from the ldl c hypothesis to ldl c causality
play

From the LDL-C hypothesis to LDL-C causality M. John Chapman BSc - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

PCSK9 inhibition and CV outcomes PACE-CME Satellite Symposium, ESC Congress, Barcelona 2017 Understanding new PCSK9 outcome data : From the LDL-C hypothesis to LDL-C causality M. John Chapman BSc (Hons), Ph.D., D.Sc., FESC Director


  1. “PCSK9 inhibition and CV outcomes” PACE-CME Satellite Symposium, ESC Congress, Barcelona 2017 Understanding new PCSK9 outcome data : From the LDL-C hypothesis to LDL-C causality M. John Chapman BSc (Hons), Ph.D., D.Sc., FESC Director Emeritus, INSERM, Research Professor, University of Pierre and Marie Curie Past- President, European Atherosclerosis Society Pitié-Salpetriere University Hospital, Paris, France

  2. PCSK9 inhibitor CV outcomes trials Alirocumab : Evolocumab : FOURIER 1 ODYSSEY OUTCOMES 2 N = 27,564 N ~ 18,000 History of MI Recent MI n = 22,356 < 1 year PAD n = 3640 History of stroke* n = 5330 *Non-haemorrhagic stroke. 1. Sabatine MS, et al. Am Heart J 2016;173:94 – 101. 2. Schwartz GG, et al. Am Heart J 2014;168:682 – 9.

  3. PCSK9 CV outcome trials : FOURIER Active arm : Patient populations : Intensive statin therapy - MI + - Non-hemorrhagic stroke - Peripheral arterial disease PCSK9 inhibitor : Evolocumab Composite endpoints : Non-fatal MI Non-fatal stroke CV benefit across all patient populations

  4. PCSK9 CV outcome trials : FOURIER Active arm : Patient populations : Intensive statin therapy - MI + - History of non- hemorrhagic stroke PCSK9 inhibitor : - Peripheral arterial Evolocumab disease On-treatment LDL-C = 30 mg/dL Composite endpoints : Non-fatal MI ; Non-fatal stroke CV benefit across all patient populations

  5. TheMissing Link ASCVD Disease LDL-C CV event process reduction ? RF control

  6. NY-160626.038/020131YlsjoLS1 Diabetes Hypertension Smoking (Glucose/AGE) Arterial Endothelium Permeability LDL Endothelial dysfunction Influx • Oxidative stress INTIMAL LDL-C • Proteolysis Retention + accumulation • Lipolysis • Aggregation Modified / Oxidised Proinflammatory LDL Monocytes: -endothelial Arterial M1 macrophages adhesion - diapedesis Proinflammatory Macrophage Foam cell Fatty Streak Lesions

  7. NY-160626.038/020131YlsjoLS1 Fatty Streak Lesion : Macrophage Foam Cells

  8. NY-160626.038/020131YlsjoLS1 Diabetes Hypertension Smoking (Glucose/AGE) Arterial Endothelium Permeability LDL Endothelial dysfunction Influx • Oxidative stress INTIMAL LDL-C • Proteolysis Retention + accumulation • Lipolysis • Aggregation Modified / Oxidised Proinflammatory LDL Monocytes: -endothelial Arterial M1 macrophages adhesion - diapedesis Proinflammatory Macrophage Foam cell Fatty Streak Lesions

  9. Cellular interactions amplify intra-plaque inflammation M1 T regs Monocyte- T helper 1 Macrophage foam cells cells Smooth muscle cells

  10. NY-160626.038/020131YlsjoLS1 Macrophage foam cells drive Plaque Progression Cholesterol TIMPs efflux Cholesterol MMPs Influx Matrix degradation Cholesterol accumulation Antioxidants Anti-inflammatory Oxidative cytokines Proinflammatory stress cytokines Lipid, protein oxidation Inflammation TFPI Cell viability Apoptosis TF Necrosis Prothrombotic activity Cell death

  11. Thin cap, lipid-rich, rupture-prone atherosclerotic plaque

  12. Ruptured plaques % Cell Type are rich in cholesterol in ruptured plaques 100 Stable 80 Rupture 60 40 20 0 Mac. SMC T-cells Kolodgie et al. Am J Pathol . 2000, 157:1259-1268. C.V. Felton, D. Crook, M.J. Davies, M.F. Oliver. ATVB 1997;17:1337-1345

  13. Plaque contents are drivers of thrombosis Waxman et al, Circulation, 2006, 114: 2390

  14. TheMissing Link ASCVD Disease LDL-C CV event process reduction ? RF control

  15. Marked Statin-mediated LDL reduction stops coronary plaque progression and induces regression 2% IVUS 1%  PAV 0% Mean % atheroma -1% volume (PAV) 95% CI -2% On-treatment LDL-C (mg/dL) Nicholls et al. JAMA 2007;297:499 – 508.

