Novel PCSK9 Outcomes in Perspective: Lessons Suboptimal from - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

novel pcsk9 outcomes in perspective lessons
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Novel PCSK9 Outcomes in Perspective: Lessons Suboptimal from - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

LDL-C Novel PCSK9 Outcomes in Perspective: Lessons Suboptimal from FOURIER & Statin Therapy ODYSSEY ASCVD Jennifer G. Robinson, MD, MPH Risk Professor, Departments of Epidemiology & Medicine Director, Prevention Intervention


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Novel PCSK9 Outcomes in Perspective: Lessons from FOURIER & ODYSSEY

Jennifer G. Robinson, MD, MPH Professor, Departments of Epidemiology & Medicine Director, Prevention Intervention Center University of Iowa Iowa City, Iowa

ASCVD Risk

LDL-C

Suboptimal Statin Therapy

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Disclosures

▪ Jennifer G. Robinson, MD, MPH

– Research Grants to Institution: Acasti, Amarin, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Esai, Esperion, Merck, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Takeda – Consultant: Amgen, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi – Vice Chair, 2013 ACC/AHA Cholesterol Guideline

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

LDL-C lowering drugs to date

Major CVD Event (MACE) Reduction over Mean/median duration: Statins (5 years), Ezetimibe (7 years), PCSK9 mAbs (11-34 months)

*Applied FOURIER inclusion criteria to LONG TERM. ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; CVD, cardiovascular disease; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol mAb, monoclonal antibodyPCSK9, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kinexin type 9. CTT Collaboration. Lancet. 2005;366:1267-1278; Cannon CP et al. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2387-2397; Robinson JG et al. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1489-1499; Sabatine MS et al. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1500-1509; The HPS2-THRIVE Collaborative Group. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:2003-2012; The ACCORD Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1563-1574; AIM-HIGH. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:2255-2267; Sabatine M et al. N Engl J Med. doi 10.1056/NEJMoa1615664; Robinson JG et al. Presented at ACC 2017. Poster number 1203-305

IMPROVE-IT ASCVD

LDL-C 70 → 54 mg/dL (1.8 → 1.4 mmol/L)

FOURIER 92 → 30 mg/dL

Reduction in LDL-C (mmol/L) Proportional Reduction in Event Rate (SE) ODYSSEY LONGTERM/ASCVD*

LDL-C 122 → 48 mg/dL

OSLER I & II

LDL-C 120 → 48 mg/dL

ODYSSEY OUTCOMES 87-103 → 40-66 mg/dL

slide-4
SLIDE 4

FOURIER too short? Landmark analyses ASCVD

ASCVD=CVD death, myocardial infarction, stroke Sabatine M et al. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1713-1722

Year 2 25% RRR Less than 35% RRR expected from CTT for 1.6 mmol/L LDL-C

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Test for heterogeneity between RR in first year and RR in years 1-5+: NS CCT, Cholesterol Treatment Trialists; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; MCVE, major cardiovascular events; RR, relative risk; RRR, relative risk reduction. Data from https://www.cttcollaboration.org/efficacy-web-page. Accessed December 20, 2017.

No Reason to Expect Greater RRR After 2 Years Based on 5 RCTs Mod vs High Intensity Statin

0.5 0.75 1 1.25 Year More statin Less statin RR (CI) per 1 mmol/L reduction in LDL-C

99% or 95% CI

LDL-C lowering worse LDL-C lowering better Events (% p.a.) 0-1 year 1-2 years 2-3 years 3-4 years 4-5 years 5+ years All years Years 1-5+ 1396 (7.4) 1641 (8.8) 645 (3.8) 741 (4.4) 499 (3.6) 603 (4.4) 470 (3.6) 522 (4.1) 414 (3.7) 476 (4.4) 413 (3.9) 433 (4.1) 3837 (4.5) 4416 (5.3) 2441 (3.7) 2775 (4.3) 0.72 (0.61 - 0.86) 0.72 (0.56 - 0.93) 0.66 (0.49 - 0.89) 0.75 (0.55 - 1.02) 0.69 (0.50 - 0.97) 0.83 (0.54 - 1.27) 0.72 (0.66 - 0.78) 0.72 (0.65 - 0.80)

