Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics & Topology of Finite-Lifetime - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

β–Ά
non hermitian quantum mechanics topology
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics & Topology of Finite-Lifetime - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics & Topology of Finite-Lifetime Quasiparticles Liang Fu Kyoto workshop, 11/09/2017 Quantum Theory of Solids: Two Foundations Band Theory Quasiparticle Bloch waves Landau quasiparticles


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics & Topology

  • f Finite-Lifetime Quasiparticles

Liang Fu

Kyoto workshop, 11/09/2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Quantum Theory of Solids: Two Foundations

Band Theory Quasiparticle

  • Bloch waves
  • Energy bands in k-space
  • Landau quasiparticles
  • mass & lifetime

particle-wave duality

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Modern Developments

  • global property of Bloch

eigenstates πœ” 𝑙 in k-space Band Theory Topological Band Theory

Thouless et al (1982), Haldane (1988)…

  • Top. crystalline insulator
  • Top. Kondo insulator
  • Weyl/Dirac semimetals

diverse phenomena, unified framework

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Bewildering Behaviors of Correlated Electron Systems

  • Fermi arc: topological integrity of Fermi surface violated
slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • SmB6 & YbB12: quantum oscillation in heavy fermion insulators

Sebastian et al, Science (2015); Li et al, Science (2014)

Bewildering Behaviors of Correlated Electron Systems

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • shaking the fundamental of solid-state theory?
  • special or generic phenomena?
  • theoretical framework?

Bulk Fermi arc & Insulator’s Fermi surface

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Quasiparticles vs. Noninteracting Electrons

Fundamental distinction:

  • Quasiparticles have finite lifetime resulting from e-e and e-phonon

interaction at π‘ˆ β‰  0, and impurity scattering at all π‘ˆ.

  • Non-interacting electrons last forever.

ImΞ£ 𝑙𝐺, πœ• = 0 ∝ π‘ˆ2 < π‘™πΆπ‘ˆ Fermi liquid: Electron-phonon, quantum critical & chaotic systems: ImΞ£ πœ•~0 ~ π‘™πΆπ‘ˆ

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Damping + Dispersion

Complex spectrum of 𝐼 𝒍, πœ•~0 determines quasiparticle properties Re(𝐹𝑙) : quasiparticle dispersion Im(𝐹𝑙) : inverse lifetime single-band system: 𝐹𝑙 = πœ—k βˆ’ 𝑗𝛿k

𝐻𝑆 𝒍, πœ• = πœ• βˆ’ 𝐼 𝒍, πœ•

βˆ’1

𝐼 𝒍, πœ• ≑ 𝐼0 𝒍 + Ξ£(𝒍, πœ•)

Green’s function: Quasiparticle Hamiltonian: Bloch Hamiltonian self-energy (non-Hermitian) Finite lifetime means Ξ£ is non-Hermitian: Ξ£= Ξ£β€² + 𝑗Σ′′

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Damping Reshapes Dispersion

Complex spectrum of 𝐼 𝒍, πœ•~0 determines quasiparticle properties Re(𝐹𝑙) : quasiparticle dispersion Im(𝐹𝑙) : inverse lifetime multi-orbital systems: 𝐼0 & Ξ£ are matrices and generally do not commute

  • imaginary part of self-energy resulting from qp decay can have dramatic

feedback effect on qp dispersion in zero/small-gap systems.

𝐻𝑆 𝒍, πœ• = πœ• βˆ’ 𝐼 𝒍, πœ•

βˆ’1

𝐼 𝒍, πœ• ≑ 𝐼0 𝒍 + Ξ£(𝒍, πœ•)

Green’s function: Quasiparticle Hamiltonian: Bloch Hamiltonian self-energy Finite lifetime means Ξ£ is non-Hermitian: Ξ£= Ξ£β€² + 𝑗Σ′′ (non-Hermitian)

Kozii & LF, arXiv:1708.05841

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Damping Reshapes Dispersion

Complex spectrum of 𝐼 𝒍, πœ•~0 determines quasiparticle properties Re(𝐹𝑙) : quasiparticle dispersion Im(𝐹𝑙) : inverse lifetime multi-orbital systems: 𝐼0 & Ξ£ are matrices and generally do not commute

  • imaginary part of self-energy Ξ£β€²β€² resulting from qp decay can have

dramatic feedback effect on qp dispersion in zero/small-gap systems.

