NOW WHAT? YINGJIE LIU , INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNER, SAN JOSE STATE - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶

Mar 02, 2024 494 likes •745 views

NOW WHAT? YINGJIE LIU , INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNER, SAN JOSE STATE UNVERSITY PATRICK DEMPSEY , INSTRUCTIONAL TEACHING SPECIALIST SUPERVISOR, JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY CAREY BUSINESS SCHOOL FACULTY & INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNERS WHAT IS YOUR Role HOW

SLIDE 1

NOWWHAT?

PATRICK DEMPSEY, INSTRUCTIONAL TEACHING SPECIALIST SUPERVISOR, JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY CAREY BUSINESS SCHOOL YINGJIE LIU, INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNER, SAN JOSE STATE UNVERSITY

SLIDE 2

FACULTY INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNERS

SLIDE 3

WHAT IS YOUR

Role

SLIDE 4

HOW DO YOU

QM

SLIDE 5

102

interest / readiness / challenges / support / standards

CALIFORNIASTATEUNIVERSITYSYSTEMFACULTY

APPQMR / IYOC /

QMTRAINING

SLIDE 6

How interested are you in redesigning your course with QM standards? How ready are you to redesign your course with QM standards?

2+ 1

62% 54% 82% 80%

NUMBER OF QM TRAININGS COMPLETED VERY OR EXTREMELY

SLIDE 7

WHAT WOULD BE THE BIGGEST IMPLEMENTING QM STANDARDS IN YOUR COURSE?

challenge

SLIDE 8

What would be the biggest challenge implementing QM into your course?

1 40% 2+ 60%

72% 90%

VERY OR EXTREMELY

HOW LIKELY ARE YOU TO SEEK SUPPORT REDESIGNING YOUR COURSE?

1 2+

SLIDE 9 1 2+ 5 7 4 9 3 6 8 8 1 5 2 3 9 1 6 4 7 2

62% 80% 54% 82%

INTEREST READINESS

V / E

1 2+ TIME SUPPORT 40% 72% TIME SUPPORT 60% 90%

CHALLENGE / RESPONSE

importance support INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVES ASSESSMENTS MATERIALS ACTIVITIES INTERACTION TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT ACCESSIBILITY

SLIDE 10

EXPOSURE INTEREST & READINESS CHALLENGES SUPPORT

Technical

QM ? ! i

SLIDE 11

CONTENT DESIGN TECHNOLOGY

INSTRUCTIONALDESIGN

CONTENT DESIGN TECHNOLOGY CONTENT DESIGN TECHNOLOGY

FACULTYINSTRUCTIONALDESIGNER INSTRUCTIONALDESIGNERFACULTY

SLIDE 12

faculty buy-in for instructional design

112

/ CHALLENGES / STRATEGIES / RESPONSIBILITIES / PERCEPTIONS

INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNERS

SLIDE 13

CONSULTATIONS

VERY/EXTREMELY

ONE-ON-ONE CONSULTATIONS JUST-IN-TIME TRAINING TROUBLESHOOTING

83% 59% 55%

ONE-ON-ONE

SLIDE 14 MANAGING PROJECTS CONSULTING WITH FACULTY TROUBLESHOOTING WITH FACULTY DESIGNING NEW ONLINE COURSES MEETING ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS MANAGING LMS TRANSITIONING FACE-TO-FACE COURSES EVALUATING ONLINE COURSES DEVELOPING TECHNICAL TRAINING DEVELOP PEDAGOGICAL TRAINING PRODUCING MULTIMEDIA DELIVERYING TECHNICAL TRAINING DELIVERTYING PEDAGOGICAL TRAINING DESIGNING FACE-TO-FACE COURSES EVALUATING FACE-TO-FACE COURSES RESOURCES ABILITY TO DESIGN TRAINING INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT ABILITY TO OFFER TRAINING FREQUENCY OF TRAINING ABILITY TO PROVIDE EFFECTIVE CONSULTATION LEVEL OF FACULTY ENGAGEMENT QUALITY OF COURSES QUALITY OF TRAINING ABILITY TO OFFER TIMELY TRAINING ABILITY TO IMPLEMENT BEST PRACTICES ABILITY TO CONDUCT EFFECTIVE QUALITY INSURANCE α=.05

PERCEPTIONS RESPONSIBILITES

SLIDE 15 MANAGING PROJECTS CONSULTING WITH FACULTY TROUBLESHOOTING WITH FACULTY DESIGNING NEW ONLINE COURSES MEETING ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS MANAGING LMS TRANSITIONING FACE-TO-FACE COURSES EVALUATING ONLINE COURSES DEVELOPING TECHNICAL TRAINING DEVELOP PEDAGOGICAL TRAINING PRODUCING MULTIMEDIA DELIVERYING TECHNICAL TRAINING DELIVERTYING PEDAGOGICAL TRAINING DESIGNING FACE-TO-FACE COURSES EVALUATING FACE-TO-FACE COURSES RESOURCES ABILITY TO DESIGN TRAINING INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT ABILITY TO OFFER TRAINING FREQUENCY OF TRAINING ABILITY TO PROVIDE EFFECTIVE CONSULTATION LEVEL OF FACULTY ENGAGEMENT QUALITY OF COURSES QUALITY OF TRAINING ABILITY TO OFFER TIMELY TRAINING ABILITY TO IMPLEMENT BEST PRACTICES ABILITY TO CONDUCT EFFECTIVE QUALITY INSURANCE α=.05

