1
Is Academic Development Ready for Academic Analytics? Using - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Is Academic Development Ready for Academic Analytics? Using - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Is Academic Development Ready for Academic Analytics? Using Academic Analytics to Improve Teaching and Learning Brad Wuetherick Executive Director, Learning and Teaching 1 1 Tansi Tawow Kwe Pjilasi I would like to acknowledge
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE
Tansi … Tawow Kwe … Pjila’si I would like to acknowledge that we are gathered on the traditional and ancestral territory of the Cherokee and Creek peoples.
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE
Dalhousie University
Halifax, NS, Canada Medical-Doctoral Research (member of U15) 19,000+ students (~15,000 undergrad) 1000+ faculty 13 faculties -- 180+ degree programs
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE
- On a scale of 1-10, where are you:
1 – I know nothing ………………………………………………… 10 – I am an analytics about analytics expert
- On a scale of 1-10, where is your
Centre:
1 – We are not involved ………………………………………… 10 – We lead analytics in analytics
- n my campus
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE
Academic Analytics
A plethora of data about learners + Tools to analyse, cluster, model and predict Deeper personalized information about learners
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE
How are Academic Analytics (Learning Analytics) being used?
- Improve administrative data for strategic
enrolment management
- Provide personalized support, inform holistic
advising and early alerts initiatives
- Improve quality of communication between
learners, teachers, and advisors.
- Guide and inform course and program design
- Improve quality and accuracy of student
assessment & program evaluation
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE
Case Example #1:
John N. Gardner Institute Gateway Courses Initiative
https://www.jngi.org/
Looked at the first year American History gateway course across 32 US universities The average D/F/W/I rate for students was 25.5%
- A. Koch, "Many Thousands Failed"
https://www.historians.org/publications-and-directories/perspectives-on-history/may-2017/many- thousands-failed-a-wakeup-call-to-history-educators
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE
When institutional demographic data is added, does the conversation change?
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE
Faculty Perceptions of Academic Analytics
- several studies report faculty skepticism and
uncertainty about using such data to inform changes to teaching, learning, and curriculum practices (Andrade, 2011; Dykoff, 2011; Parry, 2012)
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE
Faculty Perceptions of Academic Analytics
- 1. Faculty skepticism about the motivations behind
the initiative
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE
Why Academic Analytics?
- Increased focus on retention and student success
(Campbell, DeBlois, and Oblinger, 2007).
- what motivates institutions?
- Focus on desire for understanding, developing
and sustaining a high quality education to help students towards their individual goals and ambitions
- Focus on practical realities that retention and
student success impacts - rankings, reputation, recruitment, and revenues
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE
Faculty Perceptions of Academic Analytics
- 1. Faculty skepticism about the motivations behind
the initiative
- 2. Concerns about Ethics and Privacy
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE
Ethics and the Privacy of Data
- Knowledge of student risk factors can result
in bias (even if unintentional) from advisors, instructors, etc.
- Profiling can be discriminatory and prejudicial
- Students have a right to keep personal
information private – and a right to be given appropriate notice about the use of their data for institutional purposes
- BUT … Institutions have an ethical
responsibility to act in the best interest of students based on the data they gather
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE
‘Balanced’ Approach to Academic Analytics Students’ rights to privacy Institution’s responsibility to act Needs of the Learner Needs of the Institution*
Ethics and Academic Analytics
Vendor Interests*
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE
Faculty Perceptions of Academic Analytics
- 1. Faculty skepticism about the motivations behind
the initiative
- 2. Concerns about Ethics and Privacy
- 3. Data Literacy
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE
What is Data Literacy?
Data literacy is the ability to collect, manage, evaluate, and apply data; in a critical manner.
- Data collection; Data management; Data analysis;
Data visualization; Data policy; Data dissemination; Effective and ethical use of data
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE
Faculty Perceptions of Academic Analytics
- 1. Faculty skepticism about the motivations behind
the initiative
- 2. Concerns about Ethics and Privacy
- 3. Data Literacy
- 4. Resistance to Change
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE
Academic Analytics at Dalhousie
Remembering that the vast majority of Dalhousie’s students are successful, we explored:
- Retention patterns: Who is leaving?
- Retention Analysis: Who is at the highest risk of
leaving?
- Retention Analysis: Why do students leave?
What are the common characteristics of students who leave?
- Predictive Modelling: What have we learned to
help us support potentially ‘at-risk’ incoming students?
