Novel rtM204 Mutations in HBV Polymerase Confer Reduced - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Novel rtM204 Mutations in HBV Polymerase Confer Reduced - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Novel rtM204 Mutations in HBV Polymerase Confer Reduced Susceptibility to Adefovir and Tenofovir Ke Zhang, Christian Bach, Yuchen Xia, Oliver Schildgen, Ulrike Protzer Institute of Virology Technische Universitt Mnchen / Helmholtz Zentrum
HBV antiviral drug resistance
1 9 9 1 Interferon alfa-2b 1 9 9 8 Lamivudine (LAM) 2 0 0 2 Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) 2 0 0 5 Entecavir (ETV) peginterferon alfa-2a 2 0 0 6 Telbivudine 2 0 0 8 Tenofovir (TDF)
- 5 nucleos(t)ide analogues are currently approved for chronic hepatitis B
- They inhibit viral replication very efficiently, but do not eliminate HBV
- Long term treatment may lead to selection of resistance mutations,
which largely limits the clinical efficacy of the treatment
→ Resistance testing is important to improve treatment monitoring and
- ptimize antiviral therapy
Establishment of a standardized phenotypic assay
Patient sample HBV clone sequence analysis and selection PCR cloning and direct sequencing Huh7 cell transfection + drug treatment (3 days) (LAM, ADV, ETV, TDF; 5 concentrations each) Automated HBV DNA extraction Selective qPCR and I C50 determination Day 1 Day 3 Day 4 -8 Day 8 Day 8
Shorter time frame, higher throughput; less labor intensive and more sensitive
rtM204 mutations in vitro and in vivo
Fold resistance (FR): LAM ADV M204V: < 50 6.1 L180M+M204V: >1000 1.3
- Mutations in YMDD motif at position rt204 (M204V/I) are well-known for
conferring resistance to LAM and ETV
- M204V is selected together with compensatory mutation L180M in vivo
I n vitro fitness
W T M2 0 4 V L1 8 0 M + M2 0 4 V
YMDD
reverse transcriptase
- Phenotypic assay:
M204V – but not L180M+M204V – shows reduced susceptibility to ADV and TDF in vitro
- why not selected in nature? fitness
- r bias?
Further identified rtM2 0 4 mutations
- M204S & L180M was first isolated from a LAM resistant patient
Bozdayi et al.; Journal of Viral Hepatitis 2003
- M204A alone was observed in ADV resistant patients
Bartholomeusz et al., HEP DART 2005
- M204Q was isolated together with rtA181T from a ADV resistant patient
von Boemmel et al.; ASSLD 2007
- M204T was isolated with or without rtI169T from a ADV resistant patient
Wang et al.; ASSLD 2010
- M204L was isolated from a TDF partial responder
Berg et al.; Gastroenterology 2010
- M204K was isolated from a LAM/ADV cross-resistant patient
Schildgen et al.; Virology Journal 2010 BUT: no systematic phenotypic data available; the clinical relevance remains unknown YMDD
reverse transcriptase
Phenotypic results of rtM204 variants
LAM IC50 FR ETV IC50 FR ADV IC50 FR TDF IC50 FR W T
0.1 1 0.003 1 1.3 1 0.6 1
M2 0 4 V
4.5 45 0.01 3 8.0 6.1 6.0 10
M2 0 4 I
> 100 > 1000 0.1 30 2.5 1.9 1.1 1.8
M2 0 4 S
1.0 10 0.003 1 2.6 2 2.4 4.0
M2 0 4 L
1.0 10 0.002 0.5 5.2 4 4.5 7.5
M2 0 4 A
1.0 10 0.003 1 1.6 1.2 0.8 1.3
M2 0 4 Q
8.0 80 0.003 1 2.4 1.8 2.5 4.0
M2 0 4 T
2.0 20 0.003 1 2.0 1.5 1.8 3.0
M2 0 4 K
50 500 0.005 1.8 > 128 > 1 0 0 > 64 > 1 0 0
N2 3 6 T
1.5 15 0.003 1 5.5 4.2 3.0 5.0
rtM204K confers adefovir and tenofovir resistance
25 50 75 100 125 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 % viral replication Lamivudine [µM]
Lamivudine
WT M204K 25 50 75 100 125 1 2 4 8 16 % viral replication Adefovir [µM]
Adefovir
WT M204K 25 50 75 100 125 0.0005 0.005 0.05 0.5 5 % viral replication Entecavir [µM]
Entecavir
WT M204K 25 50 75 100 125 0.5 1 2 4 8 % viral replication Tenofovir [µM]
Tenofovir
WT M204K
FR: 5 0 0 FR: > 1 0 0 FR: 1 .8 FR: > 1 0 0
rtM204Q isolated from an ADV resistant patient
HBV replication capacity of rtM204 variants
M204K im pairs the viral replication capacity, while M204L and M204Q may increase it
W T M 2 4 V M 2 4 I M 2 4 S M 2 4 L M 2 4 A M 2 4 Q M 2 4 T M 2 4 K 50 100 150
Relative replication [%]
Compensatory mutations for rtM204K?