PERCEPTIONS RESPONSIBILITES

accessibility

SLIDE 16 MEETING ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS RESOURCES ABILITY TO DESIGN TRAINING INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT ABILITY TO OFFER TRAINING FREQUENCY OF TRAINING ABILITY TO OFFER TIMELY TRAINING ABILITY TO IMPLEMENT BEST PRACTICES ABILITY TO CONDUCT EFFECTIVE QUALITY ASSURANCE α=.05

PERCEPTIONS RESPONSIBILITES

SLIDE 17 MANAGING PROJECTS CONSULTING WITH FACULTY TROUBLESHOOTING WITH FACULTY DESIGNING NEW ONLINE COURSES MEETING ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS MANAGING LMS TRANSITIONING FACE-TO-FACE COURSES EVALUATING ONLINE COURSES DEVELOPING TECHNICAL TRAINING DEVELOP PEDAGOGICAL TRAINING PRODUCING MULTIMEDIA DELIVERYING TECHNICAL TRAINING DELIVERTYING PEDAGOGICAL TRAINING DESIGNING FACE-TO-FACE COURSES EVALUATING FACE-TO-FACE COURSES RESOURCES ABILITY TO DESIGN TRAINING INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT ABILITY TO OFFER TRAINING FREQUENCY OF TRAINING ABILITY TO PROVIDE EFFECTIVE CONSULTATION LEVEL OF FACULTY ENGAGEMENT QUALITY OF COURSES QUALITY OF TRAINING ABILITY TO OFFER TIMELY TRAINING ABILITY TO IMPLEMENT BEST PRACTICES ABILITY TO CONDUCT EFFECTIVE QUALITY INSURANCE α=.05

PERCEPTIONS RESPONSIBILITES

SLIDE 18 MANAGING PROJECTS CONSULTING WITH FACULTY TROUBLESHOOTING WITH FACULTY DESIGNING NEW ONLINE COURSES MEETING ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS MANAGING LMS TRANSITIONING FACE-TO-FACE COURSES EVALUATING ONLINE COURSES DEVELOPING TECHNICAL TRAINING DEVELOP PEDAGOGICAL TRAINING PRODUCING MULTIMEDIA DELIVERYING TECHNICAL TRAINING DELIVERTYING PEDAGOGICAL TRAINING DESIGNING FACE-TO-FACE COURSES EVALUATING FACE-TO-FACE COURSES RESOURCES ABILITY TO DESIGN TRAINING INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT ABILITY TO OFFER TRAINING FREQUENCY OF TRAINING ABILITY TO PROVIDE EFFECTIVE CONSULTATION LEVEL OF FACULTY ENGAGEMENT QUALITY OF COURSES QUALITY OF TRAINING ABILITY TO OFFER TIMELY TRAINING ABILITY TO IMPLEMENT BEST PRACTICES ABILITY TO CONDUCT EFFECTIVE QUALITY INSURANCE α=.05

PERCEPTIONS RESPONSIBILITES

technical

SLIDE 19 CONSULTING WITH FACULTY TROUBLESHOOTING WITH FACULTY MEETING ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS DEVELOPING TECHNICAL TRAINING RESOURCES ABILITY TO DESIGN TRAINING INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT ABILITY TO OFFER TRAINING FREQUENCY OF TRAINING ABILITY TO PROVIDE EFFECTIVE CONSULTATION QUALITY OF COURSES ABILITY TO OFFER TIMELY TRAINING ABILITY TO IMPLEMENT BEST PRACTICES ABILITY TO CONDUCT EFFECTIVE QUALITY INSURANCE α=.05

PERCEPTIONS RESPONSIBILITES

SLIDE 20

CONTENT DESIGN TECHNOLOGY

INSTRUCTIONALDESIGN

CONTENT DESIGN TECHNOLOGY CONTENT DESIGN TECHNOLOGY

FACULTYINSTRUCTIONALDESIGNER INSTRUCTIONALDESIGNERFACULTY

SLIDE 21

INSTRUCTIONALDESIGNFACULTY

CONTENT DESIGN TECHNOLOGY

SLIDE 22

takeaways

training

interest and readiness

challenges

support

technical

SLIDE 23

revealed.us

QMDENVER How faculty experiences as online students affect course design choices.

SLIDE 24

Next QM Research Webinar

April 26, 2018, 1-2 p.m. Eastern CHLOE 2: Tour of the Report on the 2nd QM-Eduventures Changing Landscape of Online Education Survey