Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Restoration, Replacement or Acquisition
- f Equivalent Resources and the
Mitigation Environmental Impacts
Service Flow Use for the Deepwater Horizon oil spill and beyond Presented by: Tom Campbell Robert Haddad
of Equivalent Resources and the Mitigation Environmental Impacts - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Restoration, Replacement or Acquisition of Equivalent Resources and the Mitigation Environmental Impacts Service Flow Use for the Deepwater Horizon oil spill and beyond Presented by: Tom Campbell Robert Haddad Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Service Flow Use for the Deepwater Horizon oil spill and beyond Presented by: Tom Campbell Robert Haddad
contexts
Gulf oil spill
Pipeline construction permits
Project Development
project
Impacted Service flows
Practicable Mitigation Project
Nexus between Impact and Project
1 | Impact Mitigation
Damage and other liabilities by settling with BP
Paid $1.06 billion to BP
MOEX received an indemnity from BP
2 | Impact Mitigation
Texas
Louisiana
Mississippi
Florida
was considered
3 | Impact Mitigation
ecologically significant properties in four states
4 | Impact Mitigation
ecosystem made of densely packed oysters
5 | Impact Mitigation
secondary productivity)
(coastal resiliency)
(coastal resiliency)
gallons of sea water per day (water quality)
6 | Impact Mitigation
Mexico suffer from
erosion
water quality issues
storms
grow because they lack suitable substrate to which they can attach
7 | Impact Mitigation
concrete were dumped where reefs were needed
alternatives have recently emerged.
Steel ReefBlk
Concrete reef balls
environmental conditions
8 | Impact Mitigation
plants, submerged aquatic vegetation, oyster reefs, coir fiber logs, sand fill, and stone.
Stabilization of the shoreline.
Protection of surrounding riparian and intertidal environment.
Improvement of water quality via filtration of upland run-off.
Creation of habitat for aquatic and terrestrial species
9 | Impact Mitigation
http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/restoration/techniques/livingshorelines.html
10 | Impact Mitigation
Cost is approximately $1MM per mile
Project scaled depending on mitigation requirements
Economies of scale for larger projects
11 | Impact Mitigation
Water contamination
Oil and chemical spills
Specific ecological service loss
SEP
Direct and indirect economic benefits
Erosion and subsidence
Contractors can assemble and install
A reef “bank” could be created
12 | Impact Mitigation
erosion had occurred
erosion stopped
sediment accumulated
significant oyster growth
13 | Impact Mitigation
Measuring the Loss Basic Science In Kind Restoration
Exxon Valdez – Maitland
M/V Cape Flattery (Ohau)
Measuring the Gain Applied Sciences
14 | Impact Mitigation
VS
Measuring the Loss Basic Science Out of Kind Restoration
Deepwater Horizon
Measuring the Gain Applied Sciences
15 | Impact Mitigation
VS
Measuring the Loss Basic Science Out of Kind Restoration
Deepwater Horizon
Measuring the Gain Applied Sciences
16 | Impact Mitigation
VS
Measuring the Loss Basic Science Measuring the Gain Applied Sciences
17 | Impact Mitigation
VS
Government
are restored
considered
19 | Submerged Marine Restoration
20 | Submerged Marine Restoration
Removal of water thirsty species
Improves quality of riparian habitat Reduces sediment and chemical loading Improves water quality for aquatic species Provides stream bank stabilization Provides habitat for birds and wildlife corridor
Wetlands restoration Silt traps – large and small scale Livestock, exclusion fencing Conservation Tilling Method/Equipment
21 | Submerged Marine Restoration
Grey water, lawn care & design
water system
30-50% of city well water is lost before it reaches the tap
Agricultural waste Household HW
22 | Submerged Marine Restoration
23 | Submerged Marine Restoration
local municipal areas
24 | Submerged Marine Restoration
25 | Submerged Marine Restoration
Summary:
additional rainfall
management program that includes cloud seeding
program
26 | Submerged Marine Restoration
groundwater
management program for this area
27 | Submerged Marine Restoration
28 | Submerged Marine Restoration
Summary:
in some watersheds
methods such as flooding, high-pressure spray or sprinkler irrigation methods
evaporation using these methods
29 | Submerged Marine Restoration
Benefits:
watershed as a result of increased efficiency of agricultural use
and the quality of surface waters receiving agricultural runoff
additional water being available for other uses
30 | Submerged Marine Restoration
31 | Submerged Marine Restoration
Example:
program to reduce the amount of water it must withdraw from the river.
domestic water consumption by providing free conservation audits and incentives to replace older landscapes, toilets, and clothes machines.
achieve that goal.
permit to withdraw an increased amount of water.
32 | Submerged Marine Restoration
Benefits to City and nearby communities:
water consumption and future water demands
(agricultural and fisheries)
construction project
33 | Submerged Marine Restoration
34 | Submerged Marine Restoration
35 | Submerged Marine Restoration
amounts of water and spread rapidly through roots and seed dispersal.
willow) and produces monoculture.
birds or wildlife.
36 | Submerged Marine Restoration
Benefits:
ground water by reducing vegetative uptake
private land that volunteers
priority with removal programs on some National Wildlife Refuges
wildlife will be provided with increased food and habitat
37 | Submerged Marine Restoration
Other species will benefit from vegetative management programs … …and replanting of native vegetative species
38 | Submerged Marine Restoration
This option requires direct dialogue with each Park Manager to determine on-going projects and those projects that would be consistent with current park management plans.
39 | Submerged Marine Restoration
40 | Submerged Marine Restoration
retention/re-irrigation ponds
absorption, biological
type/location/size)
41 | Submerged Marine Restoration
42 | Submerged Marine Restoration