NYLON-12 NANOCOMPOSITE THIN FILMS AS PROTECTIVE BARRIERS by Dr. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
NYLON-12 NANOCOMPOSITE THIN FILMS AS PROTECTIVE BARRIERS by Dr. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
NYLON-12 NANOCOMPOSITE THIN FILMS AS PROTECTIVE BARRIERS by Dr. Cecilia L. Stevens, Polymer Engineering Company Dr. Marek J. Gnatowski, Polymer Engineering Company Dr. Scott Duncan, Defence Research and Development Canada Concept product
NYLON-12 NANOCOMPOSITE THIN FILMS AS PROTECTIVE BARRIERS
by
- Dr. Cecilia L. Stevens, Polymer Engineering Company
- Dr. Marek J. Gnatowski, Polymer Engineering Company
- Dr. Scott Duncan, Defence Research and Development
Canada
Concept product example
Current technology Target technology
Thicknesses of barrier films: an evolution
1270 µm (1.27 mm) 1980’s glove 500 µm (0.5 mm)
1990’s glove
25 µm (0.025 mm)
thin film
Tortuous path theorem
Tortuous path Exfoliated Platelets Polymer film
f
V W L ⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ + = 2 1 τ
Equipment used for sample blending: potential differences in performance
Batch blender (BB) Single-screw extruder (SS) Compounding twin-screw (D6/2) Twin-screw extruder (TSE)
Film casting
TEM images (1):
Exfoliation issues
BB SS
TEM images (2)
D6/2 TSE
Platelet width: ‘greater shear’ gives smaller platelets
90 110 130 150 170 190 210 BB SS D6/2 TSE Blending method Observed platelet width (nm)
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 BB SS D6/2 TSE Blending method FTIR Peak Height
FTIR clay peak:
greater shear gives a higher peak
SSNMR:
greater shear gives better dispersion and a lower T1
H relaxation time
340 350 360 370 380 390 400 410 420 BB SS D6/2 TSE Blending method T1H relaxation time (ms)
Penetration and re-emission testing
Nylon-12 had no detectable re-emission of sulphur mustard in 24 hours.
Penetration curves
1 2 3 4 5 6 5 10 15 20 25 Time (h) Penetration (ug) 100% nylon-12 BB SS D6/2 TSE
Breakthrough time:
strongly affected by exfoliation; not directly correlated to dispersion
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 BB SS D6/2 TSE Blending method Breakthrough time (h) 100% nylon
Breakthrough time:
dependent on clay loading
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 2 4 6 8 10 Clay concentration (%) Breakthrough time (h)
Tensile strength:
Not directly dependent on dispersion.
10 20 30 40 50 60 BB SS D6/2 TSE Blending method Yield stress (MPa) 100% nylon *Apparent correlation to breakthrough time is deceptive.
Tensile strength:
responsive to clay loading
40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 2 4 6 8 10
Clay concentration (%) Stress at yield (MPa)
Tensile Modulus (stiffness):
Similar to tensile strength
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 BB SS D6/2 TSE Blending method Modulus (MPa) 100% nylon
Tensile Modulus (stiffness):
increases with clay loading
600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 2 4 6 8 10
Clay concentration (%) Modulus (MPa)
Tear strength:
Similar to tensile strength and modulus
100% nylon MD TD 0.0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0 250.0 300.0 350.0 BB SS D6/2 TSE Blending method Tear strength (N/mm)
Extrusion direction Transverse direction
Tear strength:
increases slightly with clay loading
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 2 4 6 8 10 Clay concentration (%) Tear strength (N/mm)
Machine direction Transverse direction
Transparency
2.5% clay 5.0% clay 7.5% clay 10.0% clay