𝐻𝑆 𝒍, πœ• = πœ• βˆ’ 𝐼 𝒍, πœ•

βˆ’1

𝐼 𝒍, πœ• ≑ 𝐼0 𝒍 + Ξ£(𝒍, πœ•)

Green’s function: Quasiparticle Hamiltonian: Bloch Hamiltonian self-energy yin and yang of quasiparticles Finite lifetime means Ξ£ is non-Hermitian: Ξ£= Ξ£β€² + 𝑗Σ′′ The whole is more than the sum of its parts ! (non-Hermitian)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Quasiparticles in Zero/Small Gap Systems

Bloch Hamiltonian + self-energy with two lifetimes Two orbitals unrelated by symmetry generally have different lifetimes. Example: d- and f-orbitals in heavy fermion systems.

+ βˆ’

light band heavy band near hybridization nodes

∼

Kozii & LF, arXiv:1708.05841

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Microscopic Origins of Two Lifetimes

Electron-phonon interaction:

  • two orbitals with different e-ph coupling constants πœ‡1,2.

Electron-electron interaction:

𝐼 = ෍

𝑙

πœ—π‘’(𝑙)𝑒𝑙

+𝑒𝑙 + πœ—π‘” 𝑙 𝑔 𝑙 +𝑔 𝑙 + π‘Š 𝑙𝑒𝑙 +𝑔 𝑙 + β„Ž. 𝑑.

+ ෍

𝑗

π‘‰π‘œπ‘”β†‘,π‘—π‘œπ‘”β†“,𝑗

  • periodic Anderson model

interaction on f-orbital only

Kozii & LF, 1708.05841 Yang Qi, Kozii & LF, to appear

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Asymmetric Damping Reshapes Dispersion

Quasiparticle dispersion Re(Ek):

  • Ξ“

1 βˆ’ Ξ“2 ≑ 2𝛿 β‰  0 ∢ two bands stick together to form a bulk Fermi arc,

terminating at 𝑙𝑦 = 0, 𝑙𝑧 = ±𝛿/𝑀𝑧

  • new fermiology: constant dos, strong anisotropy

Quasiparticle Hamiltonian

Ξ“

1 β‰  Ξ“2

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Asymmetric Damping Reshapes Dispersion

Quasiparticle dispersion Re(Ek):

  • Ξ“

1 βˆ’ Ξ“2 ≑ 2𝛿 β‰  0 ∢ two bands stick together to form a bulk Fermi arc,

terminating at 𝑙𝑦 = 0, 𝑙𝑧 = ±𝛿/𝑀𝑧

  • new fermiology: constant dos, strong anisotropy

Quasiparticle Hamiltonian

Ξ“

1 β‰  Ξ“2

Prediction: bulk Fermi arc in heavy fermion systems

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Interplay of Damping and Coherence

Non-Hermitian quasiparticle Hamiltonian: Complex-energy spectrum: 𝐹± 𝒍 = πœ—π’ Β± πœ—1𝒍 βˆ’ πœ—2𝒍 βˆ’ 𝑗𝛿 2 + |Δ𝒍

2| βˆ’ 𝑗Γ

𝛿 ≑ (Ξ“

1βˆ’Ξ“2)/2,

Ξ“ ≑ (Ξ“

1 + Ξ“2)/2.

without hybridization, Fermi surface at band crossing πœ—1𝒍 = πœ—2𝒍 with hybridization and asymmetric damping,

  • for |Δ𝒍| > 𝛿: Re(E+) β‰  - Re(E-)

(gap opens)

  • for |Δ𝒍| < 𝛿: Re(E+) = Re(E-) = 0 (gap closes)

ky

Re(E)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Spectral Function

𝐡 𝒍, πœ• = βˆ’Im Tr𝐻𝑆 𝒍, πœ• = βˆ’Im(

1 πœ•βˆ’πΉ+ 𝒍 + 1 πœ•βˆ’πΉβˆ’ 𝒍 )

