Geometry and Topology
- f random 2-complexes
Michael Farber University of Warwick, UK July 2013
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 1
of random 2-complexes Michael Farber University of Warwick, UK - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Geometry and Topology of random 2-complexes Michael Farber University of Warwick, UK July 2013 Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 1 The Whitehead Conjecture Let be a 2-dimensional finite simplicial complex. X is called if
Michael Farber University of Warwick, UK July 2013
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 1
Let be a 2-dimensional finite simplicial complex. is called if ( ) = 0. Equivalently, is if the universal cover is contractible. Examples of aspherical 2-complex aspheric es: wi al
2 g
aspheric X X X X al X th > 0; N with > 1. Non-aspherical are and (the real projective plane).
2 2 g
g g S P
The Whitehead Conjecture
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 2
Is every subcomplex of an aspherical 2-complex also asph In 1941, J.H.C. Whitehead suggested the following question: ? This question is known as the Whitehead conjec e t rical ure.
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 3
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 4
2 2 1 2
f
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 5
(J.F. Adams, 1955): If and (K) while (L) then the kernel of the homomorphism contains a nontrivial perfect subgroup. This implies some (earlier) results of W.H. Coc
2 2 2 1 1
f
L K D K L Theorem , , ( ) ( ) kcroft who considered the cases when is finite, free, or free abelian.
1 K
( )
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 6
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 7
Consider the complete graph
A random 2-complex X is obtained from by adding each potential 2-simplex at random, with probabiltiy 1 2 0 1
n n
K n n K ijk p The Linial - Meshulam model , , , . ( ) ( , ), independently of each other. The finite probability space contains simplicial complexes satisfying and the probability function is given by
3 1 2 3
2 1
n n n n f Y
Y n p Y P Y n p R P Y p p
( ) ( ) ( )
( , ) : ( , ) ( ) ( )
f Y ( )
.
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 8
Case n=4:
p p
3
4 1
p p
2 2
6 1
p p
3
4 1
p
4
1
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 9
For simplicity I will assume that where If then for any fixed finite group of coefficients
H a.a.s. ( ). asymptotically almost sur in ely (L Topology of random 2 - complexes , . ( ; ) , G Y G p n
1
1 ial-Meshulam). If then Y simplicially collapses to a graph, a.a.s. (Kozlov, Costa-Cohen-Farber-Kappeler, Aronshtam-Linial-Luczak-Meshulam). If >-1 then and (Kozlov) ( ) ( ) , . . . H Y Y a a s
2 2
1
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 10
1
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 11
1 1 1 1
2 2 0
Phase transitions
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 12
if extends to an embedding
If then contains a subcomplex isomorphic to the tetrahedron T.
, ,
: ( ) , ,..., : ( , ) ( ) ( )
g g T Y g g
Y g V T n J Y n p J Y E J p
1 4
1 1 2
T
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 13
( )
g g
4 4 4 4 1
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 14
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 15
If < -3/5 then the fundamental group
2-complex has cohomological dimension 2, a.a.s. In particular, is torsion free, a.a.s. Moreover, if then cd( Theorem : ( ) ( , ) ( ) / ( A Y Y Y n p Y Y
1 1 1
1 3 5 )) , . . . a a s 2
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 16
1
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 17
1 2 3 1 2 3
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 18
m n Y Y n p 3 1 2 Let be an odd prime. If the proability parameter satisfies then, with probability tending to one as a random 2-complex has the following property: the fundamental gro Th Theorem C : / , , , , Y Y m up of any subcomplex has no torsion '
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 19
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 20
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 21
aspherical Assume that the probability parameter satisfies <-1/2. Then a random 2-complex , , with probability tending to one has the following property: any subcomplex is i Th Theorem D : , ' Y Y n p p n Y Y
f and only if it contains no subcomplexes with at most faces which are homeomorphic to the sphere the real projective plane
shown below. , , , , , S P Z Z
1 2 2 2 3
4 1 2
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 22
Z Z
2 3
Complexes (left) and (right)
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 23
Y Y n p Y Y 1 2 Assume that Then a random 2-complex with probability tending to one has the following property: any aspherical subcomplex Whitehe satisfies the a , i.e. d Conje e c ve t ry su ure Co Corollary : / . / . , ' Y Y bcomplex is also aspherical. '' '' '
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 24
X X
X S X A X I X A
1 1
Let be a simplicial 2-complex. For a simplicial null-homotopic loop
and the The length area isoperimetric
is constant defined as Is Isoperimetr tric consta tants ts : . in inf ;
S X I X X
1 1
0 iff the fundamental group hyperbol is . ic : . : .
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 25
The inequality means that an is satisfied for any null-homotopic loop It is known that in the class of hype isoperimetric inequ rbolic groups the word problem, the conj a ugacy lity : . : .