Neither L180M, L80I, nor A181T, could restore viral fitness of rtM204K
WT M204K M204K + L180M M204K + L80I M204K + A181T 5 10 80 100 120
Relative replication [%]
WT 5’- GTT ATA TGG ATG ATG -3’ V I W M M M204V GTT ATG TGG ATG ATG V M W M M M204I GTT ATA TTG ATG ATG V I L M M M204S GTT ATA GTG ATG ATG V I V M M M204L GTT ATC TGG ATG ATG V I W M M M204A GTT ATG CGG ATG ATG V M R M M M204Q GTT ATC AGG ATG ATG V I R M M M204T GTT ATA CGG ATG ATG V I R M M M204K GTT ATA AGG ATG ATG V I R M M
Term inal protein Spacer RT RNaseH Envelope PreS1 Pre S2 S
rtM204 sI195 / sW196
Hydrophobic Nonpolar Hydrophilic Positive charged
HBsAg secretion of rtM204 variants
sW196R (rtM204A/ K/ Q/ T) confers a secretion defect
HBsAg secretion
WT M204V M204I M204S M204L M204A M204Q M204T M204K 20 40 60 80 100 120
HBsAg Secretion [%]
sW196R/ rtM204Q blocks virion formation
sW196R produces only naked capsid particles
HuH-7 cells Transfection Ultrafilteration Concentration Density Gradient Fraction collection DNA purification rcDNA qPCR Centrification
sW196R has a dominant negative secretion defect
WT (P-) M204K M204K (LMS-) M204K + WT (P-) M204K (LMS-) + WT (P-) 5 10 15
HBsAg (S/CO)
rtM204K, resulting in sW196R inhibits HBV virion secretion
WT (P-) M204K M204K (LMS-) M204K + WT (P-) M204K (LMS-) + WT (P-) 2.0× 104 4.0× 104 6.0× 104
HBV rcDNA
HBsAg secretion HBV virion secretion
P-: premature stop codon in polymerase gene LMS-: premature stop codon in L/ M/ S gene
Infectivity of rtM204 variants on HepaRG cells
HuH-7 cells Transfection Heparin column purification and ultrafiltration Standardized virus input (MOI100) HepaRG cells Intracelluar/ extracellular DNA extraction Supernatant collection cccDNA rcDNA HBeAg Day 10 post-infection I nfection
HBsAg mutations are major determinant of infectivity
WT M204V M204I M204S M204L M204Q
50 100 150 200
cccDNA HBeAg Intracellular DNA Extracellular DNA
Relative to WT [%]
Summary
- Extensive in vitro analysis revealed novel rtM204 variants
conferring reduced susceptibility to adefovir and tenofovir
- High resistance mutations: rtM204K
- cross-resistant to lamivudine, adefovir and tenofovir
- but at a high cost of viral fitness
- high genetic barrier for selection of compensatory mutations
- Clinical significance remains to be investigated
Acknowledgement
HOPE consortium groups:
Cologne
- Dr. Rolf Kaiser
PD Dr. Oliver Schildgen Leipzig
- Dr. Florian van Bömmel
- Prof. Dr. Thomas Berg
Giessen PD Dr. Dieter Glebe Saarbrücken
- Dr. Sebastian Beggel
- Prof. Dr. Thomas Lengauer
- Prof. Ulrike Protzer
- Dr. Christian Bach
- Dr. Julie Lucifora
MSc Yuchen Xia Andrea Weicht Romina Bester Theresa Asen Kerstin Ackermann
Thank you for your attention!