πœ• kx ky

  • Dirac point spreads into an arc
  • Asymmetry due to two lifetimes

linecuts

ky

πœ• < 0 πœ• = 0 πœ• > 0

constant-energy contour

kx

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Topological Stability of Bulk Fermi Arc

𝐼(𝒍) = (𝑀𝑦𝑙𝑦 βˆ’ 𝑗 𝛿)πœπ‘¨ + π‘€π‘§π‘™π‘§πœπ‘¦

  • at two ends of Fermi arc 𝒍 = Β±π’πŸ, matrix H is non-diagonalizable

and has only one eigenstate!

  • eigenvalue coalescence is unique to non-Hermitian operators.

ky

Re(E)

at Β±π’πŸ ≑ (0, ±𝛿/𝑀𝑧)

β†’ 𝛿(βˆ’π‘— πœπ‘¨ Β± πœπ‘¦)

𝐹± 𝑙 = Β± 𝑀𝑦𝑙𝑦 βˆ’ 𝑗𝛿 2 + 𝑀𝑧

2𝑙𝑧 2

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Exceptional Points

1971 2004 1966 2015

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Exceptional Points

1971 2004 1966 2015

  • In open systems, non-Hermiticity results from coupling with external bath.
  • In interacting many-body systems, microscopic Hamiltonian is Hermitian,

while one-body quasiparticle Hamiltonian is non-Hermitian due to damping. Kozii & LF, arXiv:1708.05841

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Topology of Finite-Lifetime Quasiparticles

*quasiparticles can be electron, magnon, exciton...

Shen, Zhen & LF, arXiv:1706.07435

𝐼 𝒍, πœ• ≑ 𝐼0 𝒍 + Ξ£(𝒍, πœ•)

Non-Hermitian Hamiltonian: k-space:

Topology of non-Hermitian quasiparticle Hamiltonian: the generalization of topological band theory to interacting electron systems.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

𝐼 = πœ—πœ+ + πœ‡π‘—π‘˜π‘™π‘—πœ

π‘˜

𝐹± 𝑙 = Β± πœ—(𝑀𝑦𝑙𝑦 + 𝑀𝑧𝑙𝑧)

(𝑀𝑦, 𝑀𝑧, 𝑀𝑧/𝑀𝑦 are complex)

due to double-valuedness of square root, encircling an EP in k-space swaps the pair of complex eigenvalues:

𝐹+ β†’ πΉβˆ’ , πΉβˆ’ β†’ 𝐹+

generic Hamiltonian 𝐼(𝑙𝑦, 𝑙𝑧) near exceptional point (EP): arXiv:1706.07435

slide-22
SLIDE 22

𝐼 = πœ—πœ+ + πœ‡π‘—π‘˜π‘™π‘—πœ

π‘˜

𝐹± 𝑙 = Β± πœ—(𝑀𝑦𝑙𝑦 + 𝑀𝑧𝑙𝑧)

(𝑀𝑦, 𝑀𝑧, 𝑀𝑧/𝑀𝑦 are complex)

generic Hamiltonian 𝐼(𝑙𝑦, 𝑙𝑧) near exceptional point (EP): topological index: vorticity of complex energy β€œgap” in k-space topological charge of exceptional point: πœ‰ = Β± 1

2

topology guarantees a line of real gap closing (= Fermi arc) emanates from EP. arXiv:1706.07435

slide-23
SLIDE 23

How many parameters must be tuned to hit a degeneracy?

  • Hermitian:

3

Τ¦ 𝑏 β‹… Τ¦ 𝜏 is degenerate when Τ¦ 𝑏 = 0 => topological Weyl points in 3D

  • non-Hermitian: 2

( Τ¦ 𝑏 + 𝑗𝑐) β‹… Τ¦ 𝜏 is defective when Τ¦ 𝑏 β‹… 𝑐 = 0 and Τ¦ 𝑏 = |𝑐| => topological exceptional points in 2D and exceptional loops in 3D.