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE
Academic Analytics
- What Factors Matter: Model A - Academic
Preparation
- 1. Incoming grades (particularly Math and English)
- 2. Writing Fluency/Organization
- 3. International baccalaureate (IB) and/or advanced
placement (AP) vs traditional high school stream
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE
Academic Analytics
- What Factors Matter: Model B – Pre-Entry Non-
Academic Factors
- 1. Province/Country of origin
- 2. Rural/Urban
- 3. Gender
- 4. Age
- 5. Socio-Economic Background
- 6. Family Educational Background
- 7. Ethnicity
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE
Academic Analytics
- What Factors Matter: Model C – Post-Entry
Academic and Non-Academic
- 1. Faculty enrolled
- 2. High risk (DFW) courses
- 3. Low SRI courses
- 4. Not ‘First Choice’ program
- 5. Residence
- 6. Loans/Bursaries
- 7. Awards/Scholarships
- 8. Varsity Athletics
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE
Academic Analytics
- What Factors Matter: Model D - Academic
Performance/Behaviours
- 1. Attendance
- 2. Early Midterm Grades (need to make this
systematic)
- 3. Fall-term GPA
- 4. Credit Hours Completed
- 5. Switch to part-time in Winter term
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE
Academic Analytics
- What Factors Matter: Model E – Surveys (NSSE,
CUSC, CSI)
1. High scores on Levels of Academic Challenge (LAC), Supportive Campus Environment (SCE), Active and Collaborative Learning (ACL), and Student-Faculty Interactions (SFI) 2. Campus engagement – positive relationships with other
students; helping other students with academic work; participation in co-curricular; living on or close to campus
3. Academic engagement – tutoring other students; receiving
prompt feedback; belief they were gaining work-related knowledge and skills
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE
Academic Analytics
- What Factors Matter: Model F – Learning Activity
Data (Analytics from LMS and other Educational Technologies)
- 1. System-Level Data – course grades, comparative, etc.
- 2. Individual-Level Data – individual assessment
performance, response to individual items, etc.
- 3. Transaction-level Data – number of times logging on,
time on task, ‘click rate’, use of hints/help systems, etc.
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE
Case Example #2
- Course design consultation in STEM Gateway course –
new to faculty member, historically high D/F/W rate (~30%)
- Been taught as a traditional 3 hr lecture/3 hr lab
- Students without 85% in HS math are more likely to
struggle (3x more likely to receive D/F/W)
- All students previously rated SFI and ACL (on NSSE) lower
than peers (a known risk factor for retention)
- Students on Pell Grants were more likely to report that they
did not believe they are gaining work-related knowledge and skills (a known risk factor for retention)
- Students in past five years who lived in residence were less
likely to receive D/F/W (a protective factor for retention)
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE
Case Example #2
- 2 months before the term starts, you meet with the faculty
member
- Institutional research office was able to send the following
update: 62% of this year’s cohort has below 85% in HS math 33% of the students are in residence 68% of the students are on Pell Grants
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE
Academic Analytics – Required Steps
DATA ACCESS
THE POLICY FRAMEWORK AROUND ETHICAL ACCESS AND USE OF ANALYTICS DATA
DATA VERIFICATION
ENSURING APPROPRIATE DATA STANDARDS ARE IN PLACE ACROSS INSTITUTIONAL DATA SETS
DATA INTEGRATION
BRINGING TOGETHER DISPARATE INSTITUTIONAL DATA INTO COMMON DATA SET
DATA ANALYSIS
ANALYZING AND INTERPRETING DATA APPROPRIATELY AND ETHICALLY
DATA SUPPORT
PROVIDING THE RIGHT SUPPORT FRAMEWORK FOR THE EFFECTIVE USE OF DATA
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE
Academic Analytics
- Understanding the data about our students is
- nly useful if we use that information to make
better decisions about how we design learning experiences, support students, and support faculty/instructors/academic leaders
- Who should have access to the data?
- Under what conditions?
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE
Using Academic Analytics to Improve Teaching and Learning
INPUTS (I) + ENVIRONMENT(E) = STUDENT OUTCOMES (O) (Astin, 1993)
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE
Improving Student Success
- Cannot rely on the ‘I’, but rather must focus on the ‘E’, to
improve the ‘O’
- Bias (especially unconscious bias), which may come from
profiling students, can have an unintended negative consequence
- The interventions – administrative and educational – that
most benefit students at-risk, are also highly beneficial for ALL students
- Educational experiences (undertaken by programs – at the
curriculum level, or faculty/instructors – at the course level) are more likely to have an impact on student success and retention than other administrative or student life interventions
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE
Academic Analytics
Institutional Research Office Lead for Academic Analytics
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE
Academic Analytics
Institutional Research Office Student Affairs (Registrar, Advising, Student Life, etc) Lead for Analytics
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE
Academic Analytics
Institutional Research Office Student Affairs (Registrar, Advising, Student Life, etc) Centre for Learning and Teaching Lead for Analytics
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE
Academic Analytics
Institutional Research Office Student Affairs (Registrar, Advising, Student Life, etc) Centre for Learning and Teaching Academic Units Faculty and Instructors Students Lead for Analytics
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE
Providing the Appropriate Supports
- For academic and administrative leaders
- For faculty
- For advisors and other student affairs
professionals
- For the students themselves
__________________________________
- For educational developers (and other expected
support roles)
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE
Are the supporters ready to support?
- Are Academic Developers ready to support the
analysis, interpretation, and decision-making that come from academic analytics?
- Barriers?
- Challenges?
June 3, 2014 | presented by Jane Smith
PRESENTATION TITLE