Cumulative RRR/1 mmol/L 28% 30% 29% 29% 27%

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Baseline LDL-C critical importance

MACE: ODYSSEY vs FOURIER vs SPIRE II

SPIRE-2

Mean baseline LDL-C 134 mg/dL(3.5 mmol/L) Mean  LDL-C in treated group 59 mg/dL @6 months

LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; MACE, major adverse cardiac event; RRR, relative risk reduction. Sabatine M et al. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1713-1722; Ridker PM et al. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1527-1539; Schwartz G, et al Presented at ACC Scientific Sessions March 9, 2018 Orlando FL

Median 1-year RRR 21%

FOURIER

Mean baseline LDL-C 92 mg/dL (2.4 mmol/L) Mean  LDL-C in treated group 60 mg/dL @40 months

Median 2.2 years RRR 15%

ODYSSEY OUTCOMES

Mean baseline LDL-C 87 mg/dL (2.25 mmol/L) Mean  LDL-C in treated group 49 mg/dL @24 months

Median 2.8 years RRR 15%

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Baseline LDL-C critically important ODYSSEY OUTCOMES

24% RRR vs. CTT Expected RRR 26% for 1.2* mmol/L LDL-C

* Estimated midpoint of Week 4 LDL-C 54 mg/dl (≈1.4 mmol/L) & End of Study LDL-C 35 mg/dl (≈1 mmol/L) Schwartz G, et al Presented at ACC Scientific Sessions March 9, 2018 Orlando FL

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Most benefit - baseline LDL-C >100 mg/dl

ODYSSEY OUTCOMES

CTT Collaboration. Lancet. 2005;366:1267-1278; Data from https://www.cttcollaboration.org/efficacy-web-page. Accessed December 20 ; Tice, JA et al. Insitute for Clinical and Economic Review. Alirocumab for High Cholesterol – Preliminary New Evidence Update. March 10, 2018.

ODYSSEY OUTCOMES LDL-C>100 mg/dl 24% RRR MACE Year 2+ Observed 29% RRR MACE vs. CTT expected for 26-34% RRR MACE 1.2 mmol/L LDL-C

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Why was relative risk reduction attenuated in FOURIER & ODYSSEY OUTCOMES LDL-C<100 mg/dl?

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Baseline LDL-C drives total mortality reductions

Meta-analyses statin, ezetimibe, PCSK9i RCTs

10

Navarese EP & Robinson JG, et al. JAMA 2018; 319: 1566-1579

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Baseline LDL-C drives CVD mortality reductions

Meta-analyses statin, ezetimibe, PCSK9i RCTs

Navarese EP & Robinson JG, et al. JAMA 2018; 319: 1566-1579

slide-12
SLIDE 12

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

ODYSSEY

Largest Absolute CVD Risk Reduction Benefit in High-risk Patients with Higher LDL-C Levels

CVD, cardiovascular disease; IFG, impaired fasting glucose; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; mAb, monoclonal antibody; MS, metabolic syndrome; PCSK9, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kinexin type 9. Risk curve concept: Robinson JG, Stone NJ. Am J Cardiol. 2006:98;1405-1408.; FOURIER median of baseline LDL-C quartiles from Sabatine M, et al. Presented ACC Scientific Sessions; March 2017; Washington DC.; Schwartz G, et al Presented at ACC Scientific Sessions March 9, 2018 Orlando FL

PCSK9 mAb Greatest Benefit

CHD + Diabetes CHD + MS or IFG No CVD No Diabetes Diabetes – No CVD CHD-No MS or IFG

Cardiovascular Event Rate (%)

FOURIER

LDL (mg/dL) 1.8 2.6 3.4 4.1 4.9 mmol/L

Intent-to-treat LDL cholesterol level and risk for hard cardiovascular events

slide-13
SLIDE 13

WHY is LDL-C level important?

13

Puri, R., et al., Am J Cardiol, 2014. 114: p. 1465-1472; Nicholls, S.J., et al., JAMA, 2016. 316(22): p. 2373-2384; Robinson 2018 submitted.

