NTC Spring 2013 Pilot Project Report Koji Fujiwara Office of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ntc spring 2013 pilot project report
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

NTC Spring 2013 Pilot Project Report Koji Fujiwara Office of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

NTC Spring 2013 Pilot Project Report Koji Fujiwara Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness Bemidji State University and Northwest Technical College July 3, 2013 (Original Version was released at June 6, 2013) Office of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

NTC Spring 2013 Pilot Project Report

Koji Fujiwara Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness Bemidji State University and Northwest Technical College July 3, 2013

(Original Version was released at June 6, 2013)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness

DATA

  • Students who took at least one of the following college

readiness course in Spring 2013 semester:

  • ENGL 0050 (Section: 01-04)
  • GTEC 0006 (Section: 01-02)
  • MATH 0080 (Section: 01-04)
  • There were 79 students who met above criteria.
  • Pilot Program Participants (took ALL three courses): 15 (19.0%)
  • # new students who participated the pilot program: 9

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness

Students by Courses & # of Col. Ready Courses

3

Course Participants Non-Participants Total ENGL 15 29 44 GTEC 15 13 28 MATH 15 41 56 # College Readiness Participants Non-Participants Total 1 48 48 2 13 13 ALL 3 Courses 15 3 18 not comparable (small sample size)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness

Students by Pass/Fail Status – ENGL

Participants Non-Participants Pass (A—D) 9 14 60.0% 48.3% Fail/Withdraw 6 15 40.0% 51.7% Total 15 29

4

New vs. Returning New - Participants Returning - Participants Pass (A—D) 7 2 77.8% 33.3% Fail/Withdraw 2 4 22.2% 66.7% Total 9 6

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness

Students by Pass/Fail Status – GTEC

Participants Non-Participants Pass (A—D) 8 5 53.3% 38.5% Fail/Withdraw 7 8 46.7% 61.5% Total 15 13

5

New vs. Returning New - Participants Returning - Participants Pass (A—D) 5 3 55.6% 50.0% Fail/Withdraw 4 3 44.4% 50.0% Total 9 6

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness

Students by Pass/Fail Status – MATH

Participants Non-Participants Pass (A—D) 7 18 46.7% 43.9% Fail/Withdraw 8 23 53.3% 56.1% Total 15 41

6

New vs. Returning New - Participants Returning - Participants Pass (A—D) 6 1 66.7% 16.7% Fail/Withdraw 3 5 33.3% 83.3% Total 9 6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness

# Passing Courses by New/Returning Status

# Passing Courses New Participants Returning Participants Total 2 3 5 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 3 5 1 6 Total 9 6 15

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness

# Passing Courses for Native American Students

# Passing Courses Native American Students Non-Native American ST. 3 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 Total 9 6

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness

Retention: Spring13 – Fall13 as of 7/2/2013

Participants Non-Participants Retained 7 22 46.7% 35.5% Departed 8 40 53.3% 64.5% Total 15 62

9

  • 2 non-participants were awarded between Spring13 and
  • Summer13. Thus, they were excluded from this analysis.
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness

Retention for Native American ST: Spring13 – Fall13

Participants Non-Participants Retained 4 3 44.4% 14.3% Departed 5 18 55.6% 85.7% Total 11 33

10

  • As of 7/2/2013
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness

Results

  • 40.0% of the program participants (6 students: 5 new & 1 returning) passed all three

college readiness courses.

  • 66.7% of the participants (10 students: 7 new & 3 returning) passed at least one

college readiness course.

  • 50.0% of the returning participants (3 students) could not pass any college readiness

course.

  • Only one returning participant completed all three courses.
  • A noticeable difference is found at Spring13-Fall13 retention rates for participants

(46.7%) and non-participants (35.5%).

  • For Native American students, the difference of retention rates for participants and

non-participants was more than 30%. Thus, this program is helping them to continue their education.

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness

Thank you!

For more information: Koji Fujiwara, Ph.D.

kfujiwara@bemidjistate.edu

Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness

http://www.bemidjistate.edu/offices/research_effectiveness/

Bemidji State University & Northwest Technical College Bemidji, MN

12