Selective qPCR distingushing rcDNA from input plasmid
Principle Efficiency Selective qPCR reduces plasmid detection by > 4 logs
5’ 5’
HBV rcDNA
Primer B Primer A
pCH-9 / 3 0 9 1
primer B primer A
1,00E+ 00 1,00E+ 01 1,00E+ 02 1,00E+ 03 1,00E+ 04 1,00E+ 05 1,00E+ 06 1,00E+ 07 1,00E+ 08 detected plasm id copy num ber input plasm id copy num ber normal qPCR selective qPCR
Comparison between M204V and L180M+M204V
25 50 75 100 125 150 1 2 4 8 16 % viral replication Adefovir [µM]
Plasmid M204V treated with Adefovir
WT HBV HBV virus 25 50 75 100 125 0.5 1 2 4 8 % viral replication Tenofovir [µM]
Plasmid M204V treated with Tenofovir
WT HBV HBV virus 25 50 75 100 125 1 2 4 8 16 % viral replication Adefovir [µM]
Plasmid L180M+M204V treated with Adefovir
WT HBV HBV virus 25 50 75 100 125 0.5 1 2 4 8 % viral replication Tenofovir [µM]
L180M+M204V treated with Tenofovir
WT HBV HBV virus
Comparable result from publication
- Hepatology. 1998 Dec; 28(6): 1669-73.
Wild-type M204I M204V L180M L180M/ M204V
Term inal protein Spacer Pol/ RT RNaseH A B C E D YMDD I ( G) I I ( F) GVGLSPFLLA
rtM2 0 4
2002 nt 2040 nt
YMDD 5’- C TGT TTG GCT TTC AGT TAT ATG GAT GAT GTG GTA TTG GG -3’ Y M D D YVDD C TGT TTG GCT TTC AGT TAT GTG GAT GAT GTG GTA TTG GG Y V D D YIDD GT TTG GCT TTC AGT TAT ATT GAT GAT GTG GTA TTG GG Y I D D YSDD GT TTG GCT TTC AGT TAT AGT GAT GAT GTG GTA TTG GG Y S D D YLDD C TGT TTG GCT TTC AGT TAT CTG GAT GAT GTG GTA TTG GG Y L D D YKDD GT TTG GCT TTC AGT TAT AAG GAT GAT GTG GTA TTG GG Y K D D YADD GT TTG GCT TTC AGT TAT GCG GAT GAT GTG GTA TTG GG Y A D D YTDD GT TTG GCT TTC AGT TAT ACG GAT GAT GTG GTA TTG GG Y T D D YQDD C TGT TTG GCT TTC AGT TAT CAG GAT GAT GTG GTA TTG GG Y Q D D
Property of mutated rtM204 residues
Hydrophobic Nonpolar Hydrophilic Polar Positive charged
A case report
M204K: newly isolated from a patient cross-resistant to Lamivudine & Adefovir Schildgen et al., Virology Journal 2010, 7: 167
ADV LAM
M204L
25 50 75 100 125 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 % viral replication Lamivudine [µM]
M204L treated with Lamivudine
WT HBV HBV virus 25 50 75 100 125 1 2 4 8 16 % viral replication Adefovir [µM]
M204L treated with Adefovir
WT HBV HBV virus 25 50 75 100 125 0.0005 0.005 0.05 0.5 5 % viral replication Entecavir [µM]
M204L treated with Entecavir
WT HBV HBV virus 25 50 75 100 125 150 0.5 1 2 4 8 % viral replication Tenofovir [µM]
M204L treated with Tenofovir
WT HBV HBV virus
M204A
25 50 75 100 125 1 2 4 8 16 % viral replication Adefovir [µM]
M204A treated with Adefovir
WT HBV HBV virus 25 50 75 100 125 0.5 1 2 4 8 % viral replication Tenofovir [µM]
M204A treated with Tenofovir
WT HBV HBV virus 25 50 75 100 125 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 % viral replication Lamivudine [µM]
M204A treated with Lamivudine
WT HBV HBV virus 25 50 75 100 125 0.0005 0.005 0.05 0.5 5 % viral replication Entecavir [µM]
M204A treated with Entecavir
WT HBV HBV virus