Now Pentaquarks, What Next?? Ken Hicks (Ohio U./NSF) Reimei - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

now pentaquarks what next
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Now Pentaquarks, What Next?? Ken Hicks (Ohio U./NSF) Reimei - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Now Pentaquarks, What Next?? Ken Hicks (Ohio U./NSF) Reimei Workshop Jan. 19, 2016 How MathemaJcians Count 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11 Pre-2000: how hadron physicists count q q q 1 2, 3. 2003: how hadron physicists count 2,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Now Pentaquarks, What Next??

Ken Hicks (Ohio U./NSF) Reimei Workshop

  • Jan. 19, 2016
slide-2
SLIDE 2

How MathemaJcians Count

  • 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11…
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Pre-2000: how hadron physicists count

q q q

2, 3. 1

slide-4
SLIDE 4

2003: how hadron physicists count

2, 3, 4.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Z(4430) confirmed by LHCb

BàKπ+ψ’

4-dim amplitude analysis Model-ind. Argand plot

J

P =1 +

M = 4475 ± 7−25

+15 MeV

Γ =172 ±13−34

+37 MeV

Bf (B

0 →Z(4430) −K +) × Bf (Z(4430) − →π − &

ψ ) ≈ (3.4−2.3

−1.1) ×10 −5

arXiv:1404.1903 BW-like resonant phase moJon

>13.9σ Good agreement with Belle, (with smaller errors)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

2015: how hadron physicists count

2, 3, 4, 5.

Pc

+

u u c d c

(?)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Pentaquarks: some history

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The Anti-decuplet in the χSM

  • D. Diakonov, V. Petrov, M. Polyakov, Z.Phys.A359, 305 (1997)

S=+1 S=0 S=-1 S=-2

Δm = 108 MeV

updated version

  • D. Diakonov, V. Petrov,

arXiv:hep-ph/0310212

Theoretical prediction that spurred several experimental searches.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

LEPS/SPring8

γC K+K-(n)

PRL91, 012002 (2003)

CLAS/JLab

γD K-pK+(n)

PRL91, 252001 (2003)

Θ+(1540) published (mistakes?)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Aaempt to reproduce CLAS result

n Restricted photon energy range n Two distributions statistically

consistent with each other:

n 26% c.l. for null hypothesis

from the Kolmogorov test (two histograms are compatible).

n G10 mass distribution can be used

as a background for refitting the published spectrum.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

2009: Results of Θ+ analysis at LEPS

Δ(-2lnL) =31.1 for Δndf=2 5.2σ

7

Prob(5.2 ) 2 10 σ

= ×

Simple (γ,K-) missing mass: No correction on Fermi motion effect. nK+ invariant mass with MMSA: Fermi motion effect corrected. “The narrow peak appears only after Fermi motion correction.”

2

Peak position: 1.527 0.002 GeV/ Signal yeild: 116 21 events Differential cross-section: 12 2 nb/sr c ± ± ±

PRC 79, 025210 (2009)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Unpublished CLAS result

Using the same analysis cuts and procedures as for LEPS (2009).

fquaenergycmLEP0 Entries 19087 Mean 1.561 RMS 0.06258 / ndf

2

χ 90.99 / 98 p5 6.265 ± 1.993 −

2

Gev/c 1.45 1.5 1.55 1.6 1.65 1.7 Counts 50 100 150 200 250 300

fquaenergycmLEP0 Entries 19087 Mean 1.561 RMS 0.06258 / ndf

2

χ 90.99 / 98 p5 6.265 ± 1.993 −

Energy of photon (2.0-2.4 GeV) Proton detected Proton veto 12 nb

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Pentaquarks: the LHCb results

(Some slides borrowed from Sheldon Stone)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Physics 8, 77 (2015)

Viewpoint

Elusive Pentaquark Comes into View

Kenneth Hicks

Department of Physics and Astronomy, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, USA

Published August 12, 2015

A new type of particle containing five quarks has been observed by the LHCb experiment.

Subject Areas: Particles and Fields A Viewpoint on: Observation of J/p Resonances Consistent with Pentaquark States in 0

b Ω J/K−p Decays

  • R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration)

Physical Review Letters 115, 072001 2015 – Published August 12, 2015

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Λb à J/ψ K- p

! First looked for in LHCb as

a potential background for

B0→J/ψK+K-

! Large signal found, used

for Λb lifetime [arXiv:1402.6242]

! Dalitz plot

showed an unusual feature

[arXiv:1507.03414]

Λb→J/ψK p

BNL August 2015!

4

m2(K-p) m2(J/ψ p)

m(J/ψK-p) [MeV]

26,000 signal + 5.4% bkgrnd within ±2σ

  • f peak

…Λ*’s

slide-16
SLIDE 16

ProjecJons

Projections

arXiv:1507.03414

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Be Careful! Previous History:

Prejudices

! No convincing states 51 years after Gell-mann &

Zweig proposed qqq and qqqqq baryonic states

! Previous “observations” of several pentaquark

states have been refuted

! These included

" Θ+→K0p, K+n, mass=1.54 GeV, Γ~10 MeV " Resonance in D*-p at 3.10 GeV, Γ=12 MeV " Ξ--→Ξ-π-, mass=1.862 GeV, Γ<18 MeV

! Generally they were found/debunked by looking

for “bumps” in mass spectra circa 2004 [see Hicks

  • Eur. Phys. J. H37 (2012) 1.]

BNL August 2015!

slide-18
SLIDE 18

s t Λb → K−pJ/ψ m2

pJψ

m2

Kp

Λ(1520)

Can the s-channel band originate from a non-s-channel pole

slide-19
SLIDE 19

! Consider all Λ* states & all allowed L values BNL August 2015!

10

# parameters 64 146

Flatte´ BW ↓

Two PWA: Reduced and Extended

slide-20
SLIDE 20

PWA using only known Λ* states

c

! Use extended model, so all possible known Λ*

  • amplitudes. mKp looks fine, but not mJ/ψp

! Additions of non-resonant, extra Λ*’s doesn’t help

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Fit with Λ* and one Pc signal

! Try all JP up to 7/2± ! Best fit has JP =5/2±. Still not a good fit

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Reduced PWA with two Pc states

c

! Best fit has JP=(3/2-, 5/2+), also (3/2+, 5/2-) &

(5/2+, 3/2-) are preferred

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Argand diagrams: phase moJon

Argand diagrams

Amplitudes for 6 bins between +Γ & -Γ

Breit- Wigner Breit- Wigner

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Why two Pc states are needed:

)

c

P

  • cos(
  • 1
  • 0.8
  • 0.6
  • 0.4
  • 0.2

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Corrected events/(0.1)

100 200 300 400 500

LHCb

c

Combined P (4450)

c

P (4380)

c

P

Data demands 2 states

! Interference between opposite parity states

needed to explain Pc decay angle distribution

! Fit projections BNL August 2015! Large m(Kp) region negative interference Small m(Kp) region positive interference

slide-25
SLIDE 25

CauJon! Strong interference of Λ*

gular distributions

14

8

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Some TheoreJcal Models

Meson-Baryon Molecule 5-quark “bag”

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Why Heavy Quarks?

  • Karliner and Rosner: arXiv:1506.06386

– Predict a host of Pc and Pb states corresponding to various meson-baryon thresholds. – Based on meson-meson molecule model for XYZ – Note conspicuous absence of DD and BB states.

  • Pion exchange is suppressed b/w two pseudoscalars.

– The “repulsive kineJc energy is inversely proporJonal to the reduced mass” (Ericson, Karl).

  • Requires heavy quarks to provide sufficient aaracJon.
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Dibaryons?

What comes aqer 5?

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Dibaryons

(some slides borrowed from Reinhard Schumacher)

slide-30
SLIDE 30

6 quarks in a bag The deuteron

  • 2.2 MeV bound

The only clear-cut

“dibaryonic molecule”

Recall the nn, pp, and np

strong spin singlet states are unbound…

… by only ~100 keV One of the great “fine-tuning”

mysteries of nature!!

3S1

I(JP)=1(0+) I(JP)=0(1+)

1S0

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Bound N, bound ,

(Jaffe’s “H-particle”)

Binding? Width: ‘narrow’ or ‘wide’? Spin, Isospin ?

CLAS study: new

  • bservations

Recent WASA@COSY

claim of discovery I (JP) I (JP)=1 (2+) (?) N I (JP)=0 (3+)

slide-32
SLIDE 32

“3-body model of N and dibaryons”

  • A. Gal, H. Garcilazo, arXiv:1402.3171 (2014)

Three-body model with separable pairwise

interactions

Solve NN and N Faddeev equations found below threshold for I(JP) = 1(2+) & 2(1+) found below threshold for I(JP) = 0(3+) & 3(0+)

slide-33
SLIDE 33
  • P. Adlarson et al, Phys Rev Lett 106, 242302 (2011)

The WASA@COSY

result for

M ~ 2370 MeV

= 2m – 90 MeV

~ 70 MeV < 1/3 “ABC effect”:

enhancement of low- mass pion pairs

Dibaryon interpretation

is controversial (D. Bugg) m

ΔΔ resonance with I (JP) = 0 (3+)

slide-34
SLIDE 34

CLAS collab. 11-14-14

  • R. A. Schumacher, Carnegie Mellon University

11

  • R. Arndt, I. Strakovsky, R. Workman, Phys Rev C 50, 1796(1994)
  • 3P2 wave in d elastic scattering

is most prominent

SAID analysis: “resonance-like”

behavior in several partial waves

190 MeV W=2.18 GeV

slide-35
SLIDE 35
  • d*

d d

  • Off-

shell pion

Resembles d elastic scattering but

with an off-shell pion.

PhotoproducJon at CLAS

slide-36
SLIDE 36
  • R. Schumacher, P. Masone (CMU):

CLAS Preliminary!!

slide-37
SLIDE 37

ProjecJons: CLAS preliminary!!

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Background from ρ-meson removed: Preliminary!!

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Fit to resonance shape: Preliminary!

Fit to Resonance-like Shapes

  • W=2.75 GeV
slide-40
SLIDE 40

Next Steps

  • Study of coherent ρ-meson photoproducJon

– PhD of T. Chetry, Ohio U. grad student.

  • PWA that includes all possible final states:

– First steps being done by CMU (P. Masone)

  • In addiJon to d*++ and d*0, look for d*+.

– Also part of T. Chetry’s PhD. – Interferes with ω-meson photoproducJon. – Clearly shows isospin 1 triplet of dibaryon states.

slide-41
SLIDE 41

What’s Next??

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Summary

  • Pre-2000: only mesons and baryons

– N = 2 or 3 (except for nuclei, such as deuterium)

  • Post-2000: many new mulJ-quark hadrons:

– Tetraquark (XYZ mesons), Pentaquark (Pc states), Dibaryon (ΔΔ and NΔ). – N = 4, 5 and 6.

  • What’s next? Probably hybrid mesons.

– Predicted already by Lasce Gauge theory.

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Backup Slides

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Some theoreJcal references

  • Roca, Nieves, Oset: arXiv:1507.04249

– Pentaquarks as a D*Σc and D*Σc* molecule. – Explains the best-fit spin and parity of Pc states.

  • Guo, Meissner, Wang, Yang: arXiv:1507.04950

– Possible rescaaering from χc1 to J/ψ p.

  • Maiani, Polosa, Riquer: arXiv: 1507.04980

– Compact 5-q structure using diquarks.

  • R. Lebed: arXiv: 1507.05867

– Compact (cu) diquark and color triplet c(ud).