Notes from reviews and talks Very good so far, well done Structure - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

notes from reviews and talks
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Notes from reviews and talks Very good so far, well done Structure - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Notes from reviews and talks Very good so far, well done Structure of papers do vary, which is fine or even encouraged provided the paper is clear Tech-reports and pre-prints of the same work dont count as publications so should be


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Notes from reviews and talks

  • Very good so far, well done
  • Structure of papers do vary, which is fine or even

encouraged provided the paper is clear

  • Tech-reports and pre-prints of the same work don’t count

as publications so should be ignored when evaluating the contribution

  • Grade should be whether you think the paper should be

accepted (mainly to get you to think)

  • Presentations should include key findings of the paper,

some motivation and some critical engagement

  • There is now a “Part 2” to the paper summary submission
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Quantitative Research

  • Historical roots in positivism
  • Goal is to find laws that explain the real world
  • Identify causal links between things
  • Knowledge is only obtained through experience

and observation

  • Facts are separated from values
  • Science is based on quantitative data obtained

through rigorous processes

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Quantitative Research

  • Types of variables
  • Categorical variables
  • Binary (e.g. yes/no)
  • Nominal (e.g. males, females)
  • Ordinal (e.g. strongly/somewhat agree/disagree)
  • Continuous variables
  • Interval (e.g. temperature in degrees Fahrenheit)
  • Ratio (e.g. natural zero point e.g. degrees

Kelvin)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Quantitative Research

  • Measurement error
  • Discrepancy between real value of a variable

and measurement obtained

  • Instruments can be calibrated to reduce

measurement error

  • Self-reported measures can also have

measurement error because participants may have a reason to lie

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Quantitative Research

  • Validity
  • Whether an instrument measures what it is supposed

to measure

  • e.g. Can we use password length to measure

password complexity?

  • Content validity
  • Whether the questions in a questionnaire cover the full

range of a construct

  • Reliability
  • Whether a measure produces the same results under

the same conditions

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Quantitative Research

  • Correlational Research
  • Observe what happens in the world without

interfering

  • Measure two or more variables at one point in time
  • e.g. Measure complexity of passwords used by

employees in one organisation and which ones write them down

  • Minimises researcher bias
  • Contributes to external validity (ecological validity)
  • Note: Correlation does not imply causality!
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Questionnaires

  • “Feel the pulse” of a specific population about a topic
  • Collect small amount of data from large sample
  • Aim to get sample representative of population
  • Advantages
  • Efficient
  • Statistical significance
  • Simplicity
  • Transparency
  • Credible results
  • Disadvantages
  • Require high technical proficiency to design
  • Only measure attitudes, not behaviour
  • e.g. self-selection bias of more private individuals!
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Experimental Research

  • Manipulate one variable to see effect on another variable

(remember independent/dependent variables)

  • e.g. create passwords with different complexities and

assign them to different participants. Take note of which

  • nes resort to writing them down
  • Cause and effect (David Hume)
  • Events must occur close together in time
  • Cause must precede the effect
  • Effect never occurs without the cause
  • Confounding variables may cause both events :
  • Cause never occurs without the effect
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Experiments

  • Between-groups design
  • Manipulate the independent variable with

different participants

  • Each group of participants is tested under

different experimental conditions

  • Differences between people (e.g. IQ) can lead to

unsystematic variation in results

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Experiments

  • Within-subjects design
  • Manipulate the independent variable with same

participants

  • Every participants goes through all the

experimental conditions

  • Can introduce learning and boredom/fatigue

effects

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Laboratory experiments

  • Advantages:
  • Control over environment
  • Replicable
  • Allows the determination of cause and effect
  • Statistical significance
  • Capture behaviour, not just attitudes

!

  • Disadvantages
  • Artificiality
  • Researcher bias
  • Demand bias (participants guess what the experiment is about)
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Qualitative Research

  • Associated with constructivism
  • Reality is a social construction
  • Capture multiple perspectives of same

phenomenon

  • Context in which data was collected is very

important

  • Relationship between researcher and object/

subject of research is taken into account

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Qualitative Research

  • Qualitative data has no variables per se
  • But, you can generate some:
  • e.g. Counting instances of a code / theme
  • e.g. Correlation between code and age group
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Interviews

  • Conducted with less people than questionnaires
  • Can be structured, semi-structured, or unstructured
  • Advantages
  • Flexible
  • Rich interactions
  • Generate secondary level data such as body language or tone of voice
  • Disadvantages:
  • Standardisation is hard
  • Less reliability
  • Researcher bias
  • Time consuming
  • Only measure attitudes
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Focus groups

  • Group interviews between 4 -12 participants
  • Group can be homogeneous or heterogeneous
  • Advantages
  • Participants interact with each other
  • Efficient
  • Extreme views are kept in check by the group
  • Enjoyable to participants
  • Disadvantages
  • Difficult to manage
  • Dominating personalities
  • Small sample sizes make it difficult to generalise results
  • Group dynamic bias
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Diary methods

  • Participants record their own experiences
  • Capture data in natural contexts
  • Substitute for observation
  • Advantages
  • Report of experience close in time to actual experience
  • Data generated by participant
  • Disadvantages
  • Require lots of training and briefing of participants
  • Time consuming for participants
  • Participants may want to please researcher (bias)
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Data Analysis

  • Qualitative and quantitative data require different

methods to be analysed

  • e.g. you cannot analyse numerical data using

grounded theory

  • Method should be appropriate to research question
  • Amount of data collected should be enough to test

hypothesis

  • If you have few data points you will not achieve

statistical significance

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Quantitative Data

  • Start by looking at the data graphically
  • e.g. frequency distribution

! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

  • Look for trends in the data
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Quantitative Data

  • Fit a statistical model do the data
  • Statistical models allow us to make predictions

about the phenomenon being studied

  • The closer the fit between model and data the more

confident we can be in our predictions

  • The mean is a very simple statistical model
  • e.g. You could predict that if you ask a random

person what their email password length is, it will be 7.7 characters long

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Quantitative Data

  • Statistical test used depends on:
  • Number of predictor (independent) and outcome

(dependent) variables

  • Type of variables: categorical vs. continuous

!

  • If you wanted to the relationship between two

categorical variables:

  • Effect of type of online advertisement (image vs.

text) on purchases (yes vs. no)

  • You would use Pearson’s chi-square test
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Qualitative Data

  • Most qualitative data analysis starts with the identification of

themes

  • Themes are patterns in the data
  • Analysis involves:
  • Coding (tagging) interesting passages of text (e.g. interview

transcript) consistently

  • Grouping codes into themes
  • Interpret themes and relate them to research questions
  • e.g. You find several quotes in interviews you made about

passwords that mention they are “too long”; “too complicated”; “difficult to memorise”; “if I don’t write them down I will forget for sure”

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Qualitative Data

  • Thematic analysis stops at the identification of themes
  • Grounded theory analysis goes further
  • You group codes into categories
  • Identify properties and dimensions of each category
  • e.g. category “surveillance” has the property

“frequency” with a range going from “never” to “often”

  • Relate categories to each other
  • e.g. “high peer pressure” links to “soft drugs

consumption”

  • Find the main category, i.e. the phenomenon, and write

theory around it

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Qualitative Data

  • Seems complex and vague

!

but

!

  • In the end it boils down to spending time looking at

the data and making sense of it

  • When in doubt stay close to the data
  • i.e. do not make wild interpretations, instead make

the codes match the corresponding passage of text as much as possible