  16. LDL-C reduction remodels Coronary artery plaque Plaque volume index Lipid volume index % Change in Plaque Volume Index % Change in Lipid Volume Index 30 210 20 180 10 150 y= 0.63x+8.68 0 120 r= 0.40 p= 0.008 -10 90 y= 0.30x-4.19 -20 60 r= 0.39 -30 p= 0.011 30 -40 0 -50 -30 -60 -60 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 % Change in LDL-C % Change in LDL-C Fibrous volume index Fibrous cap thickness (%) % Change in Fibrous Cap Thickness 50 140 % Change in Fibrous Volume Index 120 40 y= -0.46x+17.67 y= -0.24x+1.20 100 r= -0.40 30 r= -0.38 P= 0.013 p= 0.010 80 20 60 10 40 0 20 -10 0 -20 -20 -30 -40 -40 -60 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 % Change in LDL-C % Change in LDL-C Hattori K, Ozaki Y et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2012;5:169 – 77 Fujita Health University

  17. GLAGOV: GLobal Assessment of plaque reGression with a PCSK9 antibOdy as measured by intraVascular ultrasound • Lowering LDL-C with evolocumab is expected to reduce the atheroma burden • IVUS imaging enables measurement of the changes in the atheroma burden Randomisation Screening and End of study, 2016 Up to 4 week placebo run-in Evolocumab 420mg SC QM lipid period, n=970 stabilisation Clinically indicated 1:1 period coronary angiogram IVUS based on Assigned to coronary angiogram atorvastatin results background Placebo SC monthly SC injection of 3 mL therapy placebo 2 – 4 weeks Max. 6 weeks Day 1 Week 4 Week 12 Week 24 Week 36 Week 52 Week 64 Week 76 Week 78 Primary endpoint: Nominal change in PAV from baseline to 78 weeks post randomisation Puri et al. Am Heart J 2016; doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.01.019

  18. Secondary Endpoint: Total Atheroma Volume Mean On-treatment LDL-C : 36.6 mg/dL ( -60%) 0 -0,9 -1 P = NS -2 Change -3 in Total P < 0.0001 Atheroma -4 Volume (mm 3 ) -5 -5,8 -6 P <0.0001 -7 Statin Statin-evolocumab monotherapy Nicholls et al, JAMA, 2016, 316: 2373

  19. Exploratory Subgroup: Baseline LDL-C <70 mg/dL Patients Showing Regression % Atheroma Volume 0 100% -0,35 Percentage Regressing (%) -0,3 81,2% P = NS 80% Change in PAV (%) -0,6 -0,9 60% P < 0.0001 48,0% -1,2 40% -1,5 -1,8 -1,97 20% -2,1 P <0.0001 -2,4 0% Statin Statin- Statin Statin- monotherapy evolocumab monotherapy evolocumab Nicholls et al, JAMA, 2016, 316: 2373

  20. NY-160626.038/020131YlsjoLS1 Potential Mechanisms contributing to plaque regression, remodelling and stabilisation arterial accumulation of LDL-C and other apoB-LPs efflux of plaque cholesterol and toxic lipids intracellular and extracellular lipid content plaque inflammation ; increase in ECM - Influx of healthy phagocytes ; removal of necrotic debris - Efferocytosis of macrophage foam cells

  21. LDL is causal in ASCVD • Dietary- and genetically-induced atherosclerosis in animal models • Epidemiology of risk factors for myocardial infarction • Familial hypercholesterolemia • Mendelian randomisation studies • PCSK9 genetics (LOF; GOF) • RCTs with statins, cholesterol absorption inhibition and PCSK9i’s lower LDL-C levels, induce plaque regression and reduce CV events • Statins remodel coronary plaque composition and favour plaque stabilisation

  22. European Heart Journal. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx144. Online at: https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article- lookup/doi/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx144

  23. Slowing and Reversing Atherosclerosis Inflammation VLDL remnants LDL Libby (2001) Circulation 104:365

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend