NTRODUCTION : : Su INT Sumit Ba Basu su Lu Lund Un University - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ntroduction
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

NTRODUCTION : : Su INT Sumit Ba Basu su Lu Lund Un University - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

NTRODUCTION : : Su INT Sumit Ba Basu su Lu Lund Un University ty, , Departm tment t of of Physics, , Divi Di vision of of Particle Physics, , Bo Box 118, 118, SE-221 221 00, 00, Lund, Sweden ema email: sumi umit.ba basu@


slide-1
SLIDE 1

INT NTRODUCTION:

: Su

Sumit Ba Basu su

Lu Lund Un University ty, , Departm tment t of

  • f Physics,

, Di Divi vision of

  • f Particle Physics,

, Bo Box 118, 118, SE-221 221 00, 00, Lund, Sweden ema email: sumi umit.ba basu@ u@cer ern. n.ch h

slide-2
SLIDE 2

1

  • I am from India
  • Ph.D (2016) ( VECC &

ALICE Expt. CERN)

  • Post-Doctoral Fellow

(Wayne State University, USA) (Dec 2016 – Mar 2020) and Now,

  • Post-Doctoral Fellow

(Lund University, Sweden) 2018 à Sumit V2.0

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Chemical Freeze-out Kinetic Chemical potential (μ) Temperature (T)

Sources

( L. Stodolsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1044 (1995) )

  • 1. Initial State fluctuations
  • 2. Thermodynamical fluctuations
  • 3. Statistical fluctuations

pT

dN/dpT a b

F(pt) ~ exp − pT Teff ⎛ ⎝ ⎜ ⎜ ⎞ ⎠ ⎟ ⎟

pT = pT

2 a b

F(pt)dpT pTF(pt)dp

a b

T

cv = C n = C VT 3

  • Sp. Heat

2

Ph.D.: Temperature Fluctuations

(GeV)

NN

S 10

2

10

3

10

〉 N 〈 C =

v

c

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

STAR Au+Au 0-5% STAR Cu+Cu 0-10% HRG HM HM via QGM QGM AMPT

  • Phy. Rev. C 94 034909 (2016)

(GeV)

NN

S 1 10

2

10

3

10

∆ C =

v

c

10 20 30 40 50 60 70

B µ , ch T = 0 B µ , kin T B µ , ch T = 0 B µ , kin T
  • SB limit
3

= VT ∆

Lattice prediction

〉 N 〈 = ∆

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Ph.D.: Multiplicity Fluctuations

3

ωch = hN2

chi hNchi2

hNchi = σ2 µ where, N is the charged particle multiplicity

kT = − 1 V ∂V ∂P # $ % & ' (

T

!" = $% < ' >% ) !*" = +,- < ' > ) !*"

kT expressed in fm3 GeV-1

  • Phys. Lett. B784 (2018) 1-5
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Two-particle transverse momentum correlations

Sean Gavin et. Al PRL 97 162302 (2006) PRC 94 024921 (2016)

4

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Two-particle transverse momentum correlations

Sean Gavin et. Al PRL 97 162302 (2006) PRC 94 024921 (2016)

5

PLB Phys Lett. B, Volume 804 (2020) 135375 Ongoing further developments: Extend this study for pp and pPb and study the variation of G2 observable with dNch/dη Promising results, soon will be reported from ALICE, about System size dependence of G2 (Momentum Correlator)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Cumulant Normalized Cumulant R2 is a robust observable! Single track efficiencies cancel out of the ratio 4 different charge combinations for R2: (+ -), (- +), (+ +), and (- -) Charge Independent (CI) combinations Charge Dependent (CD) combinations R2CD is proportional to the Balance Function

C2(x1, x2) = ρ2(x1, x2) − ρ1(x1)ρ1(x2)

x ≡ {y,ϕ, pT} ρ(x) = 1 σ dσ dx

R2(x1, x2) = C2(x1, x2) ρ1(x1)ρ1(x2)