X
I X a A a S X
1 1
problem as well as the isomorphism problem are algorithmocally solvable.
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 26
Y Y n p p n 2011 1 2 : If the probability parameter satisfies then the fundamental group of a random 2-complex is hyperbolic, a.a.s. Th Theorem Babson, Ho Hoffman,Kahle, / , , , , ,
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 27
C Y Y n p p n
If the probability parameter satisfies <-1/2 then there exists a constant such that, with probability tending to one, a random 2-complex , has the following property: any sub Th Theorem : , , , , ,
Y Y I Y C complex satisfies ' ' ' ' .
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 28
T
2
For <-1/2 a random 2-complex contains no subcomplexes homeomorphic to the torus , a.a.s. Co Corollary :
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 29
Y Y M Y
2
Let be a simplicial complex with Define as the minimal number of faces in a 2-complex homeomorphic to 2-sphere such that there exists a homotopically nontrivial simplicial m Mi Minimal sp sphere res .
Y M Y Y
2
ap We also define if . .
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 30
Y I Y c M Y c
2
16 If is a 2-complex satisfying then The proof of this deterministic statement uses an inequality
Th Theorem : .
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 31
S
Y S A M Y S h A S A A S S
2
2 Consider a homotopically nontrivial simplicial map where is homeomorphic to and Cons Cheeger con ider the
Here is a subcomplex homeomo sta rph nt Pr Proof : . ; / ; / .
ic to the disc.
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 32
S
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 33
I Y c h c h A M Y A h c
2 2
16 16 16 One can show that implies . On the other hand, proved an inequality Combining we Papasogl
u . .
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 34
C Y Y n p p n Y Y
1 2 If the probability parameter satisfies then for some constant a random 2-complex with probability tending to
Theorem : / , , , , , '
M Y C ne has ' . ' .
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 35
Let be a finite 2-complex and let be a constant such that any pure subcomplex having at most faces satisfies Then Gr Gromov's local to global Principle Th Theorem : . . X C S X C I S C I X C
3 1
44 44
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 36
A finite 2-complex is said to be a if and for any proper subcomplex
For a minimal cycle we denote We are interest minimal c ed ycle i Cl Classification of minimal cycles ' ' ' ' . . Z b Z Z Z b Z Z v Z Z f Z
2 2
1
n describing all minimal cycles satisfying / . / . Z 1 2
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 37
,
2 2 2 1 2 3 4 2 2 1 2 3
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 38
Z Z
2 3
Complexes (left) and (right)
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 39
A random 2-complex with probability tending to one has the following property: for a subcomplex the following properties are equivalent: is aspherical; contains no Th Theorem : , , , , , / ' ' ' Y Y n p p n Y Y A Y B Y
1 2
subcomplexes with at most faces which are homeomorphic to , , , , , . S P Z Z
1 2 2 2 3
4 1 2
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 40
Y Y n p Y Y 1 2 Assume that Then a random 2-complex with probability tending to one has the following property: any aspherical subcomplex Whitehe satisfies the a , i.e. d Conje e c ve t ry su ure Co Corollary : / . / . , ' Y Y bcomplex is also aspherical. '' '' '
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 41
Let Then a.a.s. There are finitely many isomorphism types of triangulations
faces. There are also finitely many simplicial quotients Pr Proof
' , ' , , , . ' , ' ,
j
B A Y Y Y Y n p p n M Y C S C
The quotients satisfying cannot be embedded into Thus we shall only consider the quotients satisfying . / . / .
j j j j j j
S S Y S 1 2
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 42
Case when Then the image contains a minimal cycle which by Theorem MinCycle is homeomorphic to one of implies which contradicts our assumption . , , , , , , . .
j j j j j j
b S S Z Z Z Z Z f Z A
2 1 2 3 4 1
4 1 2
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 43
Case Then one shows that the image contains a projective plane with at most faces which contradicts our assumption . .
j j j j
b S S A
2 1
4 1 2
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 44
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 45
m n Y Y n p 3 1 2 Let be an odd prime. If the proability parameter satisfies then, with probability tending to one as a random 2-complex has the following property: the fundamental gro Th Theorem C : / , , , , Y Y m up of any subcomplex has no torsion '
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 46
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 47
Consider the Moore surface Maps inducing mono on describe torison in
.
Sk Sketch ch of the he proof , , , , , , .
m m m m m
M S D M M Y m Y
1 2 1 1 1
1 1 1
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 48
We shall consider simplicial maps such that:
Y C
1
e number of faces) One defines the number as the number of faces in above.
m
N Y
Geometry and topology of random 2-complexes 49
If then The proof uses systollic inequality (Gromov, Katz, Rudyak,...)
/
Le Lemma :
m
I Y c m N Y c sys A
2 1 2
6 6