the public (3c , 3d)

 L e a d the c a mpus in c re a ting a c ulture o f asse ssme nt, e vide nc e -ba se d de c isio n-ma king a nd the re spo nsib le use o f da ta (3a , 3b , 3d)

T itle I X & I nc lusio n

 Cur

r e nt Status

 Co mplia nc e dire c tive s re la te d to E E O la ws  Re spo nse to a ll DHR-re la te d c o mpla ints, whic h inc lude s inve stig a tio ns  Se xua l vio le nc e re spo nse  E duc a tio n a nd tra ining thro ug h multiple me diums  Sta ke ho lde r c o nsulta tio n a t a nd b e yo nd CI  I nc lusivity a nd so c ia l justic e pro g ra mming

 F

utur e Status

 E ffic ie nt, time ly c o mpla int re so lutio ns  Co mplia nc e ma na g e r/ inve stig a to r  Co nfide ntial a na lyst  Pro g ra mming o ppo rtunitie s b e yo nd the sc re e n a nd e ffe c tive fa c ilita tio n o f c a mpus-wide c o mmitte e s  Pro g ra ms spe c ia list  Ong o ing a sse ssme nt o f c a mpus c lima te  Co mmunity e ng a g e me nt 

R isk Mitigation



L

• ss o f fe de ra l o r sta te

funding



L a wsuits



Diminishe d re puta tio n



Ong o ing mo nito ring

I nstitutio na l Re se a rc h, Pla nning & E ffe c tive ne ss

Pur pose : IR PE de ve lops and maintains institutional data and analytic al studie s to suppor t the str ate gic plan, to me asur e impr

• ve me nt, to de monstr

ate ac c ountability and to c ultivate a c ultur e of e vide nc e -base d de c ision-making.

 Suppor

t the Pr e side nt in his vision, goals and value s (3c , 3d)

 T a ke a n a c tive ro le in the c re a tio n o f the ide a l c ampus c ulture (3c , 3d)

 E

nsur e c omplianc e of loc al, CSU, state , and fe de r al r e quir e me nts, r ule s and r e gulations gove r ning highe r e duc ation institutions (3d)

 Suppo rt a nd e xpa nd e xte rnal re latio ns (3c , 3d)  Se rve a s a mo de l o f CI 's c o mmitme nt to e xc e lle nc e b y pro viding a se rvic e o rie nte d, pro fe ssio na l a nd c o nfide ntia l e nviro nme nt whic h se rve s the c a mpus c o mmunity a nd the public (3c , 3d)

 L

e ad the c ampus in c r e ating a c ultur e of asse ssme nt, e vide nc e -base d de c ision- making and the r e sponsible use of data (3a, 3b, 3d)

I nstitutio na l Re se a rc h, Pla nning & E ffe c tive ne ss

Data Management

Data Governance

Accreditation Analytic Reporting Planning Scanning Assessment Evidence Driven Decisions

IE IR C IR

Campus

I nstitutio na l Re se a rc h, Pla nning & E ffe c tive ne ss

Cur r e nt Status

 T

r iage  E nro llme nt  Ma nda te d Re po rting  HSI Sta tus  Da ta Que ue

 F

• undations

 Re e sta b lish E RS Histo ry  Ma nda te d Re po rting  Pro g ra m Re vie w (da ta )  Ac c re dita tio n (da ta )  HSI Gra nt (da ta & so me a na lytic s)  Da ta Re q ue st Pro c e ss  Wa re ho use De ve lo pme nt: BBA

F utur e Status

 Data Gove r

nanc e  iDa ta  Da ta Co o kb o o k

 Data Manage me nt & IR

 Wa re ho use 2:

 Ca mpus T ra ining  F

• AI

D

 Building Capac ity:1 YR

 Ana lyst

 Bla c kb o a rd Re po rt Write r & da ta q ue ue ma na g e r

 Ana lyst

 Gra nts & Spe c ia l Pro je c t

R isk Mitigation



I na c c ura te I nstitutio nal Da ta



I nc o nsiste nt Ca mpus F ig ure s



Unme t CSU, Sta te , & F e de ra lly Ma nda te d Re po rting



Unme t CSU, Sta te , & F e de ra lly Ma nda te d Ana lytic s



Unme t Ca mpus Da ta Re q ue sts



F a ile d Pro g ra m Re vie w



F a ile d Ac c re dita tio n



F a ile d HSI Sta tus



Burno ut

QUE ST I ONS?