B(Δx) ≈ dNch dx R2

CD = dNch

dx 1 2 R2

+− − R2 ++ + R2 −+ − R2 −−

⎡ ⎣ ⎤ ⎦

CI = 1 2 LS +US

{ }

CD = 1 2 US − LS

{ }

LS = 1 2 (++) + (−−)

{ }

US = 1 2 (+−) + (−+)

{ }

Ge General D Defi finiti tion o

  • f B

f Balance F Functi tions

For Charged particle, Signs (+) & (-) represents charge. For Λ’s being neutral particle, we define (+) for baryon number & (-) for antibaryon number. Similary, LS means same-type Baryonic number and US means opposite-type Baryonic number

6

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Conservation of quantum numbers.

  • > for each positive general charge, a negative balancing

charge produced at approx. the same space-time.

Im Import rtance of Studying Balance Functions

Understand / Probe

  • 1. Two-wave quark production model:

π± p(𝒒) : predominantly produced at late stage K± : predominantly produced at early stage

  • 2. Collision dynamics, e.g., radial flow
  • 3. Hadro-chemistry – Charge / Strangeness / Baryon / Resonance

production

The width of the BF was initially proposed to be related to the time of hadronization. Bass, Danielewicz, Pratt PRL 85 2689 (2000)

7 # of quarks

Pratt PRL. 108, 212301 (2012)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Tw Two-pa particl cle N Num umbe ber (Δη,Δφ) Co Correlations

8

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Mo Motiva vation:

h h Q

9

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Mo Motiva vation: π K p Balance Functions

✓ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

h π k p h π k P

Run I : Pb+Pb @ 2760 GeV

Q Q Q S Q B

10 # of quarks

slide-12
SLIDE 12 1
  • 1
y D 2 4 (rad) j D 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 ) j D y, D B( = 2.76 TeV NN s ALICE Pb-Pb 0-5% ± p ± p c <2 GeV/ T p 0.2< = 2.76 TeV NN s ALICE Pb-Pb 1
  • 1
y D 2 4 (rad) j D 0.05 0.1 0.15 ) j D y, D B( = 2.76 TeV NN s ALICE Pb-Pb 30-40% ± p ± p c <2 GeV/ T p 0.2< = 2.76 TeV NN s ALICE Pb-Pb 1
  • 1
y D 2 4 (rad) j D 0.02 0.04 0.06 ) j D y, D B( = 2.76 TeV NN s ALICE Pb-Pb 70-90% ± p ± p c <2 GeV/ T p 0.2< = 2.76 TeV NN s ALICE Pb-Pb 1
  • 1
y D 2 4 (rad) j D 0.05 0.1 0.15 )
  • 1
) (rad j D y, D B( = 2.76 TeV NN s ALICE Pb-Pb 0-10% ± K c 2 GeV/ £ T p £ 0.2 = 2.76 TeV NN s ALICE Pb-Pb 1
  • 1
y D 2 4 (rad) j D 0.05 0.1 0.15 )
  • 1
) (rad j D y, D B( = 2.76 TeV NN s ALICE Pb-Pb 30-40% ± K c 2 GeV/ £ T p £ 0.2 = 2.76 TeV NN s ALICE Pb-Pb 1
  • 1
y D 2 4 (rad) j D 0.05 0.1 0.15 )
  • 1
) (rad j D y, D B( = 2.76 TeV NN s ALICE Pb-Pb 60-90% ± K c 2 GeV/ £ T p £ 0.2 = 2.76 TeV NN s ALICE Pb-Pb 1
  • 0.5
  • 0.5
1 y D 2 4 ( r a d ) j D 0.02 0.04 0.06 ) j D y, D B( = 2.76 TeV NN s ALICE Pb-Pb 0-20% p p c 2.5 GeV/ £ T p £ 0.5 = 2.76 TeV NN s ALICE Pb-Pb 1
  • 0.5
  • 0.5
1 y D 2 4 ( r a d ) j D 0.02 0.04 0.06 ) j D y, D B( = 2.76 TeV NN s ALICE Pb-Pb 20-40% p p c 2.5 GeV/ £ T p £ 0.5 = 2.76 TeV NN s ALICE Pb-Pb 1
  • 0.5
  • 0.5
1 y D 2 4 ( r a d ) j D 0.02 0.04 0.06 ) j D y, D B( = 2.76 TeV NN s ALICE Pb-Pb 40-80% p p c 2.5 GeV/ £ T p £ 0.5 = 2.76 TeV NN s ALICE Pb-Pb