Exceptional Points: Ubiquitous in 𝑒 β‰₯ 2

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Exceptional Points in 2D

arXiv:1706.07435

𝐼(𝒍) = (𝑙𝑦 βˆ’ π‘—πœ†1)πœπ‘¨ + (𝑙𝑧 βˆ’ π‘—πœ†2)πœπ‘¦ + (𝑛 βˆ’ π‘—πœ€ )πœπ‘§

Introducing generic damping to 2D Dirac fermion:

  • imaginary vector potential:

Dirac point turns into Fermi arc ending at a pair of EPs.

  • imaginary Dirac mass

Dirac point turns into β€œFermi disk” ending at a ring of EPs

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Exceptional Points in 2D

Direct quantum Hall transition is replaced by intermediate phase with a pair of exceptional points at momenta:

𝑛

| Τ¦ πœ†| 𝑙βˆ₯ 𝑙βŠ₯ Introducing generic damping to 2D Dirac fermion:

arXiv:1706.07435

𝐼(𝒍) = (𝑙𝑦 βˆ’ π‘—πœ†1)πœπ‘¨ + (𝑙𝑧 βˆ’ π‘—πœ†2)πœπ‘¦ + (𝑛 βˆ’ π‘—πœ€ )πœπ‘§

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Exceptional points cannot be created or removed alone. Merging a pair of exceptional points:

  • 1

2 + 1 2 = 1: results in a topological β€œvortex point”.

  • 1

2 βˆ’ 1 2 = 0: results in a β€œhybrid point”, which can be gapped.

arXiv:1706.07435

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Yuki Nagai (JAEA & MIT)

Fermi Arc in Heavy Fermion Systems

DMFT shows temperature-dependent bulk Fermi arc in periodic Anderson model with d-wave hybridization. 𝜍(πœ•)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Topology of β€œGapped” Non-Hermitian Band Structure

Shen, Zhen & LF, arXiv:1706.07435

Left and right eigenstates:

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Gapped Non-Hermitian Band Structures

Complex energy plane

Shen, Zhen & LF, arXiv:1706.07435

LL, RR, LR, RL Berry curvature Chern numbers: all equal!

  • topologically protected edge state of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians

Proof based on the fact

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Motivation: quantum oscillation in SmB6 & YbB12:

Fermi Surface & Quantum Oscillation of In-Gap Quasiparticles

  • Ground state of Kondo insulator in periodic Anderson model is

adiabatically connected to band insulator

  • In-gap states seen in specific heat, optical conductivity

McQueen et al, PRX (2014)

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Fermi Surface & Quantum Oscillation of In-Gap Quasiparticles

Our proposal: In-gap states are due to quasiparticle damping (e.g., impurity scattering) Inverted gap

  • f-electrons have much smaller

damping rate due to localized nature

Huitao Shen & LF, to appear

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Huitao Shen

Fermi Surface & Quantum Oscillation of In-Gap Quasiparticles

Complex-energy spectrum: 𝐹± 𝒍 = πœ—π’ Β± πœ—1𝒍 βˆ’ πœ—2𝒍 βˆ’ 𝑗𝛿 2 + πœ€2 βˆ’ 𝑗Γ Ξ“

1 βˆ’ Ξ“2 > 2πœ€: Re(E+) = Re(E-) band gap closes & Fermi surface recovers!

Quantum oscillation amplitude is largely determined by the long lifetime of f-band Solution of non-Hermitian Landau level problem:

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Quasiparticles in Correlated Electron Systems

Damping =non-Hermicity: reshapes dispersion & leads to new topology. Prediction:

  • Bulk Fermi arc in heavy fermion systems
  • Quantum oscillation in insulators with inverted gap

Outlook:

  • non-Hermitian topology + DMFT => material calculation/prediction
  • thermodynamics & transport of exceptional quasiparticles
slide-34
SLIDE 34

Damping Reshapes Dispersion

Postscript:

slide-35
SLIDE 35

As an effective theory, it is natural and everywhere. Its many unusual consequences are waiting to be explored. Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics:

Non-Hermitian = dissipative, open system, subsystem…

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Thanks to

Vlad Kozii Huitao Shen Bo Zhen Michal Papaj Yang Qi Yuki Nagai Hiroki Isobe