Statins Statins+Evolocumab

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Putting it all together Clinical guidance

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

NNT to Inform Nonstatin Decision Making

Determine potential for NET BENEFIT from adding additional LDL-C lowering for additional CVD risk reduction

1 NNT = ARR

ARR, absolute risk reduction; CVD, cardiovascular disease; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; NNT, number needed to treat. Robinson JG et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:2412-2421.

Absolute risk reduction = Absolute CVD risk X Relative risk reduction from therapy

NNT Number needed to treat to prevent one event

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Extremely High, Very High, and High-risk Patients ON STATINS: Who Are They?

Extremely High Risk Very High Risk High Risk CVD++ CVD+ risk factors/FH+ risk factors CVD or FH, no risk factors ≥45% 10-year ASCVD Risk 30%-40% 10-year ASCVD Risk ≈20% 10-year ASCVD Risk CVD + FH CVD + diabetes (no polyvascular disease) CVD with well-controlled risk factors CVD + polyvascular disease CVD + PVD CVD + chronic kidney disease (excluding hemodialysis) FH age 40-75 years, no or well- controlled risk factors CVD+ recurrent CVD events Recent acute coronary syndromes CVD+ LDL-C >100 mg/dl + CRP >3 mg/L CVD + poorly controlled risk factors FH age 40-75 years + poorly controlled CVD risk factors CVD+ high risk characteristics + CRP >3 mg/dl & LDL-C <100 mg/dl

ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; CVD, cardiovascular disease; FH, familial hypercholesterolemia. Robinson JG, Watson K, et al. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2018; Robinson JG et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:2412-2421.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Extremely High Risk Very High Risk High Risk

Patient Risk Groups: “Risk Phenotypes”

>40% 10-year ASCVD risk

  • CVD + FH
  • CVD + PVD
  • Polyvascular disease
  • CVD +

recurrent events

  • CVD+comorbidities

+CRP >3 mg/L

20-29% 10- year ASCVD risk

  • CVD + well

controlled risk factors

  • Primary

prevention FH well controlled risk factors

ACS, acute coronary syndrome; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CVD, cardiovascular disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; FH, familial hypercholesterolemia; LDL-C, low- density lipoprotein cholesterol; PVD, polyvascular disease.; Robinson JG, Watson K. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2018, In press.

30-39% 10-year ASCVD risk

  • CVD + DM

(no PVD)

  • CVD + CKD
  • ACS
  • CVD or FH +

poorly controlled risk factors

slide-18
SLIDE 18

NNT and Discounting: Some Groups PCSK9 mAb Are Cost Effective in 2016 ICER analysis

NNT 10-14

  • Very-high-risk individuals with LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL (4.9 mmol/L) or

LDL-C ≥160 (4.1 mmol/L) mg/dL if ≥65% LDL-C reduction

No discount / $150,000 QALY

NNT 21-28

  • Very-high-risk patients with LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL (2.6 mmol/L)
  • High-risk patients with LDL-C ≥130 mg/dL (3.4 mmol/L)

Depending on discount Discount  50% ( $7700/year) /$150,000 QALY Discount  60% ( $5400/year) /$100,000 QALY Discount  77% ( $3200/year) /$50,000 QALY Discount  85% ( $2200/year) to avoid exceeding growth targets US healthcare costs

Cost per QALY gained over 5 years of treatment (assuming undiscounted acquisition cost of $14,000/year and 50% relative risk reduction with PCSK9 mAb). All costs in US dollars.

LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; mAb, monoclonal antibodies; NNT, number needed to treat; PCSK9, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kinexin type 9; QALY, quality-adjusted life-year. Robinson JG et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:2412-2421; Tice JA et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176:107-108.