Increasing Mass ( MeV) Centrality Charged Hadrons = Strange( )+ Non-Strange( ) Strange Meson = Kaon (K±) Non-Strange Baryon = Proton (p( ̅ 𝑞)) Non-Strange Meson = Pion (π±) 139 496 938 1. What about 𝝡 Strange Baryon ?? 2. Strange Baryons: Lambda Cascade Omega 3. Strangeness- Dependent Net Baryon?

11

slide-13
SLIDE 13 1
  • 1

0.2 0.4 0.6

5 %

  • 40 %
  • 30

90 %

  • 70

this thesis = 2.76 TeV

NN

s Pb-Pb

p p

1
  • 1

0.2 0.4 0.6

y) D B (

10 %

  • 40 %
  • 30

90 %

  • 60

p K

1

  • 1

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

p p

20 %

  • 40 %
  • 20

80 %

  • 40
1
  • 1

0.05 0.1

10 %

  • 40 %
  • 30

90 %

  • 60

K p

1
  • 1

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

10 %

  • 40 %
  • 30

90 %

  • 60

KK

1

  • 1

y D

0.05 0.1 0.15

20 %

  • 40 %
  • 20

80 %

  • 40

pK

1
  • 1

0.01 0.02

p p

20 %

  • 40 %
  • 20

80 %

  • 40
1
  • 1

0.02 0.04

20 %

  • 40 %
  • 20

80 %

  • 40

Kp

1

  • 1

0.05 0.1 0.15

pp

20 %

  • 40 %
  • 20

80 %

  • 40

B(Δy) Projections & Widths

π± K± p(p) π± K± p(p)

2 4

0.2 0.4

5 %

  • 40 %
  • 30

90 %

  • 70
this thesis = 2.76 TeV NN s Pb-Pb

p p

2 4

0.2 0.4

)

  • 1

) (rad j D B(

10 %

  • 40 %
  • 30

90 %

  • 60

p K

2 4 0.1 0.2 0.3

20 %

  • 40 %
  • 20

80 %

  • 40

p p

2 4

0.05

10 %

  • 40 %
  • 30

90 %

  • 60

K p

2 4

0.05 0.1 0.15

10 %

  • 40 %
  • 30

90 %

  • 60

KK

2 4

(rad) j D

0.05 0.1

20 %

  • 40 %
  • 20

80 %

  • 40

pK

2 4

0.01 0.02

20 %

  • 40 %
  • 20

80 %

  • 40

p p

2 4

0.01 0.02 0.03

20 %

  • 40 %
  • 20

80 %

  • 40

Kp

2 4 0.05 0.1

20 %

  • 40 %
  • 20

80 %

  • 40

pp

π± K± p(p)

Δy Δɸ(rad)

12

slide-14
SLIDE 14

20 40 60 80

0.4 0.6 0.8 1

y D

s

±

p

  • ±

p

±

K

  • ±

p ) p p(

  • ±

p

±

p

  • ±

K

±

K

  • ±

K ) p p(

  • ±

K

±

p

  • )

p p(

±

K

  • )

p p( ) p p(

  • )

p p(

= 2.76 TeV

NN

s ALICE Pb-Pb

20 40 60 80

1 1.5

j D

s

20 40 60 80

Centrality (%)

0.2 0.4 0.6

B

Y

BF Widths and Integrals

0.5 < pT(p(p)) < 2.5 GeV/c 0.2 < pT(π±, K±) < 2.0 GeV/c

STAR PRC 82, 024905 (2010)

Au-Au @ 200 GeV 0.2 < pT < 0.6 GeV/c

ALICE, PRC 88, 044910 (2013)

13

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Mo Motiva vation:

✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

h π k p h π k P

Run I : Pb+Pb @ 2760 GeV Run II : Pb+Pb @ 5020 GeV

Q Q Q S Q B

Work in Progress

B S Λ Λ

14

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Re Resu sults: s: R2 R2 Same Baryon/Strange

ΛΛ + $ Λ $ Λ Λ$ Λ

Ref: Eur.Phys.J. C77 (2017) 569 p+p @ √s =7 TeV

60-80% 30-40% 0-10%

R2(x1, x2) = C2(x1, x2) ρ1(x1)ρ1(x2)

Opposite Baryon/Strange

15

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Re Resu sults: s: B

Two Wave quark Production??? Radial Flow effect???

16

slide-18
SLIDE 18

At At Lu Lund:

  • 1. Make a multiplicity dependent RT & SO analysis for analysis

and make a connection Between Balance Function & Per Trigger Yield analysis

  • 2. Extend Jonatan’s study of 𝚶 𝚶 correlation to Ω Ω Correlation
  • 3. Grid MC: for Rope Tune CD based CR
  • 4. Pythia ANTAGYR Study and Make a comparison with QCD-

QGP(EPOS) approach to regular PYTHIA MPI model(Lund string model), Strange (Rope Hadronization framework/ Flavour Ropes) and Flow(Rope Hadronization framework/ String shoving)

  • 5. …

Λ# Λ

Thank You

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Back-up Slides

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Introduction: Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions

We want to study the Quark Gluon Plasma (QGP) We measure the correlations between identified particles B1 Ø These collisions produce “large” systems

  • f quarks and gluons

called the Quark-Gluon Plasma (our universe up to a few µs after BB) Ø nearly perfect fluid (surprise!) Ø Briefly ~100,000 times hotter than the core of the Sun. Ø Thousands of particles are produced in every event.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Co Correlation Var ariab ables

p — particle momentum pT — transverse momentum φ — azimuthal angle θ — polar angle η — pseudorapidity y — rapidity

pT

2 = px 2 + py 2

η ≡ −ln tan(θ 2) ⎡ ⎣ ⎢ ⎤ ⎦ ⎥ = 1 2 ln p + pz p − pz y = 1 2 ln E + pz E − pz Transverse plane Lorentz invariant

B2

N1 N2

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Tw Two-pa particl cle N Num umbe ber (Δη,Δφ) Co Correlations

B3

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Large Hadron Collider @ CERN

  • Largest machinery ever built by human with the highest energy of collisions

27 kilometers (17 mi) in circumference ~ 100 meters (328 ft) underground Lead ions are accelerated to more than 99.9999% of the speed of light and collide.

B4

slide-24
SLIDE 24

ALICE (A Large Ion Collider Experiment)

Excellent particle identification capability

π± K± p(p) Purity >97 % >95% ~ 94%

B5

slide-25
SLIDE 25

B6

slide-26
SLIDE 26

An Analysi ysis s Details: s:

Runlist MagFieldMinus: Runlist MagFieldPlus:

Data sets LHC18q & LHC18r pass1

Event SelecLon: V0M, |Vz| < 10 cm. Pile up cut Track SelecLon: TPC Only Tracks ( filterBit= 128 )

  • 0.7 < y < 0.7

0.6 < pT< 3.6 GeV/c nCluster >=70 0 ≦ ɸ ≦ 2π

Ne New w

RunList_LHC18q_pass1_CentralBarrelTracking_hadronPID.txt SSD SPD SDD V0 TPC TOF T0 ZDC 126 runs RunList_LHC18r_pass1_CentralBarrelTracking_hadronPID.txt SSD SPD SDD V0 TPC TOF T0 ZDC 90 runs

B7