Cost Effectiveness (Based on 2016 ICER Analysis)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

CVD + FH

CVD Plus++ = Extremely High Risk 45% 10-year ASCVD risk

5-year NNT to prevent 1 ASCVD event Initial LDL-C Ezetimibe LDL-C 20% PCSK9 mAb LDL-C50% PCSK9 mAb 65% 190 mg/dL (4.9 mmol/L) 21 8 6 160 mg/dL (4.1 mmol/L) 24 10 7 130 mg/dL (3.4 mmol/L) 30 12 9 100 mg/dL (2.6 mmol/L) 39 16 12 70 mg/dL (1.8 mmol/L) 56 28* 22*

*2-year relative risk reduction for FOURIER CTT endpoint from Sabatine MS et al. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1500-1509. ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; CVD, cardiovascular disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; FH, familial hypercholesterolemia; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; NNT, number needed to treat; mAb, monoclonal antibody; PCSK9, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kinexin type 9. Robinson JG et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:2412-2421.

Patient case: Male, 52 y, post MI & LDL-C 105 mg/dL on atorvastatin 80 mg for 6 months

  • Age & untreated LDL-C probably about 220 mg/dL ( 50%) suggests FH

Reasonable NNT thresholds: Physicians: NNT < 50; Patients: NNT <30

slide-20
SLIDE 20

CVD Plus = Very High Risk 30% 10-year ASCVD risk

5-year NNT to prevent 1 ASCVD event

Initial LDL-C Ezetimibe LDL-C 20% PCSK9 mAb LDL-C50% PCSK9 mAb 65% 190 mg/dL (4.9 mmol/L) 32 13 6 160 mg/dL (4.1 mmol/L) 38 15 7 130 mg/dL (3.4 mmol/L) 47 19 9 100 mg/dL (2.6 mmol/L) 61 25 12 70 mg/dL (1.8 mmol/L) 88 43* 33*

*2-year relative risk reduction for FOURIER CTT endpoint from Sabatine MS et al. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1500-1509. ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; CVD, cardiovascular disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; FH, familial hypercholesterolemia; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; NNT, number needed to treat; mAb, monoclonal antibody; PCSK9, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kinexin type 9. Robinson JG et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:2412-2421; Steel N. BMJ. 2000; 320:1446-1447.

Patient case: Man, 67 y, post MI, diabetes, & LDL-C 105 mg/dL on pravastatin 10 mg On maximally tolerated statin

Reasonable NNT thresholds: Physicians: NNT < 50; Patients: NNT <30

slide-21
SLIDE 21

*2-year relative risk reduction for FOURIER CTT endpoint from Sabatine MS et al. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1500-1509. Robinson JG et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68: 2412-2421. ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; FH, familial hypercholesterolemia; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; NNT, number needed to treat.

High Risk—20% 10-year ASCVD risk

5-year NNTs

Reasonable NNT thresholds: Physicians: NNT < 50; Patients: NNT <30

Clinical ASCVD without high-risk characteristics

(no diabetes/high-risk characteristics and primary LDL-C <190 mg/dL)

Primary prevention FH

(heterozygous; no clinical ASCVD; age >40 years)

Percent LDL-C Reduction Initial LDL-C Ezetimibe 20% PCSK9 mAb 50% PCSK9 mAb 65% 190 mg/dL 48 19 15 160 mg/dL 57 23 18 130 mg/dL 71 28 22 100 mg/dL 92 37 28 70 mg/dL 131 65* 50*

Patient case: Man, 67 y, post MI, no diabetes, well-controlled risk factors & LDL-C 105 mg/dL on simvastatin 20 mg (maximally tolerated statin)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Extreme High Risk Very High Risk High Risk

High Priority Patient Groups Target Nonstatins Based on CVD Risk and LDL-C

LDL-C >130 mg/dl

  • CVD + well

controlled risk factors

  • Primary prevention

FH well controlled risk factors

ACS, acute coronary syndrome; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CVD, cardiovascular disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; FH, familial hypercholesterolemia; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; PVD, polyvascular disease. Robinson JG, Watson K. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2018, In press.

LDL-C >70 mg/dl

  • CVD + FH
  • CVD + PVD
  • Polyvasular disease’
  • CVD +

recurrent events

  • CVD+comorbidities+

CRP >3 mg/L

LDL-C >100 mg/dl

  • CVD + DM

(no PVD)

  • CVD + CKD
  • ACS
  • CVD or FH + poorly

controlled risk factors